Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Centrifuge Model Studies on the Use of Hybrid-Geosynthetic Inclusions in Slopes Subjected to Infiltration

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Indian Geotechnical Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Rainfall-triggered slope failures have increased globally by over 70% in the last decade, as a direct implication of climate change. This can be counteracted by having good quality granular material to allow quick dissipation of pore water pressures. In the absence of permeable soils, the response of slopes with marginal soil during infiltration events can be improved by the simultaneous provision of preferential drainage channels and reinforcement function. The study discusses the effectiveness of inclusion of an assembled geosynthetic material possessing drainage action of a non-woven geotextile and reinforcement characteristic of woven geogrid, referred as a hybrid-geosynthetic. Centrifuge modelling technique was adopted, appropriate scaling laws were established, and a series of centrifuge tests were performed at 30 g on reinforced silty sand slopes of 2V:1H inclination representing 7.2 m height using a custom-designed rainfall simulator. The effect of geosynthetic type and optimum position of hybrid-geosynthetic layers within the slope were investigated. The slope movements, pore water pressure profiles, peak reinforcement strains and potential failure surface were analysed with the help of instrumentation and digital image analysis. The slope reinforced with geogrid indicated continuous build-up of positive pore water pressures during infiltration, while, the slope reinforced with hybrid-geosynthetic encountered lesser rise in phreatic levels by around 40% for the same intensity of rainfall. This resulted in substantially lesser peak strains of about 8% in the hybrid-geosynthetic layer as compared to the geogrids and non-woven geotextiles, wherein peak strain values as high as 48% and 19% respectively were registered. As far as the optimum placement of hybrid-geosynthetic inclusions within the slopes are concerned, the hybrid-geosynthetic layers placed within bottom one-third portion of the slope were more effective in drainage function. The hybrid-geosynthetic material thus developed can economize project costs by enhancing the performance of slopes with marginal soil deposits and the use of on-site local soils in reinforced earth construction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

References

  1. CRED (Centre for Research on the Epidemiology of Disaster) (2012) Annual disaster statistical review 2011: the numbers and trends. Research Unit, Université Catholique de Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium, CRED

    Google Scholar 

  2. Koerner RM, Koerner GR (2011) The importance of drainage control for geosynthetic reinforced mechanically stabilized earth walls. J Geoeng 6(1):3–13

    Google Scholar 

  3. Dahal RK, Hasegawa S (2008) Representative rainfall thresholds for landslides the Nepal Himalaya. Geomorphology 100(3–4):429–443

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Basu D, Misra A, Puppala AJ (2015) Sustainability and geotechnical engineering: perspectives and review. Can Geotech J 52(1):96–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bhattacherjee D, Viswanadham BVS (2018) Effect of hybrid-geosynthetic layers on slope stability under rainfall condition. Indian Geotech J 48(2):316–326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. FHWA (1997) 1997 Federal highway cost allocation study summary report, U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration

  7. AASHTO (2000) Manual for condition evaluation of highway bridges, 2nd edn. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  8. Sridharan A, Murthy S, Bindumadhava BR, Revansiddappa K (1991) Technique for using fine-grained soil in reinforced earth. J Geotech Eng ASCE 117(8):1174–1190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Fourie AB, Fabian KJ (1987) Laboratory determination of clay geotextile interaction. Geotext Geomembr 6(4):275–294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Zornberg JG, Mitchell JK (1994) Reinforced soil structures with poorly draining backfills. Part I: reinforcement Interactions and functions. Geosynth Int 1(2):103–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Tan SA, Chew SH, Ng CC, Loh SL, Karunaratne GP, Delmas Ph, Loke KH (2001) Large-scale drainage behavior of composite geotextile and geogrid in residual soil. Geotext Geomembr 19(3):163–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Noorzad R, Mirmoradi SH (2010) Laboratory evaluation of the behavior of geotextile-reinforced clay. Geotext Geomembr 28(4):386–392

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Portelinha FHM, Bueno BS, Zornberg JG (2013) Performance of nonwoven geotextile-reinforced walls under wetting conditions: laboratory and field investigations. Geosynth Int 20(2):90–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Bhattacherjee D, Viswanadham BVS (2015) Numerical studies on the performance of hybrid-geosynthetic-reinforced soil slopes subjected to rainfall. Geosynth Int 22(6):411–427

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Bhattacherjee D, BVS Viswanadham (2016) “Effect of hybrid-geosynthetic layers on soil walls with marginal backfill subjected to rainfall”. In: Proceeding of Geo-Chicago 2016, GeoSupport 269. A De, KR Reddy, N Yesiller, D Zekkos, A Farid, (eds.) pp. 362–371. Reston, VA: ASCE

  16. Raisinghani DV, Viswanadham BVS (2010) Evaluation of permeability characteristics of a geosynthetic-reinforced soil through laboratory tests. Geotext Geomembr 28(6):579–588

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. O’Kelly BC, Naughton PJ (2008) Technical note on the interface shear resistance of a novel geogrid with in-plane drainage capability. Geotext Geomembr 26(4):357–362

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kief O (2015) “Hybrid geosynthetic solution for rail track on expansive clay.” In: Proceeding of geosynthetics 2015 conference, international geosynthetics society, Portland, Oregon

  19. Shukla SK (2021) Geosynthetics and ground engineering: sustainability considerations. Int J Geosynth Ground Eng 7:17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Dixon N, Fowmes G, Frost M (2017) Global challenges, geosynthetic solutions and counting carbon. Geosynth Int 24(5):451–464

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Raja J, Dixon N, Fowmes G, Frost MW, Assinder P (2015) Obtaining reliable embodied carbon values for geosynthetics. Geosynth Int 22(5):393–401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. WRAP (Waste and Resources Action Programme) (2010) “Sustainable geosystems in civil engineering applications.” Project MRF116, Waste and resources action programme, Banbury, UK

  23. Pathak YP, Alfaro MC (2010) Wetting–drying behavior of geogrid-reinforced clay under working load conditions. Geosynth Int 17(3):144–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Bhattacherjee D, Viswanadham BVS (2019) Centrifuge model studies on performance of hybrid-geosynthetic–reinforced slopes with poorly draining soil subjected to rainfall. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng ASCE 145(12):04019108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Schofield AN (1980) Cambridge geotechnical operations. Geotechnique 30(3):227–268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Taylor RN (1995) Centrifuges in modelling: principles and scale effects. Geotechnical Centrifuge Technology, Blackie Academic and Professional, Glasgow

    Book  Google Scholar 

  27. Chandrasekaran VS (2001) Numerical and centrifuge modelling in soil structure interaction. Indian Geotech J 31(1):30–59

    Google Scholar 

  28. Bhattacherjee D, Viswanadham BVS (2018) Design and performance of an inflight rainfall simulator in a geotechnical centrifuge. Geotech Test J 41(1):72–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Llasat MC (2001) An objective classification of rainfall events on the basis of their convective features. Int J Climatol 21(1):1385–1400

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the staff members of NGCF, Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, Powai, Mumbai-400076, India, for their assistance in conducting the tests. Additionally, the author would like to acknowledge the support received at IIEST Shibpur, Howrah, Shibpur-711103, India, during the drafting of the manuscript.

Funding

Not applicable for the current research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Engineering Science and Technology Shibpur, Howrah, 711103, West Bengal, India

    Dipankana Bhattacherjee

  2. Department of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, Powai, Mumbai, 400076, India

    B. V. S. Viswanadham

Authors
  1. Dipankana Bhattacherjee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. B. V. S. Viswanadham
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dipankana Bhattacherjee.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bhattacherjee, D., Viswanadham, B.V.S. Centrifuge Model Studies on the Use of Hybrid-Geosynthetic Inclusions in Slopes Subjected to Infiltration. Indian Geotech J (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40098-024-00976-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40098-024-00976-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation