From Supply Chain Integration to Operational Performance: The Moderating Effect of Market Uncertainty

  • Dawei Lu
  • Yi Ding
  • Sobhan Asian
  • Sanjoy Kumar Paul
Original Article

Abstract

This research examines the moderating effect of market uncertainty on the causal effects from supply chain integration to operational performance of a typical supply chain. Based on an extensive and critical literature review, two exploratory conceptual hypotheses have been developed for the nonlinear relationship between the supply chain integration and operational performance of the original equipment manufacturer, and how may that relationship be moderated by a specific construct of market uncertainty. Empirical survey instrument has been designed and applied to gather the data from a wide spectrum of automotive industry in China. Confirmative factor analysis and threshold regression analysis were used as the primary research methodology to test the hypotheses. We find strong support to the hypotheses from the empirical evidence, which leads to the finding that the relationship between the supply chain integration and operational performance is ‘nonlinear’, and the ‘nonlinearity’ can be significantly moderated by the market uncertainty as one of the key environmental factors for the supply chain. This study extends the current literature by contributing for the first time the discussion of an analytical model that represents the causal effects from supply chain integration to its operational performance with respect to the market uncertainty as a moderating factor.

Keywords

Automotive industry Market uncertainty Operational performance Supply chain integration Supply chain management 

References

  1. Agarwal, A., Shankar, R., & Tiwari, M. (2006). Modeling the metrics of lean, agile and leagile supply chain: An ANP-based approach. European Journal of Operational Research, 173(1), 211–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aláez-Aller, R., & Carlos Longás-García, J. (2010). Dynamic supplier management in the automotive industry. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 30(3), 312–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Andrews, D. W., & Ploberger, W. (1994). Optimal tests when a nuisance parameter is present only under the alternative. Econometrica, 62(6), 1383–1414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ansaripoor, A. H., Asian, S., Faghih-Roohi, S., Lee, P. T. W., & Hu, Z. H., (2017). Risk quantification in maritime fleet planning problem: A CVaR approach. Working Paper. Google Scholar
  5. Asian, S., Ertek, G., Haksoz, C., Pakter, S., & Ulun, S. (2016). Wind turbine accidents: A data mining study. IEEE Systems Journal. doi: 10.1109/JSYST.2016.2565818.Google Scholar
  6. Asian, S., Hemati, M., & Samandizadeh, K. (2009). Strategic planning evaluation in manufacturing companies through fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (FAHP). Journal of Industrial Management, 4(7), 1–20.Google Scholar
  7. Asian, S., & Nie, X. (2014). Coordination in supply chains with uncertain demand and disruption risks: Existence, analysis, and insights. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems, 44(9), 1139–1154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bai, J. (1997). Estimation of a change point in multiple regression models. Review of Economics and Statistics, 79(4), 551–563.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Beamon, B. M. (1999). Measuring supply chain performance. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 19(3), 275–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Boehmke, B. C., & Hazen, B. T. (2017). The Future of Supply Chain Information Systems: The Open Source Ecosystem. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 18(2), 163–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bowersox, D. J., Closs, D. J., & Stank, T. P. (1999). 21st century logistics: Making supply chain integration a reality. Michigan: Michigan State University, Council of Logistics Management.Google Scholar
  12. Breusch, T. S., & Pagan, A. R. (1979). A simple test for heteroscedasticity and random coefficient variation. Econometrica, 47(5), 1287–1294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Brown, T. A. (2015). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  14. Cao, Z., Huo, B., Li, Y., & Zhao, X. (2015). The impact of organizational culture on supply chain integration: A contingency and configuration approach. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 20(1), 24–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Chandler, A. D. (1990). Strategy and structure: Chapters in the history of the industrial enterprise. Boston: MIT press.Google Scholar
  16. Coleman, L. (2011). An exploratory analysis of factors influencing initial market response and media reports following shock corporate events. Financial Review, 46(2), 313–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Cousins, P. D., & Menguc, B. (2006). The implications of socialization and integration in supply chain management. Journal of Operations Management, 24(5), 604–620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16(3), 297–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Das, A., Narasimhan, R., & Talluri, S. (2006). Supplier integration—finding an optimal configuration. Journal of Operations Management, 24(5), 563–582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Davies, R. B. (1987). Hypothesis testing when a nuisance parameter is present only under the alternative: Linear model case. Biometrika, 74(1), 33–43.Google Scholar
  21. Devaraj, S., Krajewski, L., & Wei, J. C. (2007). Impact of eBusiness technologies on operational performance: the role of production information integration in the supply chain. Journal of Operations Management, 25(6), 1199–1216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Drazin, R., & Van de Ven, A. H. (1985). Alternative forms of fit in contingency theory. Administrative Science Quarterly, 514–539.Google Scholar
