Advertisement

Intravascular Ultrasound in the Creation of Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunts: Review of the Literature and Future Directions

  • Raja S. RamaswamyEmail author
  • Tatulya Tiwari
  • Olaguoke Akinwande
  • Christopher D. Malone
Ultrasound (M Hahn and M Shiemorteza, Section Editors)
  • 23 Downloads
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Ultrasound

Abstract

Purpose of Review

Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) placement is a well-established interventional radiology procedure for treating sequelae of portal hypertension involving shunting portal blood flow to the hepatic vein bypassing the liver through a stent graft. Creating a TIPS can be a complex and radiation-intensive procedure due to the technically challenging step of cannulating the portal vein from the hepatic vein. As this is the most unpredictable step in TIPS creation, multiple techniques have been described for visualizing the portal vein to facilitate its access. The use of intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) has gained significant interest over the last few years due to reports of improved procedural metrics such as shortened procedural time and radiation dose. The purpose of this article is to review the literature and detail technical advances utilizing IVUS in TIPS creation.

Recent Findings

Intravascular ultrasound has been shown to be a safe and reproducible means of real-time image guidance for TIPS creation. The use of IVUS has been associated with improved procedural metrics including a decreased number of intrahepatic needle passes, shorter portal vein access times, decreased contrast usage, and a decrease in radiation dose.

Summary

Due to technical advances and real-time portal vein visualization using IVUS, TIPS creation at our institution has dramatically changed. Our institutional practice has nearly completed shifted to the sole use of IVUS for portal vein access in TIPS creation due to significantly improved procedural metrics including radiation dose and contrast usage.

Keywords

Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt TIPS Intracardiac echocardiography Intravascular ultrasound Portal hypertension 

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Guidelines

Conflict of interest

Raja S. Ramaswamy, Tatulya Tiwari, Olaguoke Akinwande, and Christopher D. Malone each declare no potential conflicts of interest.

Research Involving Human and Animal Rights

All reported studies/experiments with human or animal subjects performed by the authors have been previously published and complied with all applicable ethical standards (including the Helsinki Declaration and its amendments, institutional/national research committee standards, and international/national/institutional guidelines).

References

Recently published papers of particular interest have been highlighted as: •• Of major importance

  1. 1.
    Rosch J, Hanafee WN, Snow H. Transjugular portal venography and radiologic portacaval shunt: an experimental study. Radiology. 1969;92(5):1112–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Coldwell DM, Ring EJ, Rees CR, et al. Multicenter investigation of the role of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt in management of portal hypertension. Radiology. 1995;196(2):335–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    LaBerge JM, Ring EJ, Gordon RL, et al. Creation of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts with the wallstent endoprosthesis: results in 100 patients. Radiology. 1993;187(2):413–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Dariushnia SR, Haskal ZJ, Midia M, et al. Quality improvement guidelines for transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2016;27(1):1–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Marquardt S, Rodt T, Rosenthal H, Wacker F, Meyer BC. Impact of anatomical, procedural, and operator skill factors on the success and duration of fluoroscopy-guided transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2015;38(4):903–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Rossle M, Siegerstetter V, Huber M, Ochs A. The first decade of the transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS): state of the art. Liver. 1998;18(2):73–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gaba RC, Khiatani VL, Knuttinen MG, et al. Comprehensive review of TIPS technical complications and how to avoid them. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011;196(3):675–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Miller DL, Balter S, Cole PE, et al. Radiation doses in interventional radiology procedures: the RAD-IR study: part I: overall measures of dose. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2003;14(6):711–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Miraglia R, Maruzzelli L, Cortis K, et al. Radiation exposure in transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt creation. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2016;39(2):210–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Farsad K, Fuss C, Kolbeck KJ, et al. Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt creation using intravascular ultrasound guidance. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2012;23(12):1594–602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    •• Kao SD, Morshedi MM, Narsinh KH, et al. Intravascular Ultrasound in the Creation of Transhepatic Portosystemic Shunts Reduces Needle Passes, Radiation Dose, and Procedure Time: A Retrospective Study of a Single-Institution Experience. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2016;27(8):1148–53. First study to demonstrate improved procedural metrics when using IVUS including fewer intrahepatic needle passes, decreased contrast usage, decreased radiation dose, and shortened procedural time.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    •• Gipson MG, Smith MT, Durham JD, et al. Intravascular US-Guided Portal Vein Access: Improved Procedural Metrics during TIPS Creation. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2016;27(8):1140–47. Study found that IVUS guidance facilitates successful TIPS creation in patients with challenging anatomy along with a reduction in procedural metrics including radiation dose, contrast, and procedural time.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    •• Pillai AK, Andring B, Faulconer N, et al. Utility of Intravascular US-Guided Portal Vein Access during Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt Creation: Retrospective Comparison with Conventional Technique in 109 Patients. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2016;27(8):1154–59. Study concluded that IVUS TIPS is associated with shorter portal vein acces times, decreased needle pass-related capsular perforations, and reduced radiation dose.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ripamonti R, Ferral H, Alonzo M, Patel NH. Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt-related complications and practical solutions. Semin Intervent Radiol. 2006;23(2):165–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ali F, Mangi MA, Rehman H, Kaluski E. Use of carbon dioxide as an intravascular contrast agent: a review of current literature. World J Cardiol. 2017;9(9):715–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Yamagami T, Tanaka O, Yoshimatsu R, et al. Hepatic artery-targeting guidewire technique during transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt. Br J Radiol. 2011;84(1000):315–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Zabicki B, Ricke J, Dudeck O, Pech M. CT-assisted transfemoral intrahepatic portosystemic shunt in a long duration follow-up: a case report. Pol J Radiol. 2014;79:39–41.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Gazzra C, Fonio P, Gallesio C, et al. Ultrasound-guided transhepatic puncture of the hepatic veins for TIPS placement. Radiol Med. 2013;118(3):379–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Haskal ZJ, Duszak R Jr, Furth EE. Transjugular intrahepatic transcaval portosystemic shunt: the gun-sight approach. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 1996;7(1):139–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Piliere G, Van Horn MH, Dixon R, Stavas J, Aylward S, Bullitt E. Vessel target location estimation during the TIPS procedure. Med Image Anal. 2009;13(3):519–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Tavare AN, Wigham A, Hadjivassilou A, et al. Use of transabdominal ultrasound-guided transjugular portal vein puncture on radiation dose in transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt formation. Diagn Interv Radiol. 2017;23(3):206–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Hodgson JM, Graham SP, Savakus AD, et al. Clinical percutaneous imaging of coronary anatomy using an over-the-wire ultrasound catheter system. Int J Card Imaging. 1989;4(2–4):187–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kew J, Davies RP. Intravascular ultrasound guidance for transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt procedure in a swine model. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2004;27(1):38–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Saxon RR, Keller FS. Technical aspects of accessing the portal vein during the TIPS procedure. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 1997;8(5):733–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Raja S. Ramaswamy
    • 1
    Email author
  • Tatulya Tiwari
    • 2
  • Olaguoke Akinwande
    • 1
  • Christopher D. Malone
    • 1
  1. 1.Mallinckrodt Institute of RadiologyWashington University in St. LouisSt. LouisUSA
  2. 2.Endovascular Surgery and Interventional RadiologyLexington Veterans Affairs (VA) Medical CenterLexingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations