Skip to main content
Log in

Group Efficiency of Tension Double Under-Reamed Piles in Sand

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Indian Geotechnical Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

During the last few years, many researchers have studied experimentally and numerically the behaviour of single under-reamed piles subjected to vertical forces in sand. Surprisingly, the uplift response and the uplift group efficiency of group double under-reamed piles embedded in sand subjected to uplift loads were never fully studied. As a result, in this paper, we carried out laboratory studies on different configurations of double under-reamed piles in groups subjected to uplift loads in different relative densities of dry sand. The effect of relative density, spacing between double under-reamed piles, and the number of piles in the group on the group efficiency of model groups was investigated. Hence, the influence of the corresponding parameters on the group efficiency was evaluated. The results showed that group efficiency of tension double under-reamed piles in all model tests was less than 100%. Furthermore, in the case of dense sand and double under-reamed pile spacing ratio equal four times the under-ream diameter, the group efficiency is found to be 79.18%, 65.28%, and 55.13% for two, three, and four pile configurations, respectively, while these values are found to be 86.75%, 81.14%, and 74.46% in loose sand in the same order. In addition, an analytical model based on the limit equilibrium approach was used to estimate the uplift capacity of group double under-reamed piles based on failure mode identification.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

H :

Embedment depth.

d p :

Stem diameter of tension double under-reamed pile.

D u :

Diameter of the under-reamed bulb.

S u :

Spacing between under-reamed bulbs.

L b :

Bucket length of tension double under-reamed pile.

N :

Number of tension double under-reamed piles in the group configuration.

S p :

Spacing between tension double under-reamed piles.

D r :

Sand relative density

References

  1. Malhotra H, Singh SK (2021) Experimental and numerical studies on pull-out behavior of granular anchor pile foundation embedded in sandy soil. Arab J Sci Eng 46:4477–4487. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-020-05013-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Sakr M, Nazir A, Azzam W, Sallam A (2020) Model study of single pile with wings under uplift loads. Appl Ocean Res. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apor.2020.102187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Farokhi, Alielahi, Mardani (2014) Optimizing the performance of underreamed piles in clay using numerical method geowall competition view project seismic vulnerability assessment of geotechnical structures view project. 1507–1520

  4. Christopher T, Gopinath (2016) Parametric study of under-reamed piles in sand. 577–581

  5. Harris DE, Madabhushi GS (2015) Uplift capacity of an under-reamed pile foundation. Proc Inst Civ Eng Geotech Eng 168:526–538. https://doi.org/10.1680/jgeen.14.00154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Rahman MA, Sengupta S (2017) Uplift capacity of inclined underreamed piles subjected to vertical load. J Inst Eng (India): Ser A 98(4): 533–544

  7. Moayedi H, Mosallanezhad M (2017) Uplift resistance of belled and multi-belled piles in loose sand. Measurement 109:346–353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2017.06.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Abbas HO (2020) Laboratory evaluation of effective parameters on uplift force under reamed pile in expansive soil. Geotech Geol Eng 38:4243–4252. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-020-01292-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Chen J, Ke C, Li H (2021) Uplift capacity of a novel under-reamed pile foundation

  10. Majumder M, Chakraborty D, Kumawat V (2022) Model test study on single and group under-reamed piles in sand under compression and tension. Innov Infrastruct Solut 7:129. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41062-021-00725-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Peter JA, Lakshmanan N, Manoharan P (2006) Investigations on the static behavior of self-compacting concrete under-reamed piles. J Mater Civil Eng. https://doi.org/10.1061/ASCE0899-1561200618:3408

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kumar A, Khatri VN, Gupta SK (2021) Numerical and analytical study on uplift capacity of under-reamed piles in sand. Marine Georesources and Geotechnology

  13. Alielahi H, Mardani Z, Daneshvar S (2014) Influence of under-reamed pile groups arrangement on tensile bearing capacity using FE method. Electron J Geotech Eng 19:1395–1410

    Google Scholar 

  14. Shetty P, S NB, Kumar S NB (2015) Analytical study on the geometrical features of under-reamed pile by Ansys. J Mod Chem and Appl Sci Int J Mod Chem Appl Sci:174–180

  15. Shrivastava N, Bhatia N (2008) Ultimate bearing capacity of underreamed pile-finite element approach

  16. Vali R, Mehrinejad Khotbehsara E, Saberian M et al (2019) A three-dimensional numerical comparison of bearing capacity and settlement of tapered and under-reamed piles. Int J Geotech Eng 13:236–248. https://doi.org/10.1080/19386362.2017.1336586

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Indian Standards (1980) IS 2911–3 (1980): Code of practice for design and construction of pile foundations, Part 3: Under-reamed piles

  18. Ghaly A, Hanna A (1994) Model investigation of the performance of single anchors and group of anchors

  19. Kishida H (1963) Stress distribution by model piles in sand

  20. Gaaver KE (2013) Uplift capacity of single piles and pile groups embedded in cohesionless soil. Alex Eng J 52:365–372. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2013.01.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Fioravante V, Jamiolkowski M (2006) On the effects of residual tangent stresses in centrifuge pile tests. In: Taylor, Francis, Leiden (eds) 6th Int. Conf. on Physical Modelling in Geotechnics. the Netherlands, pp 827–833

  22. Azzam E (2015) Model Study on the Performance of Single-Finned Pile inSand under Tension Loads. J Irrig Drain Eng. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Nazir A, Nasr A (2013) Pullout capacity of batter pile in sand. J Adv Res 4:147–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jare.2012.04.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Dickin EA, Leung CF Performance of piles with enlarged bases subject to uplift forces\

  25. Shanker K, Basudhar PK, Patra NR (2007) Uplift capacity of single piles: predictions and performance. Geotech Geol Eng 25:151–161. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-006-9000-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Nazir R, Moayedi H, Pratikso A, Mosallanezhad M (2015) The uplift load capacity of an enlarged base pier embedded in dry sand. Arab J Geosci 8:7285–7296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-014-1721-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Dash BK, Pise PJ Effect of compressive load on uplift capacity of model piles. https://doi.org/10.1061/ASCE1090-02412003129:11987

  28. Subba Rao KSS, Venkatesh KH (1985) Uplift behaviour of short piles in unifrom sand. Japenese Soc Soil Mech Found Eng 25(4):1–7

    Google Scholar 

  29. Yang YS, Qiu LC (2020) MPM simulation of uplift resistance of enlarged base piles in sand. Soils Found 60(5):1322–1330. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sandf.2020.08.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Ilamparuthi K, Dickin EA The in#uence of soil reinforcement on the uplift behaviour of belled piles embedded in sand

  31. Ilamparuthi K, Dickin EA, Muthukrisnaiah K (2002) Experimental investigation of the uplift behaviour of circular plate anchors embedded in sand. Can Geotech J 39:648–664. https://doi.org/10.1139/t02-005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Kumar A, Bhardwaj Pandit C, Sivakumar Babu GL (2017) Pullout behaviour of strip anchor in soil using FLAC 2D

  33. Hsu ST, Chen XY, Wang YF (2020) A 3-D Analysis on the loading behaviours of an under-reamed anchor in cohesion-less soils. In: IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering. Institute of Physics Publishing

  34. Shankeri K, Basudharii PK, Patraiii NR (2006) Uplift capacity of pile groups embedded in sands: predictions and performance

  35. Lee CY (2007) Settlement and load distribution analysis of underreamed piles. 2:

  36. Sambhaji Golait Y, Harihar Padade A (2018) Enhancement in effectiveness of cemented stone columns for soft clay ground improvement by providing underreamed bulbs. Int J Geomech 18:04018149. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)gm.1943-5622.0001282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Vanitha L, Patra NR, Chandra S (2007) Uplift capacity of pile group anchors. Geotech Geol Eng 25:339–347. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-006-9114-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Kotal A, Kumar Khan A (2015) 50 th IGC 50 th Indian Geotechnical Conference 17 th-19 th

  39. Sakr MA, Nazir AK, Farouk A, et al (2015) Uplift capacity of helical piles in sand

  40. Sales MM, Prezzi M, Salgado R et al (2017) Load-settlement behaviour of model pile groups in sand under vertical load. J Civ Eng Manag 23:1148–1163. https://doi.org/10.3846/13923730.2017.1396559

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Emirler B, Tolun M, Laman M (2016) Experimental investigation of the uplift capacity of group anchor plates embedded in sand. Geomech Eng 11(5):691–711. https://doi.org/10.12989/gae.2016.11.5.691

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Liu J, Liu M, Zhu Z (2012) Sand Deformation around an Uplift Plate Anchor. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 138:728–737. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)gt.1943-5606.0000633

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. MEYERHOF G G, ADAMS J I (1968) The ultimate uplift capacity of foundations

  44. Ashraf Ghaly B, Hanna A, Hanna M Uplift behavior of screw anchors in sand. I: dry sand

  45. Ilamparuthi K, Muthukrishnaiah K (1999) Anchors in sand bed: delineation of rupture surface

  46. Sutherland HB, Finlay TW, Fadl MO (1982) uplift capacity of embedded anchors in sand. In: 3rd international conference on the behaviour of offshore structures. MA, Cambridge, pp 451–463

  47. P. A. VERMEER, W. SUTJIADI (1985) The uplift resistance of shallow embedded anchors. In: International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering. pp 1635–1638

  48. Murray EJ, Geddes JD, Asce F (1987) Uplift of anchor plates in sand

  49. Mitsch M.P, Clemence S.P. (1985) The uplift capacity of helix anchors in sand. Uplift behavior of anchor foundation in soil. ASCE 26–47

  50. Mulyanda D, Iqbal MM, Dewi R (2020) The effect of helical size on uplift pile capacity. Int J Sci Technol Res 9:2

    Google Scholar 

  51. Shanker K, Basudhar PK, Patra NR (2009) Uplift capacity of pile groups embedded in sand. In: IGC

  52. Wood DM (2017) Geotechnical modelling. Geotech Modell. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781315273556

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Franke E (1985) Scale effect in 1g-model tests on horizontally loaded piles Pieux en modèle sous charges horizontales-Effet d’échelle

Download references

Funding

The authors state that no funding is involved.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ibrahim GamalEldin.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sakr, M., Nazir, A., Azzam, W. et al. Group Efficiency of Tension Double Under-Reamed Piles in Sand. Indian Geotech J 53, 11–28 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40098-022-00642-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40098-022-00642-y

Keyword

Navigation