Abstract
Purpose of Review
We summarize recent evidence describing how the health of first-generation immigrant children (FGIC) is influenced by the relational, built, community, and policy/political environments after migration to the United States.
Recent Findings
FGIC health is promoted and strengthened by family values, cultural ties, and positive peer relationships, while prior trauma, stressors in family relationships and discrimination detract from physical and mental health. While individual circumstances vary, some FGIC experience substandard built environments associated with poverty, including housing insecurity, food insecurity, and toxin exposures. Within community environments, FGIC receive support from their cultural communities, but may face challenges in navigating complex education and health systems. The policy/political environment often negatively impacts FGIC’s mental health and their ability to access medical and social services.
Summary
Healthcare provider awareness about health promoting and detracting factors for FGIC across multiple environments after migration can help inform comprehensive, trauma-informed care.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Healthcare providers are uniquely positioned to both care and advocate for immigrant children, from their arrival through supporting integration into their new community. In 2022, one in four children identified as part of an immigrant family; about 4% of all children in the United States, approximately 2.6 million, were estimated to be foreign born [1]. Immigrant children have different pathways to migration to the United States. It is estimated that in 2022, 40% of refugees entering the United States were under the age of 18 years, and similarly, around 40% of forcibly displaced individuals globally were children [2]. Between 2022 and 2024, over 100,000 unaccompanied children were released to sponsors through the Office of Refugee Resettlement [3].
Ties to community and one’s culture serve as protective factors after migration, and most children are resilient despite a difficult past journey [4•]. Many children and families face traumatic experiences in their home country prior to migration; armed conflict, stress and trauma of displacement are associated with poor health and mental health outcomes [5,6,7,8,9,10]. Family support during migration is associated with higher levels of resilience.
There are several resources reviewing recommendations about initial screening and evaluation of immigrant children arriving in the US [11,12,13,14], the importance of their migration path, and general reviews detailing approaches to primary care for immigrant children [15,16,17,18]. There are fewer reviews, however, about the ongoing adjustment children face after migration and how their new environments impact their health. Once in the United States, immigrant children experience both health promoting and detracting factors. The experience of migration –both the path before and after US arrival – is a social determinant of health (SDOH) for children [19].
Despite interacting with many immigrant patients and families, pediatricians often report feeling unprepared to care for immigrant children, including not understanding the complexity of care needs and influences [20]. The goal of our narrative review is to assess the impact of environmental factors on the adjustment of immigrant children after migration to the United States. This review summarizes recent evidence on the environmental factors impacting the health of foreign-born children under 18 years old arriving in the US (from now on referred to as “first-generation immigrant children” or FGIC), and the role healthcare providers can serve in supporting these children and families.
Methods
This review used narrative review methodology [21] to explore: what environmental factors impact the health of FGIC in the US, and how can healthcare providers promote the health of FGIC? This methodology is well suited to provide a general overview on this topic with room to interpret the findings and note research gaps; it is not an exhaustive literature review approach and it does not include grading the evidence quality.
The authors and a university librarian searched 3 databases (PubMed, Embase, and CINAHL) for English-language articles published in the last 5 years on the health of FGIC in the US. Search terms used included: immigrant, migrant, first generation, refugee, asylee, unaccompanied, undocumented, special immigrant visa, temporary visitor, legal permanent resident, child health, adolescent health, United States. When articles included both first-generation and later-generation immigrant children, or did not specify whether immigrant children were first-generation, articles were included per authors’ discretion. In order to draw conclusions from the widest range of papers, the authors (familiar with the field) added articles by personal suggestion, articles through reference lists of previously found articles, as well as policy statements and guidelines from professional organizations. All included materials will be referred to as publications moving forward. Commentaries, editorials, and gray literature were excluded. The publication search and selection process were stopped when authors felt that topic saturation was reached.
Results
There were 349 publications identified for this narrative review; 10 additional publications were found through author suggestions, and 8 additional publications through reference lists of reviewed publications. AZ and PN reviewed publications to choose relevant ones based on relevance to the research question (focused on FGIC in the US) and the addition of a novel perspective to the review, yielding a total of 74 publications, which were included in the final review. Authors then categorized publications into one of four categories of environmental impact on the health of FGIC – relational environment (21 publications), built environment (21 publications), community environment (17 publications), and policy/political environment (15 publications). Eight publications addressed multiple environments. Figure 1 shows the definition of each environment. Authors then reviewed publications to describe each publication’s population, methods, and health outcomes and associations considered (Table 1) and summarized main findings below.
Relational Environment
Relationships are a major source of resilience and well-being in the lives of all people, including immigrant children. A total of 21 publications in our search examined the impact of the relational environment on the health of FGIC. Most publications focused on the association between family relationships and mental health outcomes, and some addressed the association between relationships with peers and other adults in the community and physical health outcomes.
In many immigrant families, strong family ties provide major sources of resilience, and separation from family before, during, or after the migration journey is a toxic stress for children. In a study of affidavits of minors seeking asylum in the US, most of whom reported migration-related family separation and multiple traumatic stressors in their home country, 80.5% presented with significant symptoms of trauma-related disorders, depression, and/or anxiety [22•]. Additionally, the well-being of parents is impactful on the well-being of children; for example, in a study of West African immigrant children, parental post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) was associated with externalizing behaviors in children, which was strongest in parent-child dyads that experienced more than 1 year of separation [23]. In a survey of Latinx middle schoolers in Atlanta (12% of whom were born outside the US), family member detention or deportation once in the US was associated with an increased risk of suicidal ideation, alcohol use, and externalizing problems in youth [24]. Even the fear of family member detention or deportation can negatively impact youth mental health [25, 26•]; Latinx youth with unauthorized parents have more internalizing symptoms and a higher allostatic load—a combination of physiologic parameters including BMI, blood pressure, pulse, glucose metabolism, lipid regulation, and inflammation [26•].
When immigrant children come to the US after a period of parental separation either before migration, during migration, or at the border, reunification brings its own challenges. Reunification with family is a sensitive process of reattachment, especially given prior trauma of separation [22•, 27]. Additionally, some unaccompanied minors resettle with non-parental relatives or with non-family caregivers; youth living with non-family caregivers had less sources of resilience and less friends, while those living with non-parental relatives reported having more friends [4•]. Challenges with family reunification or placement with a non-parent sponsor can also contribute to an increased risk for labor and sex trafficking/exploitation of unaccompanied immigrant children; other factors that increase the risk of exploitation for this population include exposure to xenophobia, adjustment challenges, lack of familiarity with new culture and laws, and trouble accessing resources [28].
Another theme of the relational environment is the impact of acculturation and parents’ own mental health on parenting practices, parent-child relationships, and children’s mental health. Both children and families face acculturation stress with a new environment, social norms, language, and systems. Children, however, often acculturate faster than parents [29], leading to changes in family power dynamics, challenging parents’ abilities to uphold traditional family values [30] and monitor health behaviors such as substance use [31]. Additionally, in the US, families often have much less support from extended family and other community members compared to their home countries [30]. Parents of Syrian refugees voiced trouble finding time to spend with their family given long work hours, an experience likely shared by other immigrant groups [29]. Additionally, acculturation stressors are associated with increased risk of intimate partner violence (IPV) in immigrant populations, especially with more time spent in the US [32]. IPV negatively impacts children’s mental health, including increased rates of PTSD, anxiety, and depression [32]. Given such high prevalence of IPV in immigrant families (30-60% self-reported rates) and barriers to seeking help, it is very important for healthcare providers to screen for IPV using culturally sensitive tools when taking care of immigrant children [32].
Acknowledging the impact of family relationships on children’s physical and mental health, several publications examined interventions to support family well-being. The Family Strengthening Intervention for Refugees (FSI-R) demonstrated improved family power dynamics and child mental health [33, 34], and a culturally based intervention with the Filipino community demonstrated promising engagement by families [35]. Additional proposed sources of support are faith communities and nonparental adult mentors [36].
For many children, especially adolescents, peer relationships are also incredibly impactful. Immigrant adolescents who reported greater peer and family social support reported greater resilience during adversity, and ethnic identity searching (learning about and engaging in activities related to one’s culture) enhanced the relationship between peer social support and resilience [37]. Adolescents are more likely to form friendships with peers who share their immigrant generation status, and first-generation youth with more same-generation friends are less likely to report several risk-taking behaviors [38]. Peer relationships, however, can also negatively impact physical and mental health after arrival to the US. Through the process of acculturation, efforts to gain more peer acceptance can lead to conflict in family relations [39]. A study among first-generation Hispanic children had lower rates of obesity compared to later generations; having a social network with more second-generation friends was associated with a higher BMI among first-generation Hispanic children [40]. While rates of alcohol use were lower among first-generation Latinx youth at baseline compared to their peers, rates of alcohol use were among the highest when reassessed two years post-resettlement [41]. Additionally, perceived discrimination by peers is a source of distress and isolation [39]. Thus, overall, peer relations can both promote and detract from physical and mental health outcomes.
Built Environment
In our search, 21 publications addressed the impact of the built environment on FGIC’s health. The main themes that emerged were the poor conditions of immigration detention; the impact of poverty on immigrant children; and risks of toxin exposure.
One of the first environments that some FGIC are exposed to is the border of entry into the United States, and for some, the physical environment of detention. A significant portion of literature touches upon time in detention, which is correlated to poorer health outcomes for children, higher rates of developmental delays, hyperactivity and conduct disorder, as well as higher rates of PTSD and stress [42,43,44]. Reports of medication confiscation were also common, placing children at risk for medical crises both in detention and in the community without needed medications [45]. Congregate and unsanitary living situations increase the risk of infectious diseases, and requirements for safe and sanitary conditions in Customs and Border Protection custody do not include provision of soap [46•]. Numerous publications discussed that the physical environment of detention is not safe for children and should be avoided at all costs [47]; these sentiments are further supported by the American Academy of Pediatrics’ policy statement, reaffirmed in 2022 [48].
Upon arrival into a community in the US, neighborhood poverty was found to be a risk factor for parent-reported poor physical health of children [49]. Food insecurity is higher among some immigrant communities compared to US-born communities [50], and food insecurity is associated with poorer socioemotional health for children [49]. Food insecurity screening rates were as high as 75% amongst some immigrant families in the US, and one publication found food insecurity as high as 100% in asylum seeking families [50, 51]. FGIC are reported to also have lower access to telehealth services than non-immigrant children due to barriers to accessing stable internet [52], which has implications for schoolwork, parental work options and healthcare access.
FGIC face numerous challenges due to pollution and toxin exposures as well, making physical activity unsafe or less healthy [53, 54]. FGIC are at increased risk of elevated lead levels both from pre-migration exposures, particularly in those who spent time in refugee camps [55], as well as in post arrival environments. One study found that 30% of refugee children had elevated lead levels at repeat screening after arrival in the US, suggesting ongoing exposures post arrival such as paint, pipes, pots, make-up, and toys [56•]. Current recommendations highlight the importance of repeat screening three to six months after arrival given such risks [57]. Parents and children are often under pressure to take jobs with poorer working conditions and fewer protections, such as agricultural work, which increases risk for pesticide exposure, heat stroke and asthma exacerbation risks [58,59,60,61]. Even if not the agricultural worker themselves, having a parent involved in farm work increases exposure risks [61, 62]. Children in migrant seasonal worker families are also more likely to live in environments with more asthma triggers [62].
