Advertisement

Maritime Studies

, Volume 17, Issue 3, pp 263–273 | Cite as

Governance and governability: indigenous small-scale fisheries and autonomy in coastal Nicaragua

  • Miguel González
Original Paper

Abstract

This paper describes recent changes in the social and economic conditions of small-scale fisheries on the Caribbean Coast of Nicaragua. It examines these conditions in relation to governance challenges faced by indigenous peoples, for whom access to fisheries and tenure rights to land and waters are critical components of their livelihoods. The titling of large swaths of land under a collective property regime, combined with uncontrolled immigration by non-indigenous, campesino settlers, and the weakening of traditional forms of authority have generated a scenario where conflicts are frequent, while negotiation—when it occurs—often expresses historical injustice and power imbalances between the state and indigenous peoples. What institutional impediments currently affect the governability of indigenous, small-scale fisheries along the Caribbean Coast, and how can they be addressed? In order to answer this question, the paper examines three factors that influence the structural position of indigenous peoples with regard to fisheries: changes in tenure regimes, tensions between hierarchical versus decentralized governance modes, and the consequences of legally fragmented, “mosaic” governance patterns. The paper draws theoretical insights from the literature on interactive governance and legal pluralism to propose that in a scenario of contested entitlements, actions for improving self-governance and mobilizing agency offer potential for improving governability and respect for indigenous human rights.

Notes

Acknowledgments

In the preparation of this article, I acknowledge the valuable support of Aneesah Choudhry.

Funding information

Partial funding for this research was provided by the SSHRC small-research travel grant administered through York University.

References

  1. Anaya, S.J., and C. Grossman. 2002. The case of Awas Tingni v Nicaragua: a new step in the international law of indigenous peoples. Journal of International and Comparative Law 19 (1): 1–15.Google Scholar
  2. APIAN. 2017. Informe sobre la Situación de los Derechos Territoriales de los Pueblos Indígenas y Afrodescendientes de Nicaragua Nicaragua. Managua: Alianza de Pueblos Indígenas y Afrodescendientes de Nicaragua Managua: APIAN.Google Scholar
  3. Asamblea Nacional de Nicaragua. 2004. Ley de Pesca. Ley 489. La Gaceta Diario Oficial, Número 251, Managua, Nicaragua.Google Scholar
  4. Aswani, S. 1999. Common property models of sea tenure: a case study from the Roviana and Vonavona Lagoons, New Georgia, Solomon Islands. Human Ecology 27 (3): 417–453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Aylwin Oyarzún, J. 2014. Derechos políticos de los pueblos indígenas en Latinoamérica. Avances y desafíos. México: Tribunal Electoral del Poder Judicial de la Federación http://portal.te.gob.mx/sites/default/files/cuaderno_25_je.pdf. Accessed 2 June 2018.Google Scholar
  6. Banco Central de Nicaragua. 2017. Informe Anual 2017. Managua: Banco Central. Available at: https://www.bcn.gob.ni/publicaciones/periodicidad/anual/informe_anual/index.php.
  7. Baratt, D.M., and K. Van Meter. 2004. Decompression sickness in Miskito Indian divers: review of 229 cases. Aviat Space Environ Med 75 (4): 350–353.Google Scholar
  8. Barnutti Navarro, R. 2010. La Pesca y el Turismo como Alternativa para el Desarrollo Humano. Paper presented at the VIII Tourism Convention, Corn Island, Nicaragua, September 30th.Google Scholar
  9. Bavinck M, Chuenpagdee R, Jentoft S, Kooiman J (Eds): Governability of Fisheries and Aquaculture: Theory and Applications. Dordrecht: Springer; 2013.Google Scholar
  10. Cunningham, W. 2017. The open paths as an indigenous woman in the defense of the human and territorial rights of the indigenous peoples of the North Caribbean coast autonomous region. Paper presented at the Simposio sobre Memoria Social de la Autonomía Costeña, VI Congreso Centroamericano de Estudios Culturales, Managua: UCA, July 11-13.Google Scholar
  11. FAO. 2012. Voluntary guidelines on the responsible governance of tenure of land, fisheries and forests in the context of National Food Security. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. http://www.fao.org/docrep/016/i2801e/i2801e.pdf. Accessed 2 June 2018.
  12. FAO. 2015. Voluntary guidelines for supporting sustainable small-scale fisheries in the context of food security and poverty eradication. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. http://www.fao.org/3/a-i4356e.pdf. Accessed 2 June 2018.
  13. Finley-Brook, M. & Offen, K. 2009. Bounding the commons: land demarcation in northeastern Nicaragua. Bull Lat Am Res, 28 (3), 2009, 342–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Goeth, J. 2016. In Nicaragua, the latest zombie megaproject. Nacla, 05-20-2016. http://nacla.org/news/2016/05/20/nicaragua-latest-zombie-megaproject. Accessed 10 July 2018.
  15. González, M. 2008. Governing multi-ethnic societies in Latin America: regional autonomy, democracy and the state in Nicaragua, 1987–2007. Unpubl. PhD Dissertation, Graduate Programme in Political Science, York University, Toronto.Google Scholar
  16. González, M. 2016. The unmaking of self-determination: twenty-five years of regional autonomy in Nicaragua. Bulletin of Latin America Research 33 (3): 306–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. González, M. 2017. Beyond the small-scale fisheries guidelines: tenure rights and informed consent in indigenous fisheries of Nicaragua. In The small-scale fisheries guidelines: Global implementation, ed. S. Jentoft, R. Chuenpagdee, M.J. Barragán-Paladines, and N. Franz, 191–212. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. González, M 2018. “The Embrace of Liwa Mairin: Lobster Diving and Sustainable Livelihoods in the Nicaraguan Miskitu Coast” in Viability and Sustainability of Small-Scale Fisheries in Latin America and The Caribbean (Eds): Silvia Salas, Maria José Barragán-Paladines, & Ratana Chuenpagdee, MARE Publication Series, Vol. 19, New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  19. González, M. Forthcoming. Leasing communal lands…in ‘perpetuity’: post-titling scenarios on the Caribbean Coast of Nicaragua. In Indigenous Struggles for Autonomy: The Caribbean Coast of Nicaragua, ed. B. Luciano. New York: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  20. González, C., and S. Jentoft. 2011. MPA in labor: securing the Pearl Cays of Nicaragua. Environ Manag 47: 617–629.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gordon, E.T., G. Gurdian, and Ch. Hale. 2003. Rights, resources and the social memory of struggle: reflections on a study of indigenous and black communities land rights on Nicaragua’s Atlantic Coast. Hum Organ 62 (4): 369–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. INPESCA. 2008. Estrategia para el Desarrollo Sostenible de la Pesca Artesanal, la Seguridad Alimentaria y la Reduccion de la Pobreza de las Familias Vinculadas 2008–2015. Managua: INPESCA.Google Scholar
  23. INPESCA. 2016. Anuario Pesquero y Acuicola 2015. Managua: INPESCA.Google Scholar
  24. INPESCA. 2017. Cifras preliminares. Managua: INPESCA.Google Scholar
  25. Jentoft, S. 2007. Limits to governability? Institutional implications for ocean and coastal governance. Mar Policy 4: 360–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Jentoft, S. 2011. Legal pluralism and the governability of fisheries and coastal systems. The Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law 43 (64): 149–172.  https://doi.org/10.1080/07329113.2011.10756673.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Jentoft, S., and M. Bavinck. 2014. Interactive governance for sustainable fisheries: dealing with legal pluralism. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 11: 71–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Jentoft, S., and R. Chuenpagdee. 2015. 'Assessing Governability of Small-Scale Fisheries,' in Jentoft, Svein and Ratana Chuenpagdee (eds.) Interactive Governance for Small-Scale Fisheries, Pp. 17–35, Switzerland: Springer.Google Scholar
  29. Jentoft, S., H. Minde, and R. Nilsen. 2003. Indigenous peoples: resource management and global rights. Delft: Eburon Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  30. Jentoft, S., M. Bavinck, D. Johnson, and K.T. Thomson. 2009. Fisheries co-management and legal pluralism: how an analytical problem becomes an institutional one. Human Organization 68 (1): 27–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Jentoft, S., N. Stacey, J. Sunde, and M. González. Forthcoming. The small-scale fisheries of indigenous peoples: a struggle for secure tenure rights. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  32. Kooiman, J. 2008. Exploring the concept of governability. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice 10 (2): 171–190.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13876980802028107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kooiman, J. and M. Bavinck. 2013. Theorizing governability – the interactive governance perspective. In Governability of fisheries and aquaculture: theory and applications, eds M. Bavinck, R. Chuenpagdee, S. Jentoft, and J. Kooiman, 9–30. MARE Publication Series 7.Google Scholar
  34. Kooiman J, Bavinck M, Jentoft S, Pullin R (Eds): Fish for Life: Interactive Governance for Fisheries. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press; 2005.Google Scholar
  35. Larson, A.M., M.F. Soto, D. Mairena, E. Moreno, E. Mairena, and J. Mendoza-Lewis. 2016. The challenge of ‘territory’: weaving the social fabric of indigenous communities in Nicaragua’s northern Caribbean autonomous region. Bulletin of Latin American Research 35 (3): 322–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Lopes, P.F.M., G. Hallwass, A. Begossi, V.J. Isaac, M. Almeida, and S.A.M. Renato. 2018. The challenge of managing Amazonian small-scale fisheries in Brazi. In Viability and sustainability of small-scale fisheries in Latin America and the Caribbean, ed. S. Salas, M.J. Barragan-Paladines, and R. Chuenpagdee, 219–241. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  37. Nicaragua National Assembly. 1987. Statute of autonomy of the autonomous regions of the Atlantic Coast. La Gaceta 238, Managua: Nicaragua National Assembly.Google Scholar
  38. Nicaraguan National Assembly. 2009. Ley General del Instituto de Pesca y Acuicultura. Debates de Leyes, Managua: Asamblea Nacional. http://legislacion.asamblea.gob.ni/Diariodebate.nsf/76ed72912dd57e570625698c00773f5d/b45c5166c615c5ba062575e4005ebdf8?OpenDocument. Accessed July 15 2018.
  39. Ribot, J.C., and N.L. Peluso. 2003. A theory of access. Rural Sociology 68 (2): 153–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Sobreiro, T. 2015. Urban-rural livelihoods, fishing conflicts and indigenous movements in the middle Rio Negro region of the Brazilian Amazon. Bulletin Latin American Research 34: 53–69.  https://doi.org/10.1111/blar.12259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Stahler-Sholk, R. 1997. Structural adjustment and resistance. In The undermining of the Sandinista revolution, ed. G. Prevost and H.E. Vanden. New York: St. Martin Press.Google Scholar
  42. United Nations. 2007. United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples. https://www.un.org/development/desa/indigenouspeoples/declaration-on-the-rights-of-indigenouspeoples.html. Accessed 1 October 2018.
  43. URACCAN-Aprodin. 2017. Pueblos Originarios y Afro-descendientes de Nicaragua. Etnografia, Ecosistemas Naturales y Areas Protegidas. Managua: IBIS.Google Scholar
  44. von Benda-Beckmann F, von Benda-Beckmann K, Wiber M. 2006. The properties of property. In Changing Properties of Property (Eds): F von Benda-Beckmann, K von Benda-Beckmann, M Wiber, pp. 1–39. New York: Berghahn.Google Scholar
  45. Williamson, D., and G. Fonseca. 2007. Compendio estadístico de las regiones autónomas de la Costa Caribe de Nicaragua. Managua: CIDCA-UCA.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Social ScienceYork UniversityTorontoCanada

Personalised recommendations