The Flexibility Paradox: Achieving Ambidexterity in High-Variety, Low-Volume Manufacturing
- 81 Downloads
The ability to simultaneously increase operational efficiency and undertake organisational innovation has become a cornerstone for the long-term prosperity of organisations. For manufacturing small-to-medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) that produce a high variety of customised products at low volumes (HVLV), achieving this so-called organisational ambidexterity poses significant challenges. HVLV manufacturers are designed to facilitate maximum flexibility in the manufacturing system; however, it is this same flexibility that can hinder the ability of a HVLV manufacturer to achieve organisational ambidexterity—bringing to light an apparent trade-off between two seemingly contradictory objectives. Hence, in this paper, we investigate the relationship between flexibility and ambidexterity in the context of HVLV manufacturing as well as the use of different management practices to manage this relationship. We construct a conceptual model by adopting a paradox-based view of tensions using insights from an extensive literature review. Building off the contributions of paradox and organisation theory, this conceptual model demonstrates the multi-dimensional and dynamic nature of tensions between flexibility and ambidexterity as they manifest as much from salient factors (regarding social phenomena and individual cognition) as they are from latent factors (through the complex interactions of organisational elements). By moving beyond the dominant paradigm of efficiency-driven research in HVLV manufacturing, we provide managers with unique insights into the role flexibility plays in achieving ambidexterity to help facilitate better informed decisions taken by them. Further theoretical and practical implications are discussed as well as potential areas for further research.
KeywordsAmbidexterity Flexibility High-variety Low-volume manufacturing Paradox thinking
- Asia Pacific Defence Reporter (APDR). (2017). Brisbane company Ferra engineering wins export success. Viewed November 22, 2017. https://www.asiapacificdefencereporter.com/articles/1211/BRISBANE-COMPANY-FERRA-ENGINEERING-WINS-EXPORT-SUCCESS.
- Australian Advanced Manufacturing Council (AAMC). 2017. Making it in Australia: Our advanced manufacturing future. Viewed November 22 2017. http://aamc.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/Making-it-in-Australia-Our-Advanced-Manufacturing-Future.pdf.
- Australian Manufacturing Growth Centre (AMGC). (2016). Sector competitiveness plan 2017. Viewed November 10 2017. https://12262-console.memberconnex.com/Attachment?Action=Download&Attachment_id=15.
- Bloom, N., Brynjolfsson, E., Foster, L., Jarmin, R.S., Patnaik, M., Saporta-Eksten, I. & Van Reenen, J. (2017). What drives differences in management? National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
- Bloom, N. & Van Reenen, J. (2006). Measuring and explaining management practices across firms and countries. National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
- Brozovic, D. (2016). Strategic flexibility: A review of the literature. International Journal of Management Reviews, 00, 1–29.Google Scholar
- Chesbrough, H. W. (2007). Why companies should have open business models. MIT Sloan Management Review, 48(2), 22.Google Scholar
- Duncan, R. B. (1976). The ambidextrous organization: Designing dual structures for innovation. The management of organization, 1, 167–188.Google Scholar
- Ferra. (2017). Ferra quality certification. Viewed November 22 2017. http://www.ferra.com.au/quality/.
- Green, R., Toner, P., & Agarwal, R. (2012). Understanding productivity: Australia’s choice. Sydney: McKell Institute Sydney.Google Scholar
- Hill, L., Brandeau, G., Truelove, E., & Lineback, K. (2014). The inescapable paradox of managing creativity. Harvard Business Review, 12, 2–5.Google Scholar
- Katic, M., Agarwal, R., & Al-Kilidar, H. (2017). ‘Exploring the effect of customisation on management practices in High-Variety, Low-Volume Manufacturing’, paper presented to the 24th EurOMA Conference. Scotland: Edinburgh.Google Scholar
- KfW. (2016). SME panel 2016—annual analysis of the structure and development of SMEs in Germany. Viewed November 24 2017. https://www.kfw.de/PDF/Download-Center/Konzernthemen/Research/PDF-Dokumente-KfW-Mittelstandspanel/PDF-Dateien-Mittelstandspanel-(EN)/KfW-SME-Panel-2016_EN.pdf.
- KPMG. (2015). Future state: Australian manufacturing and smart specialisation. Viewed November 20 2017. https://assets.kpmg.com/content/dam/kpmg/pdf/2015/07/australian-manufacturing-smart-specialisation-june-2015.pdf.
- Leih, S., Linden, G., & Teece, D. (2015). Business model innovation and organisational design: A dynamic capabilities perspective, Business model innovation: The organisational dimension (pp. 24–42). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Lewis, M. W. (2000). Exploring paradox: Toward a more comprehensive guide. Academy of Management Review, 25(4), 760–776.Google Scholar
- Loïc, P., Lecocq, X., & Angot, J. (2010). Customer-integrated business models: A theoretical framework. Management, 13(4), 226–265.Google Scholar
- McShane, S. L., Olekalns, M., & Travaglione, A. (2013). Organisational behaviour: Emerging knowledge, global insights. North Ryde: McGraw Hill Australia.Google Scholar
- Merrow, E. W. (2011). Industrial megaprojects: Concepts, strategies, and practices for success. Hoboken: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Runco, M. A. (2014). Creativity: Theories and themes: Research, development, and practice. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
- Smith, W. K., & Lewis, M. W. (2011). Toward a theory of paradox: A dynamic equilibrium model of organizing. Academy of Management Review, 36(2), 381–403.Google Scholar
- Smith, W. K., Lewis, M. W., & Tushman, M. L. (2016). ”Both/and” leadership. Harvard Business Review, 94(5), 1–8.Google Scholar
- Stacey, R., & Mowles, C. (2016). Strategic Management and Organisational Dynamics: The challenge of complexity to ways of thinking about organisations. London: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
- Teece, D.J., Pisano, G. & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 509–33.Google Scholar
- Thomassen, M. K., & Alfnes, E. (2017). Mass customization challenges of engineer-to-order manufacturing, Managing Complexity (pp. 27–39). Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
- Venohr, B., Fear, J. & Witt, A. (2015). Best of German Mittelstand-The World Market Leaders, Deutsche Standards. Viewed November 19 2017. https://static1.squarespace.com/static/548ac75ce4b0a10ad41f38e7/t/57344e180442625ddb6f5b7f/1463045664669/160419_FIN+BOGM+.pdf.
- Weber, W.W. (2016). Germany’s midsize manufacturers outperform its industrial giants. Harvard Business Review Digital Articles, 2–5.Google Scholar