Skip to main content
Log in

Coupled Analytical—Numerical Modeling of Ground Vibrations Generated from Moving Trains in Circular Shaped Tunnel Embedded in Soil

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Indian Geotechnical Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In metropolitan cities, underground railway lines of Mass Rapid Transit Systems are the lifeline to the daily commuters. However, these underground lines cause vibrations while trains move. This ground-borne vibrations may cause damage to heritage buildings and façade elements. Humans can feel this vibration, and the comfort of people living nearby is compromised if vibrations cross threshold limit. In the current study, a two-stage coupled analysis is conducted to assess ground-borne vibrations in the free field generated by moving trains in a circular shaped tunnel. Two sub-models are generated—(a) train-track sub-model and (b) tunnel-soil coupling sub-model. The preceding model is a closed-form analytical solution which calculates the quasi-static effect of dynamic interactions between the train wheel and the railway track. The follower model is a 2D FE model to calculate the transfer of dynamic forces from track-tunnel interface to the ground surface through the soil medium. It is found that the computed results fairly match with experimental results for both amplitude and frequency content of the vibration. It is observed that ground vibrations reduce with distance from tunnel and any structure or residents staying beyond 30 m distance would not be affected by vibration as only 25% of vibration is present at this distance. The vibration is found to increase with velocity of train and at soft ground conditions to limit vibration, the velocity of train can be restricted. It is found that the frequency content of vibration is in interference range of human life and critical zone of frequency of structures. Therefore, careful assessment of vibration is required during finalization of the metro project particularly if the ground has shear wave velocity of less than 400 m/s.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of Data and Material

All data generated or used during the study appear in the submitted article.

References

  1. Federal Railroad Administration (2012) High speed ground transportation, noise and vibration impact assessment

  2. RDSO (2015) RDSO report CT-38—“guidelines for noise and vibrations”

  3. Ma M, Markine V, Liu WN, Yuan Y, Zhang F (2011) Metro train-induced vibrations on historic buildings in Chengdu, China. J Zhejiang Univ-Sci A 12(10):782–793

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Vogiatzis KE, Kouroussis G (2015) Prediction and efficient control of vibration mitigation using floating slabs: practical application at Athens metro lines 2 and 3. Int J Rail Transp 3(4):215–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Sadeghi J, Esmaeili MH, Akbari M (2019) Reliability of FTA general vibration assessment model in prediction of subway induced ground borne vibrations. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 117:300–311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kurzweil LG (1979) Ground-borne noise and vibration from underground rail systems. J Sound Vib 66(3):363–370

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Melke J (1988) Noise and vibration from underground railway lines: proposals for a prediction procedure. J Sound Vib 120(2):391–406

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Chatterjee P, Degrande G, Jacobs S, Charlier J, Bouvet P, Brassenx D (2003) Experimental results of free field and structural vibrations due to underground railway traffic. In: 10th international congress on sound and vibration. Stockholm Sweden, pp 387–394

  9. Clouteau D, Arnst M, Al-Hussaini TM, Degrande G (2005) Freefield vibrations due to dynamic loading on a tunnel embedded in a stratified medium. J Sound Vib 283(1–2):173–199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Degrande G, Clouteau D, Othman R, Arnst M, Chebli H, Klein R, Janssens B (2006) A numerical model for ground-borne vibrations from underground railway traffic based on a periodic finite element–boundary element formulation. J Sound Vib 293(3–5):645–666

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Gupta S, Hussein MFM, Degrande G, Hunt HEM, Clouteau D (2007) A comparison of two numerical models for the prediction of vibrations from underground railway traffic. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 27(7):608–624

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Galvín P, François S, Schevenels M, Bongini E, Degrande G, Lombaert G (2010) A 2.5 D coupled FE-BE model for the prediction of railway induced vibrations. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 30(12):1500–1512

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Liravi H, Arcos R, Clot A, Conto KF, Romeu J (2022) A 2.5 D coupled FEM–SBM methodology for soil-structure dynamic interaction problems. Eng Struct 250:113371

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Forrest JA, Hunt HEM (2006) A three-dimensional tunnel model for calculation of train-induced ground vibration. J Sound Vib 294(4–5):678–705

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Forrest JA, Hunt HEM (2006) Ground vibration generated by trains in underground tunnels. J Sound Vib 294(4–5):706–736

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Hussein MFM, Hunt HEM (2009) A numerical model for calculating vibration due to a harmonic moving load on a floating-slab track with discontinuous slabs in an underground railway tunnel. J Sound Vib 321(1–2):363–374

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Hussein MFM, François S, Schevenels M, Hunt HEM, Talbot JP, Degrande G (2014) The fictitious force method for efficient calculation of vibration from a tunnel embedded in a multi-layered half-space. J Sound Vib 333(25):6996–7018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Yang YB, Hung HH (2001) A 2.5 D finite/infinite element approach for modelling visco-elastic bodies subjected to moving loads. Int J Numer Methods Eng 51(11):1317–1336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Lopes P, Costa PA, Ferraz M, Calçada R, Cardoso AS (2014) Numerical modeling of vibrations induced by railway traffic in tunnels: from the source to the nearby buildings. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 61:269–285

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Fernández Ruiz J, Alves Costa P, Calçada R, Medina Rodríguez LE, Colaço A (2017) Study of ground vibrations induced by railway traffic in a 3D FEM model formulated in the time domain: experimental validation. Struct Infrastruct Eng 13(5):652–664

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Malmborg J, Persson K, Persson P (2019) Modeling train-induced ground-borne vibrations using FEM in a moving frame of reference. In: 7th international conference on computational methods in structural dynamics and earthquake engineering, COMPDYN 2019 (vol 3, pp 5899–5912). Eccomas Proceedia

  22. Ramil KM (2021) Analysis of vibration by rail traffic using plaxis 3D. Int Res J Eng Technol (IRJET) 8(2):2177–2183

    Google Scholar 

  23. Malmborg J, Persson P, Persson K (2022) Numerical investigation of railway subgrade stiffening: critical speed and free-field vibrations. Transp Geotech 34:100748

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Xu QY, Ou X, Au FTK, Lou P, Xiao ZC (2016) Effects of track irregularities on environmental vibration caused by underground railway. Eur J Mech-A/Solids 59:280–293

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Ma M, Liu W, Qian C, Deng G, Li Y (2016) Study of the train-induced vibration impact on a historic Bell Tower above two spatially overlapping metro lines. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 81:58–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Hu J, Bian X, Jiang J (2016) Critical velocity of high-speed train running on soft soil and induced dynamic soil response. Procedia Eng 143:1034–1042

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Yuan Z, Xu D, Shi L, Pan X, He B, Hu M, Cai Y (2022) Hybrid analytical-numerical modelling of ground vibrations from moving loads in a tunnel embedded in the saturated soil. Eur J Environ Civ Eng 26(12):6047–6075

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. He C, Zhou S (2023) Ground vibrations induced by the passage of double-line trains in underground tunnels. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 165:107719

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Zhang X, Zhou S, He C, Di H, Si J (2021) Experimental investigation on train-induced vibration of the ground railway embankment and under-crossing subway tunnels. Transp Geotech 26:100422

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Li C, Liu W (2021) Probabilistic prediction of metro induced ground-borne vibration and its accuracy evaluation. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 141:106509

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Faizan AA, Kırtel O, Çelebi E, Zülfikar AC, Göktepe F (2022) Experimental validation of a simplified numerical model to predict train-induced ground vibrations. Comput Geotech 141:104547

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Kumari S, Sahoo PP, Swant VA (2012) Dynamic analysis of railway track. Int J Emerg Technol Adv Eng 2:11

    Google Scholar 

  33. Basu D, Kameswara Rao NSV (2013) Analytical solutions for Euler–Bernoulli beam on visco-elastic foundation subjected to moving load. Int J Numer Anal Meth Geomech 37(8):945–960

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Connolly DP, Kouroussis G, Laghrouche O, Ho CL, Forde MC (2015) Benchmarking railway vibrations-track, vehicle, ground and building effects. Constr Build Mater 92:64–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. PLAXIS 2D (2020) Reference manual. https://www.plaxis.com/support/manuals/plaxis-2d-manuals/.

  36. Ferreira PA, López-Pita A (2013) Numerical modeling of high-speed train/track system to assess track vibrations and settlement prediction. J Transp Eng 139(3):330–337

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Whitman RV, Richart FE Jr (1967) Design procedures for dynamically loaded foundations. J Soil Mech Found Div 93(6):169–193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Bowles JE (1996) Foundation analysis and design. The McGrawHill Companies. Inc., Singapore

    Google Scholar 

  39. Stewart WP, Campanella RG (1993) Practical aspects of in situ measurements of material damping with the seismic cone penetration test. Can Geotech J 30(2):211–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. BS 7385-1: 1990 Evaluation and measurement for vibration in buildings, part 1: guide for measurement of vibrations and evaluation of their effects on buildings

  41. BS 7385–2: 1993 Evaluation and measurement for vibration in buildings, part 2: guide to damage levels from groundborne vibration

  42. TCRP Web-Only Document 48: ground-borne noise and vibration in buildings caused by rail transit

  43. ISO 2631-1:1997 Evaluation of human exposure to whole-body vibration—part 1: general requirements

  44. Federal Railroad Administration (2006) FTA report FTA-VA-90-1003-06—“transit noise and vibration impact assessment”

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bappaditya Manna.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sur, A., Manna, B. & Shahu, J.T. Coupled Analytical—Numerical Modeling of Ground Vibrations Generated from Moving Trains in Circular Shaped Tunnel Embedded in Soil. Indian Geotech J (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40098-024-00961-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40098-024-00961-2

Keywords

Navigation