Advertisement

Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management

, Volume 17, Issue 3, pp 307–319 | Cite as

Company-Cause-Customer: Interaction Architecture

  • Urvi AgrawalEmail author
  • Arushie Mangla
  • Mahim Sagar
Original Article

Abstract

There is a rapid increase in number of companies employing cause-related marketing to create a differentiation, further brand image and foster purchase intention. However, they are faced with a challenge to create a positive impact on customer’s perception of cause in reference to the company, positive impact to nurture customer’s innate moral obligation and minimising apprehension about company’s intention. This study identifies factors that influence customer’s perception and the inter-relations among them. This study identifies factors that influence customer’s perception using Grounded Theory approach, which are further examined for inter-linkages and using total interpretive structural modelling to develop a hierarchal model reflecting their relative order of impact. This study proposes a generic company-cause-customer interaction architecture that marketers can employ as a first step in designing their cause-marketing campaign. Findings indicate cause-centric variables like type of cause (e.g., environment etc.) and customer’s proximity to cause (local/national/global) as the most rooted factors in customer’s cognition. Hence, the companies should primarily focus on this factor while designing their cause marketing strategy. The research details out the interaction architecture of company-cause-customer. This study is beneficial for Brand Managers and Product Managers for developing decision tools in the area of cause branding. The interaction architecture digraph will be an important input for developing an integrated model for company, cause and customer.

Keywords

Cause Cause related marketing Company Customer Customer cognition Customer perception Marketing campaign TISM 

References

  1. Baghi, I., & Gabriell, V. (2012). For-profit or non-profit brands: Which are more effective in a cause-related marketing programme? Journal of Brand Management, 20(3), 21–35.Google Scholar
  2. Barone, M. J., Miyazaki, A. D., & Taylor, K. A. (2000). The influence of cause-related marketing on consumer choice: Does one good turn deserve another? Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 28(2), 248–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barone, M. J., Norman, A. T., & Miyazaki, A. D. (2007). Consumer response to retailer use of cause-related marketing: Is more fit better? Journal of Retailing, 83(4), 437–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bigné-Alcañiz, E., Currás-Pérez, R., Ruiz-Mafé, C., & Sanz-Blas, S. (2010). Consumer behavioural intentions in cause-related marketing. The role of identification and social cause involvement. International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing, 7, 127–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brønn, P. S., & Vrioni, A. B. (2001). Corporate social responsibility and cause-related marketing: An overview. International Journal of Advertising, 20(2), 201–222.Google Scholar
  6. Brown, T. J., & Dacin, P. A. (1997). The company and the product: Corporate associations and consumer product responses. Journal of Marketing, 61(1), 68–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (1990). Grounded theory research: Procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria. Qualitative Sociology, 13(t), 3–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Demetriou, M., Papasolomou, I., & Vrontis, D. (2009). Cause-related marketing: Building the corporate image while supporting worthwhile causes. Journal of Brand Management, 17(4), 266–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Drumwright, M. E. (1996). Company advertising with a social dimension: The role of noneconomic criteria. The Journal of Marketing, 60, 71–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Endacott, R. W. J. (2004). Consumers and CRM: A national and global perspective. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 21(3), 183–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. New York, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  12. Grau, S. L., & Folse, J. A. G. (2007). Cause-related marketing (CRM): The influence of donation proximity and message-framing cues on the less-involved consumer. Journal of Advertising, 36(4), 19–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hoeffler, S., & Keller, K. L. (2002). Building brand equity through corporate societal marketing. Journal of Public Policy and Marketing, 21(1), 78–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Holbrook, M. B., & Hirschman, E. C. (1982). The experiential aspects of consumption: Consumer fantasies, feelings, and fun. Journal of Consumer Research, 9(2), 132–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lafferty, B. A. (2007). The relevance of fit in a cause-brand alliance when consumers evaluate corporate credibility. Journal of Business Research, 60, 447–453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lafferty, B. A., & Goldsmith, R. E. (2005). Cause-brand alliances: Does the cause help the brand or does the brand help the cause? Journal of Business Research, 58(4), 423–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Meyer, H. (1999). ``When the cause is just’’. Journal of Business Strategy, 6, 27–31.Google Scholar
  18. Moosmayer, D. C., & Fuljahn, A. (2010). Consumer perceptions of cause related marketing campaigns. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 27(6), 543–549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Murphy, I. P. (1997). Pillsbury proves charity, marketing begins at home. Marketing News, 16.Google Scholar
  20. Myers, B., Kwon, W., & Forsythe, S. (2012). Creating successful cause–brand alliances: The role of cause involvement, perceived brand motivations and cause–brand alliance attitude. Journal of Brand Management, 20(3), 205–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Nan, X., & Heo, K. (2007). Consumer responses to corporate social responsibility (CSR) initiatives: Examining the role of brand–cause fit in cause-related marketing. Journal of Advertising, 36(2), 63–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Nasim, S. (2011). Total interpretive structural modeling of continuity and change forces in e-government. Journal of Enterprise Transformation, 1(2), 147–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Payne, A. F., Storbacka, K., & Frow, P. (2008). Managing the co-creation of value. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 36(1), 83–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Pracejus, J. W., & Olsen, G. D. (2004). The role of brand/cause fit in the effectiveness of cause-related marketing campaigns. Journal of Business Research, 57(6), 635–640.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ross, J. K., Patterson, L. T., & Stutts, M. A. (1992). Consumer perceptions of organizations that use cause-related marketing. Journal of Academy of Marketing Science, 20(1), 93–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Sagar, M., Khandelwal, R., Mittal, A., & Singh, D. (2011). Ethical Positioning Index (EPI): An innovative tool for differential brand positioning. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 16(2), 124–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Shell, A. (1989). Cause related marketing: Big risks, big potential. Public Relations Journal, 45(7), 8–13.Google Scholar
  28. Simmons, C. J., & Becker-Olsen, K. L. (2006). Achieving marketing objectives through social sponsorships. Journal of Marketing, 70, 154–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Strahilevitz, M. (1999). The effects of product type and donation magnitude on willingness to pay more for a charity-linked brand. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 8(3), 215–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Strahilevitz, M., & Myers, J. (1998). Donations to charity as purchase incentives: How well they work may depend on what you are trying to sell. Journal of Consumer Research, 24(4), 434–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Sushil. (2005). Interpretive matrix: A tool to aid interpretation of management in social research. Global Journal of Flexible System Management, 6(2), 27–30.Google Scholar
  32. Sushil. (2012). Interpreting the interpretive structural model, organization research methods. Global Journal of Flexible System Management, 13(2), 87–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Till, B. D., & Nowak, L. I. (2000). Toward effective use of cause-related marketing alliances. Journal of Product and Brand Management, 9(7), 472–484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Van den Brink, D., Odekerken-Schröder, D. G., & Pauwels, P. (2006). The effect of strategic and tactical cause-related marketing on consumers’ brand loyalty. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 23(1), 15–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Varadarajan, P. R., & Menon, A. (1988). Cause-related marketing: A co-alignment of marketing strategy and corporate philanthropy. Journal of Marketing, 52, 58–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Warfield, J. N. (1976). Societal systems: Planning, policy and complexity. New York, NY: Wiley.Google Scholar
  37. Wasuja, S., Sagar, M., & Sushil. (2012). Cognitive bias in salespersons in specialty drug selling of pharmaceutical industry. International Journal of Pharmaceutical and Healthcare Marketing, 6(4), 310–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Webb, D. J., & Mohr, L. A. (1998). A typology of consumer responses to cause-related marketing: From skeptics to socially concerned. Journal of Public Policy and Marketing, 17(2), 226–238.Google Scholar
  39. Yechiam, E., Barron, G., Erev, I., & Erez, M. (2003). On the robustness and the direction of the effect of cause-related marketing. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 2(4), 320–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.A.T. Kearney Ltd.GurgaonIndia
  2. 2.Bain & Company India Pvt. Ltd.MumbaiIndia
  3. 3.Department of Management StudiesIndian Institute of Technology DelhiNew DelhiIndia

Personalised recommendations