Skip to main content
Log in

Performance and Microstructure of Alkali-Activated Red Mud-Based Grouting Materials Under Class F Fly Ash Amendment

  • Technical Note
  • Published:
Indian Geotechnical Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

From the perspective of sustainable development and environmental protection, the environmental friendly substitute of ordinary grouting materials is needed to be proposed. In this paper, we prepared a high-performance and low-cost grouting materials from red mud, granulated blast furnace slag (GBFS) and class F fly ash (FFA). In order to determine the optimal raw materials property, we investigated the effect of FFA dosages on red mud–GBFS grouts system. The results showed that 10% of FFA content could improve the 90-day compressive strength of grouts by 15.4%; fluidity and volume stability were also improved considerably. But when the FFA content is overmuch, it would result in some negative effects, such as longer setting time and higher bleeding rate. According to the mineral phase analysis, the effects of FFA mainly attributed to the physical properties before 28 days, such as ball effect, filling effect and micro-aggregate effect, and the pozzolanic effect of FFA influenced the long-term performance chiefly. Above all the results in this study, the optimum dosage of FFA is 10%.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Availability of Data and Material

The data and materials in this paper are available.

References

  1. Davidovits J, Sawyer J (1984) Early high-strength mineral polymer. Pyrament Inc, Houston

    Google Scholar 

  2. Duxson P, Fernández-Jiménez A, Provis J, Lukey G, Palomo A, Deventer J (2007) Geopolymer technology: the current state of the art. J Mater Sci 42:2917–2933

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Rao M, Acharya P (2017) Mercury intrusion porosimetry studies with geopolymers. Indian Geotech J 47(6):1–8

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hanif A, Kim Y, Lu Z, Park C (2017) Early-age behavior of recycled aggregate concrete under steam curing regime. J Clean Prod 152:103–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Henon J, Alzina A, Absi J, Smith DS, Rossignol S (2013) Potassium geopolymer foams made with silica fume pore forming agent for thermal insulation. J Porous Mater 20:37–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Davidovits J (1994) Geopolymers: inorganic polymeric new materials. J Mater Educ 16:91–139

    Google Scholar 

  7. Davidovits J (1994) Properties of geopolymer cements. In: Proceedings first international conference, Kiev. Geopolymer Institute, Saint-Quentin

  8. Davidovits J (2002) 30 years of successes and failures in geopolymer applications. Market trends and potential breakthroughs. In: Geopolymer 2002 conference, Melbourne. Geopolymer Institute, Saint-Quentin

  9. Li Z, Ding Z, Zhang Y (2004) Development of sustainable cementitious materials. In: International workshop on sustainable development and concrete technology, Beijing

  10. Lee JM, Yang TY, Yoon SY (2010) Recycling of coal fly ash for fabrication of porous mullite composite. Adv Mater Res 156–157:1649–1652

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Duan P, Yan C, Zhou W (2016) Influence of partial replacement of fly ash by metakaolin on mechanical properties and microstructure of fly ash geopolymer paste exposed to sulfate attack. Ceram Int 42:3504–3517

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Siddique R (2004) Performance characteristics of high-volume class F fly ash concrete. Cem Concr Res 34:487–493

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Demirboǧa R (2003) Influence of mineral admixtures on thermal conductivity and compressive strength of mortar. Energy Build 35:189–192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Pan Y, Liu J, Gou Y (2009) Experimentalresearchondurabilityofocean-engineeringhigh-performance concrete affected by fly ash. J Harbin Inst Technol 41:179–181

    Google Scholar 

  15. Xia J, Zhang L, Yang Y, Yu L (2018) Experimental study on durability of various grouting materials. J Huazhong Univ Sci Technol 46:99–104

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kaya K, Soyer-Uzun S (2016) Evolution of structural characteristics and compressive strength in red mud–metakaolin based geopolymer systems. Ceram Int 42:7406–7413

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Sekhar C, Nayak S, Preetham K (2017) Influence of granulated blast furnace slag and cement on the strength properties of lithomargic clay. Indian Geotech J 47:384–392

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Lemougna P, Wang K, Tang Q, Cui X (2017) Study on the development of inorganic polymers from red mud and slag system: application in mortar and lightweight materials. Constr Build Mater 156:486–495

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Pan Z, Li D, Yu J, Yang N (2003) Properties and microstructure of the hardened alkali-activated red mud–slag cementitious material. Cem Concr Res 33:1437–1441

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Cao SP, Zhou QF, Peng YL (2013) Effects of expansive agent and steel fiber on the properties of the fly ash ceramsite lightweight aggregate concrete. Appl Mech Mater 357–360:1332–1336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Petit J, Wirquin E, Khayat K (2010) Effect of temperature on the rheology of flowable mortars. Cem Concr Compos 32:43–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Palacios M, Alonso M, Varga C, Puertas F (2018) Influence of the alkaline solution and temperature on the rheology and reactivity of alkali-activated fly ash pastes. Cem Concr Compos 95:277–284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Rosquoët F, Alexis A, Khelidj A (2003) A experimental study of cement grout: rheological behavior and sedimentation. Cem Concr Res 33(5):713–722

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Hefni Y, Zaher Y, Wahab M (2018) Influence of activation of fly ash on the mechanical properties of concrete. Constr Build Mater 172:728–734

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Fung W, Kwan A (2010) Role of water film thickness in rheology of CSF mortar. Cem Concr Compos 32:255–264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Vance K, Kumar A, Sant G, Neithalath N (2013) The rheological properties of ternary binders containing Portland cement, limestone, and metakaolin of fly ash. Cem Concr Res 52:196–207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Fung W, Kwan A (2010) Role of water film thickness in rheology of CSF mortar. Cem Concr Compos 32(4):255–264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Jayasree C, Gettu R (2008) Experimental study of the flow behavior of super plasticized cement paste. Mater Struct 41(9):1581–1593

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Mu S, Liu J, Lin W, Wang Y, Liu J, Shi L (2017) Property and microstructure of aluminosilicate inorganic coating for concrete: role of water to solid ratio. Constr Build Mater 148:846–856

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Choo H, Lim S, Lee W, Lee C (2016) Compressive strength of one-part alkali activated fly ash using red mud as alkali supplier. Constr Build Mater 125:21–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Nevin K, Kunga D, Liming H, Wen Q, Meegoda J (2019) Synthesis and characterization of geopolymers derived from coal gangue, fly ash and red mud. Constr Build Mater 206:287–296

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Weihui L, Jia F, Zhihua W, Hao X (2017) Molecular dynamics simulations of mechanical properties of C-S-H structures with varying calcium-to-silicon ratio. Mater Rev 31(10):158–163

    Google Scholar 

  33. Yang T, Yao X, Zhang Z (2014) Quantification of chloride diffusion in fly ash-slag-based geopolymers by X-ray fluorescence (XRF). Constr Build Mater 69:109–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Dai S, Lei Z, Peng S, Chou C, Wang X, Yong Z (2010) Abundances and distribution of minerals and elements in high-alumina coal fly ash from the Jungar Power Plant, Inner Mongolia China. Int J Coal Geol 81(4):320–332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Li S, Liu R, Zhang Q, Zhang X (2016) Protection against water or mud inrush in tunnels by grouting: a review. J Rock Mech Geotech Eng 8:753–766

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Kaya K, Soyer-Uzun S (2015) Evolution of structural characteristics and compressive strength in red mud-metakaolin based geopolymer systems. Ceram Int 42:7406–7413

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Silva P, Sagoe K, Sirivivatnanon V (2007) Kinetics of geopolymerization: role of Al2O3 and SiO2. Cem Concr Compos 37:512–518

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Zhang M, El-Korchi T, Zhang G, Liang J, Tao M (2014) Synthesis factors affecting mechanical properties, microstructure, and chemical composition of red mud-fly ash based geopolymers. Fuel 134:315–325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Zhu H, Zhang Z, Zhu Y, Tian L (2014) Durability of alkali-activated fly ash concrete: chloride penetration in pastes and mortars. Constr Build Mater 65:51–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was financially supported by the Young Scientists Funds of National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grants No. 51709158) and the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation Funded Project (Nos. 2018M632676, 2018M642658).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

CL contributed to conceptualization, review and editing. WD acquired methodology, software and contributed to investigation, writing—original draft. ZL provided resources and contributed to writing—review and editing, supervision, data curation. FS contributed to investigation and review.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhaofeng Li.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest to this work.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lin, C., Dai, W., Li, Z. et al. Performance and Microstructure of Alkali-Activated Red Mud-Based Grouting Materials Under Class F Fly Ash Amendment. Indian Geotech J 50, 1048–1056 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40098-020-00438-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40098-020-00438-y

Keywords

Navigation