Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Magnetic Field-Induced Vertigo in the MRI Environment

  • MRI Safety (M Bock, Section Editor)
  • Published:
Current Radiology Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This review discusses the theory behind, and the experimental evidence for, the perception of vertigo in a high magnetic field found in a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) environment. Recent experiments have shown that there is an eye nystagmus response that is proportional to magnetic field exposure and not purely one of rate of change of magnetic field. The mechanism of transduction can be attributed to the Lorentz forces on the endolymph in the ear canals, producing a static pressure due to the vector product of the magnetic field and current density. The adaption and response of the measurable effect reveals time constants which support such a mechanism and explain why the balance system responds in the way we observe and feel. The position and movement of the head relative to the direction of field is of fundamental importance to the sensation of vertigo, as are ambient conditions such as lighting levels. Recent surveys of subjects undergoing seven tesla or higher MRI scans report that although there is a high perception of vertigo-like effects, these are not intolerable and are not generally the cause of subject withdrawal. This review argues that the International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation guidelines on low-frequency fields still need to acknowledge the role of a high magnetic field in producing vertigo sensations rather than rate of change of field alone.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance

  1. Heinrich A, et al. Effects of static magnetic fields on cognition, vital signs, and sensory perception: a meta-analysis. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2011;34(4):758–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Schlamann M, et al. Exposure to high-field MRI does not affect cognitive function. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2010;31(5):1061–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Oman CM, Marcus EN, Curthoys IS. The influence of semicircular canal morphology on endolymph flow dynamics—an anatomically descriptive mathematical-model. Acta Otolaryngol. 1987;103(1–2):1–13.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. van Egmond AAJ, Groen JJ, Jongkees LBW. The mechanics of the semicircular canal. J Physiol Lond. 1949;110(1–2):1–17.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Houpt TA, et al. Orientation within a high magnetic field determines swimming direction and laterality of c-Fos induction in mice. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2013;305(7):R793–803.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Houpt TA, et al. Behavioral effects on rats of high strength magnetic fields generated by a resistive electromagnet. Physiol Behav. 2005;86(3):379–89.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Cason AM, et al. Labyrinthectomy abolishes the behavioral and neural response of rats to a high-strength static magnetic field. Physiol Behav. 2009;97(1):36–43.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Schenck JF. Physical interactions of static magnetic fields with living tissues. Prog Biophys Mol Biol. 2005;87(2–3):185–204.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Glover PM, et al. Magnetic-field-induced vertigo: a theoretical and experimental investigation. Bioelectromagnetics. 2007;28(5):349–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. •• Roberts DC, et al. MRI magnetic field stimulates rotational sensors of the brain. Curr Biol. 2011;21(19):1635–40. This work marks a breakthrough in the understanding of the vestibular response to high magnetic fields. Not only did it provide new measurements but it also hypothesised the Lorentz force mechanism for the first time to explain the response.

  11. Antunes A, et al. Magnetic field effects on the vestibular system: calculation of the pressure on the cupula due to ionic current-induced Lorentz force. Phys Med Biol. 2012;57(14):4477–87.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Mian OS, et al. On the vertigo due to static magnetic fields. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(10):e78748.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Glover PM, et al. A dynamic model of the eye nystagmus response to high magnetic fields. Phys Med Biol. 2014;59(3):631–45.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Ward BK, et al. Magnetic vestibular stimulation in subjects with unilateral labyrinthine disorders. Front Neurol. 2014;5:28.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Theysohn JM, et al. Vestibular effects of a 7 Tesla MRI examination compared to 1.5 T and 0 T in healthy volunteers. PLoS ONE. 2014;9(3):e92104.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. van Nierop LE, et al. MRI-related static magnetic stray fields and postural body sway: a double-blind randomized crossover study. Magn Reson Med. 2013;70(1):232–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Theysohn JM, et al. Subjective acceptance of 7 Tesla MRI for human imaging. Magn Reson Mater Phys, Biol Med. 2008;21(1–2):63–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Klix S, et al. On the subjective acceptance during cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging at 7.0 tesla. Plos One 2015;10(1):e0117095. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0117095.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Uwano I, et al. Assessment of sensations experienced by subjects during MR imaging examination at 7T. Magn Reson Med Sci. 2015;14(1):35–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. •• Cosottini M, et al. Short-term side-effects of brain MR examination at 7 T: a single-centre experience. Eur Radiol. 2014;24(8):1923–8. Reports a high degree of tolerance to high magnetic fields by subjects. Reports an interesting finding that the number of subjects reporting discomfort significantly reduced over the period from installation of the scanner until the writing of the report. The authors ascribe this to ‘operator experience’. As the most regularly reported side-effect is vertigo then there must be an assumption that the information given to subjects prior to scanning regarding this effect must be improving.

  21. • Rauschenberg, J., et al. Multicenter study of subjective acceptance during magnetic resonance imaging at 7 and 9.4 T. Investig Radiol. 2014;49(5):249–59. This work is major study covering over 3000 subjects’ responses from a number of 7 and 9.4 T installations over a number of years. These responses indicate a high level of acceptance for high-field scanning with around 20% of subjects citing vertigo as being significant. The vertigo effect was more pronounced at 9.4 T than at 7 T.

  22. Chou IJ, et al. Subjective discomfort in children receiving 3 T MRI and experienced adults’ perspective on children’s tolerability of 7 T: a cross-sectional questionnaire survey. BMJ Open. 2014;4(10):e006094. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006094.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. McRobbie DW. Occupational exposure in MRI. Br J Radiol. 1012;2012(85):293–312.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Yamaguchi-Sekino S, Sekino M, Ueno S. Biological effects of electromagnetic fields and recently updated safety guidelines for strong static magnetic fields. Magn Reson Med Sci. 2011;10(1):1–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Ziegelberger G. ICNIRP guidelines: for limiting exposure to electric fields induced by movement of the human body in a static magnetic field and by time-varying magnetic fields below 1 Hz. Health Phys. 2014;106(3):418–25.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Gowland P, Glover P. Comment on ICNIRP guidelines for limiting exposure to electric fields induced by movement of the human body in a static magnetic field and by time-varying magnetic fields below 1 Hz. Health Phys. 2014;107(3):261.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Ziegelberger G. Response by ICNIRP to the comments of Gowland and Glover. Health Phys. 2014;107(3):262.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. The Sir Peter Mansfield Imaging Centre, School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, NG7 2RD, UK

    Paul Glover

Authors
  1. Paul Glover
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paul Glover.

Additional information

This article is part of the Topical Collection on MRI Safety.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Glover, P. Magnetic Field-Induced Vertigo in the MRI Environment. Curr Radiol Rep 3, 29 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40134-015-0112-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40134-015-0112-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation