Skip to main content
Log in

Calibration of Earth Pressure Sensors

  • Technical Note
  • Published:
Indian Geotechnical Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Economic and optimum design of retaining structures, silos, buried pipes, etc. mainly depend on earth pressures acting on the structure and its variation. Earth pressure sensors are being widely used to measure these pressures, and calibration of these sensors plays a vital role in precise assessment of earth pressures. In the present study, calibration of two types of pressure sensors is performed by dead weight calibration (DWC) and fluid calibration methods. Two diaphragm type earth pressure cells (DEPCs), viz. 40 and 30 mm diameter, and a tactile pressure sensor (TPS) of size  25 mm × 25 mm × 2 mm thick are used in this study. Two set-ups are developed for DWC of DEPC and TPS. Pneumatic calibration chamber (PCC) is developed to perform fluid and soil calibration of pressure sensors. PCC tests facilitate application of pressure uniformly on the entire area of sensor compared to DWC method. From fluid calibration trials, a drop in full scale output of 40 mm DEPC after 3 years of usage is observed. Dead Weight and Pneumatic Calibration tests on TPS revealed non-linear response with applied pressure. Soil calibration of 30 mm diameter DEPC using PCC tests exhibited consistent results compared to that of DWC method.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15

References

  1. Peattie KR, Sparrow RW (1954) The fundamental action of earth pressure cells. J Mech Phys Solids 2:141–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Labuz JF, Theroux B (2005) Laboratory calibration of earth pressure cells. ASTM Geotech Test J 28(2):1–9

    Google Scholar 

  3. Dave TN, Dasaka SM (2011) In-house calibration of pressure transducers and effect of material thickness. Geomech Eng 5(1):1–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Hilis (1981) Active touch sensing. Artificial Intelligence Laboratory memo 629, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA

  5. Paikowsky SG, Hajduk EL (1997) Calibration and use of grid-based tactile pressure sensors in granular material. ASTM Geotech Test J 20(2):218–241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Gao Y, Wang YH (2013) Calibration of tactile pressure sensors for measuring stress in soils. ASTM Geotech Test J 36(4):1–7

    Google Scholar 

  7. O’Neal TS, Hagerty DJ (1993) Earth pressure cells: Environmental effects, and calibration. In: Proceedings of 7th international symposium on filed measurements in geomechanics (7th FMGM), pp 1–12. doi:10.1061/40940(307)53

  8. Talesnick M (2005) Measuring soil contact pressure on a solid boundary and quantifying soil arching. ASTM Geotech Test J 28(2):1–9

    Google Scholar 

  9. Li Y, Talesnick M, Bolton MD (2014) Use of null gauges to monitor soil stresses during excavation in a centrifuge. Int J Phys Model Geotech 14(2):40–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ingram JK (1965) The development of a free-field soil stress gage for static and dynamic measurements. Instruments and apparatus for soil and rock mechanics. ASTM STP 392, American Society for Testing and Materials, pp 20–36

  11. Triandafilidis GE (1974) Soil-stress gage design and evaluation. ASTM Geotech Test J 2(3):146–158

    Google Scholar 

  12. Clayton CRI, Bica AVD (1993) The design of diaphragm-type boundary total stress cells. Geotechnique 43(4):523–536

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Weiler WA, Kulhawy FH (1982) Factors affecting stress cell measurements in soil. J Geotech Eng 108(12):1529–1548

    Google Scholar 

  14. O’Rourke TD, Jezerski JM, Olson NA, Bonneau AL, Palmer MC, Stewart HE, O’Rourke MJ, Abdoun T (2008) Geotechnics of pipeline system response to earthquakes. In: proceeding of geotechnical earthquake engineering and soil dynamics IV, Sacramento, CA, USA, pp 1–38

  15. El Ganainy H, Tessari A, Abdoun T, Sasanakul I (2014) Tactile pressure sensors in centrifuge testing. ASTM Geotech Test J 37(1):1–13

    Google Scholar 

  16. Selig ET (1980) Soil stress gage calibration. ASTM Geotech Test J 3(4):153–158

    Google Scholar 

  17. Garnier J, Ternet O, Cottuneau LM, Brown CJ (1999) Placement of embedded pressure cells. Geotechnique 49(3):405–414

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Palmer MC, O’Rourke TD, Olson NA, Abdoun T, Ha D, O’Rourke MJ (2009) Tactile pressure sensors for soil-structure interaction assessment. J Geotech Geoenivron Eng 135(11):1638–1645

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ramirez A, Nielsen J, Ayuga F (2010) On the use of plate-type normal pressure cells in soils. Part 1: Calibration and evaluation. Comput Electron Agric 71(1):71–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Gade VK, Dasaka SM, Chauhan VB (2014) Calibration of tactile pressure sensor. In: Proceedings of Indian geotechnical conference, Kakinada, India, pp 272–279

  21. ASTM D2487-11 (2011) Classification of soils for engineering purposes (unified soil classification system), West Conshohocken, PA

  22. ASTM D4254-00 (2006) Standard test methods for minimum index density and unit weight of soils and calculation of relative density, West Conshohocken, PA

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support received from the Ministry of Earth Sciences, Government of India [MoES/P.O(Seismo)/1(118)/2010], to carry out the research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. M. Dasaka.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gade, V.K., Dasaka, S.M. Calibration of Earth Pressure Sensors. Indian Geotech J 48, 142–152 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40098-017-0223-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40098-017-0223-0

Keywords

Navigation