Skip to main content
Log in

Does uncertainty avoidance keep charity away? comparative research between charitable behavior and 79 national cultures

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Culture and Brain

Abstract

Prosocial behavior and the motivation behind it have been dominant topic and core concern of numerous studies across array of different social science disciplines. Nevertheless, the prevailing research approach is still mainly focused on prosocial behavior observed in terms of situational and individual aspects and less in terms of cultural and group tendencies and orientations. This research tried to explain prosocial behavior among 79 different countries focusing on cultural dimension of uncertainty avoidance. According to Hofstede, uncertainty avoidance (UAI) reflects how society deals with the uncertainty that future brings and with the level of anxiety brought by the outcome of this ambiguity. The amount to which the participants of a culture feel threatened by ambiguous or unfamiliar situations and shape views and institutions to avoid them are reflected in UAI score. Since charity is closely intertwined with economic, social and personal resources which in turn are closely linked with uncertainty avoidance, we successfully postulated how lower uncertainty avoidance is related with higher prosocial behavior which we ultimately supported by our research results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andreoni, J. (1993). An experimental test of the public-goods crowding-out hypothesis. The American Economic Review, 1317-1327.

  • Auten, G. E., Sieg, H., & Clotfelter, C. T. (2002). Charitable giving, income, and taxes: an analysis of panel data. American Economic Review, 92, 371–382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aydinli, A., Bender, M., & Chasiotis, A. (2013). Helping and volunteering across cultures: Determinants of prosocial behavior. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture, 5(3), 6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Babrow, A. S., Hines, S. C., & Kasch, C. R. (2000). Managing uncertainty in illness explanation: An application of problematic integration theory (pp. 41–67). Explaining illness: Research, theory, and strategies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Babrow, A. S., Kasch, C. R., & Ford, L. A. (1998). The many meanings of uncertainty in illness: Toward a systematic accounting. Health communication, 10(1), 1–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ball-Rokeach, S. J. (1973). From pervasive ambiguity to a definition of the situation. Sociometry, 378-389.

  • Bauer, R. A. (1960). Consumer behavior as risk taking. In R. S. Hancock (Ed.), Dynamic marketing for a changing world (pp. 389–398). Chicago: American Marketing Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bekkers, R., & Wiepking, P. (2011). Who gives? A literature review of predictors of charitable giving part one: religion, education, age and socialisation. Voluntary Sector Review, 2(3), 337–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belsky, J., Bakermans-Kranenburg, M. J., & van IJzendoorn, M. H. (2007). For better and for worse: Differential susceptibility to environmental influences. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16, 300–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belsky, J., Jonassaint, C., Pluess, M., Stanton, M., Brummett, B., & Williams, R. (2009). Vulnerability genes or plasticity genes? Molecular Psychiatry, 14, 746–754.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Berger, C. R., & Calabrese, R. J. (1975). Some explorations in initial interaction and beyond: Toward a developmental theory of interpersonal communication. Human communication research, 1(2), 99–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blake, R., & Jefferson, S. (1992). Defection-Why?: An Insight Into the Reasons for Volunteers Leaving. York: Jefferson Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bontempo, R. N., Bottom, W. P., & Weber, E. U. (1997). Cross-cultural differences in risk perception: A model-based approach. Risk Analysis, 17(4), 479–488.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brashers, D. E. (2001). Communication and uncertainty management. Journal of Communication, 51(3), 477–497.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, A. C., & Lewis, G. B. (2001). Giving, volunteering, and mistrusting government. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 20(4), 765–769.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Capner, M., & Caltabiano, M. L. (1993). Factors affecting the progression towards burnout: A comparison of professional and volunteer counsellors. Psychological Reports, 73(2), 555–561.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Carl, D., Gupta, V., & Javidan, M. (2004). Power distance. Culture, leadership, and organizations: The GLOBE study of, 62, 513–563.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlo, G., Roesch, S. C., Knight, G. P., & Koller, S. H. (2001). Between-or within-culture variation?: Culture group as a moderator of the relations between individual differences and resource allocation preferences. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 22(6), 559–579.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chan, K. S., Godby, R., Mestelman, S., & Muller, R. A. (2002). Crowding-out voluntary contributions to public goods. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 48(3), 305–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charities Aid Foundation (2006).International comparisons of charitable giving November 2006: www.cafonline.org/pdf/International%20Comparisons%20of%20Charitable%20Giving.pdf (Retrieved in April, 2015)

  • Charities Aid Foundation (2014), World Giving Index, A global view of giving trends November, 2014. https://www.cafonline.org/pdf/CAF_WGI2014_Report_1555AWEBFinal.pdf (Retrieved in April, 2015)

  • Clotfelter, C. T. (1985). Tax reform and charitable giving in 1985. Tax Notes, 26(5), 477–488.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cnaan, R. A., Boddie, S. C., McGrew, C. C., & Kang, J. (2006). The other Philadelphia story: How local congregations support quality of life in urban America. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crişan, L. G., Pană, S., Vulturar, R., Heilman, R. M., Szekely, R., Drugă, B., & Miu, A. C. (2009). Genetic contributions of the serotonin transporter to social learning of fear and economic decision making. Social cognitive and affective neuroscience, 4(4), 399–408.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Dake, K. (1992). Myths of nature: Culture and the social construction of risk. Journal of Social issues, 48(4), 21–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dholakia, U. M. (2001). A motivational process model of product involvement and consumer risk perception. European Journal of Marketing, 35, 1340–1360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DiPietro, W. R. (2013). Some Reasons for Differences in Charitable Giving Between Countries. Global Journal of Human-Social Science Research, 13(1)

  • Douglas, M., & Wildavsky, A. (1982). Risk and culture: An essay on the selection of technical and environmental dangers. Berkeley. Cal.: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duronto, P. M., Nishida, T., & Nakayama, S. I. (2005). Uncertainty, anxiety, and avoidance in communication with strangers. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 29(5), 549–560.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eckel, C. C., & Grossman, P. J. (2005). Subsidizing charitable contributions: A field test comparing matching and rebate subsidies. Virginia Tech: Manuscript.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenberg, N., Fabes, R. A., & Spinrad, T. L. (2006). Prosocial behaviour. Handbook of child psychology, 3, 646–718.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engel, J. F., Warshaw, M. R., & Kinnear, T. C. (1994). Promotional strategy: managing the marketing communications process. Burr Ridge, IL: Irwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Exley, C. L. (2014). Excusing Selfishness in Charitable Giving: The Role of Uncertainty. Working Paper.

  • Fairbrother, M., & Martin, I. W. (2013). Does inequality erode social trust? Results from multilevel models of US states and counties. Social science research, 42(2), 347–360.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Feldstein, M., & Taylor, A. (1976). The income tax and charitable contributions. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 1201–1222.

  • Fletcher, G., & Clark, M. S. (Eds.). (2008). Blackwell handbook of social psychology: Interpersonal processes (Vol. 2). John Wiley & Sons, New York.

  • Gilbert, C. G. (2005). Unbundling the structure of inertia: Resource versus routine rigidity. Academy of Management Journal, 48(5), 741–763.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greene, P. A., & McClelland, R. (2001). The Effects of Federal Estate Tax Policy on Charitable Contributions. Congressional Budget Office.

  • Gudykunst, W. B., & Hammer, M. R. (1987). The influence of ethnicity, gender, and dyadic composition on uncertainty reduction in initial interactions. Journal of Black Studies, 18, 191–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Handy, F., & Cnaan, R. A. (2007). The role of social anxiety in volunteering. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 18(1), 41–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haski-Leventhal, D. (2005). To be or not to be: Retention and turnover among volunteers: Qualitative research of volunteers at a rape crisis center. Jerusalem: Hebrew University. in Jerusalem.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haski-Leventhal, D., & Cnaan, R. A. (2009). Group processes and volunteering: Using groups to enhance volunteerism. Administration in Social Work, 33(1), 61–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, M. D., Huang, S. C., & Chang, C. C. A. (2012). When others cross psychological distance to help: Highlighting prosocial actions toward outgroups encourages philanthropy. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48(1), 220–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hibbert, S., & Horne, S. (1996). Giving to charity: questioning the donor decision process. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 13(2), 4–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture’s consequences. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, G. (1981). Culture’s consequence: International differences in work related values. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, G. (1983). National cultures in four dimensions: A research-based theory of cultural differences among nations. International Studies of Management & Organization, 13, 46–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, G. H. (2001). Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions and organizations across nations. Geert Hofstede (Ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publication.

  • Hofstede, G., & Bond, M. H. (1984). Hofstede’s culture dimensions an independent validation using rokeach’s value survey. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 15(4), 417–433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, G., & Hofstede, G. J. (2005). Culture and Organizations. Software of the Mind: Intercultural Cooperation and its Importance for Survival.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, G., Hofstede, G. J., & Minkov, M. (1991). Cultures and organisations-software of the mind: intercultural cooperation and its importance for survival. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoftede, G., Hofstede, G. J., & Minkov, M. (2010). Cultures and organizations: software of the mind: intercultural cooperation and its importance for survival. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • House, R. J., Hanges, P. J., Javidan, M., Dorfman, P. W., & Gupta, V. (Eds.). (2004). Culture, leadership, and organizations: The GLOBE study of 62 societies. Sage publications.

  • Hoyer, W. D., & Macinnis, D. J. (1997). Customer behavior.

  • Inglehart, R., & Baker, W. E. (2000). Modernization, cultural change, and the persistence of traditional values. American Sociological Review, 65, 19–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Isaac, R. M., & Norton, D. A. (2013). Endogenous institutions and the possibility of reverse crowding out. Public Choice, 156(1–2), 253–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ishii, K., Kim, H. S., Sasaki, J. Y., Shinada, M., & Kusumi, I. (2014). Culture modulates sensitivity to the disappearance of facial expressions associated with serotonin transporter polymorphism (5-HTTLPR). Culture and Brain, 2(1), 72–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kagitcibasi, C. (1997). Individualism and collectivism. Handbook of cross-cultural psychology, 3, 1–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kagitcibasi, C. (2013). Family, self, and human development across cultures: Theory and applications. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, L. B., Szybillo, G. J., & Jacoby, J. (1974). Components of perceived risk in product purchase: A cross-validation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 59(3), 287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kashima, Y., Yamaguchi, S., Kim, U., Choi, S. C., Gelfand, M. J., & Yuki, M. (1995). Culture, gender, and self: a perspective from individualism-collectivism research. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69(5), 925.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Keller, H. (2007). Cultures of infancy. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kemmelmeier, M., Jambor, E. E., & Letner, J. (2006). Individualism and good works cultural variation in giving and volunteering across the United States. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 37(3), 327–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, U. E., Triandis, H. C., Kâğitçibaşi, Ç. E., Choi, S. C. E., & Yoon, G. E. (1994). Individualism and collectivism: Theory, method, and applications. Sage Publications, Inc

  • Kitayama, S., Conway III, L. G., Pietromonaco, P. R., Park, H., & Plaut, V. C. (2010). Ethos of independence across regions in the United States: The production-adoption model of cultural change. American Psychologist, 65(6), 559.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kitayama, S., & Uskul, A. K. (2011). Culture, mind, and the brain: Current evidence and future directions. Annual Review of Psychology, 62, 419–449.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kleinhesselink, R. R., & Rosa, E. A. (1991). Cognitive representation of risk perceptions a comparison of Japan and the United States. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 22(1), 11–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knafo, A., Schwartz, S. H., & Levine, R. V. (2009). Helping strangers is lower in embedded cultures. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 40(5), 875–879.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kogan, N., & Wallach, M. A. (1964). Risk taking: A study in cognition and personality. New York: Holt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kotler, P. (1979). Strategies for introducing marketing into nonprofit organizations. The Journal of Marketing, 43, 37–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kramer, R. M. (1999). Trust and distrust in organizations: Emerging perspectives, enduring questions. Annual Review of Psychology, 50(1), 569–598.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kuhnen, C. M., & Chiao, J. Y. (2009). Genetic determinants of financial risk taking. PLoS ONE, 4, e4362.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Lancee, B., & Van de Werfhorst, H. G. (2012). Income inequality and participation: A comparison of 24 European countries. Social science research, 41(5), 1166–1178.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Leung, K., Bhagat, R. S., Buchan, N. R., Erez, M., & Gibson, C. B. (2005). Culture and international business: Recent advances and their implications for future research. Journal of International Business Studies, 36(4), 357–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • List, J. A. (2011). The market for charitable giving. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 25, 157–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Madden, K. M., & Scaife, W. A. (2008). Good times and philanthropy: Giving by Australia’s affluent.

  • Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98, 224–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meier, S. (2006). A survey of economic theories and field evidence on pro-social behavior.

  • Meier, S. (2006). The economics of non-selfish behaviour. Books.

  • Mitchell, V.-W. (1999). Consumer perceived risk: Conceptualizations and models. European Journal of Marketing, 33(1), 163–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, T. L., Griffin, K., Stewart, S. H., & Loba, P. (2004). ‘We Will Never Ever Forget…’: The Swissair Flight 111 Disaster and its Impact on Volunteers and Communities. Journal of Health Psychology, 9(2), 245–262.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mowen, J. C., & Sujan, H. (2005). Volunteer behavior: A hierarchical model approach for investigating its traits and functional motive antecedents. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 15(2), 170–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mullen, E., & Skitka, L. J. (2009). Comparing Americans’ and Ukrainians’ Allocations of Public Assistance The Role of Affective Reactions in Helping Behavior. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 40(2), 301–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Obradović, J., & Boyce, W. T. (2009). Individual differences in behavioral, physiological, and genetic sensitivities to contexts: Implications for development and adaptation. Developmental Neuroscience, 31(4), 300–308.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Omoto, A. M., & Snyder, M. (1993). AIDS volunteers and their motivations: Theoretical issues and practical concerns. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 4(2), 157–176.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Reitsma, J., Scheepers, P., & Grotenhuis, M. T. (2006). Dimensions of individual religiosity and charity: cross-national effect differences in European countries?. Review of Religious Research, 347-362.

  • Roodman, D., & Standley, S. (2006). Tax policies to promote private charitable giving in DAC countries. Center for Global Development Working Paper, 82.

  • Roselius, T. (1971). Consumer rankings of risk reduction methods. The Journal of Marketing, 35, 56–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, C. W., & Cho, H. (2003). A social network contagion theory of risk perception. Risk Analysis, 23(2), 261–267.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schiff, J. A. (1990). Charitable giving and government policy: An economic analysis (No. 102). Praeger Pub Text.

  • Schwartz, S. H. (1973). Normative explanations of helping behavior: A critique, proposal, and empirical test. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 9(4), 349–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shah, A. (2012). Uncertainty avoidance index and its cultural/country implications relating to consumer behavior. Journal of International Business Research, 11(1), 119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, B., Sturmer, S., & Steffens, K. (2000). Helping individuals or group members? The role of individual and collective identification in AIDS volunteers. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 497–506.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slovic, P. (1987). Perception of risk. Science, 236(4799), 280–285.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Slovic, P. (1991). Beyond numbers: A broader perspective on risk perception and risk communication. Acceptable evidence: Science and values in risk management, 48, e65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slovic, Paul Ed. The perception of risk. Earthscan publications, 2000.

  • Steinberg, R. (1990). Taxes and giving: New findings. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 1(2), 61–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stephan, W. G., & Stephan, C. W. (1985). Intergroup anxiety. Journal of social issues, 41, 157–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stoltenberg, S. F., Christ, C. C., & Carlo, G. (2013). Afraid to help: Social anxiety partially mediates the association between 5-HTTLPR triallelic genotype and prosocial behavior. Social Neuroscience, 8(5), 400–406.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stoltenberg, S. F., Lehmann, M. K., Anderson, C., Nag, P., & Anagnopoulos, C. (2011). Serotonin transporter (5-HTTLPR) genotype and childhood trauma are associated with individual differences in decision making. Frontiers in genetics2.

  • Stone, R. N., & Gronhaug, K. (1993). Perceived risk: Further considerations for the marketing discipline. European Journal of Marketing, 27, 39–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tansey, J., & O’riordan, T. (1999). Cultural theory and risk: a review. Health, Risk & Society, 1(1), 71–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Terry, D. J., & Hogg, M. A. (1996). Group norms and the attitude-behavior relationship: A role for group identification. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 776–793.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Triandis, H. C. (1995). Individualism & collectivism. Westview Press.

  • Triandis, H. C., Bontempo, R., Villareal, M. J., Asai, M., & Lucca, N. (1988). Individualism and collectivism: Cross-cultural perspectives on self-ingroup relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(2), 323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van de Vijver, F. J., Chasiotis, A., & Breugelmans, S. M. (Eds.). (2011). Fundamental questions in cross-cultural psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vandello, J. A., & Cohen, D. (1999). Patterns of individualism and collectivism across the United States. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(2), 279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vesterlund, L., Wilhelm, M., & Xie, H. (2008). Motives for charitable giving. Mimeo: University of Pittsburgh.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vishwanath, A. (2003). Comparing online information effects a cross-cultural comparison of online information and uncertainty avoidance. Communication Research, 30(6), 579–598.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Way, B. M., & Taylor, S. E. (2010). The serotonin transporter promoter polymorphism is associated with cortisol response to psychosocial stress. Biological Psychiatry, 67(5), 487–492.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, J. 2005. “Some things social surveys don’t tell us about volunteering”. In Processes of community change and social action, Edited by: Omoto, A.M. 11–28. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

  • Winterich, K. P., & Zhang, Y. (2014). Accepting inequality deters responsibility: How power distance decreases charitable behavior. Journal of Consumer Research, forthcoming, 41, 274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wymer, W. W, Jr, & Samu, S. (2002). Volunteer service as symbolic consumption: Gender and occupational differences in volunteering. Journal of Marketing Management, 18(9–10), 971–989.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the Science and Technology Service Network Initiative of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (KFJ-EW-STS-0880) and the Knowledge Innovation Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (KSCX2-EW-J-8).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ren Xiaopeng.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical standards

The manuscript does not contain clinical studies or patient data.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Stojcic, I., Kewen, L. & Xiaopeng, R. Does uncertainty avoidance keep charity away? comparative research between charitable behavior and 79 national cultures. Cult. Brain 4, 1–20 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40167-016-0033-8

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40167-016-0033-8

Keywords

Navigation