Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Anesthesia for Deep Brain Stimulation

  • Neuroanesthesia (M Smith, Section Editor)
  • Published:
Current Anesthesiology Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose of Review

Deep brain stimulation is used in the treatment of patients with functional neurological disorders but has expanded to include many other disorders. The target site for stimulation is dependent on the disease and symptoms of each patient. The procedure includes imaging techniques to visualize and establish coordinates to the nuclei, electrophysiological guidance with microelectrode recordings, and testing of an awake patient.

Recent Findings

The goals of anesthesia are to provide optimal surgical conditions and patient comfort, facilitate target localization and diagnosis, and treat complications. The choice of anesthetic agents and techniques will depend not only on the specific patient population and stimulation target but also varies according to institutional practice. Monitored anesthesia care, conscious sedation, and general anesthesia have all been used successfully. Perioperative complications include intracranial hemorrhage, seizures, and venous air embolism.

Summary

The anesthetic management will continue to evolve with new developments in surgical, imaging, and monitoring techniques, and the understanding of the effects of drugs on electrophysiological recordings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

GPe:

Globus pallidus externa

GPi:

Globus pallidus interna

MD:

Mediodorsal nucleus of thalamus

PU:

Putamen

STN:

Subthalamic nuclei

VA:

Ventral anterior nucleus of thalamus

VC:

Ventral caudal nucleus of thalamus

Vim:

Ventral intermedius nucleus of thalamus

VOP:

Ventral oralis posterior nucleus of thalamus

VP:

Visual pathway

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as • Of importance; •• Of major importance

  1. Miocinovic S, Somayajula S, Chitnis S, et al. History, applications, and mechanisms of deep brain stimulation. JAMA Neurol. 2013;70:163–71.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Benabid AL, Pollak P, Louveau A, et al. Combined (thalamotomy and stimulation) stereotactic surgery of the Vim thalamic nucleus for bilateral Parkinson disease. Appl Neurophysiol. 1987;50:344–6.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Lozano AM, Dostrovsky J, Chen R, et al. Deep brain stimulation for Parkinson’s disease: disrupting the disruption. Lancet Neurol. 2002;1:225–31.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. •• Larson PS. Deep brain stimulation for movement disorders. Neurotherapeutics. 2014;11:465–74. Brain targets implanted include the thalamus (essential tremor), subthalamic nucleus (Parkinson’s disease), globus pallidus (Parkinson’s disease and dystonia) with new targets currently being explored. Future developments include brain electrodes that can steer current directionally, systems capable of “closed loop” stimulation, systems that can record and interpret regional brain activity and modify stimulation parameters in a clinically meaningful way.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. •• Sharma M, Naik V, Deogaonkar M. Emerging applications of deep brain stimulation. J Neurosurg Sci. 2016;60(2):242–55. This review provides an overview of emerging applications of DBS, including a summary of the published literature. The pathophysiology and aberrant neural circuits involved in these disorders are highlighted. Recent advances include closed loop systems, responsive neurostimulation systems, and optogenetics techniques.

  6. Kalia SK, Sankar T, Lozano AM. Deep brain stimulation for Parkinson’s disease and other movement disorders. Curr Opin Neurol. 2013;26:374–80.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kocabicak E, Temel Y, Hollig A, et al. Current perspectives on deep brain stimulation for severe neurological and psychiatric disorders. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2015;11:1051–66.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Laxton AW, Lipsman N, Lozano AM. Deep brain stimulation for cognitive disorders. Handb Clin Neurol. 2013;116:307–11.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Mandat T, Koziara H, Tutaj M, et al. Thalamic deep brain stimulation for tremor among multiple sclerosis patients. Neurol Neurochir Pol. 2010;44:542–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Yamamoto T, Katayama Y, Kobayashi K, et al. Deep brain stimulation for the treatment of vegetative state. Eur J Neurosci. 2010;32:1145–51.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Benabid AL, Torres N. New targets for DBS. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2012;18:S21–3.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. • Williams NR, Foote KD, Okun MS. STN versus GPi deep brain stimulation: translating the rematch into clinical practice. Mov Disord Clin Pract. 2014;1:24–35. Interdisciplinary teams can facilitate the more patient-tailored, symptom specific DBS treatment planning and provide a more thorough analysis of the risk-benefit ratio for each patient.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Venkatraghavan L, Manninen P. Anesthesia for deep brain stimulation. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2011;24:495–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. •• Li Q, Qian Z, Arbuthnott GW, et al. Cortical effects of deep brain stimulation implications for pathogenesis and treatment of Parkinson disease. JAMA Neurol. 2014;71:100–3. The mechanism of action of DBS is not fully understood but recent studies suggest that the activity in the motor cortical areas is directly altered by DBS by signals traveling in an antidromic fashion from the STN.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Slavin KV, Thulborn KR, Wess C, et al. Direct visualization of the human subthalamic nucleus with 3T MR imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2006;27:80–4.

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Cho ZH, Min HK, Oh SH. Direct visualization of deep brain stimulation targets in Parkinson’s disease with the use of 7 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging. J Neurosurg. 2010;113:639–47.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Sharma M, Deogaonkar M. Accuracy and safety using intraoperative O-arm during placement of deep brain stimulation electrodes without electrophysiological recordings. J Clin Neurosci. 2016;27:80–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Burchiel KJ, McCartney S, Lee A, et al. Accuracy of deep brain stimulation electrode placement using intraoperative computed tomography without microelectrode recording. J Neurosurg. 2013;119:301–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Foltynie T, Zrinzo L, Martinez-Torres I, et al. MRI-guided STN DBS in Parkinson’s disease without microelectrode recording: efficacy and safety. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2011;82:358–63.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Starr PA, Martin AJ, Ostrem JL, et al. Subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulator placement using high-field interventional magnetic resonance imaging and a skull-mounted aiming device: technique and application accuracy. J Neurosurg. 2010;112:479–90.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Gumprechet H, Widenka D, Lumenta C. BrainLab VectorVision neuronavigation system: technology and clinical experience in 131 cases. Neurosurgery. 1999;44:97–105.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Bot M, Van den Munckhof P, Bakay R. Analysis of stereotactic accuracy in patients undergoing deep brain stimulation using Nexframe and the Leksell frame. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg. 2015;93(5):316–25.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Sharma M, Rhiew R, Deogaonkar M, et al. Accuracy and precision of targeting using frameless stereotactic system in deep brain stimulator implantation surgery. Neurol India. 2014;62:503–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Rezai AR, Kopell BH, Gross RE, et al. Deep brain stimulation for Parkinson’s disease: surgical Issues. Mov Disord. 2006;21:S197–218.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Frost EA, Osborn I. Deep brain stimulation—surgery for movement disorders and Parkinson’s disease. Int Anesthesiol Clin. 2009;47:57–68.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Erickson KM, Cole DJ. Anesthetic considerations for awake craniotomy for epilepsy and functional neurosurgery. Anesthesiol Clin. 2012;30:241–68.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Grant R, Gruenbaum SE, Gerrard J. Anaesthesia for deep brain stimulation: a review. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2015;28:505–10.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Scharpf DT, Sharma M, Deogaonkar M, et al. Practical considerations and nuances in anesthesia for patients undergoing deep brain stimulation implantation surgery. Korean J Anesthesiol. 2015;68:332–9.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Chakrabarti R, Ghazanwy M, Tewari A. Anesthetic challenges for deep brain stimulation: a systematic approach. N Am J Med Sci. 2014;6:359–69.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Sebeo J, Deiner SG, Alterman RL, et al. Anesthesia for pediatric deep brain stimulation. Anesthesiol Res Pract. 2010. doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2010/401419.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Khatib R, Ebrahim Z, Rezai A, et al. Perioperative events during deep brain stimulation: the experience at Cleveland clinic. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 2008;20:36–40.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Venkatraghavan L, Manninen P, Mak P, et al. Anesthesia for functional neurosurgery. Review of complications. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 2006;18:64–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Raz A, Eimerls D, Zaidel A, et al. Propofol decreases neuronal spiking activity in the subthalamic nucleus of Parkinsonian patients. Anesth Analg. 2010;111:1285–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Hutchison WD, Lang AE, Dostrovsky JO, et al. Pallidal neuronal activity: implications for models of dystonia. Ann Neurol. 2003;53:480–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Maciver MB, Bronte-Stewart HM, Henderson JM, et al. Human subthalamic neuron spiking exhibits subtle responses to sedatives. Anesthesiology. 2011;115:254–64.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. •• Kim W, Song IH, Lim YH, et al. Influence of propofol and fentanyl on deep brain stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus. J Korean Med Sci. 2014;29:1278–86. Continuous infusion of propofol and fentanyl did not interfere with the MER signals from the STN. The results of this study suggest that propofol and fentanyl can be used for STN DBS in patients with advanced Parkinson’s disease improving the overall experience of the patients.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Elias WJ, Durieux ME, Huss D, et al. Dexmedetomidine and arousal affect subthalamic neurons. Mov Disord. 2008;23:1317–20.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. •• Krishna V, Elias G, Sammartino F, et al. The effect of dexmedetomidine on the firing properties of STN neurons in Parkinson’s disease. Eur J Neurosci. 2015;42:2070–7. Dexmedetomidine infusion was associated with a slight increase in firing rate but a significant decrease in burst index of STN neurons. As the bursting pattern is often used to identify STN and guide electrode placement, high-dose dexmedetomidine (>0.5 μg/kg/min) should be avoided.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Chen SY, Tsai ST, Lin SH, et al. Subthalamic deep brain stimulation in Parkinson’s disease under different anesthetic modalities: a comparative cohort study. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg. 2011;89:372–80.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. •• Hippard HK, Watcha M, Stocco AJ, et al. Preservation of microelectrode recordings with non-GABAergic drugs during deep brain stimulator placement in children. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2014;14(3):279–86. Microelectrode recordings were preserved with a combination of dexmedetomidine and ketamine, remifentanil, and nicardipine during DBS insertion in pediatric patients.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. • Kwon WK, Kim JH, Lee JH, et al. Microelectrode recording (MER) findings during sleep-awake anesthesia using dexmedetomidine in deep brain stimulation surgery for Parkinson’s disease. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2016;143:27–33. Firing rates of GPi neurons were significantly lower with dexmedetomidine sedation when compared to no sedation. However, there were no differences in the outcomes between the groups in terms of target localization or postoperative motor scores.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Sanghera MK, Grossman RG, Kalhorn CG, et al. Basal ganglia neuronal discharge in primary and secondary dystonia in patients undergoing pallidotomy. Neurosurgery. 2003;52:1358–73.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. •• Venkatraghavan L, Rakhman E, Krishna V, et al. The effect of general anesthesia on the microelectrode recordings from pallidal neurons in patients with dystonia. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 2015;28(3):256–61. There was a difference in spontaneous and evoked neuronal discharges with MER performed under general anesthesia compared with no sedation. This made target localization more difficult during general anesthesia. MER recordings during general anesthesia appeared most robust with a combination of low-dose propofol and remifentanil infusion, and a low concentration of either sevoflurane or desflurane.

  44. Rodriguez RL, Fernandez HH, Haq I, et al. Pearls in patient selection for deep brain stimulation. Neurologist. 2007;13:253–60.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Poon CCM, Irvin MG. Anaesthesia for deep brain stimulation and in patients with implanted neurostimulator devices. Br J Anaesth. 2009;103:152–65.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Venkatraghavan L, Luciano M, Manninen P. Anesthetic management of patients undergoing deep brain stimulation insertion. Anesth Analg. 2010;110:1138–45.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Schulz U, Keh D, Barner C, et al. Bispectral index monitoring does not improve anesthesia performance in patients with movement disorders undergoing deep brain stimulating electrode implantation. Anesth Analg. 2007;104:1481–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. • Bharadwaj S, Nagappa M, Tan A, et al. Comparison of bispectral index and entropy monitoring in patients undergoing internalisation of deep brain stimulators. J Neuroanaesthesiol Crit Care. 2016;3:25–32. Both Bispectral indexand Entropy performed well in patients with movement disorders. There was a good correlation between them. Hemodynamic parameters were not reliable indicators of depth of anesthesia in these patients.

  49. Rozet I, Muangman S, Vavilala MS, et al. Clinical experience with dexmedetomidine for implantation of deep brain stimulators in Parkinson’s disease. Anesth Analg. 2006;103:1224–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Sassi M, Zekaj E, Grotta A, et al. Safety in the use of dexmedetomidine (precedex) for deep brain stimulation surgery: our experience in 23 randomized patients. Neuromodulation. 2013;16:401–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Harries AM, Kausar J, Roberts SA, et al. Deep brain stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus for advanced Parkinson’s disease using general anesthesia: long-term results. J Neurosurg. 2012;116:107–13.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Nakajima T, Zrinzo L, Foltynie T, et al. MRI-guided subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation without microelectrode recording: can we dispense with surgery under local anaesthesia? Stereotact Funct Neurosurg. 2011;89:318–25.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Chen T, Mirzadeh Z, Chapple K, et al. “Asleep” deep brain stimulation for essential tremor. J Neurosurg. 2015;27:1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  54. •• Asha MJ, Kausar J, Krovvidi H, et al. The effect of dopaminergic therapy on intraoperative microelectrode recordings for subthalamic deep brain stimulation under GA: can we operate on patients ‘on medications’? Acta Neurochir. 2016;158:387–93. The insertion of STN DBS under general anesthesia did not affect the physiological localization of the STN or the clinical effectiveness of the procedure.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Ostrem JL, Ziman N, Galifianakis NB, et al. Clinical outcomes using ClearPoint interventional MRI for deep brain stimulation lead placement in Parkinson’s disease. J Neurosurg. 2015;23:1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  56. • Mirzadeh Z, Chapple K, Lambert M, et al. Parkinson’s disease outcomes after intraoperative CT-guided “asleep” deep brain stimulation in the globus pallidus internus. J Neurosurg. 2015;9:1–6. The insertion of GPi DBS under general anesthesia by the use of direct anatomical targeting resulted in significantly better outcomes as measured by the improvement in the off-medication motor scores at 6 months after surgery.

  57. •• Chabardes S, Isnard S, Castrioto A, et al. Surgical implantation of STN-DBS leads using intraoperative MRI guidance: technique, accuracy, and clinical benefit at 1-year follow-up. Acta Neurochir. 2015;157:729–37. Intraoperative MRI guided DBS insertion increases target accuracy and also improves clinical outcome as measured by pre- and post- Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale motor score (UPDRS-3) at 1-year follow-up.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Moll CK, Payer S, Gulberti A, et al. STN stimulation in general anaesthesia: evidence beyond ‘evidence-based medicine’. Acta Neurochir Suppl. 2013;117:19–25.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Hu X, Jiang X, Zhou X, et al. Avoidance and management of surgical and hardware-related complications of deep brain stimulation. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg. 2010;88:296–303.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Fenoy FJ, Simpson RK Jr. Risks of common complications in deep brain stimulation surgery: management and avoidance. J Neurosurg. 2014;120:132–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Boviatsis EJ, Stavrinou LC, Themistocleous M, et al. Surgical and hardware complications of deep brain stimulation. A seven-year experience and review of the literature. Acta Neurochir. 2010;152:2053–62.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Okun MS, Rodriguez RL, Foote KD, et al. A case-based review of troubleshooting deep brain stimulator issues in movement and neuropsychiatric disorders. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2008;14:532–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Binder DK, Rau GM, Starr PA. Risk factors for hemorrhage during microelectrode-guided deep brain stimulator implantation for movement disorders. Neurosurgery. 2005;56:722–32.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Gorgulho A, De Salles AA, Frighetto L, Behnke E. Incidence of hemorrhage associated with electrophysiological studies performed using macroelectrodes and microelectrodes in functional neurosurgery. J Neurosurg. 2005;102:888–96.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Zrinzo L, Foltynie T, Limousin P, et al. Reducing hemorrhagic complications in functional neurosurgery: a large case series and systematic literature review. J Neurosurg. 2012;116:84–94.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Hooper AK, Okun MS, Foote KD, et al. Venous air embolism in deep brain stimulation. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg. 2008;87:25–30.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Johnson RD, Qadri SR, Joint C, et al. Perioperative seizures following deep brain stimulation in patients with multiple sclerosis. Br J Neurosurg. 2010;24:289–90.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Morishita T, Foote KD, Burdick AP. Identification and management of deep brain stimulation intra and postoperative urgencies and emergencies: review. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2010;16:153–62.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Poston EM, Frucht SJ. Movement disorder emergencies. J Neurol. 2008;255:2–13.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Pilitsis JG, Rezai AR, Boulis NM, et al. A preliminary study of transient confusional states following bilateral subthalamic stimulation for Parkinson’s disease. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg. 2005;83:67–70.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Trombetta C, Deogaonkar A, Deogaonkar M, et al. Delayed awakening in dystonia patients undergoing deep brain stimulation surgery. J Clin Neurosci. 2010;17:865–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. •• Rothlind JC, York MK, Carlson K, et al. Neuropsychological changes following deep brain stimulation surgery for Parkinson’s disease: comparisons of treatment at pallidal and subthalamic targets versus best medical therapy. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2015;86:622–29. A small minority of patients with Parkinson’s disease develop significant decline in neuropsychological function with DBS insertion. Both STN and GPi stimulation were associated with reduction in neuropsychological functions.

    Google Scholar 

  73. Odekerken VJ, Van Laar T, Staal MJ, et al. Subthalamic nucleus versus globus pallidus bilateral deep brain stimulation for advanced Parkinson’s disease (NSTAPS study): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Neurol. 2013;12(1):37–44.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Krack P, Fraix V, Mendes A, et al. Postoperative management of subthalamic nucleus stimulation for Parkinson’s disease. Mov Disord. 2002;17:S188–97.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Air EL, Ostrem JL, Sanger TD, et al. Deep brain stimulation in children: experience and technical pearls. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2011;8(6):566–74.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Starr PA, Markun LC, Larson PS, et al. Interventional MRI-guided deep brain stimulation in pediatric dystonia: first experience with the ClearPoint system. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2014;14:400–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. • Beuter A, Lefaucheur JP, Modolo J. Closed-loop cortical neuromodulation in Parkinson’s disease: An alternative to deep brain stimulation? Clin Neurophysiol. 2014;125(5):874–85. Closed-loop cortical stimulation is an emerging technique which might offer substantial clinical benefits for patients with advanced Parkinson’s disease.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. • Bauer R, Martin E, Haegele-Link S, et al. Noninvasive functional neurosurgery using transcranial MR imaging-guided focused ultrasound. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2014;20:S197–9. Transcranial magnetic resonance imaging-guided focused ultrasound is a novel, noninvasive, alternative treatment option for patients with essential tremor and Parkinson’s disease.

    Google Scholar 

  79. Lipsman N, Schwartz ML, Huang Y, et al. MR-guided focused ultrasound thalamotomy for essential tremor: a proof-of-concept study. Lancet Neurol. 2013;12:462–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lashmi Venkatraghavan.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

Lashmi Venkatraghavan and Pirjo Manninen declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Neuroanesthesia.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Venkatraghavan, L., Manninen, P. Anesthesia for Deep Brain Stimulation. Curr Anesthesiol Rep 6, 233–243 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40140-016-0165-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40140-016-0165-6

Keywords

Navigation