Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Assembling marine spatial planning in the global south: International agencies and the fate of fishing communities in India

  • 6 Accesses

Abstract

The language and practice of Marine spatial planning (MSP) is typically associated with state-led multi-sectoral planning efforts. Yet in countries like India, where the government is not yet promoting MSP, ocean space has already been divided using principles and practices that are characteristic of MSP elsewhere in the world. Instead of being initiated by the state, these MSP-like processes are initiated by international agencies when industries seek large-scale development of India’s marine ecosystems. Although intended as an inclusive, holistic process to plan industrial development, this assemblage of MSP technologies, processes, and practices mandated by international corporations produces a particular power relation through its rejection of local knowledge and insistence on data, for instance, in the form of discrete, geo-coded polygons. This paper argues that this form of MSP produces an ontological politics, despite emerging from seemingly rational, post-political, and technocratic processes. Engaging with such politics is increasingly possible with access to geographical information systems, and this, therefore, provides a novel space in which to engage in political struggle. The case of externally mandated MSP in India demonstrates that non-state actors can initiate MSP, and therefore, opens the possibility for fishing communities, as non-state actors, to directly engage with the assemblage of practices that produce MSP.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Notes

  1. 1.

    https://www.indiatoday.in/mail-today/story/india-norway-ink-mou-to-boost-blue-economy-1426724-2019-01-09

  2. 2.

    https://pib.gov.in/newsite/PrintRelease.aspx?relid=185994

  3. 3.

    https://www.voanews.com/south-central-asia/fishermen-turn-maps-indias-coasts-cleared-tourism-industry

References

  1. Balgos, M.C., Cicin-Sain, B., VanderZwaag, D.L., 2015. A Comparative Analysis ofOcean Policies in Fifteen Nations and Four Regions. In: Cicin-Sain, B.,VanderZwaag, D.L., Balgos, M.C. (Eds.), Routledge Handbook of National and Regional Ocean Policies. Routledge.

  2. Barbesgaard, M. 2017. Blue growth: savior or ocean grabbing?. The Journal of Peasant Studies 45 (1): 130–149.

  3. Bavinck, Maarten. 2003. The spatially splintered state: Myths and realities in the regulation of marine fisheries in Tamil Nadu, India. Development and Change 34 (4): 633–657.

  4. Bennett, Nathan James, Hugh Govan, and Terre Satterfield. 2015. Ocean grabbing. Marine Policy 57: 61–68.

  5. Boucquey, Noëlle, Luke Fairbanks, Kevin St Martin, Lisa M. Campbell, and Bonnie McCay. 2016. The ontological politics of marine spatial planning: Assembling the ocean and shaping the capacities of ‘community’and ‘environment’. Geoforum 75: 1–11.

  6. Boucquey, Noëlle, Kevin St Martin, Luke Fairbanks, Lisa M. Campbell, and Sarah Wise. 2019. Ocean data portals: Performing a new infrastructure for ocean governance. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 37 (3): 484–503.

  7. Chatterjee, Partha. 2004. The politics of the governed: Reflections on popular politics in most of the world. Columbia University Press. New York, NY.

  8. Collie, Jeremy S., Michael W. Beck, Bethany Craig, Timothy E. Essington, David Fluharty, Jake Rice, and James N. Sanchirico. 2013. Marine spatial planning in practice. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 117: 1–11.

  9. Commissioner of Fisheries. 2007. Gujarat Fisheries Statistics. https://cof.gujarat.gov.in/Images/commissioneroffisheries/pdf/statastic-information-new.pdf Accessed on 9th August 2019.

  10. Dineshbabu, A.P., Sujitha Thomas, Prathibha Rohit, and G. Maheswarudu. 2019. Marine spatial planning for resource conservation, fisheries management and for ensuring fishermen security–global perspectives and Indian initiatives. Current Science 116 (4): 561–567.

  11. Ehler, Charles. 2008. Conclusions: Benefits, lessons learned, and future challenges of marine spatial planning. Marine Policy 32 (5): 840–843.

  12. Ehler, C. N. (2018). Marine Spatial Planning: An Idea Whose Time Has Come. In Offshore Energy and Marine Spatial Planning. In K. Yates & C. Bradshaw (Eds.), Offshore Energy and Marine Spatial Planning (pp. 6–17). London: Routledge.

  13. Ehler, Charles, and Fanny Douvere. 2009. Marine spatial planning: A step-by-step approach toward ecosystem-based management. Intergovernmental oceanographic commission and man and the biosphere Programme. IOC Manual and Guides no. 53, ICAM Dossier no. 6. Paris: UNESCO.

  14. Fairbanks, Luke, Lisa M. Campbell, Noëlle Boucquey, and Kevin St. Martin. 2018. Assembling enclosure: Reading marine spatial planning for alternatives. Annals of the American Association of Geographers 108 (1): 144–161.

  15. Elwood, Sarah. 2006. Negotiating knowledge production: The everyday inclusions, exclusions, and contradictions of participatory GIS research. The Professional Geographer 58 (2): 197–208.

  16. Fairbanks, Luke, Noëlle Boucquey, Lisa M. Campbell, and Sarah Wise. 2019. Remaking oceans governance: Critical perspectives on marine spatial planning. Environment and Society 10 (1): 122–140.

  17. FAO. 2015. Voluntary guidelines for securing sustainable small-scale fisheries in the context of food security and poverty eradication. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.

  18. Flannery, Wesley, Noel Healy, and Marcos Luna. 2018. Exclusion and non-participation in marine spatial planning. Marine Policy 88: 32–40.

  19. Foley, Melissa M., Benjamin S. Halpern, Fiorenza Micheli, Matthew H. Armsby, Margaret R. Caldwell, Caitlin M. Crain, Erin Prahler, et al. 2010. Guiding ecological principles for marine spatial planning. Marine Policy 34 (5): 955–966.

  20. Franco, J., Buxton, N., Vervest, P., Feodoroff, T., Pedersen, C., Reuter, R., and Barbesgaard, M. C. 2014. The global ocean grab: A primer. Retrieved from the Economic Justice Program of the Transnational Institute website: http://www.tni.org/briefing/global-ocean-grab-primer-0.

  21. Frumkes, D.R. 2002. The status of the California rigs-to-reefs Programme and the need to limit consumptive fishing activities. ICES Journal of Marine Science 59: S272–S276.

  22. Gabriel, Oscar W. 2017. “Participation and Political Trust.” In Handbook on Political Trust, ed. by S. Zmerli and T. van der Meer, 228–241. Cheltenham / Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing.

  23. Government of India (1976) Territorial Waters, Continental Shelf, Exclusive Economic Zone and Other Maritime Zones Act http://nbaindia.org/uploaded/Biodiversityindia/Legal/19.%20Territorial%20Water,%20Continental%20Shelf,%20Exclusive%20Economic%20Zone%20and%20other%20Maritime%20Zones%20Act,%201976.pdf Accessed on 26th July 2019.

  24. Gupta, Akhil. 2012. Red tape. Durham: Duke University Press.

  25. Halpern, Benjamin S., Jordan Diamond, Steve Gaines, Stefan Gelcich, Mary Gleason, Simon Jennings, Sarah Lester, Amber Mace, Laurence McCook, Karen McLeod, Nicholas Napoli, Kit Rawson, Jake Rice, Andrew Rosenberg, Mary Ruckelshaus, Bettina Saier, Paul Sandifer, Astrid Scholz, Anna Zivian. 2012. Near-term priorities for the science, policy and practice of Coastal and Marine Spatial Planning (CMSP). Marine Policy 36 (1):198–205.

  26. Hazen, Helen D., and Leila Harris. 2006. Power of maps:(counter) mapping for conservation. ACME: An International E-Journal for Critical Geographies 4 (1): 99–130.

  27. Holm, Petter, and Kåre Nolde Nielsen. 2007. Framing fish, making markets: The construction of individual transferable quotas (ITQs). The Sociological Review 55 (2): 173–195.

  28. IFC. 2012a. Performance Standard 1. International Finance Corporation. https://www.ifc.org/wps/wcm/connect/3be1a68049a78dc8b7e4f7a8c6a8312a/PS1_English_2012.pdf?MOD=AJPERES Accessed 26th July 2019.

  29. IFC. 2012b. Guidance Note. International Finance Corporation. https://www.ifc.org/wps/wcm/connect/e280ef804a0256609709ffd1a5d13d27/GN_English_2012_Full-Document_updated_June-27-2019.pdf?MOD=AJPERES Accessed 26th July 2019.

  30. IFC. 2012c. Guidance Note 5 Land Acquisition and Involuntary Resettlement. International Finance Corporation. https://www.commdev.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/IFC-Guidance-Note-5-Land-Acquisition-and-Involuntary-Resettlement.pdf Accessed 26th July 2019.

  31. IFC. 2019. Guidance Note 6. International Finance Corporation. https://www.ifc.org/wps/wcm/connect/5e0f3c0c-0aa4-4290-a0f8-4490b61de245/GN6_English_June-27-2019.pdf?MOD=AJPERES&CVID=mKqG85z Accessed 26th July 2019.

  32. IL&FS 2009. Technical Guidance Manual. https://www.elaw.org/system/files/Offshore%20and%20Onshore.pdf Accessed 26th July 2019.

  33. Isaacs, M. 2019. Is the blue justice concept a human rights agenda?. PLAAS Policy Brief. Bellville: Institute for Poverty, land and agrarian studies.

  34. Jay, Stephen. 2010. Built at sea: Marine management and the construction of marine spatial planning. The Town Planning Review 81 (2): 173–192.

  35. Jones, Peter J.S., Louise Marie Lieberknecht, and Wanfei Qiu. 2016. Marine spatial planning in reality: Introduction to case studies and discussion of findings. Marine Policy 71: 256–264.

  36. Karnad, Divya. 2017a. Locating effective commons and community in Maharashtra State's fisheries, India Doctoral dissertation, Rutgers University-School of Graduate Studies, New Brunswick.

  37. Karnad, Divya. 2017b. Navigating customary law and state fishing legislation to create effective fisheries governance in India. Marine Policy 86: 241–246.

  38. Kidd, Sue, and Dave Shaw. 2014. The social and political realities of marine spatial planning: Some land-based reflections. ICES Journal of Marine Science 71 (7): 1535–1541.

  39. Kurien, John. 1995. Impact of joint ventures on fish economy. Economic and Political Weekly: 300–302.

  40. Kurien, John, and T.R. Thankappan Achari. 1990. Overfishing along Kerala coast: Causes and consequences. Economic and Political Weekly: 2011–2018.

  41. Ludden, David. 1993. Oriental Empericism: Transformations of colonial knowledge. In Orientalism and the postcolonial predicament: Perspectives on South Asia, ed. Breckenridge and van der veer. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

  42. Mackenzie, A.F.D. 2012. Places of Possibility: Property, Nature and Community Land Ownership. Chicester: Wiley-Blackwell.

  43. Maini Hemant and Budhraja Lipi. 2017. Ocean based blue economy: An insight into the SAGAR as the last growth frontier https://niti.gov.in/writereaddata/files/document_publication/Indian%20Ocean%20Region_v6%281%29.pdf accessed on 9th Aug 2019.

  44. Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas. 2017. Exploration and Production http://petroleum.nic.in/exploration-production/about-exploration-production Accessed on 9th August 2019.

  45. NFDB. 2018. Draft National Policy on Mariculture http://nfdb.gov.in/PDF/Draft%20National%20Policy%20on%20Mariculture%20NFDB%20-%20CMFRI%2028%20Sept.2018.pdf accessed on 9th august 2019.

  46. O’Sullivan, David. 2006. Geographical information science: Critical GIS. Progress in Human Geography 30 (6): 783–791.

  47. ONGC. 2019. History. https://www.ongcindia.com/wps/wcm/connect/en/about-ongc/history/ accessed on 9th august 2019.

  48. Peel, Deborah, and Greg M. Lloyd. 2004. The social reconstruction of the marine environment: Towards marine spatial planning? The Town Planning Review 75 (3): 359–378.

  49. Peluso, Nancy Lee. 1995. Whose woods are these? Counter-mapping forest territories in Kalimantan, Indonesia. Antipode 27 (4): 383–406.

  50. Rankin, William. 2016. After the map: Cartography, navigation, and the transformation of territory in the twentieth century. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

  51. Santos, C. F., Domingos, T., Ferreira, M. A., Orbach, M., and Andrade, F. 2014. How sustainable is sustainable marine spatial planning? Part II–The Portuguese experience. Marine Policy 49, 48–58.

  52. Shajahan, K.M. 1996. Deep Sea fishing policy: A critique. Economic and Political Weekly 31 (5): 263–266.

  53. Sieber, Renee. 2004. Rewiring for a GIS/2. Cartographica 39 (1): 25–40.

  54. Sievanen, Leila, Heather M. Leslie, Julia M. Wondolleck, Steven L. Yaffee, Karen L. McLeod, and Lisa M. Campbell. 2011. Linking top-down and bottom-up processes through the new US National Ocean Policy. Conservation Letters 4 (4): 298–303. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-263X.2011.00178.x.

  55. Sinha, Subir. 2012. Transnationality and the Indian Fishworkers' movement, 1960s–2000. Journal of Agrarian Change 12 (2–3): 364–389.

  56. Snyder, R., St. Martin, K. 2015. A fishery for the future: The Midcoast Fishermen’s Association and the work of economic being-in-common. In Making other worlds possible: Performing diverse economies, ed. G. Roelvink, K. St. Martin, and J. K. GibsonGraham, Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.

  57. St. Martin, Kevin. 2009. Toward a cartography of the commons: Constituting the political and economic possibilities of place. The Professional Geographer 61 (4): 493–507.

  58. St. Martin, K. 2020. “Framing Essay: The Diversity of Property,” In The Handbook of Diverse Economies, eds. Gibson-Graham, J.K. and K. Dombroski, pp. 271–282. Cheltenham: Edwad Elgar.

  59. Tafon, Ralph V. 2018. Taking power to sea: Towards a post-structuralist discourse theoretical critique of marine spatial planning. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space 36 (2): 58–273. https://doi.org/10.1177/2399654417707527.

  60. Trouillet, Brice, Lise Bellanger-Husi, Angelina El Ghaziri, Christine Lamberts, Elodie Plissonneau, and Nicolas Rollo. 2019. More than maps: Providing an alternative for fisheries and fishers in marine spatial planning. Ocean and Coastal Management 173: 90–103.

  61. Zacharaiah, P.U. (2010) Present and future scenario of Indian marine fisheries. http://www.cmfri.org.in/uploads_en/divisions/files/Present%20and%20future%20scenario%20of%20Indfian%20marine%20fisheries.pdf accessed on 9th august 2019.

Download references

Author information

Correspondence to Divya Karnad.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Karnad, D., St. Martin, K. Assembling marine spatial planning in the global south: International agencies and the fate of fishing communities in India. Maritime Studies (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40152-020-00164-4

Download citation

Keywords

  • Blue economy
  • Marine spatial planning
  • Community
  • Commons
  • Fishing territories
  • Ontological politics