Advertisement

Maritime Studies

, Volume 17, Issue 3, pp 241–251 | Cite as

Role of communities in fisheries management: “one would first need to imagine it”

  • Fikret Berkes
  • Prateep Kumar Nayak
Original Paper
  • 51 Downloads

Abstract

Are coastal communities relevant in fisheries management? Starting from what Svein Jentoft has had to say about the topic, we explore the idea that viable fishing communities require viable fish stocks, and viable fish stocks require viable fishing communities. To elaborate and expand on Jentoft’s arguments, first, we discuss values as a key attribute of communities that confer the ability to manage coastal resources. Turning to power, next we explore why fishing communities need to be empowered by having the opportunity to self-manage or co-manage resources. Third, regarding community viability, we make the argument that (1) rebuilding or maintaining viable fishing communities and fish stocks cannot succeed without first dealing with vulnerabilities, and that (2) the dimensions of vulnerability involve increase/decrease in well-being, better/poorer access to capitals, and building/losing resilience. The idea that healthy fishing communities and healthy fish stocks require one another implies a viable system that contains both, a social-ecological system view. The values embedded in communities enable them to manage resources. Thus, managers and policy makers need to imagine healthy fishing communities who take care of resources, and this positive image of communities is more likely than present policies to lead to viable fishing communities as well as viable fish stocks.

Keywords

Community Small-scale fisheries Values Images Power Vulnerability Resilience Social-ecological systems 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank the organizers of this special issue and two anonymous referees for their insightful and constructive comments.

Funding information

Berkes’ work has been supported by the Canada Research Chairs program (http://www.chairschaires.gc.ca). Nayak’s work has been supported by funding from the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council (SSHRC) of Canada.

