Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Musculoskeletal Issues and Care for Pregnant and Postpartum Women

  • Women's Health Rehabilitation (S Bennis and C Fitzgerald, Section Editors)
  • Published:
Current Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose of Review

This paper seeks to review the important musculoskeletal issues that arise for pregnant and postpartum women. It outlines the background, diagnosis, and management of these musculoskeletal issues; reviews the existing and recent literature; and offers clinical opinions from the perspective of women’s health PM&R physicians.

Recent Findings

Existing and recent literature on pelvic girdle pain, lumbosacral back pain, pubic symphysis separation, transient osteoporosis, rectus diastasis, and postpartum neuropathy offer some new insights on management, which is often context-dependent. Management requires individualized physical therapy and precautions for delivery and postpartum. Emerging alternatives like acupuncture for pelvic girdle pain (PGP) and surgical reconstruction for diastasis recti abdominis (DRA) may be considered.

Summary

The various musculoskeletal pathologies that occur in the peripartum period can produce significant disability for women. With timely diagnosis and treatment, however, these musculoskeletal issues are often transient in nature and do not result in long-term functional deficits.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance

  1. Kovacs FM, Garcia E, Royuela A, González L, Abraira V, Spanish Back Pain Research Network. Prevalence and factors associated with low back pain and pelvic girdle pain during pregnancy: a multicenter study conducted in the Spanish National Health Service. Spine. 2012;37(17):1516–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Vleeming A, Albert HB, Östgaard HC, Sturesson B, Stuge B. European guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of pelvic girdle pain. Eur Spine J. 2008;17(6):794–819. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-008-0602-4.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Albert H, Godskesen M, Westergaard J. Evaluation of clinical tests used in classification procedures in pregnancy-related pelvic joint pain. Eur Spine J. 2000;9(2):161–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s005860050228.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Elden H, Ostgaard HC, Fagevik-Olsen M, Ladfors L, Hagberg H. Treatments of pelvic girdle pain in pregnant women: adverse effects of standard treatment, acupuncture and stabilising exercises on the pregnancy, mother, delivery and the fetus/neonate. BMC Complement Altern Med. 2008;8:34. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6882-8-34.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Gausel AM, Malmqvist S, Andersen K, Kjærmann I, Larsen JP, Dalen I, et al. Subjective recovery from pregnancy-related pelvic girdle pain the first 6 weeks after delivery: a prospective longitudinal cohort study. Eur Spine J. 2020;29:556–63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-020-06288-9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Ronchetti I, Vleeming A, van Wingerden JP. Physical characteristics of women with severe pelvic girdle pain after pregnancy: a descriptive cohort study. Spine. 2008;33(5):E145–51. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181657f03.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Stuge B, Laerum E, Kirkesola G, Vøllestad N. The efficacy of a treatment program focusing on specific stabilizing exercises for pelvic girdle pain after pregnancy: a randomized con-trolled trial. Spine. 2004;29(4):351–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Szkwara JM, Milne N, Hing W, Pope R. Effectiveness, feasibility, and acceptability of dynamic elastomeric fabric orthoses (DEFO) for managing pain, functional capacity, and quality of life during prenatal and postnatal care: a systematic review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019;16(13). doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16132408.

  9. Quintero Rodriguez C, Troynikov O. The effect of maternity support garments on alleviation of pains and discomforts during pregnancy: a systematic review. J Pregnancy. 2019;2019:1–21. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/2163790.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. •• Nicolian S, Butel T, Gambotti L, Durand M, Filipovic-Pierucci A, et al. Cost-effectiveness of acupuncture versus standard care for pelvic and low back pain in pregnancy: a randomized controlled trial. PLoS One. 2019;14(4):e0214195. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0214195 A multicenter RCT that demonstrated acupuncture improved disability scores and health care costs for patients with pelvic girdle and low back pain.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. • Vas J, Cintado MC, Aranda-Regules JM, Aguilar I, Rivas RF. Effect of ear acupuncture on pregnancy-related pain in the lower back and posterior pelvic girdle: a multicenter randomized clinical trial. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2019;98(10):1307–17. https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.13635Two weeks of ear acupuncture treatment by midwives reduced lumbar and pelvic pain and functional disability.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. LaBan MM, Perrin JC, Latimer FR. Pregnancy and the herniated lumbar disc. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1983;64:319–21.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Mousavi SJ, Parnianpour M, Vleeming A. Pregnancy related pelvic girdle pain and low back pain in an Iranian population. Spine. 2007;32:E100–4. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000254123.26649.6e.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. LaBan MM, Rapp NS, von Oeyen P, Meerschaert JR. The lumbar herniated disk of pregnancy: a report of six cases identified by magnetic resonance imaging. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1995;76(5):476–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0003-9993(95)80582-6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. De Santis M, Di Gianantonio E, Straface G, Cavaliere AF, Caruso A, et al. Ionizing radiations in pregnancy and teratogenesis: a review of literature. Reprod Toxicol. 2005;20:323–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reprotox.2005.04.004.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Snow RE, Neubert AG. Peripartum pubic symphysis separation: a case series and review of the literature. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 1997;52(7):438–43. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006254-199707000-00023.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Yoo JJ, Ha YC, Lee YK, Hong JS, Kang BJ, Koo KH. Incidence and risk factors of symptomatic peripartum diastasis of pubic symphysis. J Korean Med Sci. 2014;29(2):281–6. https://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2014.29.2.281.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Schoellner C, Szöke N, Siegburg K. Pregnancy-associated symphysis damage from the orthopedic viewpoint—studies of changes of the pubic symphysis in pregnancy, labor and post partum. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb. 2001;139(5):458–62. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2001-17991.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Hagen R. Pelvic girdle relaxation from an orthopaedic point of view. Acta Orthop Scand. 1973;45(4):550–63. https://doi.org/10.3109/17453677408989178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Desmond FA, Harmon D. Ultrasound-guided symphysis pubis injection in pregnancy. Anesth Analg. 2010;111(5):1329–30. https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0b013e3181f4814c.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Leadbetter RE, Mawer D, Lindow SW. Symphysis pubis dysfunction: a review of the literature. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2004;16(6):349–54. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767050400018247.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Herren C, Sobottke R, Dadgar A, Ringe MJ, Graf M, Keller K, et al. Peripartum pubic symphysis separation—current strategies in diagnosis and therapy and presentation of two cases. Injury. 2015;46(6):1074–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2015.02.030.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Owens K, Pearson A, Mason G. Symphysis pubis dysfunction—a cause of significant obstetric morbidity. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2002;105(2):143–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0301-2115(02)00192-6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Phupong V, Sudjai D. Vaginal delivery with intrapartum pubic symphysis separation: a case report. J Reprod Med. 2003;48(4):296–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Sahan I, De Deken J, Anagnostakos K. Bilateral femoral neck fracture in a postpartum woman: beware of the risk factors. Case Rep Orthop. 2019;2019:1–4. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/4134351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Cohen A, Kamanda-Kosseh M, Dempster DW, Zhou H, Müller R, Goff E, et al. Women with pregnancy and lactation-associated osteoporosis (PLO) have low bone remodeling rates at the tissue level. J Bone Miner Res. 2019;34(9):1552–61. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbmr.3750.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Hadji P, Boekhoff J, Hahn M, Hellmeyer L, Hars O, Kyvernitakis I. Pregnancy-associated transient osteoporosis of the hip: results of a case-control study. Arch Osteoporos. 2017;12(1):11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11657-017-0310-y.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Kovacs CS, Ralston SH. Presentation and management of osteoporosis presenting in association with pregnancy or lactation. Osteoporos Int. 2015;26(9):2223–41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-015-3149-3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Ishikawa K, Nagai T, Kuroda T, Kudo Y, Toyone T, et al. Fracture management and current concepts related to pregnancy-associated osteoporosis. Clin Calcium. 2019;29(1):78–84 CliCa19017884.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Asadipooya K, Graves L, Greene LW. Transient osteoporosis of the hip: review of the literature. Osteoporos Int. 2017;28(6):1805–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-017-3952-0.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Speziali A, Tei MM, Placella G, Chillemi M, Cerulli G. Postpartum sacral stress fracture: an atypical case report. Case Rep Orthop. 2015;2015:1–4. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/704393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Kartal E, Sahin E, Dilek B, Baydar M, Manisali M, et al. Regional migratory osteoporosis: case report of a patient with neuropathic pain 2011;31(10):1375–81. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-009-1256-1.

  33. • Arayssi TK, Tawbi HA, Usta IM, Hourani MH. Calcitonin in the treatment of transient osteoporosis of the hip. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2003;32(6):388–97. https://doi.org/10.1053/sarh.2002.50014Case report of two patients who received calcitonin for transient osteoporosis of pregnancy.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Willis-Owen CA, Daruka JS, Chen A, Lewis A. Bilateral femoral neck fractures due to transient osteoporosis of pregnancy: a case report 2008;1(1):120. doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/1757-1626-1-120.

  35. Ergin T, Selam B, Lembet A, Öztürk HB, Damlacık A, et al. Transient osteoporosis of pregnancy: case report. J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc. 2010;11(3):163–4. https://doi.org/10.5152/jtgga.2010.27.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Wang Q, Yu X, Chen G, Sun X, Wang J. Does diastasis recti abdominis weaken pelvic floor function? A cross-sectional study. Int Urogynecol J. 2020;31:277–83. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-019-04005-9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. • Sperstad JB, Tennfjord MK, Hilde G, Ellström-Engh M, Bø K. Diastasis recti abdominis during pregnancy and 12 months after childbirth: prevalence, risk factors and report of lumbopelvic pain. Br J Sports Med. 2016;50(17):1092–6. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2016-096065This prospective cohort study of 300 first-time pregnant women in Norway showed prevalence of mild DRA to be high both during pregnancy and after childbirth.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Candido G, Lo T, Janssen PA. Risk factors for diastasis of the recti abdominis. J Assoc Chart Physiother Womens Health. 2005;97:49–54.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Keshwani N, McLean L. Ultrasound imaging in postpartum women with diastasis recti: intrarater between-session reliability. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2015;45(9):713–8. https://doi.org/10.2519/jospt.2015.5879.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Benjamin DR, van de Water AT, Peiris CL. Effects of exercise on diastasis of the rectus abdominis muscle in the antenatal and post-natal periods: a systematic review. Physiotherapy. 2014;100(1):1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physio.2013.08.005.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Kamel DM, Yousif AM. Neuromuscular electrical stimulation and strength recovery of postnatal diastasis recti abdominis muscles. Ann Rehabil Med. 2017;41(3):465–74. https://doi.org/10.5535/arm.2017.41.3.465.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. • Gluppe SL, Hilde G, Tennfjord MK, Engh ME, Bø K. Effect of a postpartum training program on the prevalence of diastasis recti abdominis in postpartum primiparous women: a randomized controlled trial. Phys Ther. 2018;98(4):260–8 This study of 175 primiparous women, randomized to either an exercise or a control group, found that weekly, postpartum, supervised exercise program did not reduce prevalence of diastasis.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. • Lee D, Hodges PW. Behavior of the linea alba during a curl-up task in diastasis rectus abdominis: an observational study. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2016;46(7):580–9. https://doi.org/10.2519/jospt.2016.6536This study investigated the reduction of inter-rectus distance (IRD) narrowing before a curl up, and while narrowing of IRD may be reduced, the transversus abdominis activation before a curl up may positively influence abdominal mechanics.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Olsson A, Kiwanuka O, Wilhelmsson S, Sandblom G, Stackelberg O. Cohort study of the effect of surgical repair of symptomatic diastasis recti abdominis on abdominal trunk function and quality of life. BJS Open. 2019;3(6):750–8. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs5.50213.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Wong CA, Scavone BM, Dugan S, Smith JC, Prather H, Ganchiff JN, et al. Incidence of postpartum lumbosacral spine and lower extremity nerve injuries. Obstet Gynecol. 2003;101(2):279–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0029-7844(02)02727-8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sarah K. Hwang.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Women's Health Rehabilitation

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Choo, H.J., Hwang, S.K. & Hynes, C.K. Musculoskeletal Issues and Care for Pregnant and Postpartum Women. Curr Phys Med Rehabil Rep 8, 493–500 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40141-020-00286-0

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40141-020-00286-0

Keywords

Navigation