Welding in the World

, Volume 61, Issue 2, pp 325–332 | Cite as

Development and testing of a high-chromium, Ni-based filler metal resistant to ductility dip cracking and solidification cracking

Research Paper

Abstract

Ni-based filler metals for repair and construction of nuclear reactor components require 30 wt% Cr to insure resistance to primary water stress corrosion cracking (PWSCC). Current generation alloys can be susceptible to solidification cracking and ductility dip cracking, depending on Nb content and the amount of eutectic that forms during weld solidification. Computational thermodynamic modeling was used to identify alternative eutectic-forming elements to Nb, such as Hf and Ta. Previous work has utilized a design of experiment methodology (DOE) in conjunction with computational and experimental techniques to optimize a new filler metal composition that should be resistant to weld cracking. In this paper, the optimized compositions were subjected to further weldability testing, namely the cast pin tear test (CPTT) and the strain-to-fracture (STF) test. An optimized Ta-bearing composition was found to be crack resistant, while an optimized Hf-bearing composition was highly susceptible to solidification cracking. Differences may be related to the nature of the eutectic constituents that form at the end of solidification. The Hf-bearing composition did not form Laves phase as its final eutectic constituent, while Laves is present in both the Nb- and Ta-bearing systems.

Keywords (IIW Thesaurus)

Nickel alloys Filler materials Hot cracking Solidification cracking Eutectics 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI) in Charlotte, NC. Special thanks to program Manager Steve McCracken for his insight and encouragement throughout the project.

References

  1. 1.
    Andresen PL, Morra MM (2008) Stress corrosion cracking of stainless steels and nickel alloys in high-temperature water. Corrosion 64(1):15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Frederick G, Lu B, King C (2008) Technical basis for preemptive weld overlays for alloy 82/182 butt welds in PWRs. (EPRI, 2008)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Fredette L, Scott P (2010) Evaluation of full structural and optimized weld overlays as mitigation strategies for primary water stress corrosion cracking in pressurized water reactors. (Battelle, 2010)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Jacko RJ, Gold RE, Kroes A (2003) Accelerated corrosion testing of alloy 52M and alloy 182 weldments. 11th Int. Conf. Environmental Degradation of Materials in Nuclear SystemsGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kiser SD, Hinshaw EB (2005) Nickel alloy welding requirements for nuclear service. Focus on Nuclear Power Generation, pp 21–26Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lippold JC, Nissley NE (2008) Ductility-Dip cracking in high chromium, Ni-base filler metals. Hot Cracking Phenomena in Welds II, pp 409–425Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Alexandrov BT et al (2011) Weldability studies of high-Cr, Ni-base filler metals for power generation applications. Weld World 55(3–4):65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Cieslak MJ (1991) The welding and solidification metallurgy of alloy 625. Weld J 70(2):S49–S56Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Dupont JN, Robino CV, Marder AR (1998) Solidification and weldability of Nb-bearing superalloys. Weld J 77(10):417s–431sGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Przybylowicz E. et al. (2016) Weldability evaluation of high chromium, Ni-base filler metals using the cast pin tear test. In: Cracking phenomena in welds IV. Springer, pp 269–288Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Baeslack WA III (1988) Weld cracking in Ta-modified cast Inconel 718. Scr Metall 22(5):729CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kotval PS, Venables JD, Calder RW (1972) The role of hafnium in modifying the microstructure of cast nickel-base superalloys. Metallurgical Transactions 3(2):457CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Dahl JM, Danesi WF, Dunn RG (1973) Partitioning of refractory metal elements in hafnium-modified cast nickel-base superalloys. Metallurgical Transactions 4(4):1087–1096CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Dmitrieva GP, Shurin AK (1974) Investigation of phase equilibria and structure in Ni-ZrC and Ni-HfC alloys. Metallofizika 53:97–100Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Nash P, West DRF (1981) Phase-equilibria in Ni-rich region of Ni-Cr-Hf system. Metal Science 15(8):353–356CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Fusner E, Hope A, Lippold J 2014 Development of high-Cr, Ni-based filler metals using combined computational and experimental techniques. Weld J 93(5)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Nissley N (2002) Development of the strain-to-fracture test for evaluating ductility-dip cracking in austenitic stainless steels and Ni-base alloys. Welding in the World 46(7–8):32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Luskin T, Alexandrov BT (2012) Improvement and modeling of the cast pin tear test. AWS Professional Program, Las VegasGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Luskin TC (2013) Investigation of weldability in high-Cr Ni-base filler metals. The Ohio State UniversityGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kreuter VC (2015) Optimization and application of the strain-to-fracture test for studying ductility-dip cracking in Ni-base alloys. The Ohio State UniversityGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Sowards JW (2009) Development of a chromium-free consumable for joining stainless steel. The Ohio State UniversityGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Feng X, Hope A, Lippold JC (2014) Effect of Cr on eutectic phase formation and solidification temperature range in Ni–Cr–Hf system. Mater Lett 116:79–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© International Institute of Welding 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Welding Engineering Program, Department of Materials Science and EngineeringThe Ohio State UniversityColumbusUSA

Personalised recommendations