Advertisement

Maritime Studies

, Volume 17, Issue 2, pp 189–198 | Cite as

Indigenous women respond to fisheries conflict and catalyze change in governance on Canada’s Pacific Coast

  • Sarah Harper
  • Anne K. Salomon
  • Dianne Newell
  • Pauline Hilistis Waterfall
  • Kelly Brown
  • Leila M. Harris
  • U. Rashid Sumaila
Research

Abstract

While the agency of individuals has been identified as a key factor in triggering governance transformations in social-ecological systems, more research attention is needed on how the social position of the actors involved influences these processes of change. Here, we highlight how the unique position of Indigenous women in a recent fishery conflict brought strength to this resource struggle and led to changes in the management of Pacific herring (Clupea pallasii) on the Central Coast of British Columbia, Canada. Through 18 semi-structured interviews with Heiltsuk women and men involved in this fishery conflict, we identified important actions taken by women in the community, which contributed to advancing the preconditions for transformation of the existing governance system. Heiltsuk women took on key leadership roles, increasing social cohesion, facilitating the flow of information, and negotiating among those holding power and conflicting objectives. Viewed through the framework of transformative change in social-ecological systems, women demonstrated strategic agency in challenging colonial governance regimes and catalyzing change. We relate these findings to theoretical understandings of women in environmental justice movements and activism and underscore the importance of Indigenous women as agents of change in their communities and as important actors in fisheries governance transformations. These leadership roles must be recognized and supported to navigate towards natural resource sustainability and social justice, globally, as well as reconciliation for past injustices, nationally.

Keywords

Women Indigenous peoples Fishing rights Activism Governance transformations Reconciliation Pacific herring 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We are grateful for the guidance and support received from the Heiltsuk Integrated Resource Management Department on developing this project. This work would also not have been possible without the insights that were generously shared by Heiltsuk women and men over the course of this study. We would also like to thank all those who reviewed this paper and provided valuable feedback.

Authors’ contributions

The main author (SH) led this project from inception through to the analysis and writing of this manuscript. The second and third authors (AKS and DN) provided key guidance on developing this project and contributed significantly to the text while PW, KB, and LH made substantive intellectual contributions and RS provided analytic support and project oversight. All authors critically reviewed the text and agree with the analysis and conclusions.

Funding

This work was supported financially by the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada through a Canadian Graduate Doctoral Scholarship to SH and the OceanCanada Partnership led by RS and through a Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada Strategic Partnership Grant to AKS.

Compliance with ethical standards

This project was developed with the consent and ongoing input from the Heiltsuk Nation (i.e., from the Heiltsuk Integrated Management Department, the Heiltsuk Tribal Council, and the women and men who participated in this study). Ethics protocols were followed throughout this research, including those set forth by the Heiltsuk Nation, the University of British Columbia, and Simon Fraser University.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

  1. Agarwal, Bina. 2000. Conceptualising environmental collective action: why gender matters. Cambridge Journal of Economics 24: 283–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bell, Shannon Elizabeth, and Yvonne A. Braun. 2010. Coal, identity, and the gendering of environmental justice activism in central appalachia. Gender and Society 24: 794–813.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bennett, Nathan J., Maery Kaplan-Hallam, Gerry Augustine, Natalie Ban, Dyhia Belhabib, Irene Brueckner-Irwin, Anthony Charles, John Couture, Sondra Eger, Lucia Fanning, Paul Foley, Anne Marie Goodfellow, Larry Greba, Edward Gregr, Don Hall, Sarah Harper, Brandon Maloney, Jim McIsaac, Wanli Ou, Evelyn Pinkerton, Darren Porter, Richard Sparrow, Robert Stephenson, Allison Stocks, U. Rashid Sumaila, Tasha Sutcliffe, and Megan Bailey. 2018. Coastal and Indigenous community access to marine resources and the ocean: a policy imperative for Canada. Marine Policy 87: 186–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brown, F., and Y. K. Brown. 2009. Staying the course, staying alive: coastal First Nations fundamental truths: biodiversity, stewardship and sustainability. Victoria: Biodiversity BC.Google Scholar
  5. Escobar, Arturo. 2006. Difference and conflict in the struggle over natural resources: a political ecology framework. Development 49: 6–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Folke, Carl, Stephen R. Carpenter, Brian Walker, Marten Scheffer, and Terry Chapin. 2010. Resilience thinking: integrating resilience, adaptability and transformability. Ecology and Society 15: 20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Gelcich, Stefan, Terry P. Hughes, Per Olsson, Carl Folke, Omar Defeo, Miriam Fernández, and Simon Foale. 2010. Navigating transformations in governance of Chilean marine coastal resources. PNAS 107: 16794–16799.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Grey, Minnie. 2010. From the tundra to the boardroom to everywhere in between and the changing roles of Inuit women in the Arctic. In Indigenous Women and Feminism, ed. Cheryl Suzack, Shari M. Huhndorf, Jeanne Perreault, and Jean Barman, 21–28. Vancouver: UBC Press.Google Scholar
  9. Harris, Douglas. 2000. Territoriality, Aboriginal Rights, and the Heiltsuk spawn-on-kelp fishery. UBC Law Review 34: 195–238.Google Scholar
  10. Harris, Leila, Jyoti Phartiyal, Dayna Nadine Scott, and Megan Peloso. 2017. Women talking about water. Candian Women’s Studies 30: 15–22.Google Scholar
  11. John, Sonja. 2015. Idle No More-indigenous activism and feminism. Theory in Action 8: 38–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Jones, Russ, Catherine Rigg, and Evelyn Pinkerton. 2017. Strategies for assertion of conservation and local strategies for assertion of conservation and local management rights: a Haida Gwaii herring story. Marine Policy 80: 154–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kuokkanen, Rauna. 2011. From indigenous economies to market-based self-governance: a feminist political economy analysis. Canadian Journal of Political Science 2: 275–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Marshall, Catherine, and Gretchen B. Rossman. 2011. Designing qualitative research. Fifth. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
  15. Moore, Michele-lee, Ola Tjornbo, Elin Enfors, Corrie Knapp, Jennifer Hodbod, Jacopo A. Baggio, and Albert Norström. 2014. Studying the complexity of change: toward an analytical framework for understanding deliberate social-ecological transformations. Ecology and Society 19: 54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Newell, Dianne. 1997. Tangled webs of history: Indians and the Law in Canada’s Pacific Coast fisheries. 2nd printi. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
  17. Norman, Emma S. 2017. Standing up for inherent rights: the role of indigenous-led activism in protecting sacred waters and ways of life. Society and Natural Resources 30 (4): 537–553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Olsson, Per, Lance H. Gunderson, Steve R. Carpenter, Paul Ryan, Louis Lebel, Carl Folke, and C.S. Holling. 2006. Shooting the rapids: navigating transitions to adaptive governance of social-ecological systems. Ecology and Society 11: 18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Palmater, Pamela D. 2011. Stretched beyond human limits: death by poverty in First Nations. Canadian Review of Social Policy: 112–127.Google Scholar
  20. Pandolfelli, Lauren, Ruth Meinzen-Dick, and Stephan Dohrn. 2008. Gender and collective action: motivations, effectiveness and impact. Journal of International Development 20: 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Pardo, Mary. 1990. Mexican American women grassroots community activists: “ Mothers of East Los Angeles”. Frontiers: A Journal of Women Studies 11: 1–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Parisi, Laura, and Jeff Corntassel. 2007. In pursuit of self-determination: indigenous women’s challenges to traditional diplomatic spaces. Canadian Foreign Policy Journal 13: 81–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Polido, Laura, and Devon Peña. 1998. Environmentalism and positionality: the early pesticide campaign of the united farm workers’ organizing committee, 1965-71. Race, Class & Gender 6: 33–50.Google Scholar
  24. Sayers, Judith F., Kelly A. MacDonald, Jo-anne Fiske, Melonie Newell, Evelyn George, and Wendy Cornet. 2001. First Nations women, governance and the Indian Act: a collection of policy research reports. Ottawa: Status of Women Canada.Google Scholar
  25. Staeheli, Lynn. 2004. In Mapping women, making politics, ed. Eleonore Kofman and Linda Peake, 1st ed. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  26. Tsosie, Rebecca. 2010. Native women and leadership: an ethic of culture and relationship. In Indigenous Women and Feminism, ed. Cheryl Suzack, Shari M. Huhndorf, Jeanne Perreault, and Jean Barman, 29–42. Vancouver: UBC Press.Google Scholar
  27. Udel, Lisa J. 2001. Revision and resistance: the politics of native women’s motherwork. Frontiers: A Journal of Women’s Studies 22: 43–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. von der Porten, Suzanne, Dana Lepofsky, Deborah Mcgregor, and Jennifer Silver. 2016. Recommendations for marine herring policy change in Canada: aligning with Indigenous legal and inherent rights. Marine Policy 74: 68–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Walker, Brian, C.S. Holling, Stephen R. Carpenter, and Ann Kinzig. 2004. Resilience, adaptability and transformability in social – ecological systems. Ecology and Society 9: 5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Waterfall, Hilistis Pauline. 1993. Traditional roles of Heiltsuk women in collective decision-making. Waglisla: Report prepared for the Minister of Supply and Services and the Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples.Google Scholar
  31. Westermann, Olaf, Jacqueline Ashby, and Jules Pretty. 2005. Gender and social capital: the importance of gender differences for the maturity and effectiveness of natural resource management groups. World Development 33: 1783–1799.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Westley, Frances R., Ola Tjornbo, Lisen Schultz, Per Olsson, Carl Folke, Beatrice Crona, and Örjan Bodin. 2013. A theory of transformative agency in linked social-ecological systems. Ecology and Society 18: 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Whyte, Kyle Powys. 2014. Indigenous women, climate change impacts and collective action. Hypatia 29: 599–616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute for the Oceans and FisheriesUniversity of British ColumbiaVancouverCanada
  2. 2.Simon Fraser UniversityBurnabyCanada
  3. 3.Institute for the Oceans and Fisheries and Department of HistoryUniversity of British ColumbiaVancouverCanada
  4. 4.Heiltsuk Tribal CouncilBella BellaCanada
  5. 5.Heiltsuk Integrated Resource Management DepartmentBella BellaCanada
  6. 6.Institute for Resources, Environment, and Sustainability (IRES) and the Institute for Gender, Race, Sexuality, and Social JusticeUniversity of British ColumbiaVancouverCanada

Personalised recommendations