Advertisement

Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management

, Volume 18, Issue 4, pp 303–320 | Cite as

Critical Success Factors in Implementation of Urban Metro System on PPP: A Case Study of Hyderabad Metro

  • Rakesh Kulshreshtha
  • Anil Kumar
  • Ashish Tripathi
  • Dinesh Kumar Likhi
Original Research

Abstract

Rail-based metro system is crucial for supporting a city’s expansion and growth. However, urban metro projects being capital intensive with long gestation and pay back periods may not be financially viable but socially desirable. More and more cities in India are announcing metro projects committing huge budgetary resources to these projects at the cost of sectors such as health and education. Given the huge requirement of capital and possibility of attracting willing as well as capable private investors to undertake urban transport projects, promoting public–private partnerships (PPPs) could be a key priority. However, none of the metro projects launched during past 7 years in India have been planned on PPP framework. International experience in PPP metro and our own Delhi airport metro experience have demonstrated that many issues can influence the successful implementation of PPPs in such projects. In this context, outcome of Hyderabad metro is keenly watched as it is one of the largest metro rail projects built under a PPP framework anywhere in the world. The paper reviews the research conducted on critical success factors (CSFs) that are necessary for adopting PPP models in urban metros in Indian context. Eighteen CSFs identified through literature survey have been validated in a pilot study through structured questionnaire and grouped in seven macro-factors through hierarchical cluster analysis. A case study has been attempted using SAP–LAP framework to analyse the identified CSFs in real-life settings of the first two stages of Hyderabad metro project. Key players working on the project were interviewed during a field study to gather feedback on actions they took on factors critical to success. Observations and findings have been synthesised as learnings for future such projects.

Keywords

Critical success factors Metro system Public–private partnership SAP–LAP Urban transport 

References

  1. 12th FYP (2012–2017). Twelfth five year plan. In Five year plan documents, planning commission. Government of India, II (p. 341).Google Scholar
  2. Ahluwalia, I. J. (2014). Hyderabad metro shows the way. In I. Ahluwalia (Ed.), Transforming our cities: Post cards of change (p. 274). Noida: HarperCollins Publishers.Google Scholar
  3. Allport, R. (2008). Success and failures in Urban transport infrastructure projects. https://workspace.imperial.ac.uk/rtsc/public/Success%20and%20Failure%20in%20Urban%20Transport%20Infrastructure%20Projects.pdf. Accessed 24 Apr 2015.
  4. Babatunde, S. O., Perera, S., Udeaja, C., & Zhou, L.(2014). Identification of barriers to public private partnerships in developing countries. Retrieved 23 Dec 2014 from http://www.cib2014.org/proceedings/files/papers/494.pdf.
  5. Budget (2017–18). Speech of Minister of Finance, Government of India. http://indiabudget.nic.in/ub2017-18/bs/bs.pdf. Accessed 15 Feb 2017.
  6. Chan, P. (2010). Critical success factors for PPPs in infrastructure development: Chinese perspective. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 136(5), 484–494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. DMRC. (2007). Executive summary of detailed project report prepared by DMRC for corridor 1, 2 & 3. Hyderabad: Government of Andhra Pradesh.Google Scholar
  8. ESCAP (2011). A Guidebook on PPP in Infrastructure. Retrieved 12 Dec 2014 from http://www.unescap.org/resources/guidebook-public-private-partnership-infrastructure.
  9. Famakin, I. (2014). Assessment of critical success factors and benefits of public private partnership in construction projects. International Journal of Emerging Technology and Advanced Engineering, 4(6), 742–751. http://www.ijetae.com/index.html. Accessed 30 Mar 2015.
  10. Gangwar, R., & Raghuram, G. (2013). Framework for structuring PPP framework for railways. www.iimahd.ernet.in. Accessed 23 Feb 2015.
  11. Gates, L. P. (2010). Strategic planning with critical success factors and future scenarios: An integrated strategic planning framework. Technical Report, Carnegie Mellon University. http://www.sei.cmu.edu. Accessed 20 Feb 2015.
  12. Goel, S., Dwivedi, R., & Sherry, A. M. (2012). Critical factors for successful implementation of E-governance: A case study of HUDA. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 13(4), 233–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hardcastle, C., Eswards, P. J., Akintoye, A., & Li, B. (2005). Critical success factors for PPP/PFI projects in the UK construction industry: A factor analysis approach. Construction Management and Economics, 23(5), 459–471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ismail, S., & Ajija, S. (2013). Critical success factors of public partnership implementation in Malaysia. Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Administration, 5(1), 6–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kabra, G., & Ramesh, A. (2015). Analyzing ICT issues in humanitarian supply chain management: A SAP-LAP linkages framework. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 16(2), 157–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. KPMG. (2010). Success and failures in Urban transport infrastructure projects. UK: KPMG International.Google Scholar
  17. Kulshreshtha, R., Kumar, A., Tripathi, A., & Likhi, D. K. (2016). Critical success factors for public private partnerships in Urban metro systems in Indian context. Urban Transport Journal, 15(1), 60–75.Google Scholar
  18. Leedy, A. (1977). Practical research: Planning and design. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  19. Li, B. (2005). Critical success factors for PPP/PFI projects in the UK construction industry. Construction Management and Economics, 23(5), 459–471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Millones, G. M. (2010). Breaking down factors of public private partnership in Urban rail. www.tbm.tudelft.nl/…/Thesis_Guiseppe_Manrique.pdf. Accessed 15 Jan 2015.
  21. Nasim, S., & Sushil (2014). Flexible strategy framework for managing continuity and change in E-Government. In Sushil and E. A. Stohr (Eds.), The Flexible Enterprise, Flexible Systems Management (pp. 47–66). New Delhi: Springer. Google Scholar
  22. Owens, M. G., & Reddy, N. V.S. (2010). Hyderabad metro rail: A renaissance of Urban rail. http://hmrl.telangana.gov.in/articles/2010.09.12-15. Accessed 15 Mar 2016.
  23. Reddy, N. V. S. (2011). Hyderabad metro is not just a metro but an effort to transform Hyderabad into a competitive global city. C.E. & C.R. Review, Interview. http://hmrl.telangana.gov.in/articles/2011-08-01-CE&CR-Aug-2011-Hyd-Metro-is-not-just-a-Metro,-But-an-effort-to-transform-Hyd-into-a-competitive-Global-City.pdf. Accessed 17 July 2016.
  24. Saunders, E. (2007). Research methods for business students. Essex: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  25. Smith, N. J., & Gannon, M. (2008). Political risk in light rail transit PPP projects. Management, Procurement and Law, 161(MP4):179–185. ISSN1751-4304. http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/55380. Accessed 20 Mar 2015.
  26. Sushil, (2000a). Situation-actor-process options: Mapping and enhancing flexibility. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 17(3), 301–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Sushil, (2000b). SAP-LAP models of enquiry. Management Decision, 38(5), 347–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Sushil, (2001). SAP-LAP framework. Global Journal of Flexible Management, 2(1), 51–55.Google Scholar
  29. Sushil, (2009). SAP-LAP linkages—a generic interpretive framework for analysing managerial contexts. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 10(2), 11–20.Google Scholar
  30. Sushil, (2016). Theory of flexible systems management. In Sushil, J. Connel, & J. Burgess (Eds.), Flexible work organizations: The challenges of capacity building in Asia, flexible systems management (pp. 3–20). New Delhi: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Sushil, (2017). Theory building using SAP-LAP linkages: An application in the context of disaster management. Annals of Operations Research. doi: 10.1007/s10479-017-2425-3.Google Scholar
  32. US Department of Transport. (2012). Value for Money Assessment for PPPs-a primer. http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/ipd/pdfs/p3/p3_value_for_money_primer_122612.pdf. Accessed 15 Mar 2015.
  33. Virginia, T., Allen, & Overy (2012). Advocates for international development-legal guide for public private partnerships. http://a4id.org/sites/default/files/files/%5BA4ID%5D%20Public-Private%20Partnership.pdf. Accessed 29 Apr 2015.
  34. World Bank (2007). Public private partnership units: Lessons for their design and use in infrastructure. In Public private infrastructure advisory facility. World Bank.Google Scholar
  35. Yadav, N., & Sushil, (2014). Theoretical roots of flexible strategy game-card: An evolving strategic performance management system. In Sushil & E. A. Stohr (Eds.), The flexible enterprise, flexible systems management (pp. 99–109). New Delhi: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Zhang, X. (2005). Critical success factors for public private partnerships in infrastructure development. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 131(1), 3–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rakesh Kulshreshtha
    • 1
  • Anil Kumar
    • 2
  • Ashish Tripathi
    • 3
  • Dinesh Kumar Likhi
    • 4
  1. 1.University of Petroleum and Energy Studies (UPES)DehradunIndia
  2. 2.Department of Power and Infrastructure ManagementUPESDehradunIndia
  3. 3.College of Management and Economic StudiesUPESDehradunIndia
  4. 4.Mishra Dhatu Nigam LtdKanchanbagh, HyderabadIndia

Personalised recommendations