Skip to main content
Log in

Hearing Health Equity: Access and Utilization of Implantable Devices

  • REVIEW
  • Published:
Current Otorhinolaryngology Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose of Review

Hearing loss is a significant public health problem with profound impacts on health. Despite strong supportive evidence of implantable devices, such as cochlear implants, for hearing loss treatment, there are limitations in their utilization and access. The objective of this review is to evaluate factors influencing equity of hearing healthcare and implantable devices.

Recent Findings

Hearing healthcare inequities are pervasive and persistent. With attention to cochlear implantation, this review describes the disconnects, delays, and different outcomes of patients with hearing loss based on geographic context, socioeconomic status, education, race, and ethnicity. Additionally, approaches to address these inequities are described.

Summary

A wide range of social factors impact access and utilization of hearing healthcare, and specifically cochlear implantation. It is critical to frequently revisit definitions and descriptions of hearing healthcare inequities, renew our understanding of the underlying mechanisms, and constantly reimagine interventions to promote equity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance

  1. World report on hearing. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2021. License: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO

  2. Mehra S, Eavey RD, Keamy DG Jr. The epidemiology of hearing impairment in the United States: newborns, children, and adolescents. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2009;140(4):461–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otohns.2008.12.022.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. World Health Organization. Assistive devices/ technologies:WhatWHOis doing. World Health Organization. http://www.who.int/disabilities/technology/activities/en. Accessed January 2024.

  4. Lu MC, Halfon N. Racial and ethnic disparities in birth outcomes: a life-course perspective. Matern Child Health J. 2003;7(1):13–30. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1022537516969.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Mitchell RJ, Bates P. Measuring health-related productivity loss. Popul Health Manag. 2011;14(2):93–8. https://doi.org/10.1089/pop.2010.0014.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Kilbourne AM, et al. Advancing health disparities research within the health care system: a conceptual framework. Am J Public Health. 2006;96(12):2113–21. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2005.077628.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Brennan-Jones CG, Taljaard DS, Brennan-Jones SE, Bennett RJ, de Swanepoel W, Eikelboom RH. Self-reported hearing loss and manual audiometry: a rural versus urban comparison. Aust J Rural Health. 2016;24(2):130–5. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajr.12227.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Bush ML, Osetinsky M, Shinn JB, et al. Assessment of Appalachian region pediatric hearing healthcare disparities and delays. Laryngoscope. 2014;124(7):1713–7. https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.24588.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Bush ML, Burton M, Loan A, Shinn JB. Timing discrepancies of early intervention hearing services in urban and rural cochlear implant recipients. Otol Neurotol. 2013;34(9):1630–5. https://doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0b013e31829e83ad.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Bush ML, Bianchi K, Lester C, et al. Delays in diagnosis of congenital hearing loss in rural children. J Pediatr. 2014;164(2):393–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2013.09.047.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Noblitt B, Alfonso KP, Adkins M, Bush ML. Barriers to rehabilitation care in pediatric cochlear implant recipients. Otol Neurotol. 2018;39(5):e307–13. https://doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0000000000001777.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Chan S, Hixon B, Adkins M, Shinn JB, Bush ML. Rurality and determinants of hearing healthcare in adult hearing aid recipients. Laryngoscope. 2017;127(10):2362–7. https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.26490.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Hixon B, Chan S, Adkins M, Shinn JB, Bush ML. Timing and impact of hearing healthcare in adult cochlear implant recipients: a rural-urban comparison. Otol Neurotol. 2016;37(9):1320–4. https://doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0000000000001197.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Planey AM. Audiologist availability and supply in the United States: a multi-scale spatial and political economic analysis. Soc Sci Med. 2019;222:216–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.01.015.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Nassiri AM, Marinelli JP, Sorkin DL, Carlson ML. Barriers to adult cochlear implant care in the United States: an analysis of health care delivery. Semin Hear. 2021;42(4):311–20. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1739281.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Sorkin DL. Cochlear implantation in the world’s largest medical device market: utilization and awareness of cochlear implants in the United States. Cochlear Implants Int. Mar 2013;14 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S4–12. https://doi.org/10.1179/1467010013z.00000000076.

  17. Biggerstaff ME, Short N. Evaluation of specialist referrals at a rural health care clinic. J Am Assoc Nurse Pract. 2017;29(7):410–4. https://doi.org/10.1002/2327-6924.12480.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Newman CW, Weinstein BE, Jacobson GP, Hug GA. Test-retest reliability of the hearing handicap inventory for adults. Ear Hear. 1991;12(5):355–7. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003446-199110000-00009.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Yesantharao LV, Donahue M, Smith A, Yan H, Agrawal Y. Virtual audiometric testing using smartphone mobile applications to detect hearing loss. Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol. 2022;7(6):2002–10. https://doi.org/10.1002/lio2.928.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Quimby AE, Venkatesh S, Corsten M, et al. Socioeconomic status among cochlear implant candidates and association with surgical pursuance. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2023;149(10):891–8. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoto.2023.2217.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. •• Schuh MR, Bush ML. Evaluating equity through the social determinants of hearing health. Ear Hear. 2022 Jul-Aug 01;43(Suppl 1):15S–22S. https://doi.org/10.1097/AUD.0000000000001188. A review of the social determinants of health that impact hearing healthcare access and utilization.

  22. National Research Council Panel on Race E, Health in Later L. The national academies collection: reports funded by National Institutes of Health. In: Bulatao RA, Anderson NB, eds. Understanding Racial and Ethnic Differences in Health in Late Life: A Research Agenda. National Academies Press (US). Copyright © 2004, National Academies; 2004.

  23. Sorkin DL. Impact of Medicaid on cochlear implant access. Otol Neurotol. 2019;40(3):e336–41. https://doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0000000000002142.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Chang DT, Ko AB, Murray GS, Arnold JE, Megerian CA. Lack of financial barriers to pediatric cochlear implantation: impact of socioeconomic status on access and outcomes. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2010;136(7):648–57. https://doi.org/10.1001/archoto.2010.90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Lipschitz N, Kohlberg GD, Scott M, Smith MM, Greinwald JH Jr. Socioeconomic disparities in pediatric single-sided deafness. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2020;163(4):829–34. https://doi.org/10.1177/0194599820923634.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Drake M, Friedland DR, Hamad B, et al. Factors associated with delayed referral and hearing rehabilitation for congenital sensorineural hearing loss. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2023;175: 111770. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijporl.2023.111770.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Awad DR, Castaño JE, McCoy JL, et al. Socioeconomic status and cochlear implant usage: a datalogging study. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2023;132(12):1535–42. https://doi.org/10.1177/00034894231170588.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Bernstein IA, Megwalu UC. Association between insurance status and hearing healthcare use in the United States. Am J Otolaryngol. 2023 Nov-Dec;44(6):103993.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjoto.2023.103993.

  29. Tran ED, Vaisbuch Y, Qian ZJ, Fitzgerald MB, Megwalu UC. Health literacy and hearing healthcare use. Laryngoscope. 2021;131(5):E1688–e1694. https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.29313.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Marinelli JP, Sydlowski SA, Carlson ML. Cochlear implant awareness in the United States: a national survey of 15,138 adults. Semin Hear. 2022;43(4):317–23. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1758376.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Sharma SD, Cushing SL, Papsin BC, Gordon KA. Hearing and speech benefits of cochlear implantation in children: a review of the literature. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2020;133: 109984. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijporl.2020.109984.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Meinhardt G, Sharrer C, Perez N, Downes A, Davidowitz T, Schuh M, Robinson L, Lustig LR, Bush M. Reporting of sociodemographic data in cochlear implant clinical trials: a systematic review. Otol Neurotol. 2023;44(2):99–106. https://doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0000000000003766.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Pittman CA, Roura R, Price C, Lin FR, Marrone N, Nieman CL. Racial/ethnic and sex representation in US-based clinical trials of hearing loss management in adults: a systematic review. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2021;147(7):656–62. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoto.2021.0550.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Nieman CL, Marrone N, Szanton SL, Thorpe RJ Jr, Lin FR. Racial/ethnic and socioeconomic disparities in hearing health care among older Americans. J Aging Health. 2016;28(1):68–94. https://doi.org/10.1177/0898264315585505.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Mahendran GN, Rosenbluth T, Featherstone M, Vivas EX, Mattox DE, Hobson CE. Racial disparities in adult cochlear implantation. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2022;166(6):1099–105. https://doi.org/10.1177/01945998211027340.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Tolisano AM, Schauwecker N, Baumgart B, et al. Identifying disadvantaged groups for cochlear implantation: demographics from a large cochlear implant program. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2020;129(4):347–54. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003489419888232.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Liu X, Rosa-Lugo LI, Cosby JL, Pritchett CV. Racial and insurance inequalities in access to early pediatric cochlear implantation. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2021;164(3):667–74. https://doi.org/10.1177/0194599820953381.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Mahoney CF, Stephens SD, Cadge BA. Who prompts patients to consult about hearing loss? Br J Audiol. 1996;30(3):153–8. https://doi.org/10.3109/03005369609079037.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. • Tampio AJF, Schroeder Ii RJ, Wang D, Boyle J, Nicholas BD. Trends in sociodemographic disparities of pediatric cochlear implantation over a 15-year period. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2018 Dec;115:165–170.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijporl.2018.10.003. Epub 2018 Oct 4. PMID: 30368379. An assessment in cochlear implantation inequities over the past 15 years demonstrating improvement in socioeconomic gaps but not racial/ethnic gaps in care.

  40. National Association of Community Health Centers. (2016) Protocol for Responding to and Assessing Patients’ Assets, Risks, and Experiences (PRAPARE). https://www.nachc.org/research-and-data/prapare/. Accessed January 2024.

  41. American Academy of Family Physicians. (2017). The EveryONE Project Toolkit. https://www.aafp.org/family-physician/patient-care/the-everyone-project/toolkit.html. Accessed January 2024.

  42. • Bush ML, Taylor ZR, Noblitt B, Shackleford T, Gal TJ, Shinn JB, Creel LM, Lester C, Westgate PM, Jacobs JA, Studts CR. Promotion of early pediatric hearing detection through patient navigation: a randomized controlled clinical trial. Laryngoscope. 2017 Nov;127 Suppl 7(Suppl 7):S1-S13. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.26822. A clinical trial describing a patient navigation intervention to promote timely access and utilization of pediatric hearing healthcare.

  43. • Nieman CL, Marrone N, Mamo SK, et al. The Baltimore HEARS Pilot Study: an affordable, accessible, community-delivered hearing care intervention. Gerontologist. Nov 10 2017;57(6):1173–1186. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnw153. A clinical trial examining a community-delivered intervention to promote hearing screening and hearing loss treatment.

  44. Choi JS, Shim KS, Shin NE, et al. Cultural adaptation of a community-based hearing health intervention for Korean American older adults with hearing loss. J Cross Cult Gerontol. 2019;34(3):223–43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10823-019-09376-6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. •• Berg KA, Holder JT, Gifford RH. Development of an optimized protocol for cochlear implant care to increase cochlear implant access. Otol Neurotol. 2023 Sep 1;44(8):e635–e640. https://doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0000000000003968. A study describing increasing access for cochlear implant care based on changing clinical programming and scheduling protocols.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

DA and MB equally contributed to the writing of this manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Matthew L. Bush.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

MLB is a consultant for Cochlear America. There are no conflicts of interests with the content of this manuscript. The authors have no other financial relationships or conflicts of interest to disclose pertaining to the manuscript.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Adkins, D., Bush, M.L. Hearing Health Equity: Access and Utilization of Implantable Devices. Curr Otorhinolaryngol Rep (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40136-024-00501-9

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40136-024-00501-9

Keywords

Navigation