Community Environment
In addition to the immediate relationships in immigrant children’s lives, the community environment within which they live influences health. A total of 17 publications in our search addressed community impact on the health of FGIC. The main themes of these publications included the health impacts of the school environment, neighborhood culture, discrimination, and healthcare utilization.
In the school environment, belonging amongst peers was a common theme across the included publications. In a cohort of US high school students, 43% of whom were FGIC, a higher level of perceived school belonging for students was associated with higher resilience and lower suicidal ideation, while an increased number of stressful life events and specific regions of birth were associated with increased risk for suicidal ideation [63]. In qualitative interviews with Syrian refugee adolescents and parents, they reported several challenges in the new school environment that impact their sense of belonging, including language barriers, different social norms, and trouble communicating with the school system [29]. Additionally, FGIC are more likely to experience isolation and victimization in the classroom than their nonimmigrant peers [30], and perceived discrimination can impact mental health [64]. In a study of Somali and Hispanic immigrant youth, perceived discrimination was associated with symptoms of depression and anxiety [65]. Further, youth who used problem-focused coping strategies, rather than emotion-focused coping strategies, had less symptoms, providing a possible avenue for intervention to enhance coping strategies [65].
Neighborhood community characteristics influence immigrant child health as well. Some parents of Syrian refugees perceived their neighborhood to be unsafe, which made them afraid to leave the house and was a barrier to seeking healthcare services [66]. In a survey of children with foreign-born parents, neighborhood trust (feeling like people can be trusted and help each other) was associated with parental reports of increased overall physical and socioemotional health for children [49]. Parents of Syrian refugees reported that having their cultural community living around them is helpful in maintaining values and identity [29], and members of the cultural community can assist with answering questions, transportation, translation, and emotional support [66].
Health system access is also a part of the community environment. Health insurance coverage is a key factor influencing health system access (discussed in the policy/political environment section), and there are many additional barriers for families to access medical care. These include linguistic barriers (English-language automated reminders, lack of interpreters, difficulty understanding available interpreters, lack of adequate translation and cultural considerations in health education), limited health literacy, disjointed or non-existent care coordination, and difficulties with transportation [66, 67]. When families interact with the health care system, there are also individual, family, and cultural level factors that interplay with the community environment such as cultural perceptions of health care, family members’ mental health and prior experiences with the system which may have been traumatic, and the need to have time away from work [29]. Such barriers make it more difficult for immigrant children to access preventive health services, and immigrant children have lower immunization rates, lower likelihood of being prescribed preventative asthma medications, and higher rates of infectious diseases compared to native US born children [51]. Language barriers and lack of culture-centered support have also been shown to contribute to sexual and reproductive health inequities among immigrant youth [67]. However, the presence of a primary care physician in the neighborhood was associated with improved parent-reported child health status [49], and the ability to access acute visits for asthma in Federally Qualified Health Centers (which often have culturally and linguistically concordant services) was associated with lower emergency department visits and hospitalization rates among children of migrant seasonal farm workers [62]. Access to a medical home and school-based health can help mitigate some of the barriers to care that FGIC and their families experience [66,67,68].
There are parallel and additional barriers to accessing mental and behavioral health services for children in immigrant families. FGIC are less likely to access mental health services, and speaking a language other than English at home was associated with decreased access [69]. Parents of Latino children (not limited to immigrant children) reported language barriers, poverty, lack of empowerment, and confusion about the diagnostic process as contributors to delays in autism spectrum diagnosis among Latino children [70]. In a study of Latinx youth admitted for suicidal behavior to psychiatric hospitals, 20% had not accessed any formal mental health services prior to hospitalization (including outpatient mental health care, primary care support, school staff support) [71]. Being a FGIC and higher caregiver enculturation (maintaining the beliefs and values of one’s culture of origin) were associated with lower likelihood of use of formal mental health services, and speaking Spanish was associated with lower social support [71].
In contrast to the many challenges in accessing mental health services, there is a growing focus on solutions. For example, the Trauma Systems Therapy for Refugees (TST-R) is a multi-tiered prevention and intervention model developed with community-based participatory research that provides mental health services in a community-based, trauma-focused, culturally responsive way by collaborating with the school, family, and cultural brokers [72•, 73]. TST-R addresses stressors in a social ecological framework and has been successfully implemented across cultural groups including with youth in the Somali and Bhutanese communities in the US [72•]. This model demonstrates promise in reducing inequities to accessing mental health services among immigrant populations [72•]. A study among Asian-American immigrant youth showed that even when school-based mental health services are available, it is important to provide education about mental health services, engage families, and explain confidentiality to decrease inequities in utilization [74].
Policy and Political Environment
Immigration policy shapes not only legal outcomes for FGIC and their families but also health outcomes through access to programs and services. The policy/political environment that a child interacts with may extend from their first experience entering the US to the rhetoric and policies in place at the community, state, and federal levels. Our search resulted in 15 publications addressing the impact of the policy/political environment on an FGIC’s health, with an emphasis on the influence of negative political rhetoric on healthcare seeking behaviors, and impact of insurance coverage on health outcomes.
The policy/political environment an FGIC is welcomed into has a significant impact on family and child acclimation and sense of belonging. Negative immigration rhetoric and anti-immigrant legislation (defined as legislation that “serves to restrict immigrant access to basic services, public benefits, or employment, or increase the threat of legal consequence or deportation” [75•]) impacts family stress levels and limits access to medical and social services through the “chilling effect”: regardless of true eligibility for services, such rhetoric and policies instill fear, confusion about eligibility, and fear of becoming a public charge [76], decreasing willingness to access services families are eligible for [77,78,79,80,81,82]. Insurance rates are lower in communities with more restrictive access to health care benefits, and medical insurance is a positive predictor of health outcomes [79]. The impact of immigrant unfriendly policy/political environments on mental health, in particular, has been an area of active research [80]. The presence of harsher state-level and national immigration policies and stricter enforcement is associated with negative mental health impacts on children [24, 25], as well as decreased health-seeking behaviors and decreased access to social services [75•, 80].
On the contrary, policy/political environments that were viewed as friendly or inclusive to immigrants were associated with positive health outcomes, largely due to increased insurance rates, resulting in improved preventative care and decreased morbidity, as well as improved self-assessment of mental health [79, 83, 84•]. One publication by Koball showed a positive correlation between the ability of an undocumented immigrant to receive a driver’s license and positive health outcomes [84•]. The Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program eligibility among adolescents had a positive impact on their mental health and health seeking behaviors [85, 86]; however, uncertainty about the future of DACA due to changes in federal administration led to worsening in parent-reported child health to pre-DACA levels among DACA-eligible immigrants and their children [87]. More publications focus on negative policies and a gap that remains is further studying the impacts of friendly, sanctuary policies on health [80].
Discussion
This narrative review summarizes recent evidence about the impact of the relational, built, community, and policy/political environments on the health of FGIC and their families after arrival to the United States. Based on our literature review and our collective clinical experience, table 2 summarizes our recommendations for how providers can screen for environmental factors that may influence FGIC health and best support the well-being of FGIC and their families. It is critical to remember that establishing a trusting therapeutic relationship over time and multiple visits is the cornerstone of effectively partnering with families of FGIC to help families adjust to their new environments. It is also imperative to continually incorporate cultural humility, cultural safety, and cultural sensitivity into clinical care to reduce healthcare disparities [88,89,90].
While our search yielded publications with a variety of methods and health outcomes which are clinically useful in the care of immigrant children and families, we also identified several gaps in recent literature based on our clinical experience. Identified gaps include exploring the relationship between physical and mental health outcomes and the role of: care coordination between schools and health systems; early childhood and infant learning; communities of faith; social media; job environments, adultification, and employment off record; and sanctuary policy impact on health. From our collective experiences, housing instability also plays a significant role in health outcomes for families, and we did not identify any publications focused on this area. While a few publications discussed community and family-based interventions, these were limited and there is an opportunity for more health promotion and resiliency fostering interventions. On the contrary, the experience of detention felt more frequently studied, with less publications studying other pathways of migration and health outcomes. While several research gaps were identified, it is important to acknowledge that the environments surrounding FGIC are dynamic, and evidence gaps are inevitable. In these cases, healthcare providers can lean on their collective clinical expertise, including consultations with colleagues and adapting evidence from other patient populations and professional fields as appropriate.
Conclusions
The health of FGIC is influenced by a myriad of ever-changing environmental factors within the United States. Providers caring for FGIC must continually reassess not only the influences of pre-migration environments and the migration journey, but also the environments that become home for FGIC and their families in the US. More research is needed to elucidate the impact of different post-migration environmental factors on FGIC’s health, considering the heterogeneity of this large group of children, including different migration journeys, legal status designations, and resources post-resettlement. Additional research, ideally rooted in community participation, will help hone and refine best practices for immigrant child health care.
References
Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance
The Annie E. Casey Foundation (2024). Understanding the children of immigrant families. https://www.aecf.org/blog/who-are-the-children-in-immigrant-families. Accessed 18 Apr. 2024.
The United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (2023). Global trends: forced displacement in 2022. https://www.unhcr.org/sites/default/files/2023-06/global-trends-report-2022.pdf Accessed 18 Apr. 2024.
Office of Refugee Resettlement (2024). Unaccompanied children released to sponsors by state. https://www.acf.hhs.gov/orr/grant-funding/unaccompanied-children-released-sponsors-state. Accessed 18 Apr. 2024.
• Orjuela-Grimm M, Marti-Castaner M, Bhatt-Carreño S, Castro MA, Restrepo Henao A, Pinilla H, et al. Household composition after resettlement and emotional health in adolescent migrants. J Migr Health. 2022;5: 100103. Interesting mixed-methods study highlighting the resilience and vulnerability of minors seeking asylum and the importance of support of mental health.
Shenoda S, Kadir A, Pitterman S, Goldhagen J, Suchdev P, Chan K, et al. The american academy of pediatrics policy statement: the effects of armed conflict on children. pediatrics. 2018; 142(6):e20182585. https://publications.aap.org/pediatrics/article/142/6/e20182585/37469/The-Effects-of-Armed-Conflict-on-Children. Accessed 18 Apr. 2024.
Cohodes EM, Kribakaran S, Odriozola P, Bakirci S, McCauley S, Hodges HR, et al. Migration-related trauma and mental health among migrant children emigrating from mexico and central america to the united states: effects on developmental neurobiology and implications for policy. Dev Psychobiol. 2021;63(6): e22158.
Naranjo L, Williams Y, Levy J, Obando R, Gonzalez JA, Pachar M, et al. The Endless vulnerability of migrant children in-transit across the darien gap. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2023;109(3):515–9.
National Child Traumatic Stress Network (n.d.). Refugee Trauma. https://www.nctsn.org/what-is-child-trauma/trauma-types/refugee-trauma. Accessed 18 Apr. 2024.
Center on the Developing Child (n.d.). ACEs and Toxic Stress: Frequently Asked Questions. https://developingchild.harvard.edu/resources/aces-and-toxic-stress-frequently-asked-questions/. Accessed 18 Apr. 2024.
Felitti VJ, Anda RF, Nordenberg D, Williamson DF, Spitz AM, Edwards V, et al. Relationship of childhood abuse and household dysfunction to many of the leading causes of death in adults. The Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACE) Study. Am J Prev Med. 1998; 14(4):245–58.
Meneses C, Chilton L, Duffee J, Joiner T, Koehler J, Linton J, et al. American academy of pediatrics: immigrant health toolkit (2021). https://downloads.aap.org/AAP/PDF/cocp_toolkit_full.pdf. Accessed 18 Apr. 2024.
Chilton L, Handal G, Paz-Soldan G, Granado-Villar D, Gitterman B, Brown J, et al. The american academy of pediatrics policy statement: providing care for immigrant, migrant, and border children. pediatrics. 2013; 131(6): e2028–e2034. https://publications.aap.org/pediatrics/article/131/6/e2028/31071/Providing-Care-for-Immigrant-Migrant-and-Border. Accessed 18 Apr. 2024.
Minnesota Department of Health: Center of Excellence in Newcomer Health (n.d.). CareRef. https://careref.web.health.state.mn.us/. Accessed 18 Apr. 2024.
CDC. Guidance for the u.s. domestic medical examination for newly arriving refugees 2021. https://www.cdc.gov/immigrantrefugeehealth/guidelines/domestic-guidelines.html. Accessed 18 Apr. 2024.
Ibrahim A, Linton J, Dawson-Hahn E.. Providing compassionate, evidence-based care for refugee, immigrant, and migrant children. Adv Pediatr. 2024.
Kroening ALH, Dawson-Hahn E. Health considerations for immigrant and refugee children. Adv Pediatr. 2019;66:87–110.
Fredricks K, Stein F. Care of the immigrant child. Pediatr Rev. 2022;43(1):16–27.
Triemstra JD, Monterrey AC. The health of children who are immigrants and refugees: A review for the general pediatrician. Pediatr Ann. 2019;48(11):e455-60.
Castañeda H, Holmes SM, Madrigal DS, Young MED, Beyeler N, Quesada J. Immigration as a social determinant of health. Annu Rev Public Health. 2015;18(36):375–92.
Sisk B, Green A, Chan K, Yun K. Caring for children in immigrant families: are united states pediatricians prepared? Acad Pediatr. 2020;20(3):391–8.
Sukhera J. Narrative Reviews: Flexible, Rigorous, and Practical. J Grad Med Educ. 2022;14(4):414–7.
• Sangmo L, DiRisio AC, D’Andrea MR, Singer-Pomerantz S, Baranowski KA. The experiences of minors seeking asylum in the united states: a modified consensual qualitative research analysis. J Trauma Stress. 2020;33(6):882–93. Comprehensive evaluation of the experience of minors seeking asylum in the US, including traumatic experiences pre-migration and during migration, physical injuries, mental health sequelae, and resilience factors.
Anakwenze O, Rasmussen A. The impact of parental trauma, parenting difficulty, and planned family separation on the behavioral health of West African immigrant children in New York City. Psychol Trauma. 2021;13(4):457–66.
Roche KM, White RMB, Lambert SF, Schulenberg J, Calzada EJ, Kuperminc GP, et al. Association of family member detention or deportation with latino or latina adolescents’ later risks of suicidal ideation, alcohol use, and externalizing problems. JAMA Pediatr. 2020;174(5):478–86.
Lemon ED, Mera Nieto KS, Serrano Laguna LY, Flores YA, Niño-Suastegui M, Peraza Campos J, et al. “I Can Never Feel Safe”: Latinx Youth Voices on Psychosocial Impacts of 287(g) in Georgia. Health Educ Behav. 2024;51(1):71–81.
• Potochnick S, Mikkelsen I, Gallo LC, Isasi CR, Gonzalez F, Perreira KM. Immigrant parent legal status and children’s health in the hispanic community health study of latino youth (SOL Youth). J Immigr Minor Health. 2023. Unique in measuring both physical and mental health characteristics, and analyzing impact of parents' and children's stress and resilience on health outcomes.
Delgado JR, Diaz LD, LaHuffman-Jackson R, Quion N, Walts K. Community-based trauma-informed care following immigrant family reunification: a narrative review. Academic Pediatrics. 2021;21(4):600–4.
Greenbaum J, Kaplan D, Young J, Linton J, Gutierrez R, Caballero T, et al. Exploitation, labor and sex trafficking of children and adolescents: health care needs of patients. Pediatrics. 2023; 151(1).
d’Abreu A, Castro-Olivo S, Ura SK, Furrer J. Hope for the future: A qualitative analysis of the resettlement experience of Syrian refugee adolescents and parents. School Psychology International. 2021;42(2):132–56.
Rosenberg J, Leung JK, Harris K, Abdullah A, Rohbar A, Brown C, et al. Recently-arrived afghan refugee parents’ perspectives about parenting, education and pediatric medical and mental health care services. J Immigr Minor Health. 2022;24(2):481–8.
Wilhelm AK, Allen ML, Pratt RJ. Belonging to three worlds: somali adolescent-parent relationships in the united states and implications for tobacco prevention. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(6):3653.
Prakash N, Prevot J, Kola B, Wood SK. Improving health outcomes for immigrant families through ipv screening: resources and recommendations for pediatric health care providers. Curr Probl Pediatr Adolesc Health Care. 2019;49(1):7–15.
Neville SE, DiClemente-Bosco K, Chamlagai LK, Bunn M, Freeman J, Berent JM, et al. Investigating outcomes of a family strengthening intervention for resettled somali bantu and bhutanese refugees: an explanatory sequential mixed methods study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(19):12415.
DiClemente-Bosco K, Elizabeth Neville S, Berent JM, Farrar J, Mishra T, Abdi A, et al. Understanding mechanisms of change in a family-based preventive mental health intervention for refugees by refugees in New England. Transcultural Psychiatry. 2023;60(1):142–55.
Javier JR, Coffey DM, Palinkas LA, Kipke MD, Miranda J, Schrager SM. Promoting enrollment in parenting programs among a filipino population: a randomized trial. Pediatrics. 2019;143(2): e20180553.
Wilhelm AK, Pratt RJ, Allen ML. Key informant perspectives on somali adolescent tobacco use: contextualizing influences and prevention opportunities. Health Educ Behav. 2022;49(2):304–12.
Cole E, Su S, Diaz A, Zhang M. Social support and resilience among Burmese adolescent refugees: Examining ethnic identity searching and belonging as moderators. Children & Youth Services Review. 2022; 142.
McMillan C. Tied Together: Adolescent Friendship Networks, Immigrant Status, and Health Outcomes. Demography (Springer Nature). 2019;56(3):1075–103.
Abdi S, Akinsulure-Smith AM, Sarkadi A, Fazel M, Ellis BH, Gillespie S, et al. Promoting positive development among refugee adolescents. J Res Adolesc. 2023;33(4):1064–84.
Gonzalez CJ, Copeland M, Shapiro MF, Moody J. Associations of peer generational status on adolescent weight across Hispanic immigrant generations: A social network analysis. Soc Sci Med. 2023;323: 115831.
Ormiston CK, Pike JR, Sabado-Liwag MD, Xie B, Stacy AW, Williams F. Underage alcohol use by intersectional identity among alternative high school students. J Adolesc Health. 2023; 1-11.
Sriraman NK. Detention of immigrant children – a growing crisis. what is the pediatrician’s role? Curr Probl Pediatr Adolesc Health Care. 2019; 49(2):50–3.
Mares S. Mental health consequences of detaining children and families who seek asylum: a scoping review. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2021;30(10):1615–39.
MacLean SA, Agyeman PO, Walther J, Singer EK, Baranowski KA, Katz CL. Mental health of children held at a United States immigration detention center. Soc Sci Med. 2019;230:303–8.
Halevy-Mizrahi NR, Harwayne-Gidansky I. Medication confiscation: How migrant children are placed in medically vulnerable conditions. Pediatrics. 2020; 145(1).
• Danaher F, Blackwell R, Jasrasaria R, Bosson R. Collateral damage: increasing risks to children in a hostile immigration policy environment. Curr Pediatr Rep. 2022;10(4):260–5. Review of recent US immigration policies and impact on children's health.
Nwadiuko J, Fredricks K, Polk S, Shah S, Long JA, Diaz C, et al. Pediatric hospitalizations from immigration detention in texas, 2015–2018. J Pediatr. 2022;244:212–4.
Linton J, Griffin M, Shapiro A, Chilton L, Flanagan P, Dilley K, et al. The american academy of pediatrics policy statement: detention of immigrant children (2017). https://publications.aap.org/pediatrics/article/139/5/e20170483/38727/Detention-of-Immigrant-Children. Accessed 18 Apr. 2024.
Choi JK, Kelley M, Wang D, Kerby H. Neighborhood environment and child health in immigrant families: using nationally representative individual, family, and community datasets. Am J Health Promot. 2021;35(7):948–56.
Abunimer L, Yosief SF, Permashwar V. Food Insecurity During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Spotlight on Latinx Communities. Pediatrics [Internet]. 2022; 149.
Chang CD. Social Determinants of Health and Health Disparities Among Immigrants and their Children. Curr Probl Pediatr Adolesc Health Care. 2019;49(1):23–30.
Weith J, Fondacaro K, Khin PP. Practitioners’ perspectives on barriers and benefits of telemental health services: the unique impact of covid-19 on resettled u.s. refugees and asylees. Community Mental Health Journal. 2023; 59(4):609–21.
Jones A, Ishizawa H, Samant P. Neighborhood and behavioral effects on weight change across immigrant generations: evidence from the national longitudinal study of adolescent to adult health (add health). Int J Behav Med. 2023;30(5):731–42.
Donley N, Bullard RD, Economos J, Figueroa I, Lee J, Liebman AK, et al. Pesticides and environmental injustice in the USA: root causes, current regulatory reinforcement and a path forward. BMC Public Health. 2022;22(1):708.
Balza JS, Bikomeye JC, Beyer KMM, Rublee C, Flynn KE. Elevated blood lead levels of refugee children in the United States: a systematic review of recent literature (2011–2021). Rev Environ Health. 2023;38(2):361–83.
• Wessel L, Anderko L. Assessment and prevention of lead poisoning in refugee populations. J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2023;34(1):447–65. In-depth analysis of lead risks and screening recommendations.
CDC (2022). Screening for Lead during the Domestic Medical Examination for Newly Arrived Refugees. https://www.cdc.gov/immigrantrefugeehealth/guidelines/lead-guidelines.html. Accessed 18 Apr. 2024.
Arcury TA, Arnold TJ, Quandt SA, Chen H, Kearney GD, Sandberg JC, et al. Health and occupational injury experienced by latinx child farmworkers in North Carolina, USA. Int J Environ Res Public Health [Internet]. 2020; 17(1).
Arcury TA, Chen H, Arnold TJ, Quandt SA, Anderson KA, Scott RP, et al. Pesticide exposure among Latinx child farmworkers in North Carolina. Am J Ind Med. 2021;64(7):602–19.
Arnold TJ, Arcury TA, Sandberg JC, Quandt SA, Talton JW, Mora DC, et al. Heat-related illness among latinx child farmworkers in north carolina: a mixed-methods Study. New Solut. 2020;30(2):111–26.
Farabi N, Song S, Crockett ET, Song WO. Health Determinants of Asthma among Hispanic/Latino Children Enrolled in the Michigan Migrant and Seasonal Head Start Programs. Journal of Child Science. 2019;9(1):E17-23.
Kasten-Arias C, Hodes T, Marino M, Kaufmann J, Lucas JA, Estela Vasquez Guzman C, et al. Healthcare utilization for asthma exacerbation among children of migrant and seasonal farmworkers. Prev Med Rep. 2024; 38:102598.
Stark L, Seff I, Yu G, Salama M, Wessells M, Allaf C, et al. Correlates of Suicide Ideation and Resilience Among Native- and Foreign-Born Adolescents in the United States. J Adolesc Health. 2022;70(1):91–8.
Trent M, Dooley D, Douge J, Cavanaugh R, Lacroix A, Fanburg J, et al. The american academy of pediatrics policy statement: the impact of racism on child and adolescent health. Pediatrics. 2019;144(2): e20191765.
Forster M, Grigsby T, Rogers C, Unger J, Alvarado S, Rainisch B, et al. Perceived Discrimination, Coping Styles, and Internalizing Symptoms Among a Community Sample of Hispanic and Somali Adolescents. J Adolesc Health. 2022;70(3):488–95.
Alwan RM, Schumacher DJ, Cicek-Okay S, Jernigan S, Beydoun A, Salem T, et al. Beliefs, perceptions, and behaviors impacting healthcare utilization of Syrian refugee children. PLoS One. 2020;15(8): e0237081.
Valdez ES, Chan J, Donis A, Collins-Lovell C, Dixon S, Beatriz E, et al. Structural Racism and Its Influence On Sexual and Reproductive Health Inequities Among Immigrant Youth. Journal of Immigrant & Minority Health. 2023;25(1):16–22.
Carmine L. Current challenges in school-based health center care: COVID, mental health care, immigrant youth, expansion of telemedicine. Curr Probl Pediatr Adolesc Health Care. 2024; 101583.
Cheng TC, Lo CC. Factors Related to Use of Mental Health Services by Immigrant Children. Journal of Child & Family Studies. 2022;31(1):228–36.
Zuckerman KE, Sinche B, Mejia A, Cobian M, Becker T, Nicolaidis C. Latino parents’ perspectives on barriers to autism diagnosis. Acad Pediatr. 2014;14(3):301–8.
Buitron V, Jiménez-Colón G, Duarté-Vélez Y. Mental health services use and social support among Latinx families with adolescents who engage in suicidal behavior. Evid Based Pract Child Adolesc Ment Health. 2023;8(2):194–205.
• Miller AB, Davis SH, Mulder LA, Winer JP, Issa OM, Cardeli E, et al. Leveraging community-based mental health services to reduce inequities for children and families living in United States who have experienced migration-related trauma. Psychol Trauma. 2022. Important review of a successful intervention that provides mental health services in a community-based, trauma-focused, culturally responsive way and can reduce inequities in mental health access.
Kaplin D, Parente K, Santacroce F. A Review of the Use of Trauma Systems Therapy to Treat Refugee Children, Adolescents, and Families. J of Infant, CHild, and Adol Psychotherapy. 2019; 417-431.
Arora P, Algios A. School-Based Mental Health for Asian American Immigrant Youth: Perceptions and Recommendations. Asian American J of Psychology. 2019;10(2):166–81.
• Vernice NA, Pereira NM, Wang A, Demetres M, Adams LV. The adverse health effects of punitive immigrant policies in the United States: A systematic review. PLoS One. 2020;15(12): e0244054. Detailed review of impact of policies on health, helpful table.
Raphael JL, Beers LS, Perrin JM, Garg A. Public Charge: An Expanding Challenge to Child Health Care Policy. Acad Pediatr. 2020;20(1):6–8.
Caballero E, Gutierrez R, Schmitt E, Castenada J, Torres-Cacho N, Rodriguez RM. Impact of Anti-Immigrant Rhetoric on Latinx Families’ Perceptions of Child Safety and Health Care Access. J Emerg Med. 2022;62(2):264–74.
Oparil S, Scott R. State of the Art: the Not-So-Great Wall of America. Curr Hypertens Rep. 2019;21(12):97.
Lonquich B, Camp EA, Fredricks K, Russell EA. State-Specific Medicaid/CHIP Eligibility Criteria and Their Impact on Health Care Access for Foreign-born Children Living in the United States. J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2023;34(1):345–56.
Perreira KM, Pedroza JM. Policies of exclusion: implications for the health of immigrants and their children. Annu Rev Public Health. 2019;40:147–66.
Choi SW, Park S, Duah A, Kim K, Park M. Consequences of the 2019 Public Charge Rule Announcement and Publication on Prenatal WIC Participation Among Immigrant Families: Evidence of Spillover Effects. J Immigr Minor Health. 2023;25(6):1229–38.
Valdez ES, Chan J, Donis A, Collins-Lovell C, Dixon S, Beatriz E, et al. Structural Racism and Its Influence On Sexual and Reproductive Health Inequities Among Immigrant Youth. Journal of Immigrant & Minority Health. 2023Feb;25(1):16–22.
Lipton BJ, Nguyen J, Schiaffino MK. California’s Health4All Kids Expansion And Health Insurance Coverage Among Low-Income Noncitizen Children. Health Aff. 2021;40(7):1075–83.
• Koball H, Kirby J, Hartig S. The Relationship Between States’ Immigrant-Related Policies and Access to Health Care Among Children of Immigrants. J Immigr Minor Health. 2022;24(4):834–41. Interesting perspective on how policies have broader implications for children's health.
Sudhinaraset M, Ling I, Gao L, Chavarin J, Gee GC. The association between Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals, health access, and mental health: the role of discrimination, medical mistrust, and stigma. Ethnicity & Health. 2022;27(5):1075–87.
El-Banna G, Higuera K, Mendoza FS. The Intergenerational Health Effects of the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals Program on Families With Mixed Immigration Status. Acad Pediatr. 2022;22(5):729–35.
Patler C, Hamilton E, Meagher K, Savinar R. Uncertainty About DACA May Undermine Its Positive Impact On Health For Recipients And Their Children. Health Aff. 2019;38(5):738–45.
So N, Price K, O’Mara P, Rodrigues MA. The importance of cultural humility and cultural safety in health care. Med J Aust. 2024;220(1):12–3.
Okoniewski W, Sundaram M, Chaves-Gnecco D, McAnany K, Cowden JD, Ragavan M. Culturally Sensitive Interventions in Pediatric Primary Care Settings: A Systematic Review. Pediatrics. 2022;149(2): e2021052162.
Ragavan MI, Griffith KN, Cowden JD, Colvin JD, Bair-Merritt M. Parental Perceptions of Culturally Sensitive Care and Well-Child Visit Quality. Acad Pediatr. 2020;20(2):234–40.
National Child Traumatic Stress Network (n.d.). Screening and Assessment. https://www.nctsn.org/what-is-child-trauma/trauma-types/refugee-trauma/screening-and-assessment. Accessed 18 Apr. 2024.
Gartland D, Riggs E, Giallo R, Glover K, Stowe M, Mongta S, et al. Development of a multidimensional culturally and socially inclusive measure of factors that support resilience: Child Resilience Questionnaire-Child report (CRQ-C)-a community-based participatory research and psychometric testing study in Australia. BMJ Open. 2022;12(9): e060229.
TuftsMedicine (n.d). SWYC Translations. https://www.tuftsmedicine.org/medical-professionals-trainees/academic-departments/department-pediatrics/survey-well-being-young-children/swyc-translations#. Accessed 18 Apr 2024.
Sherin KM, Sinacore JM, Li XQ, Zitter RE, Shakil A. HITS: a short domestic violence screening tool for use in a family practice setting. Fam Med. 1998;30(7):508–12.
Greenbaum VJ, Dodd M, McCracken C. A short screening tool to identify victims of child sex trafficking in the health care setting. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2018;34(1):33–7.
Dixit A, Miner EM, Wiehe SE, McHenry MS. Adolescent burmese refugees perspectives on determinants of health. J Immigr Minor Health. 2018;20(2):370–9.
Dawson-Hahn E, Cházaro A. Mitigating the health consequences for youth in families affected by immigration policy changes: opportunities for health care professionals and health systems. JAMA Pediatr. 2019;173(8):721–3.
Immigrant Legal Research Center (2017). Family Preparedness Plan. https://www.ilrc.org/resources/family-preparedness-plan. Accessed 18 Apr. 2024.
Garg A, Toy S, Tripodis Y, Silverstein M, Freeman E. Addressing social determinants of health at well child care visits: a cluster RCT. Pediatrics. 2015;135(2):e296-304.
Health Leads (n.d.). The Health Leads Screening Toolkit. https://healthleadsusa.org/news-resources/the-health-leads-screening-toolkit/. Accessed 18 Apr. 2024.
Hager ER, Quigg AM, Black MM, Coleman SM, Heeren T, Rose-Jacobs R, et al. Development and validity of a 2-item screen to identify families at risk for food insecurity. Pediatrics. 2010;126(1):e26-32.
Green A, Saia M. Preventing Harm on Arrival: Lead Prevention in Newly Resettled Pediatric Refugees. Pediatrics. 2019;143(5): e20183567.
Goodman R (2022). Youth in mind: strengths & difficulties questionnaire. https://youthinmind.com/products-and-services/sdq/. Accessed 18 Apr. 2024.
Ethnomed (2024). Integrating cultural information into clinical practice. https://ethnomed.org/. Accessed 18 Apr. 2024.
Core: Cultural Orientation Research Exchange (n.d.). https://coresourceexchange.org/. Accessed 18 Apr. 2024.
CDC (2021). Refugee health profiles. https://www.cdc.gov/immigrantrefugeehealth/profiles/index.html. Accessed 18 Apr. 2024.
National Immigration Law Center (n.d.). Know your rights. https://www.nilc.org/get-involved/community-education-resources/know-your-rights/. Accessed 18 Apr. 2024.
Terra Firma (n.d.). https://www.terrafirma.nyc/. Accessed 18. Apr. 2024.
Grant AR, Cockburn B, Ahmed F, Dumanian R, Garcia Y, Gould J, et al. Caregiver experience with bicultural, bilingual family navigators to support early childhood development. J Immigr Minor Health. J Immigr Minor Health. 2024.
PolicyLab: Center to Bridge Research, Practice & Policy (2015). Translating standardized pediatric questionnaires: a simple tool for providers. https://policylab.chop.edu/sites/default/files/pdf/publications/Translating_Standardized_Pediatric_Questionnaires.pdf. Accessed 18 Apr. 2024.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
A.Z. and P.N. reviewed publications to choose relevant ones based on relevance to the research question. All authors then reviewed the list of included publications and made final contributions based on previous experience. A.Z. and P.N. then categorized publications into one of four categories of environmental impact on the health of FGIC; all authors reviewed the final list and groupings. A.Z. and P.N. then reviewed publications to describe each publication’s population, methods, and health outcomes and associations considered and summarized main findings in Table 1. All authors contributed to the writing and editing of the manuscript, as well as the creation of table 2. A.Z. created figure 1 with the input of A.G., and all authors then reviewed and gave final input. All authors reviewed the manuscript, figure and tables.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing Interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Conflict of Interest
Anna Zuckerman, Perry Nagin, Anisa Ibrahim, Andrea Green, and Elizabeth E. Dawson-Hann each declare no potential conflicts of interest.
Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent
This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Zuckerman, A., Nagin, P., Ibrahim, A. et al. Impact of the Relational, Built, Community, and Policy/Political Environments on Immigrant Child Health: A Narrative Review. Curr Pediatr Rep 12, 117–134 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40124-024-00316-8
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40124-024-00316-8