Journal of Advanced Ceramics

, Volume 5, Issue 3, pp 210–218 | Cite as

Superconducting parameter determination for (Co0.5Zn0.5Fe2O4) x /Cu0.5Tl0.5-1223 composite

  • M. Me. BarakatEmail author
  • N. Al-Sayyed
  • R. Awad
  • A. I. Abou-Aly
Open Access
Research Article


The addition of magnetic Co0.5Zn0.5Fe2O4 nanoparticles to the superconducting Cu0.5Tl0.5-1223 phase has been used to investigate the electrical resistivity behavior of the composite above the superconducting transition temperature T c. This was studied according to the opening of spin gap and fluctuation conductivity. The results indicated that the pseudogap temperature (T*) and superconducting fluctuation temperature (T scf) change by increasing the addition of Co0.5Zn0.5Fe2O4 nanoparticles. It was found that T* is related to hole carrier concentration P and it also depends on the antiferromagnetic fluctuation affected by magnetic nanoparticles. The excess-conductivity analysis showed four different fluctuation regions started from high temperature up to T c, and they were denoted by short wave (sw), two-dimensional (2D), three-dimensional (3D), and critical (cr) fluctuations. The crossover temperature between 3D and 2D (T 3D–2D) in the mean field region was decreased by increasing the addition of Co0.5Zn0.5Fe2O4 nanoparticles, in accordance with the decrease in T scf with x. The coherence length at 0 K along c-axis ξ c(0), effective layer thickness of the 2D system d, and inter-layer coupling strength J were estimated as a function of Co0.5Zn0.5Fe2O4 nanoparticle addition. Moreover, the thermodynamics, lower and upper critical magnetic fields, as well as critical current density have been calculated from the Ginzburg number N G. It was found that the low concentration of Co0.5Zn0.5Fe2O4 nanoparticles up to x = 0.08 wt% improves the superconducting parameters of Cu0.5Tl0.5-1223 phase. On the contrary, these parameters were deteriorated for (Co0.5Zn0.5Fe2O4) x /Cu0.5Tl0.5-1223 composite with x > 0.08 wt%.


Co0.5Zn0.5Fe2O4 nanoparticles Cu0.5Tl0.5-1223 phase pseudogap temperature fluctuation conductivity 


  1. [1]
    Tokiwa K, Tanaka Y, Iyo A, et al. High pressure synthesis and characterization of single crystals of CuBa2Ca3Cu4Oy superconductor. Physica C 1998, 298: 209–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    Takeuchi T, Iijima Y, Inoue K, et al. Effect of flat-roll forming on critical current density characteristics and microstructure of Nb3Al multifilamentary conductors. IEEE T Appl Supercon 1997, 7: 1529–1532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    Ihara H. New low anisotropic high-T c superconductors (Cu, Ag)Ba2Can−1CunO2n+4−y. In Advances in Superconductivity VII. Yamafuji K, Morishita T, Eds. Springer Japan, 1995: 255–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    Ihara H, Sekita Y, Tateai H, et al. Superconducting properties of Cu1−xTlx-1223 [Cu1−xTlx(Ba,Sr)2Ca2Cu3O10–y] thin films. IEEE T Appl Supercon 1999, 9: 1551–1554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    Khan NA, Sekita Y, Tateai F, et al. Preparation of biaxially oriented TlCu-1234 thin films. Physica C 1999, 320: 39–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    Aslamazove LG, Larkin AI. The influence of fluctuation pairing of electrons on the conductivity of normal metal. Phys Lett A 1968, 26: 238–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    Thompson RS. Microwave, flux flow, and fluctuation resistance of dirty type-II superconductors. Phys Rev B 1970, 1: 327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    Lawrence WE, Doniach S. Theory of layer structure superconductor. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Low-Temperature Physics. Kanda E, Ed. Keigaku, Tokyo, 1971: 361.Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    Hikami S, Larkin AI. Magnetoresistance of high temperature superconductors. Mod Phys Lett B 1988, 2: 693.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    Qasim I, Waqee-ur-Rehman M, Mumtaz M, et al. Role of anti-ferromagnetic Cr nanoparticles in CuTl-1223 superconducting matrix. J Alloys Compd 2015, 649: 320–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    Nadeem K, Hussain G, Mumtaz M, et al. Role of magnetic NiFe2O4 nanoparticles in CuTl-1223 superconductor. Ceram Int 2015, 41: 15041–15047.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    Hussain G, Jabbar A, Qasim I, et al. Activation energy and excess conductivity analysis of (Ag)x/CuTl-1223 nano-superconductor composites. J Appl Phys 2014, 116: 103911.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    Naqib SH. Effects of Zn on superconductivity, stripe order, and pseudogap correlations in YBa2(Cu1−yZny)3O7−δ. Physica C 2012, 476: 10–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    Emery VJ, Kivelson SA. Importance of phase fluctuations in superconductors with small superfluid density. Nature 1994, 374: 434–437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. [15]
    Chen Q, Kosztin I, Jankó B, et al. Pairing fluctuation theory of superconducting properties in underdoped to overdoped cuprates. Phys Rev Lett 1998, 81: 4708.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. [16]
    Chubukov AV, Schmalian J. Temperature variation of the pseudogap in underdoped cuprates. Phys Rev B 1998, 57: R11085.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. [17]
    Anderson PW. The ‘spin gap’ in cuprate superconductors. J Phys: Condens Matter 1996, 8: 10083.Google Scholar
  18. [18]
    Lee PA. Pseudogaps in underdoped cuprates. Physica C 1999, 317–318: 194–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. [19]
    Tallon JL, Loram JW. The doping dependence of T*—what is the real high-T c phase diagram? Physica C 2001, 349: 53–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. [20]
    Khurram AA, Khan NA, Mumtaz M. Intercomparison of fluctuation induced conductivity of Cu0.5Tl0.5Ba2Can−1CunO2n+4−y (n = 2, 3, 4) superconductor thin films. Physica C 2009, 469: 279–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. [21]
    Abou Aly AI, Ibrahim IH, Awad R, et al. Stabilization of Tl-1223 phase by arsenic substitution. J Supercond Nov Magn 2010, 23: 1325–1332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. [22]
    Koo JH, Cho G. The spin-gap in high T c superconductivity. J Phys: Condens Matter 2003, 15: L729.Google Scholar
  23. [23]
    Abou-Aly AI, Awad R, Ibrahim IH, et al. Excess conductivity analysis for Tl0.8Hg0.2Ba2Ca2Cu3O9−δ substituted by Sm and Yb. Solid State Commun 2009, 149: 281–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. [24]
    Naqib SH, Cooper JR, Tallon JL, et al. Doping phase diagram of Y1−xCaxBa2(Cu1−yZny)3O7−δ from transport measurements: Tracking the pseudogap below T c. Phys Rev B 2005, 71: 054502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. [25]
    Mohammadizadeh MR, Akhavan M. Pseudogap in Gd-based 123 HTSC. Physica B 2003, 336: 410–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. [26]
    Anderson PW. The resonating valence bond state in La2CuO4 and superconductivity. Science 1987, 235: 1196–1198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. [27]
    Lee PA, Nagaosa N, Ng T-K, et al. SU(2) formulation of the tJ model: Application to underdoped cuprates. Phys Rev B 1998, 57: 6003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. [28]
    François I, Jaekel C, Kyas G, et al. Influence of Pr doping and oxygen deficiency on the scattering behavior of YBa2Cu3O7 thin films. Phys Rev B 1996, 53: 12502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. [29]
    Emery VJ, Kivelson SA, Zachar O. Spin-gap proximity effect mechanism of high-temperature superconductivity. Phys Rev B 1997, 56: 6120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. [30]
    Presland MR, Tallon JL, Buckley RG, et al. General trends in oxygen stoichiometry effects on T c in Bi and Tl superconductors. Physica C 1991, 176: 95–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. [31]
    Ihara H, Tanaka K, Tanaka Y, et al. Mechanism of T c enhancement in Cu1−xTlx-1234 and -1223 system with T c > 130 K. Physica C 2000, 341–348: 487–488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. [32]
    Poddar A, Bandyopadhyay B, Chattopadhyay B. Effects of Co-substitution on superconductivity and transport in Tl2Ba2Ca1−xYx(Cu1−yCoy)2O8+δ. Physica C 2003, 390: 120–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. [33]
    Passos CAC, Passamai Jr. JL, Orlando MTD, et al. An investigation of T* behavior on (Hg,Re)-1223 system. Physica C 2007, 460–462: 1086–1087.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. [34]
    Hohenberg PC, Halperin BI. Theory of dynamic critical phenomena. Rev Mod Phys 1977, 49: 435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. [35]
    Lobb CJ. Critical fluctuations in high-T c superconductors. Phys Rev B 1987, 36: 3930.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. [36]
    Rahim M, Khan NA. Suppressed phonon density and Para conductivity of Cd doped Cu0.5Tl0.5Ba2Ca3Cu4−yCdyO12−δ (y = 0, 0.25, 0.5, 0.75) superconductors. J Alloys Compd 2012, 513: 55–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. [37]
    Bardeen J, Cooper LN, Schrieffer JR. Theory of superconductivity. Phys Rev 1957, 108: 1175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. [38]
    Khurram AA, Khan NA. A search for a low anisotropic superconductor. J Electromagnetic Analysis & Applications 2010, 2: 63–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. [39]
    Geru II, Ghilan ZI, Dihor IT, et al. Moldavian Journal of the Physical Sciences 2002, N2: 53.Google Scholar
  40. [40]
    Snezhko A, Prozorov T, Prozorov R. Magnetic nanoparticles as efficient bulk pinning centers in type-II superconductors. Phys Rev B 2005, 71: 024527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. [41]
    Abou-Aly AI, Awad R, Kamal M, et al. Excess conductivity analysis of (Cu0.5Tl0.5)-1223 substituted by Pr and La. J Low Temp Phys 2011, 163: 184–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Tsinghua University Press and Springer-Verlag Gmbh 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. Me. Barakat
    • 1
    Email author
  • N. Al-Sayyed
    • 2
  • R. Awad
    • 2
  • A. I. Abou-Aly
    • 1
  1. 1.Physics Department, Faculty of ScienceAlexandria UniversityAlexandriaEgypt
  2. 2.Physics Department, Faculty of ScienceBeirut Arab UniversityBeirutLebanon

Personalised recommendations