Welding in the World

, Volume 62, Issue 2, pp 243–247 | Cite as

Arc-based additive manufacturing of steel components—comparison of wire- and powder-based variants

Research Paper
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Welding, Additive Manufacturing, and Associated NDT


Additive manufacturing of components, layer-by-layer, offers several advantages compared to conventional production technologies such as higher material utilization efficiency and increased geometric possibilities. Arc-based additive manufacturing processes have the additional advantage of an almost unlimited assembly space, higher deposition rates, and an improved utilization factor of raw materials. Up to now, the gas metal arc welding variant, cold metal transfer (CMT), and other wire-based process combinations have been used predominantly in this field. Disadvantages of wire-based methods are the restricted availability of different types of wire consumables, the wire feed rate directly coupled to the heat input, and the lack of possibility to create multi-material structures with one heat source in-situ. Within this work, the 3D plasma-metal deposition (3DPMD) method, based on a plasma powder deposition process is introduced. 3DPMD has some advantages compared to the established plasma powder process and wire-based CMT process. Basis for this evaluation is the production of geometrically complex structures by the different methods (CMT & 3DPMD) and their subsequent characterization. Structures are fabricated using welding robots with the path control directly generated from the CAD files. In summary, 3DPMD offers increased flexibility in terms of material selection as well as the possibility to build graded structures. By using subroutines realized from a special postprocessor, it is possible to generate metal structures with standard welding robots directly from the CAD drawings. Microstructures and properties are directly related to the process and therefore material-process-property relationships are discussed within this work.


Additive manufacturing Plasma CMT 3DPMD SDSS 


  1. 1.
    Brandl E, Baufeld B, Leyens C, Gault R (2010) Additive manufactured Ti-6Al-4V using welding wire: comparison of laser and arc beam deposition and evaluation with respect to aerospace material specifications. Phys Procedia 5:595–606.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phpro.2010.08.087 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    NN: “x-Technik - Additive Fertigung”, journal, 01/2015; Link: x-technik IT & Medien GmbH; http://www.x-technik.at/fachbereiche/additive_fertigung.php#anchor_ausgaben
  3. 3.
    Almeida S, Williams S. “Innovative Process model of Ti6Al4V AM unsing CMT”. Proceedings of the 21st annual international freeform fabrication, 2014. AustinGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Martina F, Mehnen J, Williams SW, Colegrove P, Wang F (2012) Investigation of the benefits of plasma deposition for the additive layer manufacture of Ti–6Al–4V. J Mater Process Technol 6:1377–1386CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Guenther K, Henckell P “Wire based additive manufacturing with GMAW – Research on temperature and time towards homogeneous material properties”. Conference proceedings, IIW 2017, Shanghai. Doc. I-1306-17/XII-2359-17Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Röhrich T, Riemann A “The potential of the wire-arc based 3DMP process for rapid manufacturing”. Conference proceedings, ICWAM 2017, Metz, WIRE-AM-02Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Schoerghuber M (2016) “Using innovative CMT process for industrial applications”. Conference proceedings, KolkataGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Matthes K-J, Richter E (2006) “Schweißtechnik –Schweißen von metallischen Konstruktionswerkstoffen”. 3.Auflage, Hanser VerlagGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    NN (2006) “Hinweise zum Schweißen ferritisch - austenitischer Stähle (Duplex / Super-Duplex)”. ESAB- OK-Handbuch – Teil DuplexstähleGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Standard EN ISO 1011-2 (2001) Welding—Recommendations for welding of metallic materials—Part2: Arc welding of ferritic steels. Beuth Verlag GmbHGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Strassburg F (2000) “Schweißen nichtrostender Stähle”. DVS-Verlags GmbHGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Muthupandi V, Srinivasan P, Seshadri S, Sundaresan S (2003) Effect of weld metal chemistry and heat input on the structure and properties of duplex stainless steels. Mater Sci Eng 358(1-2):9–16.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-5093(03)00077-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Standard EN ISO 13916 (1996) “Guidance on the measurement of reheat temperature, interpass temperature and preheat temperature”. Beuth Verlag GmbHGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    DVS 0946 “Empfehlungen zum Schweißen von nichtrostenden austenitisch-ferritischen Duplex- und Superduplexstählen”. Deutscher Verband für Schweißen und verwandte Verfahren e.V.; DVS Verlag, Februar 2004Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Taban E (2008) Toughness and microstructural analysis of superduplex stainless steel joined by plasma arc welding. J Mater Sci 43(12):4309–4315.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-008-2632-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Posch G, Chladil K (2017) Material properties of CMT—metal additive manufactured duplex stainless steel blade-like geometries. Weld World 61(5):873–882.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40194-017-0474-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kaluc E, Taban E (2011) Welding behaviour of duplex and superduplex stainless steels using laser and plasma arc welding processes. Weld World 55(7–8):48–57.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03321307 Google Scholar

Copyright information

© International Institute of Welding 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Chemnitz University of Technology – Chair of Welding EngineeringChemnitzGermany

Personalised recommendations