Critical Systems Thinking Towards Enhancing Community Engagement in Micro-insurance
This paper attempts to build a conceptual framework for community engagement in micro-insurance scheme design and deployment. The framework is founded on critical systems thinking literature that introduces the characteristics of openness, flexibility, and agility. The authors have focused on a community-led micro-insurance model, where the nature of the engagement itself underpins the success or failure of a scheme, due to their very nature of operations. Select systems thinking tools are introduced to better understand issues that arise in enhancing community engagement and flexibility, both of which are regarded as a critical aspect in the development of micro-insurance schemes. Reference and learning are drawn from an on-ground scheme in India implemented by the Micro Insurance Academy. The second author of this paper was the lead for this scheme. This is a proposed framework and is yet to be tested on ground.
KeywordsCommunity engagement Critical systems thinking Flexibility Micro-insurance
- Ackoff, R. L. (2001). A brief guide to interactive planning and idealized design. Retrieved May 31, 2001 from http://www.ida.liu.se/*steho/und/htdd01/AckoffGuidetoIdealizedRedesign.pdf.
- Beer, S. (1972). Brain of the firm. London: Allen Lane.Google Scholar
- Beer, S. (1994). Beyond dispute: The invention of team syntegrity. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Burrell, G., & Morgan, G. (1979). Sociological paradigms and organizational analysis: Elements of the sociology of corporate life. London: Heinemann.Google Scholar
- Checkland, P. (1981). Systems thinking systems practice. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Dror, D. M., & Piesse, D. (2014). https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2434501. Accessed 13 Nov 2017.
- Forrester, J. W. (1969). Principles of systems. Cambridge, MA: Wright-Allan Press.Google Scholar
- Habermas, K. (1974). Theory and practice. London: Heinemann.Google Scholar
- Hall, A. D. (1962). A methodology for systems engineering. Princeton, NJ: D Van Nostrand Co.Google Scholar
- Heyer, R. (2004). Understanding soft operations research: The methods, their application and its future in the defence setting, command and control. Division Information Sciences Laboratory, Australian Department of Defence. Retrieved from http://bayanbox.ir/view/2159266497151440758/Understanding-Soft-Operations-Research.pdf. Accessed 13 Nov 2017.
- Iles, V., & Sutherland, K. (2001). Organisational change: A review for health care managers, professionals and researchers. London: National Coordinating Centre for the Service Delivery and Organisation.Google Scholar
- Jackson, M. C. (2000). Systems approaches to management. New York: Kluwer/Plenum.Google Scholar
- Jackson, M. C. (2003). Systems thinking: Creative Holism for managers. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Johnson, M. P. (2012). In M. P. Johnson (Ed.), Community-based operations research: Introduction, theory, and application. community-based operations research: Decision modeling for local impact and diverse populations (pp. 3–36). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
- Kant, E. (1969). What is enlightenment?. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill. (Reprint).Google Scholar
- Mason, R. O., & Mitroff, I. I. (1981). Challenging strategic planning assumptions. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Micro Insurance Academy (MIA). (2016). Business process handbook. New Delhi.Google Scholar
- Midgley, G. (2001). Systemic intervention: Philosophy, methodology and practice. New York: Plenum/Kluwer.Google Scholar
- Midgley, G. (2003). Science as systemic intervention: Some implications of systems thinking and complexity for the philosophy of science. Cuadernos de Administración, 16(25), 7–30.Google Scholar
- Midgley, G. (2006). Reflections on the CPTS model of interdisciplinarity. In S. Strijbos & A. Basden (Eds.), In search of an integrative vision for technology: Interdisciplinary studies in information systems. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
- Midgley, G. (2008). Systems thinking, complexity and the philosophy of science. Emergence: Complexity and Organization, 10(4), 55–73.Google Scholar
- Midgley, G. (2014). Systemic intervention. Research memorandum, 95. Hull: Hull University Business School.Google Scholar
- Mingers, J. (1997). Multi-paradigm methodology. In J. Mingers & A. Gill (Eds.), Multimethodology: The theory and practice of combining management science methodologies (pp. 1–20). Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Popper, K. (1963). Conjectures and refutations. London: Routledge and Keagan Paul.Google Scholar
- Ulrich, W. (1983). Critical heuristics of social planning: A new approach to practical philosophy. Haupt: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Van der Heijden (1996). Scenarios: The art of strategic conversation. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Williams, T. (2008). Management science in practice. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar