Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Numerical Simulation of EPBM Induced Ground Settlement

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Indian Geotechnical Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Metro tunnel construction under high-density urban areas always poses the challenge of ground settlement which should be well predicted so that necessary precautions can be taken. An underground Metro line case study from Iran is used for the investigation. In this paper, an attempt has been made to predict ground settlement using available empirical and analytical methods. Significance of correctly estimating the parameters especially volume loss has been discussed. A numerical model is developed using the finite-difference-based numerical code FLAC3D to simulate tunnel construction using earth pressure balance shield tunnel boring machine (EPBM). The stage by stage construction sequence and EPBM parameters are simulated in this model. The ground settlement behaviour as the tunnel advances is presented as displacement contours and profiles. A critical comparison has been made among all methods used to predict the ground movement for the current case study. It was concluded that empirical and analytical methods are effective only if associated parameters like volume loss can be correctly ascertained. The numerical model was found to be the most reliable and useful tool for ground settlement prediction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Arioglu E (1992) Surface movements due to tunnelling activities in urban areas and minimization of building damages (in Turkish). Istanbul Technical University, Mining Engineering Department, Short Course

    Google Scholar 

  2. Celestino TB, Gomes RAMP, Bortolucci AA (2000) Errors in-ground distortions due to settlement trough adjustment. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 15(1):97–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Jacobsz, S. W., Standing, J. R., Mair, R. J., Hagiwara, T., and Sugiyama, T. (2002) “Centrifuge modelling of tunnelling near driven piles” Proc., 3rd Int. Symp. On Geotechnical Aspects of Underground Construction in Soft Ground, IS-Toulous, France, pp 89–94.

  4. Peck, R.B. (1969) “Deep excavations and tunneling in soft ground” In:7th International conference on soil mechanics and foundation engineering, State of the Art Volume, pp 225–290.

  5. Attewell PB, Farmer IW (1974) Ground deformations resulting from tunnelling in London Clay. Can Geotech J 11(3):380–395

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kimura T, Mair RJ (1981) Centrifugal testing of model tunnels in soft clay. Proceedings of the International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering 1:319–322

    Google Scholar 

  7. Leach, G. (1985) “Pipeline Response to Tunnelling” Unpublished Paper

  8. Mair RJ, Taylor RN, Bracegirdle A (1993) Subsurface settlement profiles above tunnels in clays. Geotechnique 43(2):315–320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Moh, Z. C., Hwang, R. N., and Ju, D. H. (1996). “Ground movements around tunnels in soft ground” In Mair, R. J. and Taylor, R. N. (Eds.), Int. Symp. On Geotechnical Aspects of Underground Construction in Soft Ground, London, pp 725–730.

  10. O’Reilly MP, New BM (1982) Settlements above tunnels in the united kingdom–their magnitude and prediction. The Institution of Mining and Metallurgy London 82:55–64

    Google Scholar 

  11. Broms BB, Bennermark H (1967) “Stability of clay at vertical openings. Proc ASCE, Journal Soil Mech and Foundation Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1061/JSFEAQ.0000946

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Macklin SR (1999) The prediction of volume loss due to tunnelling in overconsolidated clay based on heading geometry and stability number. Ground Eng 32(4):30–33

    Google Scholar 

  13. Mair RJ, Gunn MJ, O’Reilly MP (1981) “Ground movements around shallow tunnels in soft clay” Proc. 10th Int. Conf. Soil Mech. and Found. Eng Balkema, Rotterdam 1:323–328

    Google Scholar 

  14. McCabe BA et al (2012) Settlement trough parameters for tunnels in Irish glacial tills. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 27(1):1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Fargnoli V, Boldini D, Amorosi A (2013) TBM tunnelling-induced settlements in coarse-grained soils: the case of the new Milan underground line 5. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 38:336–347

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Sagaseta C (1987) Analysis of undrained soil deformation due to ground loss. Geotechnique 37(3):301–320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Loganathan N, Poulos HG (1998) Analytical prediction for tunnelling-induced ground movements in clays. Journal of Geotechnical and Geo-environmental Engineering 124(9):846–856

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. González C, Sagaseta C (2001) Patterns of soil deformations around tunnels. application to the extension of Madrid Metro. Comput Geotech 28:445–468

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Katzenbach R, Breth H (1981) Nonlinear 3d analysis for natm in frankfurt clay. proc. 10th int. conf. soil mech. and found Eng, Balkema, Rotterdam 1:315–318

    Google Scholar 

  20. Potts DM, Zdravkovic L (2001) Finite element analysis in geotechnical engineering: application. Thomas Telford, London

    Google Scholar 

  21. Rowe RK, Kack GJ (1983) A theoretical examination of the settlements induced by tunnelling: four case histories. Can Geotech J 20:299–314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Cheng, C.Y., Dasari G.R., Leung, C.F. and Chow, Y.K. (2002) “A novel FE technique to predict tunnelling induced ground movements in clays” Proc. Fifteenth KKCNN Symposium on Civil engineering.

  23. Dias, D., Kastner, R., and Maghazi, M. (2000) "Three-dimensional simulation of slurry shield in tunnelling" Proc. of the International Symposium on GeotechnicalAspects of Underground Construction in Soft Ground. Balkema, Rotterdam, pp 351–356.

  24. Galli G, Grimaldi A, Leonardi A (2004) Three-dimensional modelling of tunnel excavation and lining. Computer and Geotechnics 31(3):171–183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Chakeri, H., Hasanpour, R., Hindistan, M.A. and Unver, B. (2010) “Analysis of interaction between tunnels in soft ground by 3D numerical modeling” Bulletin of engineering geology and the environment. Springer, Berlin

  26. Chakeri H, Unver B (2013) A new equation for estimating the maximum surface settlement above tunnels excavated in soft ground. Environmental Earth Sciences 71:3195–3210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Itasca Consulting Group, Inc. (2013) FLAC3D (Fast Lagrangian Analysis of Continua in Three Dimensions) Version 5.01.154

  28. Chang, C.T., Wang, J.J. and Chen, Y.W. (2000) “Factors influencing the ground loss due to tunnels driven by EPB shield” Geotechnical Aspects of Underground Construction in Soft Ground, pp 209–212.

  29. Attewell PB, Woodman JP (1982) Predicting the dynamics of ground settlement and its derivatives caused by tunnelling in soil. Ground Eng 15(7):13–22

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work is carried out as part of students M.Tech project work with no funding from any sources.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. AECOM, Chennai, India

    Gouri Krishna

  2. Department of Civil Engineering, Indian Insititute of Technology Madras, Chennai, India

    V. B. Maji

Authors
  1. Gouri Krishna
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. V. B. Maji
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to V. B. Maji.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declared that there is no conflict of interest to this work.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Krishna, G., Maji, V.B. Numerical Simulation of EPBM Induced Ground Settlement. Indian Geotech J 52, 341–351 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40098-021-00568-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40098-021-00568-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation