Abstract
Purpose of Review
To provide an overview of the adductor canal block (ACB), with specific discussion on its scope of practice in regional anesthesia for total knee arthroplasty (TKA).
Recent Findings
ACB is emerging as a viable alternative to femoral nerve block (FNB) as a purely sensory blockade providing comparable postoperative analgesia after TKA. There is growing evidence that it is non-inferior to FNB in terms of pain control, opioid consumption, and earlier ambulation without the risk of quadriceps muscle weakness.
Summary
The saphenous nerve can be effectively blocked at the adductor canal and, in conjunction with a popliteal sciatic nerve block, can be used for analgesia and anesthesia for any procedure below the knee. However, the ACB specifically has emerged as a novel technique consistently demonstrating comparable analgesic efficacy to FNB for TKA. We strongly believe, based on the current evidence available, that the ACB will replace FNB for postoperative analgesia following primary total knee arthroplasty.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance
NYSORA. Ultrasound-guided saphenous (adductor canal) block. https://www.nysora.com/regional-anesthesia-for-specific-surgical-procedures/lower-extremity-regional-anesthesia-for-specific-surgical-procedures/foot-and-anckle/ultrasound-guided-saphenous-subsartorius-adductor-canal-nerve-block/
• Wang D, Yang Y, Li Q, Tang SL, Zeng WN, Xu J, et al. Adductor canal block versus femoral nerve block for total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Sci Rep. 2017;7:40721. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep40721Detailed meta-analysis looking at efficacy of ACB versus femoral nerve block for knee surgery.
• Manickam B, Perlas A, Duggan E, Brull R, Chan VWS, Ramlogan R. Feasibility and efficacy of ultrasound-guided block of the saphenous nerve in the adductor canal. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2009;34:578–80 Earliest description of the reliability of ACB technique to block the saphenous nerve.
Jæger P, Koscielniak-Nielsen ZJ, Hilsted KL, Fabritius ML, Dahl JB. Adductor canal block with 10 mL versus 30 mL local anesthetics and quadriceps strength: a paired, blinded, randomized study in healthy volunteers. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2015;40(5):553–8.
Horn JL, Pitsch T, Salinas F, Benninger B. Anatomic basis to the ultrasound-guided approach for saphenous nerve blockade. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2009;34:486–9.
Jaeger P, Grevstad U, Henningsen MH, Gottschau B, Mathiesen O, Dahl JB. Effect of adductor-canal-blockade on established, severe post-operative pain after total knee arthroplasty: a randomized study. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2012;56:1013–9.
•• Yuan SC, et al. Adductor canal block for total knee arthroplasty: a review of the current evidence. J Anesth Surg. 2016;3(6):1–9 A review of all the current evidence available for ACB.
Ludwigson JL, Tillmans SD, Galgon RE, Chambers TA, Heiner JP, Schroeder KM. A comparison of single shot adductor canal block versus femoral nerve catheter for total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplast. 2015;30(9 Suppl):68–71.
Moahammad R, Rasouli MD, Eugene R, Viscusi MD. EDITORIAL Adductor canal block for knee surgeries: an emerging analgesic technique. Arch Bone Jt Surg. 2017;5(3):131–2.
Machi AT, Sztain JF, Kormylo NJ, Madison SJ, Abramson WB, Monahan AM, et al. Discharge readiness after tricompartment knee arthroplasty: adductor canal versus femoral continuous nerve blocks-a dual-center, randomized trial. Anesthesiology. 2015;123(2):444–56.
Shah NA, Jain NP, Panchal KA. Adductor canal blockade following total knee arthroplasty-continuous or single shot technique? Role in postoperative analgesia, ambulation ability and early functional recovery: a randomized controlled trial. J Arthroplast. 2015;30(8):1476–81.
Andersen HL, Gyrn J, Moller L, et al. Continuous saphenous nerve block as supplement to single-dose local infiltration analgesia for postoperative pain management after total knee arthroplasty. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2013;38(2):106–11.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
Sree Kolli and Mohammed Faysal Malik declare they have no conflict of interest.
Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent
This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
This article is part of the Topical Collection on Regional Anesthesia
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kolli, S., Malik, M.F. The Adductor Canal Block: a Clinical Review. Curr Anesthesiol Rep 9, 291–294 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40140-019-00335-y
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40140-019-00335-y