Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Effectiveness of Laser Diffraction Method for Particle Size Evaluation of Residual Soil

  • Technical Note
  • Published:
Indian Geotechnical Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The laser diffraction method (LDM) is a relatively new technique used to evaluate the particle size distribution (PSD) of soil. However, the lack of standard for setting the optical parameters such as refractive index (RI), absorption coefficient (AC), and small sample size results in difficulty of achieving a representative sample. To evaluate the effectiveness of LDM in carrying out the PSD of residual soil, this study was carried out to verify the reproducibility of the LDM at different obscuration levels and compare the results with that obtained by sieve-hydrometer method (SHM). Furthermore, a reasonable value of RI and AC was determined for the residual soil collected from a slope inside Universiti Teknologi Malaysia. Two soil fractions, the coarse fraction retained on 75 µm sieve and finer fraction passing through sieve 75 µm were analyzed. The LDM for fine fraction satisfied the established reproducibility goals of ISO 13320 and provided precise PSD curve at different obscuration levels. For coarse fractions, the wet method showed higher variability and failed to satisfy the ISO 13320 recommended reproducibility guidelines due to the difficulty in obtaining a proper representative sample and disintegration of the particle in the dispersion system. Conversely, the dry method of LDM, due to more sample for analysis and proper representation of the sample, provided a precise PSD curve satisfying the reproducibility criteria of ISO 13320. Based on the findings, a value of 1.55 and 0.1 for the RI and AC is recommended to achieve precise PSD for residual soil using LDM.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

References

  1. Loveland PJ, Whalley WR, Smith K, Mullins C (2000) Particle size analysis. In: Smith KA, Mullins CE (eds) Soil analysis–physical methods. Marcel Dekker, New York, pp 281–314

    Google Scholar 

  2. Clifton J, McDonald P, Plater A, Oldfield F (1999) An investigation into the efficiency of particle size separation using Stokes’ Law. Earth Surf Process Landforms 24(8):725–730

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Singer J, Anderson J, Ledbetter M, McCave I, Jones K, Wright R (1988) An assessment of analytical techniques for the size analysis of fine-grained sediments. J Sediment Res 58(3):534–543

    Google Scholar 

  4. Syvitski JP (1991) Principles, methods, and application of particle size analysis, vol 388. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Percival JB, Lindsay PJ (1997) Measurement of physical properties of sediments. In: Mudroch A, Azcue JM, Mudroch P (eds) Manual of physico-chemical analysis of aquatic sediments. CRC, Boca Raton, pp 21–34

    Google Scholar 

  6. Eshel G, Levy G, Mingelgrin U, Singer M (2004) Critical evaluation of the use of laser diffraction for particle-size distribution analysis. Soil Sci Soc Am J 68(3):736–743

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Miller BA, Schaetzl RJ (2012) Precision of soil particle size analysis using laser diffractometry. Soil Sci Soc Am J 76(5):1719–1727

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ozer M, Orhan M, Isik NS (2010) Effect of particle optical properties on size distribution of soils obtained by laser diffraction. Environ Eng Geosci 16(2):163–173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Bittelli M, Andrenelli M, Simonetti G, Pellegrini S, Artioli G, Piccoli I, Morari F (2019) Shall we abandon sedimentation methods for particle size analysis in soils? Soil Tillage Res 185:36–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Gorączko A, Topoliński S (2020) Particle size distribution of natural clayey soils: a discussion on the use of laser diffraction analysis (LDA). Geosciences 10(2):55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Galacgac JA, Ooi PS (2018) Use of a laser diffractometer to obtain the particle size distribution of fine-grained soils. Transp Res Rec 2672(52):1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Wen B, Aydin A, Duzgoren-Aydin NS (2002) A comparative study of particle size analyses by sieve-hydrometer and laser diffraction methods. Geotech Test J 25(4):434–442

    Google Scholar 

  13. Fisher P, Aumann C, Chia K, O’Halloran N, Chandra S (2017) Adequacy of laser diffraction. PLoS One 12(5):0176510

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Arriaga FJ, Lowery B, Mays MD (2006) A fast method for determining soil particle size distribution using a laser instrument. Soil Sci 171(9):663–674

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Beuselinck L, Govers G, Poesen J, Degraer G, Froyen L (1998) Grain-size analysis by laser diffractometry: comparison with the sieve-pipette method. Catena 32(3–4):193–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. McCave I, Bryant R, Cook H, Coughanowr C (1986) Evaluation of a laser-diffraction-size analyzer for use with natural sediments. J Sediment Res 56(4):561–564

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Loizeau JL, Arbouille D, Santiago S, Vernet JP (1994) Evaluation of a wide range laser diffraction grain size analyser for use with sediments. Sedimentology 41(2):353–361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Konert M, Vandenberghe J (1997) Comparison of laser grain size analysis with pipette and sieve analysis: a solution for the underestimation of the clay fraction. Sedimentology 44(3):523–535

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Yang Y, Wang L, Wendroth O, Liu B, Cheng C, Huang T, Shi Y (2019) Is the laser diffraction method reliable for soil particle size distribution analysis? Soil Sci Soc Am J 83(2):276–287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Weiwen Q, Wei H, Curtin D, Motoi L (2021) Soil particle size range correction for improved calibration relationship between the laser-diffraction method and sieve-pipette method. Pedosphere 31(1):134–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Ryżak M, Bieganowski A (2011) Methodological aspects of determining soil particle-size distribution using the laser diffraction method. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci 174(4):624–633

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Buurman P, Pape T, Muggler C (1997) Laser grain-size determination in soil genetic studies 1. Practical problems. Soil Sci 162(3):211–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Rawlins B, Wragg J, Lark R (2013) Application of a novel method for soil aggregate stability measurement by laser granulometry with sonication. Eur J Soil Sci 64(1):92–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Andrès C, Bracconi P, Réginault P, Blouquin P, Rochat M, Pourcelot Y (1998) Assessing the particle size of a broadly dispersed powder by complementary techniques. Int J Pharm 167(1–2):129–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Coulter B (2011) Instruction for use, LS 13 320 laser diffraction particle size analyzer. Beckman Coulter

  26. Storti F, Balsamo F (2010) Impact of ephemeral cataclastic fabrics on laser diffraction particle size distribution analysis in loose carbonate fault breccia. J Struct Geol 32(4):507–522

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Sperazza M, Moore JN, Hendrix MS (2004) High-resolution particle size analysis of naturally occurring very fine-grained sediment through laser diffractometry. J Sediment Res 74(5):736–743

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. ISO, B.: 13320. Particle size analysis-laser diffraction methods. ISO Standards Authority (2009).

  29. de Boer GB, de Weerd C, Thoenes D, Goossens HW (1987) Laser diffraction spectrometry: Fraunhofer diffraction versus Mie scattering. Part Part Syst Charact 4(1–4):14–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Bieganowski A, Ryżak M, Sochan A, Barna G, Hernádi H, Beczek M, Polakowski C, Makó A (2018) Laser diffractometry in the measurements of soil and sediment particle size distribution. Adv Agron 151:215–279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. ASTM Committee D-18 on Soil and Rock; ASTM Subcommittee D18.03 on Texture, Plasticity and Density Characteristics of Soils, Rock (2004) Standard test methods for particle-size distribution (gradation) of soils using sieve analysis. ASTM International,

  32. ASTM (2017) Standard test method for particle-size distribution (gradation) of fine-grained soils using the sedimentation (hydrometer) analysis

  33. Sochan A, Bieganowski A, Ryzak M, Dobrowolski R, Bartminski P (2012) Comparison of soil texture determined by two dispersion units of Mastersizer 2000. Int Agrophys 26(1):99–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Campbell JR (2003) Limitations in the laser particle sizing of soils. Adv Regolith 1:38–42

    Google Scholar 

  35. Makó A, Tóth G, Weynants M, Rajkai K, Hermann T, Tóth B (2017) Pedotransfer functions for converting laser diffraction particle-size data to conventional values. Eur J Soil Sci 68(5):769–782

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Faé GS, Montes F, Bazilevskaya E, Añó RM, Kemanian AR (2019) Making soil particle size analysis by laser diffraction compatible with standard soil texture determination methods. Soil Sci Soc Am J 83(4):1244–1252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Eshel G, Levy GJ (2007) Comments on" a Fast Method for Determining Soil Particle Size Distribution Using a Laser Instrument" by FJ Arriaga, B. Lowery, and DW Mays. Soil Sci. 171: 663-674 (2006). Soil Science 172(5):413–415

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Haynes WM (2014) CRC handbook of chemistry and physics. CRC Press, Boca Raton

    Book  Google Scholar 

  39. Kassim A, Gofar N, Lee LM, Rahardjo H (2012) Modeling of suction distributions in an unsaturated heterogeneous residual soil slope. Eng Geol 131:70–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Latifi N, Eisazadeh A, Marto A, Meehan CL (2017) Tropical residual soil stabilization: a powder form material for increasing soil strength. Constr Build Mater 147:827–836

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Yong LL, Namal Jayasanka Perera S, Syamsir A, Emmanuel E, Paul SC, Anggraini V (2019) Stabilization of a residual soil using calcium and magnesium hydroxide nanoparticles: a quick precipitation method. Appl Sci 9(20):4325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Rahardjo H, Aung K, Leong EC, Rezaur R (2004) Characteristics of residual soils in Singapore as formed by weathering. Eng Geol 73(1–2):157–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Rahman ZA, Hamzah U, Taha MR, Ithnain NS, Ahmad N (2010) Influence of oil contamination on geotechnical properties of basaltic residual soil. Am J Appl Sci 7(7):954

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Bahmani SH, Farzadnia N, Asadi A, Huat BB (2016) The effect of size and replacement content of nanosilica on strength development of cement treated residual soil. Constr Build Mater 118:294–306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Bahmani SH, Huat BB, Asadi A, Farzadnia N (2014) Stabilization of residual soil using SiO2 nanoparticles and cement. Constr Build Mater 64:350–359

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Prasad A, Kazemian S, Kalantari B, Huat BB, Mafian S (2012) Stability of tropical residual soil slope reinforced by live pole: experimental and numerical investigations. Arab J Sci Eng 37(3):601–618

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Nik Daud, N.N., Mohammed, A.S.: Material Characterization of Palm Oil Fuel Ash (POFA) Mixed with Granite Residual Soil. In: Advanced Materials Research 2014, p 2093–2097. Trans Tech Publ

  48. Mohd Yusof KN, Yusof MF (2007) Correlations of physical and chemical properties of eastern granitic soils of Peninsular Malaysia. In: Prosiding Kebangsaan Awam '07, Langkawi, Kedah, p 624

  49. Marto A, Kasim F (2003) Characterisation of Malaysian residual soils for geotechnical and construction engineering. Project Report, Vote 72256

Download references

Acknowledgements

The 1st author would like to appreciate the PhD opportunity provided by the Higher Education Commission of Pakistan.

Funding

This study is supported by Universiti Teknologi Malaysia and Ministry of Higher Education Malaysia under Fundamental Research Grant Q.J130000.2516.20H90.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Engineering, School of Civil Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310, Skudai, Johor Bahru, Malaysia

    Rafi Ullah, Rini Asnida Abdullah, Azman Kassim, Nor Zurairahetty Mohd Yunus, Arshad Ullah, Muhammad Junaid & Mohammad Jawed Roshan

  2. Department of Geological Engineering, Engineering and Management Sciences (BUITEMS), Balochistan University of Information Technology, Quetta, Pakistan

    Rafi Ullah

  3. Faculty of Transportation Engineering, Kabul Polytechnic University, Kabul, Afghanistan

    Mohammad Jawed Roshan

Authors
  1. Rafi Ullah
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Rini Asnida Abdullah
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Azman Kassim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Nor Zurairahetty Mohd Yunus
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Arshad Ullah
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Muhammad Junaid
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Mohammad Jawed Roshan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rini Asnida Abdullah.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ullah, R., Abdullah, R.A., Kassim, A. et al. Effectiveness of Laser Diffraction Method for Particle Size Evaluation of Residual Soil. Indian Geotech J 52, 1476–1486 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40098-022-00615-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40098-022-00615-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation