Maritime Studies

, Volume 17, Issue 2, pp 163–175 | Cite as

Gender and marine protected areas: a case study of Danajon Bank, Philippines

  • Danika KleiberEmail author
  • Leila Harris
  • Amanda C. J. Vincent


In this paper, we examine the role of gender in community-based management of marine protected areas (MPAs) in the Central Philippines. MPAs are a common conservation and fisheries management tool in this area, but the relationship between gendered fishing practices and participatory MPA management is rarely considered. In this region, women and men’s fishing practices are often socially and ecologically distinct. MPAs are found in both intertidal and subtidal areas where women and men tend to fish respectively. Based on over 500 interviews in 12 fishing communities, MPAs were largely perceived to be a management tool for men’s fishing. Very few men and women reported a negative effect on their personal fishing or displacement from their fishing area. However, in two communities MPAs that had been in intertidal areas had either been moved or opened specifically to allow for gleaning. Women were less likely than men to report that the MPA had a positive effect on their fishing, but women and men recommended the MPA in equal numbers. Women and men reported attending MPA meetings, but women were less likely to describe active participation in MPA management such as decision making. This research adds to the larger body of work that considers gender and inequality to critically examine issues of power and exclusion in community-based resource management.


Gender Philippines Marine protected areas Small-scale fisheries Community-based management 


Funding information

D.K. received funding for this project from the World Wildlife Fund, The University of British Columbia Liu Institute, and the International Federation of University Women. This project also benefited from support by Guylian Chocolates Belgium and an anonymous donor through their partnerships for marine conservation with Project Seahorse.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflicts of interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.


  1. Agarwal, B. 2010. Gender and green governance: The political economy of women’s presence within and beyond community forestry. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Agrawal, A., and C.C. Gibson. 1999. Enchantment and disenchantment: The role of Community in Natural Resource Conservation. World Development 27: 629–649.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Alcala, A.C. 1998. Community-based coastal resource management in the Philippines: A case study. Ocean and Coastal Management 38: 179–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Andrew, N.L., C. Béné, S.J. Hall, E.H. Allison, S. Heck, and B.D. Ratner. 2007. Diagnosis and management of small-scale fisheries in developing countries. Fish and Fisheries 8: 227–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ashworth, J.S., R.F.G. Ormond, and H.T. Sturrock. 2004. Effects of reef-top gathering and fishing on invertebrate abundance across take and no-take zones. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 303: 221–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Aswani, S., and P. Weiant. 2004. Scientific evaluation in women’s participatory management: Monitoring marine invertebrate refugia in the Solomon Islands. Human Organization 63: 301–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Baker-Médard, M. 2017. Natural resources an international journal gendering marine conservation: The politics of marine protected areas and fisheries access. Society and Natural Resources 30: 723–737.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bates, D.M. 2010. lme4: Mixed-effects modeling with R. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  9. Benzoni, F., J.S. Ashworth, A.M. Addamo, F. Stefani, A. Mabrouk, and P. Galli. 2006. Artisanal fisheries and No-Take Zones in Nabq, Egypt: effects on molluscs and reef top benthic assemblages. Proceedings of 10th International Coral Reef Symposium, 1362–1367 Okinawa, Japan. June 28-July 2, 2004.Google Scholar
  10. Braun, V., and V. Clarke. 2008. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology 3: 37–41.Google Scholar
  11. Christie, P., N.B. Armada, A.T. White, A.M. Gulayan, and H.H.Y. de Dios. 2006. Coastal environmental and fisheries profile of Danajon Bank, Bohol, Philippines. Cebu City: Fisheries Improved for Sustainable Harvest (FISH) Project.Google Scholar
  12. Clabots, B.M. 2013. Gender dimensions of community-based management of marine protected areas in Siquijor, Philippines. Master of marine and environmnetal affairs thesis, University of Washington.Google Scholar
  13. Cohen, P.J., and S.J. Foale. 2013. Sustaining small-scale fisheries with periodically harvested marine reserves. Marine Policy 37: 278–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. D’Agnes, H., J. Castro, L. D’Agnes, and R. Montebon. 2005. Gender issues within the population-environment nexus in Philippines coastal areas. Coastal Management 33: 447–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Darling, E.S. 2014. Assessing the effect of marine reserves on household food security in Kenyan coral reef fishing communities. PLoS One 9: e113614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Di Ciommo, R.C., and A. Schiavetti. 2012. Women participation in the management of a marine protected area in Brazil. Ocean and Coastal Management 62: 15–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Eder, J.F. 2005. Coastal resource management and social differences in Philippine fishing communities. Human Ecology 33: 147–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fabinyi, M. 2012. Fishing for fairness: Poverty, morality and marine resource regulation in the Philippines, Asia-Pacific Environment Monograph 7. Canberra: ANU E Press.Google Scholar
  19. Fröcklin, S., M. de la Torre-Castro, L. Lindström, and N.S. Jiddawi. 2013. Fish traders as key actors in fisheries: Gender and adaptive management. Ambio 42: 951–962.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Fröcklin, S., M. De La Torre-Castro, E. Håkansson, A. Carlsson, M. Magnusson, and N.S. Jiddawi. 2014. Towards improved management of tropical invertebrate fisheries: Including time series and gender, ed Sebastian C. A. Ferse. PLoS One: 42:e91161. Scholar
  21. Gelman, A., and J. Hill. 2009. Data analysis using regression and multilevel/hierarchical models. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Ghuman, S.J., H.J. Lee, and H.L. Smith. 2006. Measurement of women’s autonomy according to women and their husbands: Results from five Asian countries. Social Science Research 35: 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Guieb, E.R. (2008) Community, marine rights, and sea tenure: A political ecology of marine conservation in two Bohol villages in central Philippines. Dissertation Abstracts International Section A: Humanities and Social Sciences 71, 629.Google Scholar
  24. Halpern, B.S., and R.R. Warner. 2002. Marine reserves have rapid and lasting effects. Ecology Letters 5: 361–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hilborn, R. 2004. When can marine reserves improve fisheries management? Ocean and Coastal Management 47: 197–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hockey, P.A.R., and A.L. Bosman. 1986. Man as an intertidal predator in Transkei: Disturbance, community convergence and Management of a Natural Food Resource. Oikos 46: 3–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Israel-Sobritchea, C. 1994. Gender roles and economic change in a fishing community in Central Visayas. In Fishers of the Visayas: Visayas maritime anthropological studies I: 1991–1993, ed. I. Ushijima and C.N. Zayas, 279–303. Quezon City: College of Social Sciences and Philosophy, University of the Philippines.Google Scholar
  28. Jameson, S.C., M.H. Tupper, and J.M. Ridley. 2002. The three screen doors: Can marine “protected” areas be effective? Marine Pollution Bulletin 44: 1177–1183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kleiber, D., L.M. Harris, and A.C.J. Vincent. 2014. Improving fisheries estimates by including women’s catch in the Central Philippines. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 71: 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kleiber, D., L.M. Harris, and A.C.J. Vincent. 2015. Gender and small-scale fisheries: A case for counting women and beyond. Fish and Fisheries 16: 547–562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kleiber, D., K. Frangoudes, H.T. Snyder, A. Choudhury, S.M. Cole, K. Soejima, C. Pita, A. Santos, C. McDougall, H. Petrics, and M. Porter. 2017. Promoting gender equity and equality through the small-scale fisheries guidelines: Experiences from multiple case studies. In The Small- Scale Fisheries Guidelines Global Implementation, ed. N. Jentoft, S. Chuenpagdee, R. Barragán-Paladines, M.J., and Franz, vol. Vol. 14, 737–759. Cham: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lowry, K., A.T. White, and C. Courtney. 2005. National and local agency roles in integrated coastal management in the Philippines. Ocean and Coastal Management 48: 314–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Martin-Smith, K., M.A. Samoilys, J.J. Meeuwig, and A.C.J. Vincent. 2004. Collaborative development of management options for an artisanal fishery for seahorses in the central Philippines. Ocean and Coastal Management 47: 165–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. McConney, P., and A.T. Charles. 2010. Managing small-scale fisheries: Moving toward people-centered perspectives. In Handbook of Marine Fisheries Conservation and Management, ed. R.Q. Grafton, R. Hilborn, D. Squires, M. Tait, and M.J. Williams, 532–545. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Overå, R. 1993. Wives and traders: Women’s careers in Ghanaian canoe fisheries. MAST Maritime Anthropological Studies 6: 110–135.Google Scholar
  36. Pajaro, M.G., M.E. Mulrennan, J. Alder, and A.C.J.J. Vincent. 2010. Developing MPA effectiveness indicators: Comparison within and across stakeholder groups and communities. Coastal Management 38: 122–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Pomeroy, R.S., L. Garces, M. Pido, and G. Silvestre. 2010. Ecosystem-based fisheries management in small-scale tropical marine fisheries: Emerging models of governance arrangements in the Philippines. Marine Policy 34: 298–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. R Development Core Team 2013 R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.Google Scholar
  39. Rajagopalan, R. 2008. Marine protected areas in India. Chennai: International collective in support of fishworkers.Google Scholar
  40. Resurreccion, B.P., and R. Elmhirst. 2008. Gender and natural resource management: Livelihoods, mobility and interventions. VA: Earthscan, London & Sterling.Google Scholar
  41. Revollo-Fernández, D., A. Aguilar-Ibarra, F. Micheli, and A. Sáenz-Arroyo. 2015. Exploring the role of gender in common-pool resource extraction: Evidence from laboratory and field experiments in fisheries. Applied Economics Letters: 1–9.Google Scholar
  42. Russ, G.R., and A.C. Alcala. 1999. Management histories of Sumilon and Apo Marine Reserves, Philippines, and their influence on national marine resource policy. Coral Reefs 18: 307–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Schwab, K., E.B. Eide, S. Zahidi, Y. Bekhouche, P. Padilla Ugarte, J. Camus, and P. Massoudi Samandari. 2014. The Global Gender Gap Report 2014, (Vol. http://rep). Geneva: World Economic Forum (WEF).Google Scholar
  44. Selgrath, J.C., D. Kleiber, and K.P. O’Donnell. 2014. Understanding tradeoffs in fishers decision making: Catch, distance, and safety influence where fishers fish. In Enhancing Stewardship in Small-Scale Fisheries: Practices and Perspectives, CERMES Technical Report No. 73, Barbados, ed. P. McConney, R. Medeiros, and M. Pena. Cave Hill Campus: Too Big To Ignore (TBTI) and Centre for Resource Management and Environmental Studies, The University of the West Indies.Google Scholar
  45. Selgrath, J.C., S. Gregel, and A.C.J. Vincent. 2018. Shifting gears: Diversification, intensification, and effort increases in small-scale fisheries (1950-2010). PLoS One 13: e0190232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Siar, S.V. 2003. Knowledge, gender, and resources in small-scale fishing: The case of Honda Bay, Palawan, Philippines. Environmental Management 31: 569–580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Smith, S.L. 2012. Toward inclusive co-management: Factors influencing stakeholder participation. Coastal Management 40: 327–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Sultana, P., and S. Abeyasekera. 2008. Effectiveness of participatory planning for community management of fisheries in Bangladesh. Journal of Environmental Management 86: 201–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Tekanene, M. 2006. The women fish traders of Tarawa, Kiribati. In Global Symposium on Gender and Fisheries: Seventh Asian Fisheries Forum, 1–2 December 2004, Penang, Malaysia, ed. P.-S. Choo, S.J. Hall, and M.J. Williams, 115–120. Penang: WorldFish Center.Google Scholar
  50. Thorburn, C. 2000. Changing customary marine resource management practice and institutions: The case of Sasi Lola in the Kei Islands, Indonesia. World Development 28: 1461–1479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Tindall, C., and K. Holvoet. 2008. From the Lake to the plate: Assessing gender vulnerabilities throughout the fisheries chain. Development 51: 205–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Turgo, N.N. 2014. Redefining and experiencing masculinity in a Philippine fishing community. Philippine Sociological Review 62: 7–38.Google Scholar
  53. Walker, B.L.E., and M.A. Robinson. 2009. Economic development, marine protected areas and gendered access to fishing resources in a Polynesian lagoon. Gender, Place and Culture 16: 467–484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Weeks, R., G.R. Russ, A.C. Alcala, and A.T. White. 2010. Effectiveness of marine protected areas in the Philippines for biodiversity conservation. Conservation Biology 24: 531–540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Wood, L.J., L. Fish, J. Laughren, and D. Pauly. 2008. Assessing progress towards global marine protection targets: Shortfalls in information and action. Oryx 42: 340–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Yasué, M., L. Kaufman, and A.C.J. Vincent. 2010. Assessing ecological changes in and around marine reserves using community perceptions and biological surveys. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems 20: 407–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Yater, L.R. 1982. The fisherman’s family: Economic roles of women and children. In Small scale fisheries of San Miguel Bay, Philippines: Social aspects of production and marketing, ICLARM Tech. Rep. No. 9, ed. C. Bailey, 42–50. Manila: International Center for Living Aquatic Resources Management.Google Scholar
  58. Zuur, A.F., E.N. Ieno, N. Walker, A.A. Saveliev, and G.M. Smith. 2009. Mixed effects models and extensions in ecology with R. New York: Springer New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Danika Kleiber
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Leila Harris
    • 3
  • Amanda C. J. Vincent
    • 3
  1. 1.The ARC Centre of Excellence for Coral Reef StudiesJames Cook UniversityTownsvilleAustralia
  2. 2.WorldFishBayan LepasMalaysia
  3. 3.The University of British ColumbiaVancouverCanada

Personalised recommendations