Correction to: Infect Dis Ther https://doi.org/10.1007/s40121-021-00579-4

In the original publication of the article, Funding must be changed and figures files are wrong labeled, so both issues has been addressed.

  1. 1.

    Funding: The study was partially financed by grants from the ISCIII (PI18/00045), the European Regional Development Fund (FEDER) “A way of making Europe” and from Fundación Mutua Madrileña (FMM21/01).

  2. 2.

    Results: last paragraph:

    In contrast, in E. faecium biofilms, the only statistically and clinically significant difference between DH and dalbavancin was observed for the median (IQR) percentage reduction in log cfu/ml at month 6 (13.6% [13.0–18.9%] vs. 20.4% [14.6–26.6%], p = 0.01, 25% of dalbavancin value: 15.3%) (Table 3, Fig. 3C). No significant reduction in metabolic activity was detected during either of the 2 periods (months 3 and 6) (Table 3, Fig. 3D).

  3. 3.

    Figures files (you can find them attached correctly labeled).

Fig. 1A 1B must be 3A 3B.

figure a

Fig. 2A 2B must be 3C 3D.

figure b

Fig. 3A 3B must be 1A 1B.

figure c

Fig. 3C 3D must be 2A 2B.

figure d

This has been corrected in this paper.