Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Spatial Variability Modelling of Geotechnical Parameters and Stability of Highly Weathered Rock Slope

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Indian Geotechnical Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In recent years, spatial variability modeling of geotechnical parameters using random field theory is gaining strength in the reliability based analysis of geotechnical problems. Slope stability analysis of highly weathered rock slope requires proper modeling of geotechnical parameters with due consideration of extent of weathering and overburden pressure. The present study demonstrates the approach for spatial variation modeling of geotechnical parameters and reliability analysis based stability assessment of highly weathered rock slope by considering a typical case of height = 5.0 m and slope angle of 30°. Commercially available software FLAC 5.0, via inbuilt FISH function, has been utilized for the numerical analysis purpose with the assumption that highly weathered rock mass can be analyzed within the framework of the concept of equivalent continuum model. A parametric study is performed to investigate the following: (i) influence of coefficients of variation of geotechnical parameters and (ii) auto-correlation distances on the reliability analysis results. For the reliability analysis, information on mean and variance of output parameter, i.e., factor of safety of the given rock slope is obtained from 2000 Monte Carlo simulations and results are utilized with first order reliability method to obtain reliability index values. The results of the analysis clearly demonstrated that numerical modeling of spatially varying geotechnical parameters gives more realistic treatment to the property variation of a natural material and stability assessment in reliability analysis framework is more comprehensive than conventional limit equilibrium based factor of safety approach.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Singh B, Goel RK (1999) Rock mass classification: a practical approach in civil engineering. Elsevier publication, Amsterdam, p 267

    Google Scholar 

  2. Cornforth DH (2005) Landslides in practice. Wiley, Hoboken

    Google Scholar 

  3. Hoek E, Bray J (1981) Rock slope engineering, rev. 3rd edn. Institution of Mining and Metallurgy, London

  4. Duncan CW, Christopher WM (2004) Rock slope engineering: civil and mining, 4th edn. Spon Press/Taylor & Francis Group, London/New York

    Google Scholar 

  5. Charles AK (1999) Rock slope stability. Society for Mining, Metallurgy and Exploration, Littleton

    Google Scholar 

  6. Stead D, Eberhardt E, Coggan J, Benko B (2001) Advanced numerical techniques in rock slope stability analysis—applications and limitations. In: The proceedings of LANDSLIDES-Causes, Impacts and Countermeasures, Davos, Switzerland, pp 615–624

  7. Mahboubi A, Aminpour M, Noorzad A (2008) Conventional and advanced numerical methods of rock slope stability analysis: a comparison study, Gotvand Dam Right Abutment (Iran) Case Study. In: IACMAG ‘2008, Goa, India, pp 203–211

  8. Nilsen B (2000) New trends in rock slope stability analyses. Bull Eng Geol Environ 58:173–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Low BK (1997) Reliability analysis of rock wedges. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng ASCE 123(6):498–505

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Pascoe D, Pine RJ, Howe JH (1998) An extension of probabilistic slope stability analysis of China clay deposits using geostatistics. In: Maund JG, Eddleston M (eds) Geohazards and engineering geology 15. Geological Society, Engineering Geology Special Publication, 15, London, pp 193–197

    Google Scholar 

  11. Lam L, Fredlund DG (1993) A general limit equilibrium model for three-dimensional slope stability analysis. Can Geotech J 30:905–919

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hungr O, Salgado FM, Byrne PM (1998) Evaluation of a three dimensional method of slope stability analysis. Can Geotech J 26:679–686

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ning SJ, Yao LH, Zhao YN (2008) Application of improved decimal strings genetic algorithm to searching for the most critical slip surface of soil slope. J Eng Geol 16(1):109–115

    Google Scholar 

  14. Rocscience (2009) Rocscience software products—DIPS, SWEDGE, ROCFALL. Rocscience Inc, Toronto

    Google Scholar 

  15. SoilVision (2010) Soilvision Systems Ltd, Saskatoon

  16. Wilkinson PL, Anderson MG, Lloyd DM, Renaud JP (2002) An integrated hydrological model for rain-induced landslide prediction. Earth Surf Process Landforms 27:1285–1297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Pack RT, Tarboton DG, Goodwin CN (1998) The SINMAP approach to terrain stability mapping. In: Proceedings 8th Congress of the international association of engineering geology, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, 21–25 September 1998, pp 1157–1165

  18. Zhou G, Esaki T, Mitani Y, Xie M, Mori J (2003) Spatial probabilistic modeling of slope failure using an integrated GIS Monte Carlo simulation approach. Eng Geol 68:373–386

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. PLAXIS (2011) Finite element code for soil and rock analyses. In: Brinkgreve et al (eds) PLAXIS-2D Version 8, Reference Manual, DUT, The Netherlands. www.plaxis.nl

  20. Itasca (2011) Itasca software products—FLAC, FLAC3D, UDEC, 3DEC, PFC2D/3D. Itasca Consulting Group Inc, Minneapolis

    Google Scholar 

  21. Matsui T, San K-C (1992) Finite element slope stability analysis by shear strength reduction technique. Soils Found 32(1):59–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Hammah RE, Curran JH, Yacoub T, Corkum B (2004) Stability analysis of rock slopes using the finite element method. In: Schubert (ed) EUROCK ‘2004 & 53rd Geomechanics Colloquium, Salzburg, Austria

