Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Organizational Inertia and Firm Performance: Mediating Role of Green Business Model, and Open Innovation in Manufacturing SMEs of Emerging Markets

  • ORIGINAL RESEARCH
  • Published:
Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study explores the relationship between Organizational Inertia (OI) and Firm Performance (FP) and how this relationship is mediated by Green Business Model Innovation (GBMI) and Green Open Innovation (GOIN) for manufacturing small & medium enterprises (SMEs) in emerging markets. The data were collected from 465 managers of 465 SMEs in 2021. The OI was found to have an indirect relationship with FP, and this relationship is negative and significant. Further, the two direct relationships between OIN and BMI with FP consecutively were found to be positive and significant. The contribution of this study has significant implications in the field of OI, OIN, and BMI. This study examines how adversely OI affects business innovation, particularly OIN, and BMI. In addition, this study provides a mechanism for sustaining and improving FP by promoting open innovation and developing innovative business models in the organization. This transformation leads to flexibility in the organization. This study implies how SMEs can overcome OI by focusing on managerial actions such as organizational learning, cross-functional groups, and reflective practices that generate open innovation and BMI to become sustainable and provide insights to business practitioners, entrepreneurs, and organizational directors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Afthanorhan, A., Awang, Z., & Aimran, N. (2020). An extensive comparison of CB-SEM and PLS-SEM for reliability and validity. International Journal of Data and Network Science, 4(4), 357–364. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.ijdns.2020.9.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allcorn, S., & Diamond, M. A. (1997). Managing people during stressful times: The psychologically defensive workplace. Bloomsbury Publishing USA.

  • Al Mamun, A., Fazal, S. A., Mohiuddin, M., & Su, Z. (2019). Strategic orientations, the mediating effect of absorptive capacity and innovation: A study among Malaysian manufacturing SMEs. International Journal of Innovation Management, 23(02), 1950016.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Al-Azad, M. S., Mohiuddin, M., & Su, Z. (2022). The client and service provider relationship in it outsourcing project Success: The moderating effects of organizational attitudes on knowledge sharing and partnership quality. Journal of Global Information Management, 30(1), 1–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amiripour, P., Dossey, J. A., & Shahvarani, A. (2017). Impact of organizational inertia and dynamic capabilities on educational performance of the charitable societies and its impact on mathematical performance of elementary at-risk students. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research, 6(1), 37–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ben Amara, D., & Chen, H. (2021). Evidence for the mediating effects of eco-innovation and the impact of driving factors on sustainable business growth of agribusiness. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 22(3), 251–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Broccardo, L., Zicari, A., Jabeen, F., & Bhatti, Z. A. (2023). How digitalization supports a sustainable business model: A literature review. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 187, 122146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calantone, R. J., Cavusgil, S. T., & Zhao, Y. (2002). Learning orientation, firm innovation capability, and firm performance. Industrial Marketing Management, 31(6), 515–524.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carley, K. M., & Harrald, J. R. (1997). Organizational learning under fire. American Behavioral Scientist, 40(3), 310–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, C. H. (2020). Green open innovation activities and green co-innovation performance in Taiwan’s manufacturing sector. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(18), 6677. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17186677

