Abstract
Evaluation of stresses generated at soil-structure interface or within the soil mass influences the design decisions of substructures. Though many analytical techniques are available, actual measurement of these stresses is of prime importance from analytical and construction view point. The measurement of stresses also provides valuable information for validating constitutive theories of geo-material behaviour and computational techniques for examining soil-structure interaction problems. Calibration of pressure transducer involves application of known pressure to the transducer and obtaining the relationship between applied pressure and pressure cell output. In absence of such relationship, interpretation of data obtained using transducers is highly questionable. Present study describes details of indigenously developed universal pressure transducer calibration device, developed by modifying the conventional triaxial apparatus. It allows demanding task of fluid and in-soil calibration of pressure transducers, which was not possible with existing calibration devices. Performance of the developed device checked using three different types of transducers revealed accurate and repeatable results.
References
Bao M, Sun Y, Yang H, Wang J (2003) ‘A fast and accurate calibration method for high sensitivity pressure transducers’. Sens. Actuators A Phys. 108(1–3):218–223
Clayton CRI, Bica AVD (1993) The design of diaphragm-type boundary total stress cells. Geotechnique 43(4):523–535
Dave TN, Dasaka SM (2011) A review on pressure measurement using earth pressure cell’. Int. J. Earth Sci. Eng. 4(6 SPL):1031–1034
Frydman S, Keissar I (1987) Earth pressure on retaining walls near rock faces. J. Geotech. Eng. 113(6):586–599
Ingram JK (1968) ‘Development of a Free-Field Soil Stress Gage for Static and Dynamic Measurements’, Technical Report No. 1-814. US Army Waterways Experimentation Station, Corps of Engineers, Vicksburg
Labuz JF, Theroux B (2005) Laboratory calibration of earth pressure cells. Geotech. Test J. 28(2):1–9
Madabhushi SPG, Khokher YR (2010) Physical Modelling in Geotechnics. In: Springman S, Laue J, Seward L (eds) ‘Dynamic Earth Pressures and Earth Pressure Cell Measurements’. Taylor and Francis Group, London, pp 493–498
Mason HG (1965) ‘Effects of Structural Compressibility on Active and Passive Arching in Soil-Structure Interaction’, Defense Atomic Support Agency 1718. URS, Pasadena, pp 645–648
McNulty JW (1965) ‘An Experimental Study of Arching in Sand’, Technical Report No. 1-674. US Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg
Pang PLR (1986) A new boundary stress transducer for small soil models in the centrifuge. Geotech. Test J. 9(2):72–79
Selig ET (1980) Soil stress gauge calibration. Geotech. Test J. 3(4):153–158
Selig ET (1989) In situ Stress Measurements: State-of-the-Art of Pavement Response Monitoring Systems for Roads and Airfields. US Army Cold Regions Research and Engineering Laboratory, Hannover
Take WA (1998) ‘Lateral Earth Pressure Behind Rigid Fascia Retaining Wall’, M.S. Thesis. Dept. of Civil Engineering, The University of New Brunswick, Vicksburg
Terzaghi K (1943) Theoretical Soil Mechanics. Wiley, New York
Trollope, H., Lee, I. K.: ‘The measurement of soil pressure’. In: Proceedings of 5th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, vol. 2, pp. 493–499. Paris (1961)
Wachman GS, Labuz JF (2011) Soil-structure interaction of an earth pressure cell. J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 137(9):843–845
Weiler WA, Kulhawy FH (1982) Factors affecting stress cell measurements in soil. J. Geotech. Eng. Div. 108(12):1529–1548
Acknowledgments
The work reported in this paper is substantially supported by the Department of Science and Technology (DST), India (Project No. SR/FTP/ETA-69/2008).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Dave, T.N., Dasaka, S.M. Universal Calibration Device for Fluid and In-Soil Calibration of Pressure Transducers. Indian Geotech J 42, 212–219 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40098-012-0013-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40098-012-0013-7