References

  1. Acheson, J.M. 1981. Anthropology of fishing. Annual Review of Anthropology 10: 275–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Adger, W.N. 2006. Vulnerability. Global Environmental Change 16: 268–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Agrawal, A. 2003. Sustainable governance of common-pool resources. Annual Review of Anthropology 32: 243–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Armitage, D., C. Béné, A.T. Charles, D. Johnson, and E.H. Allison. 2012. The interplay of well-being and resilience in applying a social-ecological perspective. Ecology and Society 17 (4): 15.  https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-04940-170415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Armitage, D., A. Charles, and F. Berkes, eds. 2017. Governing the coastal commons. Communities, resilience and transformation. London and New York: Earthscan/Routledge.Google Scholar
  6. Bavinck, M., S. Jentoft, and J. Scholtens. 2018. Fisheries as social struggle: A reinvigorated social science research agenda. Marine Policy 94: 46–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bavinck, M., F. Berkes, A. Charles, A.C. Esteves Dias, N. Doubleday, P.K. Nayak, and M. Sowman. 2017. The impact of coastal grabbing on community conservation - a global reconnaissance. Maritime Studies 16: 8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bavinck, M., and V. Vivekanandan. 2017. Qualities of self-governance and wellbeing in the fishing communities of northern Tamil Nadu, India - the role of Pattinavar ur panchayats. Maritime Studies 16: 16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bebbington, A. 1997. New states, new NGOs? Crisis and transition among Andean rural development NGOs. World Development 25: 1755–1765.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bebbington, A. 1999. Capitals and capabilities: A framework for analysing peasant viability, rural livelihoods and poverty. World Development 27: 2021–2044.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Béné, C., L. Evans, D. Mills, S. Ovie, A. Raji, A. Tafida, A. Kodio, F. Sinaba, P. Morand, J. Lemoalle, and N. Andrew. 2011. Testing resilience thinking in a poverty context: Experience from the Niger River basin. Global Environmental Change 21: 1173–1184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Benessaiah, K., and R. Sengupta. 2014. How is shrimp aquaculture transforming coastal livelihoods and lagoons in Estero real, Nicaragua? The need to integrate social–ecological research and ecosystem-based approaches. Environmental Management 54: 162–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bennett, N.J., T.S. Whitty, E. Finkbeiner, J. Pittman, H. Bassett, S. Gelcich, and E.H. Allison. 2018. Environmental stewardship: A conceptual review and analytical framework. Environmental Management 61: 597–614.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-017-0993-2 (in press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Berkes, F. 2007. Understanding uncertainty and reducing vulnerability: Lessons from resilience thinking. Natural Hazards 41: 283–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Berkes, F. 2009. Evolution of co-management: Role of knowledge generation, bridging organizations and social learning. Journal of Environmental Management 90: 1692–1702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Berkes, F. 2011. Restoring unity: The concept of social-ecological systems. In World fisheries: A social-ecological analysis, ed. R.E. Ommer, R.I. Perry, K. Cochrane, and P. Cury, 9–28. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Berkes, F. 2015. Coasts for people. Interdisciplinary approaches to costal and marine resource management. New York and London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Berkes, F., and H. Ross. 2013. Community resilience: Toward an integrated approach. Society and Natural Resources 26: 5–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Berkes, F., and H. Ross. 2016. Panarchy and community resilience: Sustainability science and policy implications. Environmental Science & Policy 61: 185–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Bockstael, E., and F. Berkes. 2017. Using the capability approach to analyze contemporary environmental governance challenges in coastal Brazil. International Journal of the Commons 11: 799–822.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Brooks, N. 2003. Vulnerability, risk and adaptation: A conceptual framework. Working paper 38, Tyndall Center for Climate Change Research, Norwich, UK.Google Scholar
  22. Chuenpagdee, R. (ed.) 2011. World small-scale fisheries. Contemporary Visions. Eburon, Delft, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
  23. Cox, M., G. Arnold, and S. Villamayor Tomás. 2010. A review of design principles for community-based natural resource management. Ecology and Society 15 (4): 38 http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol15/iss4/art38/.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Coulthard, S. 2012. Can we be both resilient and well, and what choices do people have? Incorporating agency into the resilience debate from a fisheries perspective. Ecology and Society 17 (1): 4.  https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-04483-170104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Dearden, P., D. Emphandhu, S. Songpornwanich and A. Ruksapol 2017. Koh Pitak: A community-based environment and tourism initiative in Thailand. In: Governing the coastal commons (D. Armitage, A. Charles and F. Berkes, eds.). Earthscan/Routledge, London and New York, pp. 181–197.Google Scholar
  26. Eakin, H., X. Rueda, and A. Mahanti. 2017. Transforming governance in telecoupled food systems. Ecology and Society 22 (4): 32.  https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-09831-220432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. FAO. 2015. Voluntary guidelines for securing sustainable small-scale fisheries. Rome: Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations.Google Scholar
  28. Folke, C., T. Hahn, P. Olsson, and J. Norberg. 2005. Adaptive governance of social-ecological systems. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 30: 441–473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Frey, J.B. and F. Berkes 2017. Transformations of the reef, transformations of the mind: Marine aquarium trade in Bali, Indonesia. In: Governing the coastal commons (D. Armitage, A. Charles and F. Berkes, eds.). Earthscan/Routledge, London and New York, pp. 81–99.Google Scholar
  30. Grant, S., F. Berkes, and J. Brierley. 2007. Understanding the local livelihood system in resource management: The pelagic longline fishery in Gouyave, Grenada. Gulf and Caribbean Research 19: 113–122.Google Scholar
  31. Hanazaki, N., F. Berkes, C.S. Seixas, and N. Peroni. 2013. Livelihood diversity, food security and resilience among the Caiçara of coastal Brazil. Human Ecology 41: 152–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Huitric, M., C. Folke, and N. Kautsky. 2002. Development and government policies of the shrimp farming industry in Thailand in relation to mangrove ecosystems. Ecological Economics 40: 441–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Jentoft, S. 1999. Beyond the veil Samudra Report No 23: 3–6.Google Scholar
  34. Jentoft, S. 2000a. The community: A missing link of fisheries management. Marine Policy 24: 53–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Jentoft, S. 2000b. Legitimacy and disappointment in fisheries management. Marine Policy 24: 141–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Jentoft, S. 2005. Fisheries co-management as empowerment. Marine Policy 29: 1–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Jentoft, S. 2006. Beyond fisheries management: The phronetic dimension. Marine Policy 30: 671–680.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Jentoft, S. 2007. In the power of power: The understated aspect of fisheries and coastal management. Human Organisation 66: 426–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Jentoft, S. 2011. Roots and wings Samudra Report No 60: 17–22.Google Scholar
  40. Jentoft, S. 2014. Walking the talk: Implementing the international voluntary guidelines for securing sustainable small-scale fisheries. Maritime Studies 13: 16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Jentoft, S., and R. Chuenpagdee. 2009. Fisheries and coastal governance as a wicked problem. Marine Policy 33: 553–560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Jentoft, S., and R. Chuenpagdee. 2015. Interactive governance for small-scale fisheries. Global Reflections: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Jentoft, S., R. Chuenpagdee, A. Bundy, and R. Mahon. 2010. Pyramids and roses: Alternative images for the governance of fisheries systems. Marine Policy 34: 1315–1321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Jentoft, S., and A. Eide, eds. 2011. Poverty mosaics: Realities and prospects in small-scale fisheries. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  45. Jentoft, S., A. Eide, M. Bavinck, R. Chuenpagdee, and J. Raakjer. 2011. A better future: Prospects for small-scale fishing people. In Poverty mosaics: Realities and prospects in small-scale fisheries, ed. S. Jentoft and A. Eide, 451–469. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Jentoft, S., B.J. McCay, and D.C. Wilson. 1998. Social theory and fisheries management. Marine Policy 22: 423–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Johnson, D.S. 2006. Category, narrative and value in the governance of small-scale fisheries. Marine Policy 30: 747–756.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Johnson, D.S. 2018. The values of small-scale fisheries. In Social Wellbeing and the Values of Small-scale Fisheries, ed. D.S. Johnson, T.G. Acott, N. Stacey, and J. Urquhart, 1–21. Springer.Google Scholar
  49. Kelly, P.M., and W.N. Adger. 2000. Theory and practice in assessing vulnerability to climate change and facilitating adaptation. Climatic Change 47: 325–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Kooiman, J., M. Bavinck, S. Jentoft, and R. Pulin, eds. 2005. Fish for life: Interactive governance for fisheries. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.Google Scholar
  51. Liu, J., V. Hull, M. Batistella, R. DeFries, T. Dietz, F. Fu, T.W. Hertel, R.C. Izaurralde, E.F. Lambin, S. Li, L.A. Martinelli, W.J. McConnell, E.F. Moran, R. Naylor, Z. Ouyang, K.R. Polenske, A. Reenberg, G. de Miranda Rocha, C.S. Simmons, P.H. Verburg, P.M. Vitousek, F. Zhang, and C. Zhu. 2013. Framing sustainability in a telecoupled world. Ecology and Society 18 (2): 26.  https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-05873-180226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Loucks, L., F. Berkes, and A. Charles. 2017. Emergence of community science as a transformative process in port Mouton Bay, Canada. In Governing the coastal commons, ed. D. Armitage, A. Charles, and F. Berkes, 43–59. London and New York: Earthscan/Routledge.Google Scholar
  53. Manor, J. 1999. The political economy of decentralization. Washington DC: World Bank.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. McCay, B.J. 1998. Oyster wars and public trust. Property, law and ecology in New Jersey. University of Arizona Press, Tucson.Google Scholar
  55. McCay, B.J. 2008. The littoral and the liminal: Or why it is hard and critical to answer the question ‘who owns the coast’? Maritime Studies 7 (1): 7–30.Google Scholar
  56. McCay, B.J., and S. Jentoft. 1998. Market or community failure? Critical perspectives on common property research. Human Organization 57: 21–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. McGregor, A. 2008. Well-being, poverty and conflict. Briefing paper 1/08, ESRC Research Group on Wellbeing in Developing Countries, University of Bath, Bath, UK.Google Scholar
  58. Nayak, P.K. 2014. The Chilika lagoon social-ecological system: An historical analysis. Ecology and Society 19 (1): 1.  https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-05978-190101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Nayak, P.K. 2017. Fisher communities in transition: Understanding change from a livelihood perspective in Chilika lagoon, India. Maritime Studies 16: 13.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s40152-017-0067-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Nayak, P.K., and D. Armitage. 2018. Social-ecological regime shifts (SERS) in coastal systems. Ocean and Coastal Management 61: 84–95.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2018.04.020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Nayak, P.K., and F. Berkes. 2008. Politics of co-optation: Community forest management vs. joint forest management in Orissa, India. Environmental Management 41: 707–718.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-008-9088-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Nayak, P.K., and F. Berkes. 2010. Whose marginalisation? Politics around environmental injustices in India’s Chilika lagoon. Local Environment 15: 553–567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Nayak, P.K., and F. Berkes. 2011. Commonisation and decommonisation: Understanding the processes of change in Chilika lagoon, India. Conservation and Society 9 (2): 132–145.  https://doi.org/10.4103/0972-4923.83723.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Nayak, P.K., and F. Berkes. 2014. Linking global drivers with local and regional change: A social-ecological system approach in Chilika lagoon, Bay of Bengal. Regional Environmental Change 14 (6): 2067–2078.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-012-0369-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Nayak, P.K., and F. Berkes. 2018. Interplay between local and global: Change processes and small-scale fisheries. In Small-Scale Fisheries Governance: Transdisciplinary Analysis and Practices, ed. R. Chuenpagdee and S. Jentoft. Springer in press.Google Scholar
  66. Nayak, P.K., D. Armitage, and M. Andrachuk. 2016. Power and politics of social-ecological regime shifts in the Chilika lagoon, India and Tam Giang lagoon, Vietnam. Regional Environmental Change 16: 325–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Naylor, R.L., R.J. Goldburg, J.H. Primavera, N. Kautsky, M.C. Beveridge, J. Clay, C. Folke, J. Lubchenco, H. Mooney, and M. Troell. 2000. Effect of aquaculture on world fish supplies. Nature 405: 1017–1024.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Njaya, F., P. Donda, and C. Béné. 2012. Analysis of power in fisheries co-management: Experiences from Malawi. Society and Natural Resources. 25: 652–666.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Norris, F.H., S.P. Stevens, B. Pfefferbaum, K.F. Wyche, and R.L. Pfefferbaum. 2008. Community resilience as a metaphor, theory, set of capabilities, and strategy for disaster readiness. American Journal of Community Psychology 41: 127–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Ommer, R.E., and B. Neis. 2014. Introduction to the special feature on rebuilding fisheries and threatened communities. Ecology and Society 19 (3): 49.  https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-06960-190349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Ommer, R.E., R.I. Perry, G. Murray, and B. Neis. 2012. Social-ecological dynamism, knowledge, and sustainable coastal marine fisheries. Current Opinion on Environmental Sustainability 4: 316–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Ommer, R.E. and team. 2007. Coasts under stress. Restructuring and social-ecological health. McGill-Queen’s University Press, Montreal.Google Scholar
  73. Ostrom, E. 1990. Governing the commons. The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Österblom, H., J.-B. Jouffray, C. Folke, B. Crona, M. Troell, A. Merrie, and J. Rockström. 2015. Transnational corporations as ‘keystone actors’ in marine ecosystems. PLos ONE.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0127533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Perry, R.I., R.E. Ommer, M. Barange, S. Jentoft, B. Neis, and U.R. Sumaila. 2011. Marine social-ecological responses to environmental change and the impacts of globalization. Fish Fish 12: 427–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Robson, J.P., and P.K. Nayak. 2010. Rural out-migration and resource-dependent communities in Mexico and India. Popul Environ 32: 263–284.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11111-010-0121-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Raik, D.B., and A.L. Wilson. 2006. Planning in collaborative wildlife management: A critical perspective. J Environ Plan Manag 49: 321–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Raik, D.B., A.L. Wilson, and D.J. Decker. 2008. Power in natural resources management: An application of theory. Socity and Natural Resources 21: 729–739.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Scheffran, J., M. Brzoska, J. Kominek, P. Link, and J. Schilling. 2012. Climate change and violent conflict. Science 336: 869–871.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Scott, J. 2001. Power. Polity Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  81. Seixas, C.S., A.C. Esteves Dias, and R.R. de Feitas. 2017. Navigating from government-centralised management to adaptive co-management in a marine protected area, Paraty, Brazil. In Governing the coastal commons, ed. D. Armitage, A. Charles, and F. Berkes, 157–180. London and New York: Earthscan/Routledge.Google Scholar
  82. Sen, A. 1999. Development as freedom. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  83. Sen, A. 2013. The ends and means of sustainability. Journal of Human Development and Capabilities 14: 6–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Sinclair, P.R., and R.E. Ommer, eds. 2006. Power and restructuring: Canada’s coastal society and environment. St. John’s: ISER Books.Google Scholar
  85. Singleton, S., and M. Taylor. 1992. Common property, collective action and community. J Theor Polit 4: 309–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Sowman, M. 2017. Turning the tide: Strategies, innovation and transformative learning at the Olifants estuary, South Africa. In Governing the coastal commons, ed. D. Armitage, A. Charles, and F. Berkes, 25–42. London and New York: Earthscan/Routledge.Google Scholar
  87. Steneck, R.S., T.P. Hughes, J.E. Cinner, W.N. Adger, S.N. Arnold, et al. 2011. Creation of a gilded trap by the high economic value of the Maine lobster fishery. Conserv Biol 25: 904–912.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Walker, B., C.S. Holling, S.R. Carpenter, and A.P. Kinzig. 2004. Resilience, adaptability and transformability in social–ecological systems. Ecol Soc 9 (2): 5 http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol9/iss2/art5/print.pdf.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Weeratunge, N., C. Béné, R. Siriwardane, A. Charles, D. Johnson, E.H. Allison, P.K. Nayak, and M. Badjeck. 2014. Small-scale fisheries through the wellbeing lens. Fish Fish 15: 255–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Wolf, S., J. Hinkel, M. Hallier, A. Bisaro, D. Lincke, C. Ionescu, and R.J.T. Klein. 2013. Clarifying vulnerability definitions and assessments using formalisation. International Journal of Climate Change Strategies and Management 5 (1): 54–70.  https://doi.org/10.1108/17568691311299363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Natural Resources InstituteUniversity of ManitobaWinnipegCanada
  2. 2.School of Environment, Enterprise and DevelopmentUniversity of WaterlooWaterlooCanada

Personalised recommendations