  23. Droge, C., Vickery, S. K., & Jacobs, M. A. (2012). Does supply chain integration mediate the relationships between product/process strategy and service performance? An empirical study. International Journal of Production Economics, 137(2), 250–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Ebrahimi, S. M. (2015). Examining the impact of supply chain integration on organization structure and operational performance in oil and gas supply chains: A contingency approach. Sheffield: University of Sheffield.Google Scholar
  25. Faghih-Roohi, S., Ong, Y. S., Asian, S., & Zhang, A. N. (2016). Dynamic conditional value-at-risk model for routing and scheduling of hazardous material transportation networks. Annals of Operations Research, 247(2), 715–734.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Farrell, A. M. (2010). Insufficient discriminant validity: A comment on Bove, Pervan, Beatty, and Shiu (2009). Journal of Business Research, 63(3), 324–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Flynn, B. B., Huo, B., & Zhao, X. (2010). The impact of supply chain integration on performance: A contingency and configuration approach. Journal of Operations Management, 28(1), 58–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Frohlich, M. T., & Westbrook, R. (2001). Arcs of integration: An international study of supply chain strategies. Journal of Operations Management, 19(2), 185–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Galbraith, J. R. (1973). Designing complex organizations. Boston: Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc.Google Scholar
  30. Germain, R., & Iyer, K. N. (2006). The interaction of internal and downstream integration and its association with performance. Journal of Business Logistics, 27(2), 29–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Gimenez, C., van der Vaart, T., & Pieter van Donk, D. (2012). Supply chain integration and performance: The moderating effect of supply complexity. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 32(5), 583–610. doi: 10.1108/01443571211226506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Gimenez, C., & Ventura, E. (2005). Logistics-production, logistics-marketing and external integration: Their impact on performance. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 25(1), 20–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Glenn Richey, R., Jr., Chen, H., Upreti, R., Fawcett, S. E., & Adams, F. G. (2009). The moderating role of barriers on the relationship between drivers to supply chain integration and firm performance. International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, 39(10), 826–840.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Goldman, S. L., & Nagel, R. N. (1995). Agile competitors and virtual organizations: strategies for enriching the customer. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  35. Goldsby, T. J., Griffis, S. E., & Roath, A. S. (2006). Modeling lean, agile, and leagile supply chain strategies. Journal of Business Logistics, 27(1), 57–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Graham, G., Zailani, S., & Rajagopal, P. (2005). Supply chain integration and performance: US versus East Asian companies. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 10(5), 379–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Hambrick, D. C. (1983). High profit strategies in mature capital goods industries: A contingency approach. Academy of Management Journal, 26(4), 687–707.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Hansen, B. E. (1999). Threshold effects in non-dynamic panels: Estimation, testing, and inference. Journal of econometrics, 93(2), 345–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Hansen, B. E. (2000). Sample splitting and threshold estimation. Econometrica. 68(3), 575–603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. He, Y., & Zhao, X. (2012). Coordination in multi-echelon supply chain under supply and demand uncertainty. International Journal of Production Economics, 139(1), 106–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Henrysson, S. (1963). Correction of item-total correlations in item analysis. Psychometrika, 28(2), 211–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Huang, M.-C., Yen, G.-F., & Liu, T.-C. (2014). Reexamining supply chain integration and the supplier’s performance relationships under uncertainty. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 19(1), 64–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Huo, B. (2012). The impact of supply chain integration on company performance: an organizational capability perspective. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 17(6), 596–610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Jakhar, S. K. (2014). Designing the green supply chain performance optimisation model. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 15(3), 235–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Jin, Y., Fawcett, A. M., & Fawcett, S. E. (2013). Awareness is not enough: commitment and performance implications of supply chain integration. International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, 43(3), 205–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Jonsson, P., Andersson, D., Boon-itt, S., & Yew Wong, C. (2011). The moderating effects of technological and demand uncertainties on the relationship between supply chain integration and customer delivery performance. International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, 41(3), 253–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Khazaei Pool, J., Asian, S., Arabzad, S. M., Balouei Jamkhaneh, H., & Kia Lashaki, J. (2017a). Development of a model to analyze the factors affecting RFID technology acceptance in small and medium-sized enterprises. International Journal of Services and Operations Management, Forthcoming.Google Scholar
  48. Khazaei Pool, J., Arabzad, S., Asian, S., Fahimi, M., & Verij Kazemi, R. (2017b). Employing fuzzy ANP for ranking the personality of international brands in the sports shoe industry. Journal of Modelling in Management. doi: 10.1108/JM2-02-2016-0009.
