Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

The Comparability and Utility of Perioperative Mortality Rates in Global Health

  • Global Health Anesthesia (M Prin, Section Editor)
  • Published:
Current Anesthesiology Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose of Review

To examine the comparability and utility of perioperative mortality rate (POMR) as a key global surgery metric and the added potential for mortality review to drive continuous quality improvement.

Recent Findings

There is a wide variation in the perioperative mortality rate (POMR) reported between countries, even for the three Bellwether procedures (emergency laparotomy, emergency caesarean section, management of an open fracture) and other common procedures. Clinical registries such as the National Emergency Laparotomy Audit target high-mortality procedures. Nationally, administrative databases may be used to adjust for risk factors such as age, urgency, socio-economic status and ethnicity, as well as regional variation. To improve care, clinical governance requires practitioner, peer and multidisciplinary review of all avoidable deaths attributable to surgical disease. Appropriately messaged, POMR is a useful metric for health stakeholders and informative for National Surgical, Obstetric and Anaesthesia Plan (NSOAP).

Summary

The combination of a national database background reporting POMR and clinical governance through local peer and case review of individual mortalities is essential for improving perioperative care.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance

  1. World Health Organisation. Safe surgery saves lives program. 2009 https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/44185/9789241598552_eng.pdf;jsessionid=5F9EFBF648C4D4DD6C63B3A3F8E57C8F?sequence=1https://www.who.int/patientsafety/safesurgery/en/

  2. Haynes AB, Weiser TG, Berry WR, Lipsitz SR, Breizat AH, Dellinger EP, et al. A surgical safety checklist to reduce morbidity and mortality in a global population. Safe Surgery Saves Lives Study Group. N Engl J Med. 2009;360(5):491–9.

  3. Weiser TG, Makary MA, Haynes AB, Dziekan G, Berry WR. Gawande A and the Safe Surgery Saves Lives Measurement and Study Groups. Lancet. 2009;374:113–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. • Watters DA, Hollands MJ, Gruen RL, et al. Perioperative mortality rate (POMR): a global indicator of access to safe surgery and anaesthesia. World J Surg. 2015;39(4):856–64 Provides the background to POMR, the rationale for its use in global health at the time of the Lancet Commission of Global Surgery and major factors for risk adjustment.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Walker IA, Wilson IH. Measuring perioperative mortality: the key to improvement. Anesthesiology. 2017 Aug;127(2):215–6. https://doi.org/10.1097/ALN.0000000000001714.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. • Meara JG, Leather AJ, Hagander L, Alkire BC, Alonso N, Ameh EA, et al. Global Surgery 2030: evidence and solutions for achieving health, welfare, and economic development. Lancet. 2015;386(9993):569–624 This is the original Lancet Commission of Global Surgery report that provides the rationale for the recommended six global surgery metrics including POMR.

  7. World Health Organisation (2015) 100 Core Health Indicators https://www.who.int/healthinfo/indicators/2015/en/

  8. World Health Organisation (2018) 100 Core Health Indicators https://www.who.int/healthinfo/indicators/100CoreHealthIndicators_2018_infographic.pdf?ua=1

  9. World Health Organisation. Strengthening emergency and essential surgical care and anaesthesia as a component of universal health coverage. http://apps.who.int/gb/ebwha/pdf_files/WHA68/A68_R15-en.pdf (last accessed 5th October 2020).

  10. World Health Organization. World Health Assembly Resolution 70.22: Progress in the implementation of the 2030 agenda for sustainable development. Seventieth World Health Assembly. http://apps.who.int/gb/ebwha/pdf_files/WHA70/A70_35-en.pdf. (last accessed 5th October 2020).

  11. Suzuki E. The Global Surgery Indicators and World Bank’s World Development Indicators (WDI). PGSSC Dubai 2019 Conference on National Surgical Obstetric and Anaesthesia Planning. https://6cde3faa-9fe6-4a8d-a485-408738b17bc2.filesusr.com/ugd/d9a674_c064066307e440c5bbf620a04364855a.pdf (last accessed 29th September 2020).

  12. Ariyaratnam R, Palmqvist CL, Hider P, et al. Toward a standard approach to measurement and reporting of perioperative mortality rate as a global indicator for surgery. Surgery. 2015;158:17–26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Palmqvist CL, Ariyaratnam R, Watters DA, et al. Monitoring and evaluating surgical care: defining perioperative mortality rate and standardising data collection. Lancet. 2015;385(Suppl 2):S27.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Perioperative Mortality Review Committee. Fifth report of the perioperative mortality review committee, POMRC 20156. Wellington: Health Quality and Safety Commission New Zealand. https://www.hqsc.govt.nz/assets/POMRC/Publications/POMRC-fifth-report-Jun-2016.pdf (last accessed 5th October 2020).

  15. Perioperative Mortality Review Committee. Perioperative Mortality in New Zealand: Sixth Report of the Perioperative Mortality Review Committee. Available at: https://www.hqsc.govt.nz/assets/POMRC/Publications/POMRC_6th_Report_2017.pdf (last accessed 5th October 2020).

  16. • POMRC 2019. Perioperative Mortality in New Zealand: Eighth report of the Perioperative Mortality Review Committee. Wellington: Health Quality & Safety Commission. https://www.hqsc.govt.nz/our-programmes/mrc/pomrc/ (last accessed 5th October 2020). The New Zealand POMRC has been a leader in national POMR reporting for all procedures and for a basket of procedures. This report addresses disparity in socio-economic advantage and ethnicity as well as emergency laparotomy outcomes in New Zealand with a difference in outcomes for Maoris and non-Maoris.

  17. Watters DA, Babidge WJ, Kiermeier A, McCulloch GA, Maddern GJ. Perioperative mortality rates in Australian public hospitals: the influence of age, gender and urgency. World J Surg. 2017;41:650–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. • Kiermeier A, Babidge WJ, McCulloch GAJ, Maddern GJ, Watters DA, Aitken RJ. National surgical mortality audit may be associated with reduced mortality after emergency admission. ANZ J Surg. 2017;87:830–6 National surgical mortality audit that involves case and peer review is associated with reduced mortality after emergency surgery, responsible for 85% of perioperative mortality in Australia. This review shows declining POMR for different states and territories and includes cases treated in both the public and the private sectors.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. •• Truche P, Roa L, Citron I, Caddell L, Neto J, Reis M, et al. Bellwether procedures for monitoring subnational variation of all-cause perioperative mortality in Brazil. World J Surg. 2020;44(10):3299–309. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-020-05607-xThis is a recent national database report that compares overall POMR with Bellwether POMR for all regions of Brazil. It demonstrates a correlation in an upper-middle-income country between all POMR and both emergency laparotomy and open long bone fracture POMR.

  20. Massenburg BB, Saluja S, Jenny HE, Raykar NP, Ng-Kamstra J, Guilloux AGA, Scheffer MC, Meara JG, Alonso N, Shrime MG. Assessing the Brazilian surgical system with six surgical indicators: a descriptive and modelling study. BMJ Glob Health. 2017 May 18;2(2):e000226. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2016-000226. PMID: 28589025; PMCID: PMC5444087.

  21. Harris I, Madan A, Naylor J, Chong S. Mortality rates after surgery in New South Wales. ANZ J Surg. 2012;82:871–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Saunders DI. Murray D, Pichel AC, Varley S, Peden CJ; UK Emergency Laparotomy Network. Variations in mortality after emergency laparotomy: the first report of the UK Emergency Laparotomy Network. Br J Anaesth. 2012;109:368–75.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. •• Global Surgery Collaborative. Mortality of emergency abdominal surgery in high-, middle- and low-income countries. Br J Surg. 2016;103:971–988. This is a multicentre global contribution on emergency laparotomy outcomes and provides baseline rates. If the POMR for emergency laparotomy can be halved by introducing emergency laparotomy audit either nationally or locally, this provides the quantitative basis for what might be achieved.

  24. Tan BHL, Mytton J, Al-Khyatt W, et al. A comparison of mortality following emergency laparotomy between populations from New York State and England. Ann Surg. 2017;266:280–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Puzianowska-Kuznicka M, Walicka M, Osinska B, Rutkowski D, Gozdowski D, Czech M, et al. In-hospital mortality in a 4-year cohort study of 3,093,254 operations in seniors. World J Surg. 2016;40(5):1068–74. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-015-3400-2.

  26. Dripps RD, Lamont A, Eckenhoff JE. The role of anesthesia in surgical mortality. JAMA. 1961;178:261–6. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1961.03040420001001.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Charlson ME, Pompei MF, Ales KL, et al. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis. 1987;40:373–83.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Elixhauser A, Steiner C, Harris DR, et al. Comorbidity measures for use with administrative datasets. Med Care. 1998;36:8–27.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. •• Ng-Kamstra JS, Arya S, Greenberg SLM, Kotagal M, Arsenault C, Ljungman D, et al. Perioperative mortality rates in low-income and middle-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Glob Health. 2018;3(3):e000810. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2018-000810Though the systematic review is dated by reporting papers published 2009-2014, the authors have presented the median and range of POMR for LMICs by procedures. This is an invaluable source of information for procedures that might be used in a basket.

  30. • Wurdeman T, Strader C, Alidina S, Barash D, Citron I, Kapologwe N, et al. In-Hospital Postoperative mortality rates for selected procedures in Tanzania’s Lake Zone. World J Surg. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-020-05802-w Epub ahead of print. PMID: 32995932. Recent level 1 hospital experience of POMR reporting over 2 years: the overall average in-hospital non-obstetric postoperative mortality rate for all surgery procedures was 2.62%. The postoperative mortality rates for laparotomy and caesarean delivery were 3.92% and 0.24%, respectively. The study did report risk factors but was underpowered to show a POMR difference in the introduction of Safe Surgery 2020.

  31. Anderson GA, Ilcisin L, Abesiga L, et al. Surgical volume and postoperative mortality rate at a referral hospital in Western Uganda: measuring the Lancet Commission on Global Surgery indicators in low-resource settings. Surgery. 2017;161:1710–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. POMRC 2018. Perioperative Mortality in New Zealand. Seventh report of the Perioperative Mortality Review Committee. Wellington: Health Quality & Safety Commission https://www.hqsc.govt.nz/assets/POMRC/Publications/POMRCSeventhReport2018WEB.pdf (last accessed 5th October 2020).

  33. Hanna JS, Herrera-Almario GE, Pinilla-Roncancio M, Tulloch D, Valencia SA, Sabatino ME, et al. Use of the six core surgical indicators from the Lancet Commission on Global Surgery in Colombia: a situational analysis. Lancet Glob Health. 2020;8(5):e699–710. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(20)30090-5.

  34. Biccard BM, Madiba TE, Kluyts HL, et al. Perioperative patient outcomes in the Africa Surgical Outcomes Study: a 7-day prospective observational cohort study. Lancet. 2018;391:1589–98.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. United Republic of Tanzania. Ministry of Health, Community Development, Gender, Elderly and Children. National Surgical, Obstetric and Anaesthesia Plan 2018–2025. https://6cde3faa-9fe6-4a8d-a485-408738b17bc2.filesusr.com/ugd/d9a674_4daa353b73064f70ab6a53a96bb84ace.pdf (last accessed 29th September 2020).

  36. Davies JF, Lenglet A, van Wijhe M, Ariti C. Perioperative mortality: analysis of 3 years of operative data across 7 general surgical projects of Médecins Sans Frontières in Democratic Republic of Congo, Central African Republic, and South Sudan. Surgery. 2016 May;159(5):1269–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2015.12.022.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Republic of Rwanda. National Surgical, Obstetric and Anaesthesia Plan 2018–2024. https://6cde3faa-9fe6-4a8d-a485-408738b17bc2.filesusr.com/ugd/d9a674_c5c36059456a416480fd58fd553ef302.pdf (last accessed 29th September 2020).

  38. • Guest GD, McLeod E, William WRG, et al. Collecting data for global surgical metrics: a collaborative approach in the Pacific region. BMJ Glob Health. 2017;2:e000376.doi:https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2017-000376. This is the first regional reporting of POMR and other global surgical metrics and included 14 Pacific nations including Australia and New Zealand.

  39. Surgical Systems Strengthening. Developing National Surgical, Obstetric and Anaesthesia Plans. https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/255566/9789241512244-eng.pdf;jsessionid=18C660995269E9DD8E08F1FD50739B15?sequence=1 (last accessed 24th September 2020).

  40. •• Watters DA, Tangi V, Guest GD, McCaig E, Maoate K. Advocacy for global surgery: a Pacific perspective. ANZ J Surg. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1111/ans.15972This describes how POMR can be used along with other metrics in advocacy and how the Pacific region (Oceania) has progressed global surgery and the metrics over the past 7–8 years. It identifies the collaboration between professional bodies, ministries of health and local champions (see reference 87) that have led to a region-wide agreement to develop national surgical plans.

  41. Arya S, Ng-Kamstra J, Meara JG. Tracking perioperative mortality and maternal mortality: challenges and opportunities. Lancet Global Health. 2016;4:e440–1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Inbasegaran K, Kandasami P, Sivalingam N. A 2-year audit of perioperative mortality in Malaysian hospitals. Med J Malaysia. 1998 Dec;53(4):334–42.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. • O'Neill KM, Greenberg SL, Cherian M, Gillies RD, Daniels KM, Roy N, et al. Bellwether Procedures for monitoring and planning essential surgical care in low- and middle-income countries: caesarean delivery, laparotomy, and treatment of open fractures. World J Surg. 2016;40(11):2611–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-016-3614-yThis is the classic paper showing the correlation of being able to perform the Bellwether procedures and performing all essential surgeries.

  44. Epiu I, Tindimwebwa JV, Mijumbi C, Chokwe TM, Lugazia E, Ndarugirire F, et al. Challenges of anesthesia in low- and middle-income countries: a cross-sectional survey of access to safe obstetric anesthesia in East Africa. Anesth Analg. 2017;124(1):290–9. https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0000000000001690.

  45. Epiu I, Byamugisha J, Kwikiriza A, Autry MA. Health and sustainable development; strengthening peri-operative care in low income countries to improve maternal and neonatal outcomes. Reprod Health. 2018;15(1):168. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-018-0604-6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. • Sileshi B, Newton MW, Kiptanui J, Shotwell MS, Wanderer JP, Mungai M, et al. Monitoring Anesthesia Care Delivery and Perioperative mortality in Kenya utilizing a provider-driven novel data collection tool. Anesthesiology. 2017;127(2):250–71. https://doi.org/10.1097/ALN.0000000000001713Importance is the use of a REDCap database as electronic means of reporting POMR. They only report 7-day POMR. Anaesthesiology accompanied this paper with an editorial (reference 5).

  47. Löfgren J, Kadobera D, Forsberg BC, Mulowooza J, Wladis A, Nordin P. Surgery in district hospitals in rural Uganda-indications, interventions, and outcomes. Lancet. 2015;385(Suppl 2):S18. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60813-3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Odor PM, Grocott MP. From NELA to EPOCH and beyond: enhancing the evidence base for emergency laparotomy. Perioper Med (Lond). 2016;5(1):23. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13741-016-0048-x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Hendriksen BS, Keeney L, Morrell D, Candela X, Oh J, Hollenbeak CS, et al. Epidemiology and perioperative mortality of exploratory laparotomy in rural Ghana. Ann Glob Health. 2020;86(1):19. https://doi.org/10.5334/aogh.2586.

  50. Rickard JL, Ntakiyiruta G, Chu KM. Associations with perioperative mortality rate at a major referral hospital in Rwanda. World J Surg. 2016;40(4):784–90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-015-3308-x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Vashistha N, Singhal D, Budhiraja S, Aggarwal B, Tobin R, Fotedar K. Outcomes of emergency laparotomy (EL) care protocol at tertiary care center from low-middle-income country (LMIC). World J Surg. 2018;42(5):1278–84. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-017-4333-8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. • Chagomerana MB, Tomlinson J, Young S, Hosseinipour MC, Banza L, Lee CN. High morbidity and mortality after lower extremity injuries in Malawi: a prospective cohort study of 905 patients. Int J Surg. 2017;39:23–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2017.01.047Notable for being one of the few reports on mortality outcomes of lower limb fractures from LMICs.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Foote CJ, Mundi R, Sancheti P, Gopalan H, Kotwal P, Shetty V, et al. Bhandari M; INORMUS Investigators. Musculoskeletal trauma and all-cause mortality in India: a multicentre prospective cohort study. Lancet. 2015;385(Suppl 2):S30. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60825-X.

  54. Robson MS. Classification of caesarean sections. Fetal and maternal medicine review. 2001;12:23–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Brennan DJ, Robson MS, Murphy M, O'Herlihy C. Comparative analysis of international cesarean delivery rates using 10-group classification identifies significant variation in spontaneous labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009;201(3):308.e1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2009.06.021.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. • Uribe-Leitz T, Jaramillo J, Maurer L, Fu R, Esquivel MM, Gawande AA, et al. Variability in mortality following caesarean delivery, appendectomy, and groin hernia repair in low-income and middle-income countries: a systematic review and analysis of published data. Lancet Glob Health. 2016;4(3):e165–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(15)00320-4This paper is important because it addresses the regional and continental variations in mortality for these three conditions, obvious candidates for any basket of common conditions that might be used to make POMR more comparable. The variations are large, which are a reflection of access, workforce availability and capacity and capability.

  57. National Emergency Laparotomy Audit. https://www.nela.org.uk/reports

  58. Broughton KJ, Aldridge O, Pradhan S, Aitken RJ. The Perth Emergency Laparotomy Audit. ANZ J Surg. 2017;87(11):893–7. https://doi.org/10.1111/ans.14208.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Ho YM, Cappello J, Kousary R, McGowan B, Wysocki AP. Benchmarking against the National Emergency Laparotomy Audit recommendations. ANZ J Surg. 2018;88(5):428–33. https://doi.org/10.1111/ans.14164.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Stevens CL, Brown C, Watters DAK. Measuring outcomes of clinical care: Victorian emergency laparotomy audit using quality investigator. World J Surg. 2018;42(7):1981–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-017-4418-4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Schade AT, Hind J, Khatri C, Metcalfe AJ, Harrison WJ. Systematic review of patient reported outcomes from open tibia fractures in low and middle income countries. Injury. 2020;51(2):142–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2019.11.015.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Ibrahim JM, Conway D, Haonga BT, Eliezer EN, Morshed S, Shearer DW. Predictors of lower health-related quality of life after operative repair of diaphyseal femur fractures in a low-resource setting. Injury. 2018;49(7):1330–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2018.05.021.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Kramer EJ, Shearer D, Morshed S. The use of traction for treating femoral shaft fractures in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review. Int Orthop. 2016;40(5):875–83. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-015-3081-3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Mustafa Diab M, Shearer DW, Kahn JG, Wu HH, Lau B, Morshed S, et al. The cost of intramedullary nailing versus skeletal traction for treatment of femoral shaft fractures in Malawi: a prospective economic analysis. World J Surg. 2019;43(1):87–95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-018-4750-3.

  65. • Dewan MC, Rattani A, Gupta S, Baticulon RE, Hung YC, Punchak M, et al. Estimating the global incidence of traumatic brain injury. J Neurosurg. 2018, 1:1–18. https://doi.org/10.3171/2017.10.JNS17352Of importance because traumatic brain injuries (TBI) are the most common cause of surgical mortality in LMICs and there is a global shortage of neurosurgeons (see reference 58). In most LMICs and many MICs, they are treated by general surgeons, and national surgical planning needs to develop a strategy to manage TBIs.

  66. Mukhopadhyay S, Punchak M, Rattani A, Hung YC, Dahm J, Faruque S, et al. The global neurosurgical workforce: a mixed-methods assessment of density and growth. J Neurosurg. 2019;4:1–7. https://doi.org/10.3171/2018.10.JNS171723.

  67. Kaptigau WM, Rosenfeld JV, Kevau I, Watters DA. The establishment and development of neurosurgery services in Papua New Guinea. World J Surg. 2016;40(2):251–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-015-3268-1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Clark D, Joannides A, Ibrahim Abdallah O, Olufemi Adeleye A, Hafid Bajamal A, Bashford T, et al. Global Neurotrauma Outcomes Study (GNOS) collaborative. Management and outcomes following emergency surgery for traumatic brain injury - a multi-centre, international, prospective cohort study (the Global Neurotrauma Outcomes Study). Int J Surg Protoc. 2020;20:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isjp.2020.02.001.

  69. Weiser TG. Bellwethers versus baskets: operative capacity and the metrics of global surgery. World J Surg. 2020;44(10):3310–1. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-020-05615-x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. •• Ng-Kamstra JS, Nepogodiev D, Lawani I, Bhangu A. Perioperative mortality as a meaningful indicator: challenges and solutions for measurement, interpretation, and health system improvement. Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med. 2020;S2352-5568(20):30146–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accpm.2019.11.005This is a critical review of the use of POMR and the opportunities to improve its use as a metric. Discusses the requirements for candidates in a basket of procedures that might inform POMR and the stages on the patient journey when perioperative care might be improved. Also discusses how health system leaders and frontline clinicians can integrate surgical safety into NSOAPs and patient care pathways.

  71. McLean RC, Brown LR, Baldock TE, O'Loughlin P, McCallum IJ. Evaluating outcomes following emergency laparotomy in the North of England and the impact of the National Emergency Laparotomy Audit - a retrospective cohort study. Int J Surg. 2020;77:154–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2020.03.046.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. • Wacker J, Zwahlen M. Uncertain progress in Swiss perioperative mortality 1998-2014 for 22 operation groups. Swiss Med Wkly. 2019;149:w20034. https://doi.org/10.4414/smw.2019.20034This is an example of national reporting and review of POMR utilising a national health system database.

  73. GlobalSurg Collaborative. Determinants of morbidity and mortality following emergency abdominal surgery in children in low-income and middle-income countries. BMJ Glob Health. 2016;1(4):e000091. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2016-000091.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. • Nagra S, Kaur B, Singh S, Tangi V, Mccaig E, Stupart D, et al. How will increasing surgical volume affect mortality in the Pacific, Papua New Guinea and Timor Leste? ANZ J Surg. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1111/ans.15989Key example of how the Pacific region has used reporting of its global surgical metrics and integrated this into predicting the contribution of POMR to all country POMR if target surgical volume is reached (see also reference 73). It also shows how surgical volume correlates inversely with POMR, supporting Lancet Commission target of 5000 procedures per 100,000 population.

  75. Watters DA, Guest GD, Tangi V, Shrime MG, Meara JG. Global surgery system strengthening: it is all about the right metrics. Anesth Analg. 2018;126(4):1329–39. https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0000000000002771.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Lunn JN. The history and achievements of the National Confidential Enquiry into perioperative deaths on clinical practice. J Qual Clin Pract. 1998, 1998;18:29–35.

  77. Thompson AM, Ashraf Z, Burton H, et al. Mapping changes in surgical mortality over 9 years by peer review audit. Br J Surg. 2005, 2005;92:1449–52.

  78. •• Royal Australasian College of Surgeons. Australia and New Zealand Audit of Surgical Mortality Reports and Publications. https://www.surgeons.org/research-audit/surgical-mortality-audits/national-reports-publications (last accessed 29th September 2020). These annual reports show what can be reported and what has been achieved by national surgical mortality case and peer review. The audits are funded by Australian states and territories, and these reports are an example of what is provided to the health system in terms of clinical governance and learning as well as preserving confidentiality of the treating clinician and reviewers.

  79. Cattanach DE, Wysocki AP, Ray-Conde T, Nankivell C, Allen J, North JB. Post-mortem general surgeon reflection on decision-making: a mixed-methods study of mortality audit data. ANZ J Surg. 2018;88(10):993–7. https://doi.org/10.1111/ans.14796.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. Azzam DG, Neo CA, Itotoh FE, Aitken RJ. The western Australian audit of surgical mortality: outcomes from the first 10 years. Med J Aust. 2013;199:539–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  81. Rey-Conde T, Wysocki AP, North JB, Allen J, Ware RS, Watters DA. Clinical events reported by surgeons assessing their peers. Am J Surg. 2016;212(4):748–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2016.01.027.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  82. Hansen D, Retegan C, Ismail A, McCahy P. Risk-adjusted hospital clinical management issue rates using data from the Victorian Audit of Surgical Mortality. ANZ J Surg. 2020;90(5):728–33. https://doi.org/10.1111/ans.15896.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  83. Nepogodiev D, Martin J, Biccard B, Makupe A, Bhangu A. National Institute for Health Research Global Health Research Unit on Global Surgery. Global burden of postoperative death. Lancet. 2019;393(10170):401. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)33139-8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  84. Truché P, Shoman H, Reddy CL, Jumbam DT, Ashby J, Mazhiqi A, et al. Globalization of national surgical, obstetric and anesthesia plans: the critical link between health policy and action in global surgery. Glob Health. 2020;16(1):1. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12992-019-0531-5.

  85. •• James K, Borchem I, Talo R, et al. Universal access to safe, affordable, timely surgical and anaesthesia care in Papua New Guinea: the six global health indicators. ANZ J Surg 2020; https://doi.org/10.1111/ans.16148. The POMR is low in this province of PNG despite the challenges of access to the hospital across an archipelago of islands. This suggests that patients in extremis probably do not reach hospital, but the importance of this paper is that it shows what can be achieved by a well-trained perioperative team when patients can access hospital. The Milne Bay group have reported their surgical metrics over a 6-year period.

  86. •• UNITAR National surgical obstetric and anaesthesia planning. https://unitar.org/national-surgical-obstetric-anesthesia-planning-nsoap-manual (last accessed 29th September 2020). This is a recently published (September 2020) manual on how to develop national surgical plans and some of the steps involved. POMR is just one of the recommended surgical metrics, but for utilisation of POMR at a national planning level, this describes how it might be done, whilst references 81–85 show how individual countries in sub-Saharan Africa actually used POMR.

  87. Postgraduate Program for Surgery and Social Change. National Surgical Planning Resources. https://www.pgssc.org/national-surgical-planning (last accessed 29th September 2020).

  88. Republic of Zambia. Ministry of Health. National Surgical, Obstetric and Anaesthesia Strategic Plan 2017–2021. https://6cde3faa-9fe6-4a8d-a485-408738b17bc2.filesusr.com/ugd/d9a674_70f6813fe4e74c4d99eb028336a38745.pdf (last accessed 29th September 2020).

  89. Federal Ministry of Health of Ethiopia National Safe Surgery Strategic Plan. Saving Lives Through Safe Surgery (SaLTS) Strategic Plan 2016–2020. https://6cde3faa-9fe6-4a8d-a485-408738b17bc2.filesusr.com/ugd/d9a674_229834ef81bd47ee9cd72f94be1739fe.pdf (last accessed 29th September 2020).

  90. Federal Ministry of Health of Nigeria. National Surgical, Obstetrics Anaesthesia & Nursing Plan (NSOANP) for Nigeria. Strategic Priorities for Surgical Care (StraPS) Planning for a Future of Surgical Equity, Safety & Progress, 2019–2023. https://6cde3faa-9fe6-4a8d-a485-408738b17bc2.filesusr.com/ugd/d9a674_1f7aa8161c954e2dbf23751213bc6f52.pdf (last accessed 29th September 2020).

  91. Tangi V. Global surgical indicator tracking. Progress, Challenges, opportunities. NSOAP conference, Dubai 2019. https://6cde3faa-9fe6-4a8d-a485-408738b17bc2.filesusr.com/ugd/d9a674_89d2b689f4c147c484e4b460d48284cc.pdf (last accessed 29 September 2020).

  92. Spence RT, Mueller JL, Chang DC. A novel approach to global benchmarking of risk-adjusted surgical outcomes: beyond perioperative mortality rate. JAMA Surg 2016;151(6):501–502. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2016.0091. PMID: 27050769.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Deakin University and Barwon Health, Geelong, Australia

    D. A. Watters

  2. University Hospital Geelong, Geelong, Australia

    D. A. Watters

  3. Capital and Coast District Health Board, Wellington, New Zealand

    L. Wilson

Authors
  1. D. A. Watters
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. L. Wilson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to D. A. Watters.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

Neither of the authors has any potential conflicts of interest to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Global Health Anesthesia

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Watters, D.A., Wilson, L. The Comparability and Utility of Perioperative Mortality Rates in Global Health. Curr Anesthesiol Rep 11, 48–58 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40140-020-00432-3

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40140-020-00432-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation