Skip to main content
Log in

Performance Behavior of Geogrids at Interface of Ballast and Granular Soil

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Indian Geotechnical Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The use of geosynthetics in civil engineering projects is very common these days. The role of geogrids in stress distribution and reducing displacement is undebatable, and most of the civil engineering projects have been benefitted by the use of such products. The construction of railway embankments for heavy axle loads and high speeds is a big challenge with increasing population and demand for better economic solutions. The appropriate determination of the value of force required for pulling out the geogrid from the soil is of significant importance for reinforced soil structures. In this paper, efforts are made to understand the field behavior of geogrids under heavy loading. Therefore, pullout tests simulating the reinforced railway embankments under heavy axle loads were conducted in the laboratory. A total of 36 numbers of pullout tests were conducted in the large experimental box on biaxial and triaxial geogrids to study their behavior when used for railway embankments. The tests were conducted at two different strain rates of 5 mm/min and 1 mm/min for understanding the varying effects of strain rate under high stress. Results indicate that the biaxial geogrids serve a better alternative for railway applications under high stresses. The biaxial geogrids provide 33.51% higher pullout resistance and 59.28% more elongation (for the stress of 250 kN/m2) as compared to triaxial geogrid. This study also concludes that both triaxial and biaxial geogrids behave as a strain-hardening material, with biaxial geogrid showing more effect of hardening. Under the low strain rate of 1 mm/min, the biaxial geogrid performs better than triaxial geogrid for the whole load range adopted for the experiment. However, under a higher strain rate of 5 mm/min, the biaxial geogrid underperforms after the stress value of 50 kN/m2.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. GE-1- RDSO (2007) Guidelines for blanket layer provision on track formation. Design and Standard Organisation (RDSO), Ministry of Railways, India

  2. Das BM (2016) Use of geogrid in the construction of railroads. Innov Infrastruct Solut 1(1):15

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Shukla Sanjay, Sivakugan Nagaratnam, Das Braja (2009) Fundamental concepts of soil reinforcement—an overview. Int J Geotech Eng 3(3):329–342

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Indraratna B, Salim W, Rujikiatkamjorn C (2011) Advanced rail geotechnology–ballasted track. CRC Press, Boca Raton

    Book  Google Scholar 

  5. Chen C, McDowell GR, Thom NH (2014) Investigating geogrid-reinforced ballast: experimental pull-out tests and discrete element modelling. Soils Found 54(1):1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Hsieh CW, Chen GH, Wu JH (2011) The shear behaviour obtained from the direct shear and pullout tests for different poor graded soil-geosynthetic systems. J GeoEng 6(1):15–26

    Google Scholar 

  7. Moraci N, Cardile G (2012) Deformative behaviour of different geogrids embedded in a granular soil under monotonic and cyclic pullout loads. Geotext Geomembr 32:104–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Teixeira SH, Bueno BS, Zornberg JG (2007) Pullout resistance of individual longitudinal and transverse geogrid ribs. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 133(1):37–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Chen C, McDowell GR, Thom NH (2013) A study of geogrid-reinforced ballast using laboratory pull-out tests and discrete element modelling. Geomech Geoeng 8(4):244–253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Koerner RM, Wayne MH, Carroll RG (1989) Analytic behaviour of geogrid anchorage. In: Proc Geosynthetics’ 89 Conf, IFAI, San Diego, pp 525–536

  11. Hangen H, Beilke O, Rahier A, Wüstefeld D (2011) Geogrid reinforced steep slopes subjected to railway loading–case study. In: GEORAIL 2011 (géotechnique ferroviaire: Paris, 19–20 mai 2011, vol 1, pp 575–586

  12. Tensar Technical note, TN/SSspec/18.11.11

  13. Kwan CCJ (2006) Geogrid reinforcement of railway ballast. Doctoral dissertation, University of Nottingham

  14. ASTM D 6706-01 (2001) Standard test method for measuring geosynthetic pullout resistance in soil

  15. Mittal S (1993) Soil testing for engineers. Khanna Publishers, Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  16. Palmeira EM (2004) Bearing force mobilisation in pull-out tests on geogrids. Geotext Geomembr 22(6):481–509

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Fannin RJ, Raju DM (1993) On the pullout resistance of geosynthetics. Can Geotech J 30(3):409–417

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Duszyńska A, Bolt AF (2004) Pullout tests of geogrids embedded in non-cohesive soil. Arch Hydro-Eng Environ Mech 51(2):135–147

    Google Scholar 

  19. Nejad FM, Small JC (2005) Pullout behaviour of geogrids. Iran J Sci Technol Trans B Eng 29(B3):301–310

    Google Scholar 

  20. Shi D, Wang F (2013) Pull-out test studies on the interface characteristics between geogrids and soils. EJGE 18:5405–5417

    Google Scholar 

  21. Rao Venkatappa G, Pothal GK (2008) Geosynthetic testing–a laboratory manual. SAGES, Hyderabad

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

This research work was financed by the Ministry of Railways, Government of India, under the sanction no. RDS-1006-CED.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anoop Bhardwaj.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bhardwaj, A., Mittal, S. Performance Behavior of Geogrids at Interface of Ballast and Granular Soil. Indian Geotech J 50, 753–765 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40098-020-00424-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40098-020-00424-4

Keywords

Navigation