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chesbrough, H. (2004). Managing open innovation. Research-Technology Management, 47(1), 23–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chesbrough, H. (2007). Why companies should have open business models. MIT Sloan Management Review, 48(2), 22–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chesbrough, H. (2017). The future of open innovation. The future of open innovation is more extensive, more collaborative, and more engaged with a wider variety of participants. Research Technology Management, 60(6), 35–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chesbrough, H., & Crowther, A. K. (2006). Beyond high tech: Early adopters of open innovation in other industries. R&D Management, 36(3), 229–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chesbrough, H., & Garman, A. (2009). How open innovation can help you cope in lean times. Harvard Business Review, 87(12), 68–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chesbrough, H., & Schwartz, K. (2007). Innovating business models with co-development partnerships. Research-Technology Management, 50(1), 55–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chesbrough, H. W. (2003). Open innovation: The new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Harvard Business Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chuc, N., & Thai, N. (2017). The participation of Vietnamese SMEs in regional economic integration: Survey results of three manufacturing industries. Journal of Southeast Asian Economies, 34(1), 118–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dawit, B., Jiang, Y., Md Rashidul, I., & Kuyon, J. B. (2020). How does CSR enhance the financial performance of SMEs? The mediating role of firm reputation. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 34(1), 1428–1451. https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2020.1828130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De la Gala-Velásquez, B., Hurtado-Palomino, A., & Arredondo-Salas, A. Y. (2023). Organisational flexibility and innovation performance: The moderating role of management support. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 24(2), 219–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duh, R. R., Xiao, J. Z., & Chow, C. W. (2009). Chinese firms’ use of management accounting and controls: Facilitators, impediments, and performance effects. Journal of International Accounting Research, 8(1), 1–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edmondson, A. C., Bonmer, R. M., & Pisano, G. P. (2001). Disrupted routines: Team learning and new technology implementation in hospitals. Administrative Science Quarterly, 46(4), 685–716.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Efron, B. (1993). Bayes and likelihood calculations from confidence intervals. Biometrika, 80(1), 3–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Falk, R. F., & Miller, N. B. (1992). A primer for soft modeling. The University of Akron Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fjeldstad, Q. D., & Snow, C. C. (2018). Business models and organization design. Long Range Planning, 51(1), 32–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research (pre-1986), 18(1), 39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Francis, J., & Smith, A. (1995). Agency costs and innovation-some empirical evidence. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 19(2–3), 383–409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freudenreich, B., Lüdeke-Freund, F., & Schaltegger, S. A. (2020). Stakeholder theory perspective on business models: Value creation for sustainability. Journal of Business Ethics, 166, 3–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gal, D. (2006). A psychological law of inertia and the illusion of loss aversion. Judgment and Decision Making, 1(1), 23–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gatautis, R., Vaiciukynaite, E., & Tarute, A. (2019). Impact of business model innovations on SME’s innovativeness and performance. Baltic Journal of Management, 14(4), 521–539.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Godkin, L., & Allcorn, S. (2008). Overcoming organizational inertia: A tripartite model for achieving strategic organizational change. The Journal of Applied Business and Economics, 8(1), 82–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gomes, J. F., Iivari, M., Ahokangas, P., Isotalo, L., & Niemelä, R. (2017a). Cybersecurity business models for IoT-mobile device management services in future digital hospitals. Journal of ICT Standardisation, 5(1), 107–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gomes, J. F., Iivari, M., Pikkarainen, M., & Ahokangas, P. (2018). Business models as enablers of ecosystemic interaction: A dynamic capability perspective. International Journal of Social Ecology and Sustainable Development, 9(3), 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gomes, J. F., Pikkarainen, M., Ahokangas, P., & Niemelä, R. (2017b). Towards business ecosystems for connected health. Finnish Journal of eHealth and eWelfare, 9(2–3), 95–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guo, H., Su, Z., & Ahlstrom, D. (2016). Business model innovation: The effects of exploratory orientation, opportunity recognition, and entrepreneurial bricolage in an emerging economy. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 33(2), 533–549.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C., & Sarstedt, M. (2016). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) (2nd ed.). Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hair, J. F., Jr., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2009). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Pearson Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamelink, M., & Opdenakker, R. (2019). How business model innovation affects firm performance in the energy storage market. Renewable Energy, 131, 120–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hannan, M. T., & Freeman, J. (1977). The population ecology of organizations. American Journal of Sociology, 82(5), 929–964.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hannan, M. T., & Freeman, J. (1984). Structural inertia and organizational change. American Sociological Review, 49, 149–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hao-Chen, H., Mei-Chi, L., Lee-Hsuan, L., & Chien-Tsai, C. (2013). Overcoming organizational inertia to strengthen business model innovation: An open innovation perspective. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 26(6), 977–1002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu, L., & Bentler, P. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indices in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang, H. C., Lai, M. C., Lin, L. H., & Chen, C. T. (2013). Overcoming organizational inertia to strengthen business model innovation: An open innovation perspective. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 26(6), 977–1002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang, J., Lu, C., Wen, H., Hsieh, C., & Wang, H. (2020). The study of organizational inertia, business model innovation and organizational performance in Taiwan financial institutions: Organizational learning perspective. Revista Argentina De Clínica Psicológica, 19(5), 104–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • IFC (International Finance Corporation). (2009). The SME banking knowledge guide. The World Bank Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ishak, S., Shaharudin, M. R., Salim, N. A. M., Zainoddin, A. I., & Deng, Z. (2023). The effect of supply chain adaptive strategies during the COVID-19 pandemic on firm performance in Malaysia's semiconductor industries. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 24(3), 439–458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jannoo, Z., Yap, B., Auchoybur, N., & Lazim, M. (2014). The effect of nonnormality on CB-SEM and PLS-SEM path estimates. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, Open Science Index 86. International Journal of Mathematical and Computational Sciences, 8(2), 285–291. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1090631.

  • Knab, S., & Rohrbeck, R. (2014). Why intended business model innovation fails to deliver: Insights from a longitudinal study in the German smart energy market. In Proceedings of the R&D management conference, Stuttgart, Germany.

  • Laursen, K., & Salter, A. (2006). Open for innovation: The role of openness in explaining innovation performance among UK manufacturing firms. Strategic Management Journal, 27(2), 131–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liao, S. H. (2002). Problem solving and knowledge inertia. Expert Systems with Applications, 22(1), 21–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liao, S. H., Fei, W. C., & Liu, C. T. (2008). Relationships between knowledge inertia, organizational learning and organization innovation. Technovation, 28(4), 183–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lichtenthaler, U. (2008). Open innovation in practice: An analysis of strategic approaches to technology transactions. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 55(1), 148–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malm, H., Pikkarainen, M., & Hyrkäs, E. (2020). Impact of coupled open innovation on company business models: A case study of demand-driven co-creation. Journal of Innovation Management, 8(3), 75–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDonald, R. P. (1996). Path analysis with composite variables. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 31(2), 239–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McIntosh, C. N., Edwards, J. R., & Antonakis, J. (2014). Reflections on partial least squares path modeling. Organizational Research Methods, 1094428114529165.

  • Miles, J., & Shelvin, M. (1998). Effects of sample size, model specification and factor loadings on the GFI in confirmatory factor analysis. Personality and Individual Differences, 25, 85–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohiuddin, M., Matei, M., Al-Azad, S., & Su, Z. (2022). ICTs in knowledge sharing and organization culture: Case study of a center for continuing education. International Journal of Knowledge Management, 18(1), 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohiuddin, M., & Su, Z. (2013). Offshore outsourcing of core and non-core activities and integrated firm-level performance: An empirical analysis of Québec manufacturing SMEs. M@@ngement, 16(4), 454–478.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moradi, E., Jafari, S. M., Doorbash, Z. M., & Mirzaei, A. (2021). Impact of organizational inertia on business model innovation, open innovation and corporate performance. Asia Pacific Management Review. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmrv.2021.01.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, R. E., & Berthon, P. (2008). Market orientation, generative learning, innovation strategy and business performance inter-relationships in bioscience firms. Journal of Management Studies, 45(8), 1329–1353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, R. R., & Winter, S. G. (1982). An evolutionary theory of economic change. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nisbett, R. E., Peng, K., Choi, I., & Norenzayan, A. (2001). Culture and systems of thought: Holistic versus analytic cognition. Psychological Review, 108(2), 291–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oltra, M. J., Flor, M. L., & Alfaro, J. A. (2018). Open innovation and firm performance: The role of organizational mechanisms. Business Process Management Journal, 24(3), 814–836.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prabhu, H. M., & Srivastava, A. K. (2023). CEO transformational leadership, supply chain agility and firm performance: A TISM modeling among SMEs. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 24(1), 51–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reinartz, W., Haenlein, M., & Henseler, J. (2009). An empirical comparison of the efficacy of covariance-based and variance-based SEM. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 26(4), 332–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roh, T., Lee, K., & Yang, J. Y. (2021). How do intellectual property rights and government support drive a firm’s green innovation? The mediating role of open innovation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 317, 128422. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128422

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saebi, T., & Foss, N. (2015). Business models for open innovation: Matching heterogeneous open innovation strategies with business model dimensions. European Management Journal, 33(3), 201–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sánchez-García, J. Y., Núñez-Ríos, J. E., López-Hernández, C., & Rodríguez-Magaña, A. (2023). Modeling organizational resilience in SMEs: A system dynamics approach. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 24(1), 29–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sánchez Otero, J. E., Vega Jurado, J. M., & Alegre Vidal, J. (2023). Factors that influence the development of innovations with a social focus in the firm: A systematic literature review. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 24(3), 341–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Starbuck, W. H., Greve, A., & Hedberg, B. (1978). Responding to crises. Journal of Business Administration, 9(2), 111–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. J. (1985). Beyond IQ: A triarchic theory of human intelligence. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sull, D. N. (1999). Why good companies go bad? Harvard Business Review, 77(4), 42–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tajpour, M., Hossaini, E., & Mohiuddin, M. (2023). Effects of innovative climate, knowledge sharing, and communication on sustainability of digital start-ups: Does social media matter? Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2199853123001555.

  • Teece, D. J. (2010). Business models, business strategy, and innovation. Long Range Planning, 43(2–3), 172–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Terrenghi, N., Schwarz, J., Legner, C., & Eisert, U. (2017). Business model management: Current practices, required activities and IT support. In 13th International conference on Wirtschaftsinformatik (pp. 972–986).

  • Tian, Q., Zhang, S., Yu, H., & Cao, G. (2019). Exploring the factors influencing business model innovation using grounded Theory: The case of a Chinese high-end equipment manufacturer. Sustainability, 11, 1455.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van de Vrande, V., de Jong Jeroen, P., Vanhaverbeke, W., & Rochemont, M. (2009). Open innovation in SMES: Trends, motives and management challenges. Technovation, 29(6–7), 423–437.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vij, S., & Bedi, H. S. (2016). Are subjective business performance measures justified? International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 65(5), 603–621. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPPM-12-2014-0196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vorbach, S., Wipfler, H., & Schimpf, S. (2017). Business model innovation vs. business model inertia: The role of disruptive technologies. BHM Berg-Und Hüttenmännische Monatshefte, 162(9), 382–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xie, X., Fang, L., Zeng, S., & Huo, J. (2016). How does knowledge inertia affect firms product innovation? Journal of Business Research, 69(5), 1615–1620.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yin, S., Zhang, N., & Li, B. (2020). Improving the effectiveness of multi-agent cooperation for green manufacturing in China: A theoretical framework to measure the performance of green technology innovation. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17, 3211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu, B., Hao, S., & Wang, Y. (2020). Organizational search and business model innovation: The moderating role of knowledge inertia. Journal of Knowledge Management, 24(7), 1705–1718.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zott, C., & Amit, R. (2007). Business model design and the performance of entrepreneurial firms. Organization Science, 18(2), 181–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zott, C., & Amit, R. (2008). The fit between product market strategy and business model: Implications for firm performance. Strategic Management Journal, 29(1), 1–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

No funding has been received to conduct this research project.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Ho Chi Minh City University of Economics Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam

    Thanh Tiep Le

  2. Faculty of Business Administration, Laval University, Quebec City, QC, Canada

    Muhammad Mohiuddin

Authors
  1. Thanh Tiep Le
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Muhammad Mohiuddin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Muhammad Mohiuddin.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

Not Applicable.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Le, T.T., Mohiuddin, M. Organizational Inertia and Firm Performance: Mediating Role of Green Business Model, and Open Innovation in Manufacturing SMEs of Emerging Markets. Glob J Flex Syst Manag 25, 325–341 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40171-024-00384-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40171-024-00384-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation