Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Recent Technological Advances in Airway Management

  • REVIEW
  • Published:
Current Emergency and Hospital Medicine Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose of Review

The purpose of this review is to explore the published medical literature on technology used in airway management including a historical perspective, description of currently used methods and devices, and discussion on areas of continued exploration in this field. Special focus will be made on recent developments and advancements in our understanding of emergent airway management, and how technological solutions can aid in overcoming traditional challenges to effective and safe airway management in critically ill patients.

Recent Findings

Traditional technologies used in airway management such as x-ray, ultrasound, and computed tomography remain highly valuable in this field. However, a variety of new and emerging devices, combined with increased use of telemedicine and artificial intelligence to aid in the prevention and early detection of important complications, have the potential to greatly improve providers’ control over the airway of unstable patients.

Summary

Recent advances in technology may allow for more precise, rapid, and safe airway control under emergent conditions. While many of these modalities remain investigational, all may offer significant advantages over traditional methods for endotracheal intubation. However, continued investigation into their effectiveness and development is needed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance

  1. Raimonde AJ, Westhoven N, Winters R. Tracheostomy. [Updated 2023 Jul 24]. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2023 Jan-.

  2. Karparvar Z, Goldenberg D. Introduction: the history of tracheotomy. In: Seidman PA, Sinz EH, Goldenberg D, editors. Tracheotomy management: a multidisciplinary approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2011. p. 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Goksu, S., & Sen, E. History of intubation. The Journal of Academic Emergency Medicine; 2015. 14(1), 35+.

  4. Avva U, Lata JM, Kiel J. Airway Management. 2023 May 19. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2023 Jan–. PMID: 29262130.

  5. Matioc AA. An anesthesiologist’s perspective on the history of basic airway management: the “modern” era, 1960 to present. Anesthesiology. 2019;130(5):686–711. https://doi.org/10.1097/ALN.0000000000002646. PMID: 30829659.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Cook TM, Woodall N, Harper J, Benger J; Fourth National Audit Project. Major complications of airway management in the UK: results of the Fourth National Audit Project of the Royal College of Anaesthetists and the Difficult Airway Society. Part 2: intensive care and emergency departments. Br J Anaesth. 2011;106(5):632–42. https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/aer059. Epub 2011 Mar 29. PMID: 21447489.

  7. Ravindran B. Innovations in the management of the difficult airway: a narrative review. Cureus. 2023;15(2):e35117. Published 2023 Feb 17. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.35117

  8. •• Vasconcelos Pereira A, Simões AV, Rego L, Pereira JG. New technologies in airway management: a review. Medicine (Baltimore). 2022;101(48):e32084. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000032084. PMID: 36482552; PMCID: PMC9726337. Provides comprehensive review of recent technological advancements in airway management.

  9. Xia M, Ma W, Zuo M, Deng X, Xue F, Battaglini D, Aggarwal V, Varrassi G, Cerny V, Di Giacinto I, Cataldo R, Ma D, Yamamoto T, Rekatsina M, De Cassai A, Carsetti A, Chang MG, Seet E, Davis DP, Irwin MG, Huang Y, Jiang H. Expert consensus on difficult airway assessment. Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr. 2023;12(4):545–566. https://doi.org/10.21037/hbsn-23-46. Epub 2023 May 19. PMID: 37600997; PMCID: PMC10432292.

  10. Shetty A, Murphy A, Lukies M, et al. Evaluation of endotracheal tube position. Reference article, Radiopaedia.org. Accessed on 27 Jul 2023. https://doi.org/10.53347/rID-26888

  11. Salem MR. Verification of endotracheal tube position. Anesthesiol Clin North Am. 2001;19(4):813–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0889-8537(01)80012-2. PMID: 11778382.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Harris RJ, Baginski SG, Bronstein Y, Kim S, Lohr J, Towey S, Velichkovich Z, Kabachenko T, Driscoll I, Baker B. Measurement of endotracheal tube positioning on chest x-ray using object detection. J Digit Imaging. 2021;34(4):846–852. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-021-00495-6. Epub 2021 Jul 28. PMID: 34322753; PMCID: PMC8455789.

  13. Jarrett D, Stride E, Vallis K, Gooding MJ. Applications and limitations of machine learning in radiation oncology. Br J Radiol. 2019;92(1100):20190001. https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20190001.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Adhikari S, Zeger W, Schmier C, Crum T, Craven A, Frrokaj I, Pang H, Shostrom V. Pilot study to determine the utility of point-of-care ultrasound in the assessment of difficult laryngoscopy. Acad Emerg Med. 2011;18(7):754–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1553-2712.2011.01099.x. Epub 2011 Jun 27 PMID: 21707828.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Lakhal K, Delplace X, Cottier JP, Tranquart F, Sauvagnac X, Mercier C, Fusciardi J, Laffon M. The feasibility of ultrasound to assess subglottic diameter. Anesth Analg. 2007;104(3):611–4. https://doi.org/10.1213/01.ane.0000260136.53694.fe. PMID: 17312218.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. • Chowdhury AR, Punj J, Pandey R, Darlong V, Sinha R, Bhoi D. Ultrasound is a reliable and faster tool for confirmation of endotracheal intubation compared to chest auscultation and capnography when performed by novice anaesthesia residents - a prospective controlled clinical trial. Saudi J Anaesth. 2020;14(1):15–21. https://doi.org/10.4103/sja.SJA_180_19. Epub 2020 Jan 6. PMID: 31998014; PMCID: PMC6970360. Provides valuable insight regarding the usefulness of ultrasonography during ETT placement.

  17. Topcu H, Ozçiftçi S, Şahiner Y. Comparative effectiveness of real-time ultrasound-guided tracheostomy and anatomic landmark percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy: a retrospective cohort study. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2022;26(21):7883–91. https://doi.org/10.26355/eurrev_202211_30139. PMID: 36394736.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. • Nalubola S, Jin E, Drugge ED, Weber G, Abramowicz AE. Video versus direct laryngoscopy in novice intubators: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Cureus. 2022;14(9): e29578. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.29578.PMID:36312614;PMCID:PMC9595268. Illustrates the impact of video laryngoscopy and its utility for novice providers and students.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. ADROIT® Surgical. Vie Scope®. Adroit Surgical, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma. [Apparatus] https://adroitsurgical.com/

  20. Maslanka M, Smereka J, Czyzewski L, Ladny JR, Dabrowski M, Szarpak L. Vie scope® laryngoscope versus Macintosh laryngoscope with personal protective equipment during intubation of COVID-19 resuscitation patient. Am J Emerg Med. 2021 Aug;46:788–789. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2020.08.085. Epub 2020 Sep 4. PMID: 32967784; PMCID: PMC7471714.

  21. Kristensen MS, Fried E, Biro P. Infrared Red Intubation System (IRRIS) guided flexile videoscope assisted difficult airway management. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2018;62(1):19–25. https://doi.org/10.1111/aas.13016. Epub 2017 Oct 24 PMID: 29063583.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Bhaskar SB. Newer airway assessment techniques: a view on their utility. Indian J Anaesth. 2017;61(10):779–81. https://doi.org/10.4103/ija.IJA_625_17.PMID:29242647;PMCID:PMC5664880.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Singh RKR, Jain N, Kumar S, Garg N. Multi-detector computed tomography angiographic evaluation of right ventricular outflow tract obstruction and other associated cardiovascular anomalies in tetralogy of Fallot patients. Pol J Radiol. 2019;4(84):e511–6. https://doi.org/10.5114/pjr.2019.91203. PMID: 32082448; PMCID: PMC7016497.

  24. Grimes D, MacLeod I, Taylor T, O’Connor M, Sidebottom A. Computed tomography as an aid to planning intubation in the difficult airway. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2016;54(1):80–2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjoms.2015.09.034. Epub 2015 Nov 1 PMID: 26530731.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Kirby M, Smith BM, Tanabe N, Hogg JC, Coxson HO, Sin DD, Bourbeau J, Tan WC. Computed tomography total airway count predicts progression to COPD in at-risk smokers. ERJ Open Res. 2021;7(4):00307–2021. https://doi.org/10.1183/23120541.00307-2021. PMID: 34708120; PMCID: PMC8542990.

  26. Goto T, Goto Y, Hagiwara Y, Okamoto H, Watase H, Hasegawa K. Advancing emergency airway management practice and research. Acute Med Surg. 2019;6(4):336–51. https://doi.org/10.1002/ams2.428. PMID: 31592072; PMCID: PMC6773646.

  27. • Yamanaka S, Goto T, Morikawa K, Watase H, Okamoto H, Hagiwara Y, Hasegawa K. Machine learning approaches for predicting difficult airway and first-pass success in the emergency department: multicenter prospective observational study. Interact J Med Res. 2022;11(1): e28366. https://doi.org/10.2196/28366. PMID: 35076398; PMCID: PMC8826144 . Illustrates the value of artificial intelligence in difficult airway management.

  28. Hayasaka T, Kawano K, Kurihara K, Suzuki H, Nakane M, Kawamae K. Creation of an artificial intelligence model for intubation difficulty classification by deep learning (convolutional neural network) using face images: an observational study. J Intensive Care. 2021;9(1):38. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40560-021-00551-x. PMID: 33952341; PMCID: PMC8101256.

  29. Biro P, Hofmann P, Gage D, Boehler Q, Chautems C, Braun J, Spahn DR, Nelson BJ. Automated tracheal intubation in an airway manikin using a robotic endoscope: a proof of concept study. Anaesthesia. 2020;75(7):881–6. https://doi.org/10.1111/anae.14945. Epub 2020 Jan 3 PMID: 31900928.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Levin BS, Chang MG, Bittner EA. Teleguidance technology for endotracheal intubation: a scoping review. Crit Care Explor. 2021;3(12): e0582. https://doi.org/10.1097/CCE.0000000000000582. PMID: 34909695; PMCID: PMC8663862 .

  31. Spencer RJ, Chang PH, Guimaraes AR, Firth PG. The use of Google Glass for airway assessment and management. Paediatr Anaesth. 2014;24(9):1009–11. https://doi.org/10.1111/pan.12496. Epub 2014 Jul 21 PMID: 25039494.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Alismail A, Thomas J, Daher NS, Almutairi W, Terry MH, Huang C, Tan LD. Augmented reality glasses improve adherence to evidence-based intubation practice. Adv Med Educ Pract. 2019;10:279–86. https://doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S201640.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Medtronic. SonarMedTM Airway Monitoring System. Medtronic, Minneapolis, Minnesota. [Apparatus] https://www.medtronic.com/covidien/en-us/products/airway-monitoring-systems/sonarmed-airway-monitoring-system.html

  34. Meyers JM, Pinheiro J, Nelson MU. Unplanned extubation in NICU patients: are we speaking the same language? J Perinatol. 2015;35(9):676–7. https://doi.org/10.1038/jp.2015.55. PMID: 26310315.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Medtronic. Medtronic Capnostream™ 35. Medtronic, Minneapolis, Minnesota. [Apparatus] https://www.medtronic.com/covidien/en-us/products/airway-monitoring-systems/sonarmed-airway-monitoring-system.html

  36. Medtronic. CapnostreamTM 35 Portable Respiratory Monitor. Medtronic, Minneapolis, Minnesota. [Apparatus]. https://www.medtronic.com/covidien/en-us/products/capnography/capnostream-35-portable-respiratory-monitor.html

  37. • Simon LV, Torp KD. Laryngeal Mask Airway. 2022 Jul 25. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2023 Jan–. PMID: 29489214. Describes the value of a laryngeal mask away compared to the traditional bag valve mask.

  38. Kumar T, Bharati, Suman S, Kumar S, Acharya G, Lakra L. Supraglottic airway devices versus endotracheal intubation for laparoscopic surgeries: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Indian J Anaesth. 2023;67(5):409–419. https://doi.org/10.4103/ija.ija_398_22

  39. Gordon J, Cooper RM, Parotto M. Supraglottic airway devices: indications, contraindications and management. Minerva Anestesiol. 2018;84(3):389–97. https://doi.org/10.23736/S0375-9393.17.12112-7. Epub 2017 Oct 12 PMID: 29027772.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. • Kumar T, Bharati, Suman S, Kumar S, Acharya G, Lakra L. Supraglottic airway devices versus endotracheal intubation for laparoscopic surgeries: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Indian J Anaesth. 2023;67(5):409–419. https://doi.org/10.4103/ija.ija_398_22. Epub 2023 May 11. PMID: 37333696; PMCID: PMC10269978. Provides comprehensive review of supraglottic airway devices and how they may be beneficial in avoiding side effects seen with endotracheal intubation.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Wayne State University School of Medicine, 540 E Canfield St, Detroit, MI, 48201, USA

    Jacob M. Dougherty & James H. Paxton

Authors
  1. Jacob M. Dougherty
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. James H. Paxton
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Jacob M. Dougherty researched the project and wrote the main manuscript text. James H. Paxton MD assisted in this process by providing resources, contributing to the writing, and editing the text. All authors reviewed the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to James H. Paxton.

Ethics declarations

Competing Interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any authors.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dougherty, J.M., Paxton, J.H. Recent Technological Advances in Airway Management. Curr Emerg Hosp Med Rep 12, 32–37 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40138-024-00285-8

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40138-024-00285-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation