Skip to main content

Normalized evaluation of thermal shock resistance for ceramic materials

Abstract

A normalized method for evaluation of thermal shock resistance for ceramic materials was proposed. A thermal shock resistance index (TSRI), Г, in the range of 1 to 100, was introduced, based on a normalized formula obtained directly by a simple testing process of determining the changes in flexural strength before and after thermal shock cycles. Alumina ceramic was chosen as the model material and its thermal shock behavior was investigated systematically by water quenching. Based on the experiments on alumina ceramic, the thermal shock behaviors of other 19 types of ceramic materials ranging from porcelain, refractory ceramics to advanced ceramics including structural and functional ceramics were also evaluated, and their TSRIs, Γ, were derived. The dependence of Г on the coefficient of thermal expansion (CTE) of the materials was plotted, and it revealed that CTE is the most critical factor in affecting the thermal shock resistance for various ceramic materials. The effect of other factors such as porosity and fracture toughness on the index was also discussed.

References

  1. [1]

    Schneibel JH, Sabol SM, Morrison J, et al. Cyclic thermal shock resistance of several advanced ceramics and ceramic composites. J Am Ceram Soc 1998, 81: 1888–1892.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. [2]

    Katz RN. High-temperature structural ceramics. Science 1980, 208: 841–847.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. [3]

    Schneider GA. Thermal shock criteria for ceramics. Ceram Int 1991, 17: 325–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. [4]

    Kingery WD, Bowen HK, Uhlmann DR. Introduction to Ceramics, 2nd ed. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1976: 817–830.

    Google Scholar 

  5. [5]

    Wang H, Singh RN. Thermal shock behaviour of ceramics and ceramic composites. Int Mater Rev 1994, 39: 228–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. [6]

    Tite MS, Kilikoglou V, Vekinis G. Strength, toughness and thermal shock resistance of ancient ceramics, and their influence of technological choice. Archaeometry 2001, 43: 301–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. [7]

    Soboyejo WO, Mercer C, Schymanski J, et al. Investigation of thermal shock in a high-temperature refractory ceramic: A fracture mechanics approach. J Am Ceram Soc 2001, 84: 1309–1314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. [8]

    Federer JI, Tiegs TN. Analysis of candidate silicon carbide recupurator materials exposed to industrial furnace environments. In Ceramics in Heat Exchangers. Columbus: American Ceramic Society, 1985, 14: 315–334.

    Google Scholar 

  9. [9]

    Atkinson A, Barnett S, Gorte RJ, et al. Advanced anodes for high temperature fuel cells. Nat Mater 2004, 3: 17–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. [10]

    Vedula VR, Green DJ, Hellmann JR, et al. Test methodology for the thermal shock characterization of ceramics. J Mater Sci 1998, 33: 5427–5432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. [11]

    Colombo P. Ceramic foams: Fabrication, properties and applications. Key Eng Mater 2002, 206-213: 1913–1918.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. [12]

    Bao YW, Wang XH, Zhang HB, et al. Thermal shock behavior of Ti3AlC2 from between 200 °C and 1300 °C. J Eur Ceram Soc 2005, 25: 3367–3374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. [13]

    Gupta TK. Strength degradation and crack propagation in thermal shocked Al2O3. J Am Ceram Soc 1972, 55: 249–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. [14]

    Hasselman DPH. Strength behavior of polycrystalline alumina subjected to thermal shock. J Am Ceram Soc 1970, 53: 490–495.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. [15]

    Kingery WD. Factors affecting thermal stress resistance of ceramic materials. J Am Ceram Soc 1955, 38: 3–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. [16]

    Hasselman DPH. Thermal stress resistance parameters for brittle refractory ceramics: A compendium. Am Ceram Soc Bull 1970, 49: 1033–1037.

    Google Scholar 

  17. [17]

    Hasselman DPH. Unified theory of thermal shock fracture initiation and crack propagation in brittle ceramics. J Am Ceram Soc 1969, 52: 600–604.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. [18]

    Swain MV. R-curve behavior and thermal shock resistance of ceramics. J Am Ceram Soc 1990, 73: 621–628.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. [19]

    Rendtorff N, Garrido L, Aglietti E. Mullite-zirconia-zircon composites: Properties and thermal shock resistance. Ceram Int 2009, 35: 779–786.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. [20]

    Lu TJ, Fleck NA. The thermal shock resistance of solids. Acta Mater 1998, 46: 4755–4768.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. [21]

    Pettersson P, Johnsson M, Shen Z. Parameters for measuring the thermal shock of ceramic materials with an indentation-quench method. J Eur Ceram Soc 2002, 22: 1883–1889.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. [22]

    Maensiri S, Roberts SG. Thermal shock of ground and polished alumina and Al2O3/SiC nanocomposites. J Eur Ceram Soc 2002, 22: 2945–2956.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. [23]

    Andersson T, Rowcliffe DJ. Indentation thermal shock test for ceramics. J Am Ceram Soc 1996, 79: 1509–1514.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. [24]

    Boccaccini DN, Romagnoli M, Kamseu E, et al. Determination of thermal shock resistance in refractory materials by ultrasonic pulse velocity measurement. J Eur Ceram Soc 2007, 27: 1859–1863.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. [25]

    Boccaccini AR, Janczak-Rusch J, Pearce DH, et al. Assessment of damage induced by thermal shock in silicon carbide fiber reinforced borosilicate glass composites. Compos Sci Technol 1998, 59: 105–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. [26]

    ASTM International. ASTM C1525-04 Standard test method for determination of thermal shock resistance for advanced ceramics by water quenching. 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  27. [27]

    British Standards Institution. European Standard EN820-3 Determination of resistance to thermal shock by water quenching. 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  28. [28]

    Evans JRG, Stevens R, Tan SR. Thermal shock of β-alumina with zirconia additions. J Mater Sci 1984, 19: 4068–4076.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lucun Guo.

Additional information

This article is published with open access at Springerlink.com

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits use, duplication, adaptation, distribution, and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, K., Wang, D., Chen, H. et al. Normalized evaluation of thermal shock resistance for ceramic materials. J Adv Ceram 3, 250–258 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40145-014-0118-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40145-014-0118-9

Keywords

  • thermal shock resistance
  • evaluation
  • ceramic materials
  • flexural strength