Maritime Studies

, Volume 17, Issue 2, pp 145–154 | Cite as

Women’s perspectives of small-scale fisheries and environmental change in Chilika lagoon, India

  • Fatima Noor Khan
  • Andrea M. Collins
  • Prateep Kumar Nayak
  • Derek Armitage


This article investigates the gendered implications of environmental change using case studies of two small-scale fishing communities in Chilika lagoon, India. We undertake an intersectional analysis that examines dynamics between groups of fisherwomen in relation to social-ecological change. We focus specifically on (1) fisherwomen’s perspectives about the key drivers of change (e.g., natural disasters and aquaculture) within the social and ecological system of Chilika lagoon; (2) how environmental change is impacting the livelihoods and coping responses of fisherwomen; and (3) how fisherwomen communities are adapting to the ongoing process of change, highlighting in particular the gendered dimensions of out-migration. Our findings demonstrate that fisherwomen’s roles and identities are not static and that the impacts of environmental change vary for different groups of fisherwomen. We find that gender intersects with caste, income, geographic location, age, and household membership to create heterogeneous experiences and knowledge that reflects the complexities associated with gender and environmental change. With specific regard to the increase in fisherwomen out-migrating, we show that responses and adaptations to environmental change have gender-differentiated impacts and challenges.


Small-scale fisheries Environmental change Chilika lagoon Out-migration Women 


  1. Adger, W.N., S. Agrawala, M.M.Q. Mirza, C. Conde, K. O’Brien, J. Pulhin, and K. Takahashi. 2007. Assessment of adaptation practices, options, constraints and capacity. Climate Change: 717–743.Google Scholar
  2. Ajibade, I., G. McBean, and R. Bezner-Kerr. 2013. Urban flooding in Lagos, Nigeria: patterns of vulnerability and resilience among women. Global Environmental Change 23 (6): 1714–1725.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Allison, E.H., and F. Ellis. 2001. The livelihoods approach and management of small-scale fisheries. Marine Policy 25 (5): 377–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barnett, J., and S. O’Neill. 2010. Maladaptation. Global Environmental Change 20 (2): 211–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Crenshaw, K. 1991. Mapping the margins: intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review 43: 1241–1299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cronin, A.A., A. Prakash, S. Priya, and S. Coates. 2014. Water in India: situation and prospects. Water Policy 16 (3): 425–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Datta, P.B., and R. Gailey. 2012. Empowering women through social entrepreneurship: case study of a women’s cooperative in India. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 36 (3): 569–587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Davis, K. 2008. Intersectionality as buzzword: a sociology of science perspective on what makes a feminist theory successful. Feminist Theory 9 (1): 67–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Demetriades, J., and E. Esplen. 2008. The gender dimensions of poverty and climate change adaptation. IDS Bulletin 39 (4): 24–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Elson, D. 1991. Male bias in the development process. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Feeny, D., F. Berkes, B.J. McCay, and J. Acheson. 1990. The tragedy of the commons: twenty-two years later. Human Ecology 18 (1): 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Habtezion, S. 2013. Overview of linkages between gender and climate change. In Policy brief. New York: United Nations Development Programme.Google Scholar
  13. Harding, S. 1992. Rethinking standpoint epistemology: what is “strong objectivity”? The Centennial Review 36 (3): 470437–470470.Google Scholar
  14. Loomis, D.K., and S.K. Paterson. 2014. Human dimensions indicators of coastal ecosystem services: a hierarchical perspective. Ecological Indicators 44: 63–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. MA. 2003. Ecosystems and human well-being: a framework for assessment. In Millennium ecosystem assessment. Washington: World Resources Institute/Island Press.Google Scholar
  16. McLeman, R., and B. Smit. 2006. Migration as an adaptation to climate change. Climatic Change 76 (1–2): 31–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Meinzen-Dick, R., C. Kovarik, and A. Quisumbing. 2014. Gender and sustainability. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 39: 29–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Mohanty, P.K., U.S. Panda, S.R. Pal, and P. Mishra. 2008. Monitoring and management of environmental changes along the Orissa coast. Journal of Coastal Research 24 (sp2): 13–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Narayanasamy, N., and M.P. Boraian. 2005. Participatory rural appraisal:(the experience of NGOs in South India). Delhi: Concept Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  20. Nayak, P. 2014. The Chilika lagoon social-ecological system: An historical analysis. Ecology and Society 19 (1): 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Nayak, P., and F. Berkes. 2011. Commonisation and decommonisation: understanding the processes of change in the Chilika lagoon, India. Conservation and Society 9 (2): 132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Nayak, P., and F. Berkes. 2012. Linking global drivers with local and regional change: a social-ecological system approach in Chilika Lagoon, Bay of Bengal. Regional Environmental Change 14 (6): 2067–2078.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Nayak, N., and A. Vijayan. 1996. Women first: report of the women in fisheries programme of ICSF in India. Volume 1. Women in fisheries Series No. 2, Samudra Dossier.Google Scholar
  24. Nayak, P., L. Oliveira, and F. Berkes. 2014. Resource degradation, marginalization, and poverty in small-scale fisheries: threats to social-ecological resilience in India and Brazil. Ecology and Society 19 (2): 73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Nelson, D.R., W.N. Adger, and K. Brown. 2007. Adaptation to environmental change: contributions of a resilience framework. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 32 (1): 395–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Ramsar. 2012. Annotated Ramsar List: India. Retrieved: March 16, 2015 from
  27. Rocheleau, D. E., B.P. Thomas-Slayter, and E. Wangari. 1996. Feminist political ecology: global issues and local experiences. London New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  28. Sekhar, N.U. 2004. Fisheries in Chilika lake: how community access and control impacts their management. Journal of Environmental Management 73 (3): 257–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Smit, B., and J. Wandel. 2006. Adaptation, adaptive capacity and vulnerability. Global Environmental Change 16 (3): 282–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Fatima Noor Khan
    • 1
  • Andrea M. Collins
    • 1
  • Prateep Kumar Nayak
    • 1
  • Derek Armitage
    • 1
  1. 1.University of WaterlooWaterlooCanada

Personalised recommendations