Skip to main content
Log in

Effectiveness of Clay Damper for Reduction in Vibration Amplitudes

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Indian Geotechnical Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Very soft clay is considered to be a poor construction material because of high compressibility and low shear strength. Again, a deep soft clay layer amplifies the stress amplitude during seismic wave propagation. Hence, it is a common practice either to avoid a soft clay layer or to improve the properties of the clay layer for founding a structure in the soft clay. In spite of all these demerits, the high damping ratio of a soft clay layer may be effectively used as an effective damper for reduction of stress amplitudes. Care must be taken over retention of moisture content of the clay and prevention of oozing out of the soft clay under a vertical stress. In the present study the soft clay has been wrapped with two layers of geomembrane in the form of a geocell of thickness 100 mm and has been placed below the foundation of a prototype frame structure. Two layers of geocells have been used for effective reduction of stress amplitude. Horizontal vibration has been imparted to the ground and acceleration-time histories at different locations like ground, foundation, tie beam, floor beam have been recorded. Comparison of results between a structure resting over clay damper and a structure resting over ground has been made. It is observed that the stress amplitude has been reduced to 40–50% of the normal value due to installation of the clay dampers. Hence, if properly designed, the soft clay may be effectively used to reduce the vibration during earthquakes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kelly JM (1997) Earthquake-resistant design with rubber, 2nd edn. Springer, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. Skinner RI, Tyler RG, Heine AJ, Robinson WH (1980) Hysteretic dampers for the protection of structures from earthquakes. Bull N Z Natl Soc Earthq Eng 13(1):22–36

    Google Scholar 

  3. Kelly JM, Hodder SB (1982) Experimental study of lead and elastomeric dampers for base isolation systems in laminated neoprene bearings. Bull N Z Natl Soc Earthq Eng 15(2):53–67

    Google Scholar 

  4. Su L, Ahmadi G, Tadjbakhsh IG (1991) Performance of sliding resilient-friction base-isolation system. J Struct Eng 117(1):165–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Mokha A, Constantinou MC, Reinhorn AM, Zayas VA (1991) Experimental study of friction-pendulum isolation system. J Struct Eng 117(4):1201–1217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Martel RR (1929) The effects of earthquake on buildings with a flexible first storey. Bull Seismol Soc Am 19(3):167–178

    Google Scholar 

  7. Jacobsen LS (1938) Effects of a flexible first story in a building located on vibrating ground. In: Timoshenko S (ed) 60th anniversary vol. Macmillan Co., New York, pp 93–103

    Google Scholar 

  8. Murthy CVR (2004) IITK-BMTPC E/Q Tips-24. http://www.iitk.ac.in/nicee/EQTips/EQTip24.pdf

  9. Constantinou M, Mokha A, Reinhorn A (1990) Teflon bearings in base isolation—II: modeling. J Struct Eng 116(2): 455–474. ISSN 0733-9445/90/0002, Paper No. 24376

  10. Ghobarah A, Ali HM (1988) Seismic performance of highway bridges. Eng Struct 10: 157–166

  11. Postollec JC (1983) Les foundations antisismiques de la central nucleare de Cruas-Meysse. Notes du Service Etude Geni Civil d’EDF-REAM

  12. Yegian MK, Kadakal UK (2004) Foundation isolation for seismic protection using a smooth synthetic liner. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 130(11):1121–1130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Naeim F, Kelly JM (1999) Design of seismic isolated structures from theory to practice. Wiley, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  14. Seigenthaler R (1970) Earthquake-proof building supporting structure with shock absorbing damping elements. Schweiz Bauztg 20:211

    Google Scholar 

  15. Delfosse GC (1980) Full earthquake protection through base isolation system. In: 7th world conference on earthquake engineering Istanbul Turkey, vol 8, p 61

  16. Li Li (1982) Base Isolation measures in aseismic structures. In: Proceedings US-PRC bilateral workshop on earthquake engineering, Harbin, China

  17. Zhou FL, Yang Z, Liu WG, Tan P (2004) New seismic isolation system for irregular structure with the largest isolation building area in the world. In: 13th world conference on earthquake engineering, Vancouver, B.C. Canada August 1–6, 2004, Paper No. 2349

  18. Zhou XY, Su JY, Fan SR (1994) Dynamic analysis of friction slide isolation system. In: Proceedings of 4th national conference on earthquake engineering

  19. Li H, Huo L (2010) Advances in structural control in civil engineering in China. Math Probl Eng 2010. Article ID 936081. doi:10.1155/2010/936081

  20. Singha S, Dey AK(2007) Seismic base isolation using soft clay damper. In: Proceedings of 13th Asian regional conference on soil mechanics and geotechnical engineering, 10–14th December, Paper Number: 8.1-25/IN-24

  21. Constantinou MC, Mokha AS, Reinhorn AM (1991) Study of sliding bearing and helical steel-spring isolation system. J Struct Eng 117(4):1257–1275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Makris N, Constantinou MC (1992) Spring-viscous damper systems for combined seismic and vibration isolation. Earthquake Eng Struct Dyn 21:649–664

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Banerji P, Murudi M, Shah AH, Popplewell N (2000) Tuned liquid dampers for controlling earthquake response of structures. Earthquake Eng Struct Dyn 29:587–602

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Ramallo JC, Johnson EA, Spencer BF Jr (2002) “Smart’’ base isolation systems. J Eng Mech 128(10):1088–1099

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Wu B, Ou J (2003) The pseudo-viscous frictional energy dissipator: a new device for mitigating seismic effects. Earthquake Eng Struct Dyn 32:31–48. doi:10.1002/eqe.213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Jamali N, Jamali S (2010) Numerical simulation of base-isolated systems sliding on concave surfaces. Asian J Civ Eng (Build Hous) 11(1):123–133

    Google Scholar 

  27. Tsang HH, Lo SH, Xu X, Sheikh MN (2012) Seismic isolation for low-to-medium-rise buildings using granulated rubber–soil mixtures: numerical study. Earthquake Eng Struct Dyn 41:2009–2024. doi:10.1002/eqe.2171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Marivani M, Hamed MS (2009) Numerical simulation of structure response outfitted with a tuned liquid damper. Comput Struct 87:1154–1165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Lu XL, Zhou Q (2001) Shaking table test and numerical analysis of combine energy dissipation system with lead rubber dampers and oil dampers. Chin Q Mech 22(1):117–127 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Shi WX, Li ZS (1999) Test study on dynamic behavior of laminated rubber bearings. J Tongfi Univ 27(4):417–421 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Julie S, Sajeeb R (2012) Performance of base isolators and tuned mass dampers in vibration control of a multistoried building. IOSR J Mech Civ Eng (IOSRJMCE) 2(6):01–07

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Kim DH, Kwon HO, Jeong MK (2000). An experimental study of the dynamic characteristics of viscous fluid dampers for base isolated building. In: 12WCEE 2000: 12th world conference on earthquake engineering, Auckland, New Zealand

  33. Mehmet AK (2016) Soft-story effects on the behavior of fixed-base and LRB base-isolated reinforced concrete buildings. Arab J Sci Eng 2016(41):381–391. doi:10.1007/s13369-015-1664-3

    Google Scholar 

  34. Marivani M, Hamed MS (2014) Numerical study of slat screen pattern effect on design parameters of tuned liquid dampers. J Fluids Eng 136:061201-11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Warn GP, Ryan KL (2012) A review of seismic isolation for buildings: historical development and research needs. Buildings 2:300–325. doi:10.3390/buildings2030300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Kelly JM, Hodder SB (1982) Experimental study of lead and elastomeric dampers for base isolation systems in laminated neoprene bearings. N Z Natl Soc Earthq Eng 15(2):53

    Google Scholar 

  37. Tsang HH, Lo SH, Xu X, Sheikh MN (2012) Seismic isolation for low-to-medium-rise buildings using granulated rubber–soil mixtures: numerical study. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 2012(41):2009–2024. doi:10.1002/eqe.2171

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

The field work has been carried out with financial assistance from a research Grant under Ministry of Earth Sciences, Govt. of India.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sanjib Singha.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Singha, S., Dey, A.K. Effectiveness of Clay Damper for Reduction in Vibration Amplitudes. Indian Geotech J 47, 233–245 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40098-017-0246-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40098-017-0246-6

Keywords

Navigation