  23. Vanmarcke EH (1983) Random fields: analysis and synthesis. MIT Press, Cambridge

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Griffiths DV, Fenton GA (2001) Bearing capacity of spatially random soil: the undrained clay Prandtl problem revisited. Géotechnique 54(4):351–359

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Griffiths DV, Fenton GA (2004) Probabilistic slope stability analysis by finite elements. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng ASCE 130(5):507–518

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Fenton GA, Griffiths DV (2003) Bearing capacity prediction of spatially random c—φ soils. Can Geotech J 40(1):54–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Fenton GA, Griffiths DV (2005) A slope stability reliability model. In: Proceedings of the K.Y. Lo Symposium, London, Ontario

  28. Popescu R, Deodatis G, Nobahar A (2005) Effects of random heterogeneity of soil properties on bearing capacity. Probab Eng Mech 20:324–341

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Popescu R, Prevost JH, Deodatis G (2005) 3D effects in seismic liquefaction of stochastically variable soil deposits. Géotechnique 55(1):21–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Hsu Sung-Chi, Nelson PriscillaP (2006) Material spatial variability and slope stability for weak rock masses. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng ASCE 132(2):183–193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Sivakumar Babu GL, Srivastava A, Murthy DSN (2006) Reliability analysis of the bearing capacity of a shallow foundation resting on cohesive soil. Can Geotech J 43:217–223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Srivastava A, Sivakumar Babu GL (2009) Effect of soil variability on the bearing capacity of clay and in slope stability problems. Eng Geol 108:142–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Srivastava A, Sivakumar Babu GL, Haldar S (2010) Influence of spatial variability of permeability property on steady state seepage flow and slope stability analysis. Eng Geol 110:93–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Uzielli M, Lacass S, Nadim F, Phoon KK (2007) Soil variability analysis for geotechnical practice. In: Tan TS, Phoon KK, Hight DW, Leroueil S (eds) Characterization and engineering properties of natural soils, Taylor & Francis group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-42691-6

  35. Sitharam TG, Sridevi J, Shimizu N (2001) Practical equivalent continuum characterization of jointed rock masses. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 38:437–448

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Sitharam TG, Madhavi Latha G (2002) Simulation of excavation in jointed rock masses using practical equivalent continuum model. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 39:517–525

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Ramamurthy T (2001) Shear strength response of some geological materials in triaxial compression’. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 38:683–697

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Ramamurthy T (2010) Engineering in Rocks for slopes, foundations and tunnels. PHI learning private limited, New Delhi, ISBN 978-81-2003-4168-5

  39. Phoon KK, Kulhawy FH (1999) Characterization of geotechnical variability. Can Geotech J 36:612–624

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Phoon KK, Kulhawy FH (1999) Evaluation of geotechnical property variability. Can Geotech J 36:625–639

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Baecher GB, Christian JT (2003) Reliability and statistics in geotechnical engineering. John Wiley Publications, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  42. Harr ME (1987) Reliability-based design in civil engineering. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  43. Lacasse S, Nadim F (1996) Uncertainties in characterizing soil properties. In: Shackleford CD, Nelson PP, Roth MJS (eds) Uncertainty in the geologic environment (GSP 58). ASCE, New York, pp 49–75

    Google Scholar 

  44. Duncan JM (2000) Factors of safety and reliability in geotechnical engineering. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng ASCE 126:307–316

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Priestley MB (1981) Spectral analysis and time series I: univariate series. Academic Press, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  46. Vanmarcke EH (1977) Probabilistic modeling of soil profiles. J Geotech Eng Div ASCE 103:1227–1246

    Google Scholar 

  47. Vanmarcke EH, Grigorin M (1983) Stochastic finite element analysis of simple beams. J Eng Mech ASCE 109(5):1203–1214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Haldar S, Sivakumar Babu GL (2008) Effect of soil spatial variability on the response of laterally loaded pile in undrained clay. Comput Geotech 35:537–547

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Srivastava A (2010) Risk analysis of earth dams under static and earthquake loading. PhD thesis, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, India

  50. Press WH, Teukolsky SA, Vetterling WT, Flannery BP (2002) Numerical recipes in C++: the art of scientific computing, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  51. USACE (1997) Risk-based analysis in geotechnical engineering for support of planning studies. US Army Corps of Engineers, Department of Army, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  52. Haldar A, Mahadevan S (2000) Probability, reliability and statistical methods in engineering design. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Civil Engineering, Jaypee University of Engineering and Technology, A-B Road, Raghogarh, 473226, Guna, Madhya Pradesh, India

    Amit Srivastava

Authors
  1. Amit Srivastava
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amit Srivastava.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Srivastava, A. Spatial Variability Modelling of Geotechnical Parameters and Stability of Highly Weathered Rock Slope. Indian Geotech J 42, 179–185 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40098-012-0016-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40098-012-0016-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation