Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Social Crowd Integration in New Product Development: Crowdsourcing Communities Nourish the Open Innovation Paradigm

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

An Erratum to this article was published on 05 February 2014

Abstract

The core of the open innovation paradigm is based on the principle of collecting ideas from external sources into the organization, and bringing those adapted, transformed and enriched ideas to the market. However, under the constant pressure of being innovative, companies have to try harder to tap their customers’ knowledge and abilities. Crowdsourcing communities provide an arena for a vast amount of consumers to actively participate in innovation processes. However, as this kind of external participation in innovation processes is still in its infancy, organizations need guidance and analytic support to reveal the potential of the open innovation paradigm. Therefore, this paper analyses new product development using social crowd integration concepts and—as a result—points to further promising directions and subtopics to perform future research in this area.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alonso, O., Rose, D. E., & Stewart, B. (2008). Crowdsourcing for relevance evaluation. SIGIR Forum, 42(2), 9–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bächle, M. (2008). Ökonomische Perspektiven des Web 2.0 - Open Innovation, Social Commerce und Enterprise 2.0. Wirtschaftsinformatik, 50, 129–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bayus, B. L. (2013). Crowdsourcing new product ideas over time: An analysis of the Dell IdeaStorm community. Management Science, 59(1), 226–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonabeau, E., Dorigo, M., & Theraulaz, G. (1999). From natural to artificial swarm intelligence. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyd, M. D., & Ellison, N. B. (2007). Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(1), 210–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brabham, D. C. (2008). Crowdsourcing as a model for problem solving—An introduction case. University of Utah, USA: Convergence.

  • Chesbrough, H. W. (2003). Open innovation: The new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Constantinides, E., & Fountain, S. (2008). Web 2.0: Conceptual foundations and marketing issues. Journal of Direct, Data and Digital Marketing Practice, 9(3), 231–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dahan, E., & Hauser, J. R. (2002). The virtual customer. The Journal of Product Innovation Management, 19, 332–353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dalander, L., & Gahl, D. L. (2010). How open is innovation? Research Policy, 39, 699–709.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franke, N., Schreier, M., & Kaiser, U. (2010). The ‘I designed it myself’ effect in mass customization. Management Science, 56(1), 125–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fuchs, C., & Schreier, M. (2011). Customer empowerment in new product development. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 28, 17–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Füller, J., & Matzler, K. (2007). Virtual product experience and customer participation. Technovation, 27, 378–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Füller, J., Mühlbacher, H., & Rieder, B. (2004). An die Arbeit, lieber Kunde! Harvard Business Manager, 59–67.

  • Füller, J., Bartl, M., Ernst, H., & Mühlbacher, H. (2006). Community based innovation. Electronic Commerce Research, 6, 57–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heidemann, J., Klier, M., Landherr, A., & Probst, F. (2011). Soziale Netzwerke im Web. Wirtschaftsinformatik & Management, 3, 40–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hendler, J., & Golbeck, J. (2008). Metcalfe’s law, Web 2.0, and the Semantic Web. Journal of Web Sematics, 6(1), 1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horton, J., & Chilton, L. (2010). The labor economics of paid crowdsourcing. In Proceedings of the 11th ACM conference on electronic commerce.

  • Howe, J. (2006). The rise of crowdsourcing. Wired 14(6), 176–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoyer, W. D., Chandy, R., Dorotic, M., Krafft, M., & Singh, S. S. (2010). Consumer cocreation in new product development. Journal of Service Research, 13(3), 283–296.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ickler, H. (2012). Wertschöpfung durch webbasierte kollektive Intelligenz. Gechäftsmodelle, Prozessarchitekturen und informkjationstechnishe Umsetzung. Norderstedt: Books on Demand.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, A. M., & Haenlein, M. (2010). Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of social media. Business Horizons, 53(1), 59–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kohler, T., Füller, J., Stieger, D., & Matzler, K. (2010). Avatar-based innovation. Computers in Human Behavior, 27, 160–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kunz, W., Schmitt, B., & Meyer, A. (2011). How does perceived firm innovativeness affect the consumer? Journal of Business Research, 64(8), 816–822.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lemeister, J. M., Huber, M., Bretschneider, U., & Krcmar, H. (2009). Leveraging crowdsourcing: Activation-supporting components for IT-based ideas competition. Journal of Management Information Systems (JMIS), 26, 197–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MIT. (2013). Handbook of collective intelligence. Retrieved on August 13, 2013, from http://cci.mit.edu/research/handbook.html.

  • Nambisan, S. (2010). Virtual customer environments. Information Technology and Product Development, 5, 109–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O′Hern, M. S., & Rindfleisch, A. (2009). Customer co-creation: A typology and research agenda. In N. K. Malholtra (Ed.), Review of marketing research (vol. 6, pp. 84–106). Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.

  • Papsdorf, C. (2009). Wie Surfen zu Arbeit wird. Frankfurt/Main: Campus Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Park, Y., & Lee, S. (2011). How to design and utilize online customer center to support new product concept generation. Expert Systems with Applications, 38, 10638–10647.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prahalad, C. K., & Ramaswamy, V. (2004). Co-creating unique value with customers. Strategy & Leadership, 32(3), 4–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ritzer, G., & Jurgensson, N. (2010). Production, Consumption, Prosumption: The nature of capitalism in the age of the digital ‘prosumer’. Journal of Consumer Culture, 10(1), 13–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sawhney, M., Verona, G., & Prandelli, E. (2005). Collaborating to create. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 19(4), 4–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomke, S., & von Hippel, E. (2002). Customers as innovators. Harvard Business Review, 80, 74–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toffler, A. (1980). The third wave. William Collins Sons & Co Ltd: USA.

  • Walcher, D. (2007). Der Ideenwettbewerb als Methode der aktiven Kundenintegration: Theorie, empirische Analyse und Implikationen für den Innovationsprozess. Wiesbaden: GWV Fachverlage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenger, E. C., & Snyder, W. M. (2000). Communities of practise: The organizational frontier. Harvard Business Review, 78, 139–145.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andreas Mladenow.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mladenow, A., Bauer, C. & Strauss, C. Social Crowd Integration in New Product Development: Crowdsourcing Communities Nourish the Open Innovation Paradigm. Glob J Flex Syst Manag 15, 77–86 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40171-013-0053-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40171-013-0053-6

Keywords

Navigation