Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management

, Volume 13, Issue 4, pp 179–193 | Cite as

The Impact of Domestic Mergers and Acquisitions on Acquirer Shareholders’ Wealth in India

Original Article


This paper examines the share price performance of domestic mergers and acquisitions in India during the period 2003–2008. The focus of the paper is on the shareholders of acquiring firms. The present work performs a disaggregated analysis for sub-samples based on the status of the target firm acquired. The sample is divided into two categories: (i) acquisition of target firm to be totally absorbed with the acquiring firm (ii) target firm remains as subsidiary (51–100 %). The study further investigates the effect of method of financing (cash or stock) employed in the acquisition and the form of the target firm (listed or unlisted) acquired on the stock returns of the acquiring companies’ shareholders. The results indicate that acquisitions generate 1.60 % (statistically significant) cumulative average abnormal returns (CAAR) during the event window of 5 days (−2, +2) for the entire sample. The major finding of disaggregated analysis is that when target remains as a domestic subsidiary, the acquirer earns 2.82 % CAAR (statistically significant) over pre-event window of 19 days (−20, −2). In contrast, the acquirer shareholder loses 0.41 % CAAR when the target firm is absorbed with the acquiring firm during the same period. The acquisitions financed with cash generate positive abnormal returns. The positive abnormal returns are not observed in the case of acquisitions financed with stock. The acquirer of unlisted domestic target firms experience higher return than the acquirers of listed domestic target firms. However, the acquirers experience (statistically significant) negative abnormal returns for the post-event window of 19 days (+2, +20) in all acquisitions.


Shareholders Short-run performance India Event study Cumulative abnormal return Shareholders wealth effect Domestic acquisitions 


  1. Alexandridis, G., Petmezas, D., & Travlos, N. G. (2010). Gains from mergers and acquisitions around the world: New evidence. Financial Management, 39(4), 1671–1694.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Andrade, G., Mitchell, M., & Stafford, E. (2001). New evidence and perspectives on mergers. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 15(2), 103–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ang, J., & Kohers, N. (2001). The takeover market for private companies: The US experience. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 25(6), 723–748.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Asquith, P., Bruner, R., & Mullins, D, Jr. (1987). Merger returns and the form of financing. Proceedings of the Seminar on the Analysis of Security Prices, 34(1), 115–146.Google Scholar
  5. Beamish, P. W., & Banks, J. C. (1987). Equity joint ventures and the theory of the multinational enterprise. Journal of International Business Studies, 18(2), 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Beena, P. L. (2000) An analysis of mergers in private corporate sector in India, Working Paper No. 301-2000. Center for Development Studies, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala, India,
  7. Berkovitch, E., & Narayanan, M. (1993). Motives for takeovers: An empirical investigation. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 28(3), 347–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bradley, Michael A., Desai, Anand, & Han Kim, E. (1988). Synergistic gains from corporate acquisitions and their division between stockholders of target and acquiring firms. Journal of Financial Economics, 21, 3–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bradley, M., Desai, A., & Kim, E. H. (1983). The rationale behind inter-firm tender offers. Journal of Financial Economics, 11(1–4), 183–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Brown, S. J., & Warner, J. B. (1980). Measuring security price performance. Journal of Financial Economics, 8(3), 205–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bruner, R. F. (2002). Does M&A pay? A survey of evidence for the decision maker. Journal of Applied Finance, 12 (Spring/Summer), 48–68.Google Scholar
  12. Campa, J. M., & Hernando, I. (2004). Shareholder value creation in European M&As. European Financial Management, 10(1), 47–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chang, S. (1998). Takeovers of privately held targets, methods of payment, and bidder returns. Journal of Finance, 53(2), 773–784.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Chari, A. P., Ouimet, P. P., & Tesar, L. (2010). The value of control in emerging markets. Review of Financial Studies, 23(4), 1741–1770.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Conn, R. L., Cosh, A., Guest, P. M., & Hughes, A. (2005). Impact on UK acquirers of domestic, cross-border, public and private acquisitions. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, 32(5/6), 815–870.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cowan, A. R. (1992). Nonparametric event study tests. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 1(4), 343–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Cowan, A. R. (2007). Eventus 8.0 users guide, standard edition 2.1. Ames Lowa: Cowan Research LC.Google Scholar
  18. Dennis, D. K., & McConnel, J. J. (1986). Corporate mergers and security returns. Journal of Financial Economics, 16(2), 143–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Dodd, P., & Ruback, R. (1977). Tender offers and stockholders returns. Journal of Financial Economics, 5(3), 351–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Doukas, J., & Travlos, N. G. (1988). The effect of corporate multinationalism on shareholders wealth: Evidence from international acquisitions. Journal of Finance, 43(5), 1161–1175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Draper, P., & Paudyal, K. (2006). Acquisitions: private vs. public. European Financial Management, 12(1), 57–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Dyck, A., & Zingales, L. (2004). The private benefits of control. Journal of Finance, 59(2), 533–596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Eckbo, B. E., Giammarino, R. M., & Heinkel, R. L. (1990). Asymmetric information and the medium of exchange in takeovers. Review of Financial Studies, 3(4), 651–676.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Faccio, M., McConnell, J. J., & Stolin, D. (2006). Returns to acquirers of listed and unlisted targets. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 41(1), 197–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Firth, M. (1980). Takeovers: Shareholder returns and the theory of the firm. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 94(2), 235–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Fishman, M. (1989). Preemptive bidding and the role of the medium of exchange in acquisitions. Journal of Finance, 44(1), 41–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Franks, J. R., & Harris, R. S. (1989). Shareholder wealth effects of corporate takeovers: the UK experience 1955–1985. Journal of Financial Economics, 23(2), 225–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Fuller, K., Netter, J., & Stegemoller, M. (2002). What do returns to acquiring firms tell us? Evidence from firms that make many acquisitions. Journal of Finance, 57(4), 1763–1794.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Goergen, M., & Renneboog, L. (2004). Shareholder wealth effects of European domestic and cross-border takeover bids. European Financial Management, 10(1), 9–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hansen, R. G. (1987). A theory for the choice of exchange medium in mergers and acquisitions. Journal of Business, 60(1), 75–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hansen, R. G., & Lott, J. (1996). Externalities and corporate objectives in a world with diversified shareholders/consumers. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 31(1), 43–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Heron, R., & Lie, E. (2002). Operating performance and the method of payment in takeovers. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 37(1), 137–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Huang, Y., & Walkling, R. (1987). Target abnormal returns associated with acquisition announcements: payment, acquisition form, and managerial resistance. Journal of Financial Economics, 19(2), 329–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Jarrell, G., Brickley, J., & Natter, J. (1988). The market for corporate control: The empirical evidence since 1980. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 2(2), 49–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Jarrell, G. A., & Poulsen, B. A. (1989). The returns to acquiring firms in tender offers: Evidence from three decades. Financial Management, 18(3), 12–19.Google Scholar
  36. Jensen, M. (1986). Agency costs of free cash flow, corporate finance, and takeovers. American Economic Review, 76(2), 323–329.Google Scholar
  37. Jensen, M., & Ruback, R. (1983). The market for corporate control: The scientific evidence. Journal of Financial Economics, 11(1–4), 5–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Jung, K., Kim, Y., & Stulz, R. (1996). Timing, investment opportunities, managerial discretion, and the security issue decision. Journal of Financial Economics, 42(2), 159–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Kiymaz, H. (2003). Wealth effect for US acquirers from foreign direct investments. Journal of Business Strategies, 20(1), 7–21.Google Scholar
  40. Kiymaz, H., & Mukherjee, T. K. (2000). The impact of country diversification on wealth effects in cross-border mergers. The Financial Review, 35(2), 37–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Kohli, R., & Mann, B. J. S. (2011). Analyzing determinants of value creation in domestic and cross-border acquisitions in India. International Business Review,. doi:10.1016/j.ibusrev.2011.11.006.Google Scholar
  42. Langeteig, T. C. (1978). An application of three-factor performance index to measure stockholders gains from merger. Journal of Financial Economics, 6, 365–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Lowinski, F., Schiereck, D., & Thomas, T. W. (2004). The effects of cross-border acquisitions on shareholder wealth: Evidence from Switzerland. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 22(4), 315–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Mandelker, G. (1974). Risk and return: The case of merging firms. Journal of Financial Economics, 1(4), 303–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Mann, B. S., & Kohli, R. (2009). Impact of mode of payment and insider ownership on target and acquirer’s announcement returns in India. Vikalpa, 34(4), 51–66.Google Scholar
  46. Markides, C. C., & Ittner, C. D. (1994). Shareholder benefits from corporate international diversification: evidence from U.S. international acquisitions. Journal of International Business Studies, 25(2), 343–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Marr, M. W., Mohta, S., & Spivey, M. F. (1993). An analysis of foreign takeovers in the United States. Managerial and Decision Economics, 14(4), 285–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Martin, K. J. (1996). The method of payment in corporate acquisitions, investment opportunities and managerial ownership. Journal of Finance, 51(4), 1227–1246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Masse, I., Hanrahan, R., & Kushner, J. (1990). The effect of the method of payment on stock returns in Canadian tender offers and merger proposals for both target and bidding firms. Quarterly Journal of Business and Economics, 29(4), 102–124.Google Scholar
  50. Mittal, A., & Jain, P. K. (2012). Mergers and acquisitions performance system: integrated framework for strategy formulation and execution using flexible strategy game-card. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management. doi:10.1007/s40171-012-0004-7.
  51. Moeller, S. B., & Schlingemann, F. P. (2005). Global diversification and bidder gains: A comparison between cross-border and domestic acquisitions. Journal of Banking & Finance, 29(3), 533–564.Google Scholar
  52. Morck, R., & Yeung, B. (1991). Why investors value multinationality. Journal of Business, 64(2), 165–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Mueller, D. C. (1969). Theory of conglomerate mergers. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 83, 643–649.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Mulherin, J. H., & Boone, A. L. (2000). Comparing acquisitions and divestitures. Journal of Corporate Finance, 6(2), 117–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Myers, S. C., & Majluf, N. S. (1984). Corporate financing and investment decisions when firms have information that investors do not have. Journal of Financial Economics, 13(2), 187–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Nenova, T. (2003). The value of corporate voting rights and control: A cross-country analysis. Journal of Financial Economics, 68, 328–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Pettway, R. H., Sicherman, N. W., & Yamada, T. (1990). Japanese mergers: relative size, corporate collectivism and shareholder wealth. In Rhee, S. G., & Chang, R. P. (Eds.), Pacific-Basin capital markets research (Vol. 1, pp. 181–202). Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  58. Rani, N., Yadav, S. S., & Jain P. K.(2010). Corporate merger practices in India: An empirical study. In Proceedings of tenth global conference on flexible systems management GLOGIFT10, graduate school of system design and management collaboration complex. Japan: Hiyoshi Campus, Keio University.Google Scholar
  59. Rappaport, A., & Sirower, M. (1999). Stock or Cash? The trade-offs for buyers and sellers in mergers and acquisitions. Harvard Business Review, 77(6), 147–158.Google Scholar
  60. Roll, R. (1986). The hubris hypothesis of corporate takeovers. Journal of Business, 59, 197–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Seth, A., Song, K. P., & Pettit, R. (2000). Synergy, managerialism or hubris? An empirical examination of motives for foreign acquisitions of US firms. Journal of International Business Studies, 31(3), 387–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Shleifer, A., & Vishney, R. W. (1989). Management entrenchment: the case of manager specific investments. Journal of Financial Economics, 25(1), 123–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Sushil. (2009). The dual perspective of performance. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 10(4), iii.Google Scholar
  64. Sushil. (2010). Flexible strategy game-card. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 11(1/2), 2 (Editorial).Google Scholar
  65. Trautwein, F. (1990). Merger motives and prescriptions. Strategic Management Journal, 11(4), 283–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Travlos, N. (1987). Corporate takeover bids method of payment, and bidding firms’ stock returns. Journal of Finance, 42(4), 943–963.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Weston, J. F., & Weaver, S. C. (2001). Mergers and acquisitions. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  68. Yook, K. C. (2003). Larger return to cash acquisitions: signalling effect or leverage effect? Journal of Business, 76(3), 477–498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Management StudiesIndian Institute of Technology DelhiNew DelhiIndia

Personalised recommendations