  49. Kim, S. W. (2009). An investigation on the direct and indirect effect of supply chain integration on firm performance. International Journal of Production Economics, 119(2), 328–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Koenker, R., & Bassett Jr, G. (1982). Robust tests for heteroscedasticity based on regression quantiles. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 43–61.Google Scholar
  51. Kotha, S., & Nair, A. (1995). Strategy and environment as determinants of performance: Evidence from the Japanese machine tool industry. Strategic Management Journal, 16(7), 497–518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Koufteros, X., Vonderembse, M., & Jayaram, J. (2005). Internal and external integration for product development: The contingency effects of uncertainty, equivocality, and platform strategy. Decision Sciences, 36(1), 97–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Lambert, D. M., & Cooper, M. C. (2000). Issues in supply chain management. Industrial Marketing Management, 29(1), 65–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Lawrence, P. R., & Lorsch, J. W. (1967). Managing differentiation and integration. Organization and Environment.Google Scholar
  55. Li, J., Ning, L., Zeng, D., & Gu, X. (2014). Dynamic patterns of technology collaboration: A case study of the Chinese automobile industry, 1985–2010. Scientometrics, 101(1), 663–683.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Li, G., Yang, H., Sun, L., & Sohal, A. S. (2009). The impact of IT implementation on supply chain integration and performance. International Journal of Production Economics, 120(1), 125–138. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2008.07.017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Liu, Z., & Cruz, J. M. (2012). Supply chain networks with corporate financial risks and trade credits under economic uncertainty. International Journal of Production Economics, 137(1), 55–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Lockstroem, M., Schadel, J., Harrison, N., Moser, R., & Malhotra, M. K. (2010). Antecedents to supplier integration in the automotive industry: A multiple-case study of foreign subsidiaries in China. Journal of Operations Management, 28(3), 240–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Longinidis, P., & Georgiadis, M. C. (2013). Managing the trade-offs between financial performance and credit solvency in the optimal design of supply chain networks under economic uncertainty. Computers and Chemical Engineering, 48, 264–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Mozur, P. (2014). China Auto Firms Catch Up. Wall Street Journal (Online), 1–1.Google Scholar
  61. Narasimhan, R., & Kim, S. W. (2002). Effect of supply chain integration on the relationship between diversification and performance: Evidence from Japanese and Korean firms. Journal of Operations Management, 20(3), 303–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Neely, A., Gregory, M., & Platts, K. (1995). Performance measurement system design: a literature review and research agenda. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 15(4), 80–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Parkhe, A. (1993). Strategic alliance structuring: A game theoretic and transaction cost examination of interfirm cooperation. Academy of Management Journal, 36(4), 794–829.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Paul, S. K., Asian, S., Goh, M., & Torabi, S. A. (2017). Managing sudden transportation disruptions under delivery delay and quantity loss. Annals of Operations Research, Forthcoming.Google Scholar
  65. Petersen, K. J., Handfield, R. B., & Ragatz, G. L. (2005). Supplier integration into new product development: Coordinating product, process and supply chain design. Journal of Operations Management, 23(3), 371–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Prajogo, D. I., Oke, A., & Olhager, J. (2015). Supply chain processes: linking supply logistics integration, supply performance, lean processes and competitive performance. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 36(2), 220–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Prajogo, D., & Olhager, J. (2012). Supply chain integration and performance: The effects of long-term relationships, information technology and sharing, and logistics integration. International Journal of Production Economics, 135(1), 514–522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Rai, A., Patnayakuni, R., & Seth, N. (2006). Firm performance impacts of digitally enabled supply chain integration capabilities. MIS Quarterly, 30(2), 225–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Rodrigues, A. M., Stank, T. P., & Lynch, D. F. (2004). Linking strategy, structure, process, and performance in integrated logistics. Journal of Business logistics, 25(2), 65–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Russell, J. A. (1978). Evidence of convergent validity on the dimensions of affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36(10), 1152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Saeed, K. A., Malhotra, M. K., & Grover, V. (2005). Examining the impact of interorganizational systems on process efficiency and sourcing leverage in buyer–supplier dyads. Decision Sciences, 36(3), 365–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Schreiber, J. B., Nora, A., Stage, F. K., Barlow, E. A., & King, J. (2006). Reporting structural equation modeling and confirmatory factor analysis results: A review. The Journal of educational research, 99(6), 323–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Scott, W. R., & Cole, R. E. (2000). The quality movement and organizational theory. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  74. Sezen, B. (2008). Relative effects of design, integration and information sharing on supply chain performance. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 13(3), 233–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Shalender, K., & Singh, N. (2015). Marketing flexibility: Significance and implications for automobile industry. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 16(3), 251–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Sharifkhani, M., Khazaei Pool, J., & Asian, S. (2016). The impact of leader-member exchange on knowledge sharing and performance: An empirical investigation in the oil and gas industry. Journal of Science and Technology Policy Management, 7(3), 289–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Sinha, K. K., & Van de Ven, A. H. (2005). Designing work within and between organizations. Organization Science, 16(4), 389–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Somarin, A. R., Asian, S., & Chen, S. (2016). Dynamic priority repair policy for service parts supply chain. In 2016 IEEE international conference on industrial engineering and engineering management (IEEM) (pp. 798–802). IEEE.Google Scholar
  79. Somarin, A. R., Asian, S., Jolai, F., & Chen, S. (2017a). Flexibility in service parts supply chain: a study on emergency resupply in aviation MRO. International Journal of Production Research, Forthcoming.Google Scholar
  80. Somarin, A. R., Chen, S., Asian, S., & Wang, D. Z. (2017b). A heuristic stock allocation rule for repairable service parts. International Journal of Production Economics, 184, 131–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Song, M., & Di Benedetto, C. A. (2008). Supplier’s involvement and success of radical new product development in new ventures. Journal of operations management, 26(1), 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Sousa, R., Oliveira, P., van der Vaart, T., Pieter van Donk, D., Gimenez, C., & Sierra, V. (2012). Modelling the integration-performance relationship: Collaborative practices, enablers and contextual factors. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 32(9), 1043–1074.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Sousa, R., & Voss, C. A. (2008). Contingency research in operations management practices. Journal of Operations Management, 26(6), 697–713.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Stank, T. P., Keller, S. B., & Closs, D. J. (2001). Performance benefits of supply chain logistical integration. Transportation Journal, 41(2/3), 32–46.Google Scholar
  85. Stonebraker, P. W., & Afifi, R. (2004). Toward a contingency theory of supply chains. Management Decision, 42(9), 1131–1144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Stratton, R., & Warburton, R. D. (2003). The strategic integration of agile and lean supply. International Journal of Production Economics, 85(2), 183–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Swink, M., Narasimhan, R., & Wang, C. (2007). Managing beyond the factory walls: Effects of four types of strategic integration on manufacturing plant performance. Journal of Operations Management, 25(1), 148–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Swink, M., & Song, M. (2007). Effects of marketing-manufacturing integration on new product development time and competitive advantage. Journal of Operations Management, 25(1), 203–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Tan, S. (2009). Misuses of KR-20 and Cronbach’s alpha reliability coefficients. Egitim ve Bilim, 34(152), 101.Google Scholar
  90. Tavakoli, M. R., Asian, S., & Hemati, M. (2012). Using a fuzzy MADM in the Balanced SCORE card for the performance improvement in Iranian steel industries. Iranian Journal of Trade Studies (IJTS), 16(61), 51–80.Google Scholar
  91. Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509–533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Terjesen, S., Patel, P. C., & Sanders, N. R. (2012). Managing differentiation–integration duality in supply chain integration*. Decision Sciences, 43(2), 303–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Thompson, J. D. (1967). Organizations in action: Social science bases of administrative theory. Piscataway: Transaction publishers.Google Scholar
  94. Turkulainen, V. (2008). Managing cross-functional interdependencies—the contingent value of integration. Helsinki: Teknillinen korkeakoulu.Google Scholar
  95. Turkulainen, V., & Ketokivi, M. (2012). Cross-functional integration and performance: What are the real benefits? International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 32(4), 447–467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Tushman, M. L., & Nadler, D. A. (1978). Information processing as an integrating concept in organizational design. Academy of Management Review, 3(3), 613–624.Google Scholar
  97. Tyagi, M., Kumar, P., & Kumar, D. (2015). Assessment of critical enablers for flexible supply chain performance measurement system using fuzzy DEMATEL approach. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 16(2), 115–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Van der Vaart, T., & van Donk, D. P. (2008). A critical review of survey-based research in supply chain integration. International Journal of Production Economics, 111(1), 42–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Van Hoek, R. I. (1998). “Measuring the unmeasurable”-measuring and improving performance in the supply chain. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 3(4), 187–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Vazquez-Bustelo, D., Avella, L., & Fernández, E. (2007). Agility drivers, enablers and outcomes: Empirical test of an integrated agile manufacturing model. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 27(12), 1303–1332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Vickery, S. K., Jayaram, J., Droge, C., & Calantone, R. (2003). The effects of an integrative supply chain strategy on customer service and financial performance: An analysis of direct versus indirect relationships. Journal of Operations Management, 21(5), 523–539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Wilden, R., Gudergan, S. P., Nielsen, B. B., & Lings, I. (2013). Dynamic capabilities and performance: Strategy, structure and environment. Long Range Planning, 46(1), 72–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Williams, L. J., Hartman, N., & Cavazotte, F. (2010). Method variance and marker variables: A review and comprehensive CFA marker technique. Organizational Research Methods, 13(3), 477–514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Williamson, O. E. (1981). The economics of organization: The transaction cost approach. American Journal of Sociology, 87(3), 548–577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Williamson, O. E. (1989). Transaction cost economics. Handbook of industrial organization, 1, 135–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Williamson, O. E. (1991). Comparative economic organization: The analysis of discrete structural alternatives. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36(2), 269–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. Won Lee, C., Kwon, I.-W. G., & Severance, D. (2007). Relationship between supply chain performance and degree of linkage among supplier, internal integration, and customer. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 12(6), 444–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. Wong, C. Y., Boon-Itt, S., & Wong, C. W. (2011a). The contingency effects of environmental uncertainty on the relationship between supply chain integration and operational performance. Journal of Operations Management, 29(6), 604–615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. Wong, C. W., Lai, K.-H., & Cheng, T. (2011b). Value of information integration to supply chain management: roles of internal and external contingencies. Journal of Management Information Systems, 28(3), 161–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. Wong, E. M., Ormiston, M. E., & Tetlock, P. E. (2011c). The effects of top management team integrative complexity and decentralized decision making on corporate social performance. Academy of Management Journal, 54(6), 1207–1228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. Wook Kim, S. (2006). Effects of supply chain management practices, integration and competition capability on performance. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 11(3), 241–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. Xinqiao, P., & Junfeng, W. (2001). A study of market size and enterprise quantity of china’s auto industry. Economic Research Journal, 11, 006.Google Scholar
  113. Yu, W., Chavez, R., Feng, M., & Wiengarten, F. (2014). Integrated green supply chain management and operational performance. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 19(5/6), 683–696. doi: 10.1108/scm-07-2013-0225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  114. Yusuf, Y., Gunasekaran, A., Adeleye, E., & Sivayoganathan, K. (2004). Agile supply chain capabilities: Determinants of competitive objectives. European Journal of Operational Research, 159(2), 379–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  115. Zhang, D. Z. (2011). Towards theory building in agile manufacturing strategies—Case studies of an agility taxonomy. International Journal of Production Economics, 131(1), 303–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  116. Zhao, G., Feng, T., & Wang, D. (2015). Is more supply chain integration always beneficial to financial performance? Industrial Marketing Management, 45, 162–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  117. Zhao, L., Huo, B., Sun, L., & Zhao, X. (2013). The impact of supply chain risk on supply chain integration and company performance: A global investigation. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 18(2), 115–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dawei Lu
    • 1
  • Yi Ding
    • 1
  • Sobhan Asian
    • 2
  • Sanjoy Kumar Paul
    • 3
  1. 1.WMGUniversity of WarwickCoventryUK
  2. 2.College of BusinessRMIT UniversityMelbourneAustralia
  3. 3.UTS Business SchoolUniversity of Technology SydneySydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations