Abstract
Identifying the cause of social events enables us to understand why our environment interacts with us in a certain way. Although previous studies suggest that the right temporoparietal junction (rTPJ) is associated with internal attribution, the causal relationship remains unclear. The present study, firstly, aimed to investigate whether and how the attributional tendency could change with anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) of the rTPJ. Secondly, since Japanese individuals tend to perform self-effacing attribution as a socially adaptive behavior, we examined whether the increased activation of the rTPJ, which facilitates the process of shaping self-concept from another perspective, might increase self-effacing attributions specifically among individuals who are highly sensitive to social rewards. Consistent with these predictions, we found that the increased activation of the rTPJ enhanced self-effacing bias, and this relationship was specifically observed among high reward dependent (RD) individuals. We also revealed that it took a longer time for the high RD participants to avoid self-responsibility for failure after the stimulation. These results suggest that anodal tDCS of the rTPJ could exacerbate self-blaming tendencies in Japanese individuals.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anderson, C. A., Krull, D. S., & Weiner, B. (1996). Explanations: Processes and consequences. In E. T. Higgins & A. W. Kruglanski (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (pp. 271–296). New York: Guilford.
Blackwood, N. J., Bentall, R. P., Simmons, A., Murray, R. M., & Howard, R. J. (2003). Self-responsibility and the self-serving bias: An fMRI investigation of causal attributions. NeuroImage, 20(2), 1076–1085. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1053-8119(03)00331-8.
Breen, N., Caine, D., & Coltheart, M. (2001). Mirrored-self misidentification: Two cases of focal onset dementia. Neurocase, 7(3), 239–254. https://doi.org/10.1093/neucas/7.3.239.
Campbell, W. K., & Sedikides, C. (1999). Self-threat magnifies the selfserving bias: A meta-analytic integration. Review of General Psychology, 3(1), 23. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.3.1.23.
Cloninger, C. R. (1987). A systematic method for clinical description and classification of personality variants: A proposal. Archives of General Psychiatry, 44(6), 573–588. https://doi.org/10.1001/archpsyc.1987.01800180093014.
Cloninger, C. R., Svrakic, D. M., & Przybeck, T. R. (1993). A psychobiological model of temperament and character. Archives of General Psychiatry, 50(12), 975–990. https://doi.org/10.1001/archpsyc.1993.01820240059008.
Gilbert, D. T., Pelham, B. W., & Krull, D. S. (1988). On cognitive busyness: When person perceivers meet persons perceived. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(5), 733. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.54.5.733.
Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York: Wiley.
Heine, S. J., Kitayama, S., Lehman, D. R., Takata, T., Ide, E., Leung, C., et al. (2001). Divergent consequences of success and failure in Japan and North America: An investigation of self-improving motivations and malleable selves. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(4), 599. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.81.4.599.
Hsu, T. Y., Tseng, L. Y., Yu, J. X., Kuo, W. J., Hung, D. L., Tzeng, O. J., et al. (2011). Modulating inhibitory control with direct current stimulation of the superior medial frontal cortex. Neuroimage, 56(4), 2249–2257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.03.059
Izawa, F. (2011). The roles of optimistic explanatory style and dispositional optimism in an interpersonal stress process. Japanese Journal of Personality. https://doi.org/10.2132/personality.19.255.
Jacobson, L., Koslowsky, M., & Lavidor, M. (2012). tDCS polarity effects in motor and cognitive domains: A meta-analytical review. Experimental Brain Research, 216(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-011-2891-9.
Kashima, Y., & Triandis, H. C. (1986). The self-serving bias in attributions as a coping strategy: A cross-cultural study. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 17(1), 83–97. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002186017001006.
Kelley, H. H. (1967). The social psychology of groups. New York: Transaction Publishers.
Kestemont, J., Ma, N., Baetens, K., Clément, N., Van Overwalle, F., & Vandekerckhove, M. (2015). Neural correlates of attributing causes to the self, another person and the situation. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 10(1), 114–121. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsu030.
Kijima, N., Saito, R., Takeuchi, M., Yoshino, A., Ono, Y., Kato, M., et al. (1996). Cloninger’s seven-factor model of temperament and character and Japanese version of Temperament and Character Inventory (TCI). Archives of Psychiatric Diagnostics Clinical Evaluation, 7, 379–399.
Kitayama, S., Takagi, H., & Matsumoto, H. (1995). Causal attribution of success and failure: Cultural psychology of the Japanese self. Japanese Psychological Review, 38(2), 247–280. (in Japanese).
Kojima, R. (1983, September). Jyoshidaisei ni okeru geninkizoku to yokuutsu-suijun tono kankei: ASQ nihon-go-ban ni yoru kento [The relationship between causal attribution and depression level in female college students: Using the Japanese version of ASQ]. Paper presented at the 47th meeting of Japanese Psychological Association, Tokyo, Japan (in Japanese).
Leung, K., & Bond, M. H. (1984). The impact of cultural collectivism on reward allocation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47(4), 793. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.47.4.793.
Mai, X., Zhang, W., Hu, X., Zhen, Z., Xu, Z., Zhang, J., et al. (2016). Using tDCS to explore the role of the right temporo-parietal junction in theory of mind and cognitive empathy. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 380. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00380.
Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98(2), 224. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.98.2.224.
Mezulis, A. H., Abramson, L. Y., Hyde, J. S., & Hankin, B. L. (2004). Is there a universal positivity bias in attributions? A meta-analytic review of individual, developmental, and cultural differences in the self-serving attributional bias. Psychological Bulletin, 130(5), 711. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.130.5.711.
Miller, D. T., & Ross, M. (1975). Self-serving biases in the attribution of causality: Fact or fiction. Psychological Bulletin, 82(2), 213–225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.schres.2017.06.057.
Muramoto, Y., & Yamaguchi, S. (1997). Another type of self-serving bias: Coexistence of self-effacing and group-serving tendencies in attribution in the Japanese culture. Japanese Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 37, 65–75 (in Japanese). https://doi.org/10.2130/jjesp.37.65.
Muramoto, Y., & Yamaguchi, S. (2003). When ‘self-effacement’ disappears: Narratives of personal and group successes depending on an ingroup relationship. Japanese Journal of Psychology, 43, 253–262 (in Japanese). https://doi.org/10.4992/jjpsy.74.253.
Muramoto, Y., Yamaguchi, S., & Kim, U. (2009). Perception of achievement attribution in individual and group contexts: Comparative analysis of Japanese, Korean, and Asian-American results. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 12(3), 199–210. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-839X.2009.01285.x.
Nitsche, M. A., Cohen, L. G., Wassermann, E. M., Priori, A., Lang, N., Antal, A., et al. (2008). Transcranial direct current stimulation: State of the art 2008. Brain Stimulation, 1(3), 206–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brs.2008.06.004.
Nitsche, M. A., & Paulus, W. (2000). Excitability changes induced in the human motor cortex by weak transcranial direct current stimulation. The Journal of Physiology, 527(3), 633–639. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7793.2000.t01-1-00633.x.
Okamoto, M., Dan, H., Sakamoto, K., Takeo, K., Shimizu, K., Kohno, S., et al. (2004). Three-dimensional probabilistic anatomical cranio-cerebral correlation via the international 10–20 system oriented for transcranial functional brain mapping. Neuroimage, 21(1), 99–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2003.08.026.
Rotter, J. B. (1966). Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. Psychological Monographs: General and Applied, 80(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0092976.
Santiesteban, I., Banissy, M. J., Catmur, C., & Bird, G. (2012). Enhancing social ability by stimulating right temporoparietal junction. Current Biology, 22(23), 2274–2277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2012.10.018.
Seidel, E. M., Eickhoff, S. B., Kellermann, T., Schneider, F., Gur, R. C., Habel, U., et al. (2010). Who is to blame? Neural correlates of causal attribution in social situations. Social Neuroscience, 5(4), 335–350. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470911003615997.
Seligman, M. E., Abramson, L. Y., Semmel, A., & Von Baeyer, C. (1979). Depressive attributional style. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 88(3), 242. https://doi.org/10.1037//0021-843X.88.3.242.
Sellaro, R., Güroǧlu, B., Nitsche, M. A., van den Wildenberg, W. P., Massaro, V., Durieux, J., et al. (2015). Increasing the role of belief information in moral judgments by stimulating the right temporoparietal junction. Neuropsychologia, 77, 400–408. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.09.016.
Sowden, S., Wright, G. R., Banissy, M. J., Catmur, C., & Bird, G. (2015). Transcranial current stimulation of the temporoparietal junction improves lie detection. Current Biology, 25(18), 2447–2451. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2015.08.014.
Trope, Y. (1986). Identification and inferential processes in dispositional attribution. Psychological Review, 93(3), 239–257. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.93.3.239.
Tseng, P., Hsu, T. Y., Chang, C. F., Tzeng, O. J., Hung, D. L., Muggleton, N. G., et al. (2012). Unleashing potential: Transcranial direct current stimulation over the right posterior parietal cortex improves change detection in low-performing individuals. Journal of Neuroscience, 32(31), 10554–10561. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.0362-12.2012.
Wu, Q., Chang, C. F., Xi, S., Huang, I. W., Liu, Z., Juan, C. H., et al. (2015). A critical role of temporoparietal junction in the integration of top‐down and bottom‐up attentional control. Human Brain Mapping, 36(11), 4317–4333. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.22919.
Yamauchi, H. (1988). Effects of actor’s and observer’s roles on causal attributions by Japanese subjects for success and failure in competitive situations. Psychological Reports, 63(2), 619–626. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1988.63.2.619.
Ye, H., Chen, S., Huang, D., Zheng, H., Jia, Y., & Luo, J. (2015). Modulation of neural activity in the temporoparietal junction with transcranial direct current stimulation changes the role of beliefs in moral judgment. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 9, 659. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2015.00659.
Yoshida, A., & Ura, M. (2003). An examination of direct and indirect adaptation promoting effects through self-derogative presentation. The Japanese Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42(2), 120–130 (in Japanese). https://doi.org/10.2130/jjesp.42.120.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by grants from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (15K00205 and 15H01866).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Takano, R., Nomura, M. Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation of the right temporoparietal junction enhances the self-effacing bias in Japanese individuals. Cult. Brain 7, 80–91 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40167-018-0064-4
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40167-018-0064-4