Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Applying a non-invasive multi-spectral sensing technique to two-phase flow measurements for pipeline monitoring

  • Original Research
  • Published:
International Journal of Energy and Environmental Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

"Smart" sensors, with a fusion-based approach, pave the way for potentially changing how pipeline network systems are controlled, maintained, and monitored. This is typically done through structural modeling or spot monitoring using micro-electromechanical systems, strain gauges or through general conventional sensing. One of the challenges facing new developments in structural health monitoring (SHM) of a deployed asset is application to inaccessible locations. This work presents the use of a non-intrusive integrity monitoring sensor system utilising a multi-spectral approach to give more trusted insights to structural integrity as well as flow characteristics. The paper addresses the fundamental problems in identifying and characterising two-phase (air–water and oil–water) flow patterns and flow pattern transitions using numerous sensing techniques: strain gauges, optical Fibre Bragg Gratings, thermocouples (K-type), accelerometers, acoustic emission analysis and gyroscopes. By providing low noise, un-biased strain measurements, the non-intrusive sensor system can verify and improve integrity monitoring, providing a reliable alternative to conventional sensing. In addition, the non-intrusive sensor system enables pressure monitoring, providing flow assurance data and, provides good data integrity, making it an ideal tool as an enhanced surveillance strategy in real time for SHM of pipeline networks.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Spencer, B.F., Ruiz-Sandoval, M.: Smart sensing technology for structural health monitoring. In: Earthquake Engineering, Canada (2004)

  2. Alsaka Department of Enviorment Conservation: Technical Review of Leak Detection Technologies Crude Oil Transmission Pipelines (2004)

  3. Cawley, P.: Structural health monitoring: closing the gap between research and industrial deployment. Struct. Health Monit. 17, 1225–1244 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Abd Murad, M. (ed.): 4th European-American Workshop on Reliability of NDE. The Development of Structural Health Monitoring (SHM) Procedures for the Structural Integrity and Maintenance Repair of Offshore Ageing Pipelines: NDT net (2009)

  5. Li, J., Yang, X., Sitzenfrei, R.: Rethinking the framework of smart water system: a review. Water 412(12), 25 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Dai, F., Wang, D.: Analysis and comparison of long-distance pipeline failures. J. Pet. Eng. 2017, 1–7 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Santos, A., Younis, M.: A sensor network for non-intrusive and efficient leak detection in long pipelines. In: Proceedings of the IFIP Wireless Days Conference, Canada (2011)

  8. Hopkins, P.: PIPELINES: past, present, and future. In: Asian Pacific IIW International Congress, Sydney (2007)

  9. Zahab, S., Zayed, T.: Leak detection in water distribution networks: an introductory overview. Smart Water 4, 1–23 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Trans Mountain Pipeline spill in Abbotsford estimated at up to 190,000 litres of crude oil. CBC.ca. Retrieved 02 May 2021

  11. MacLean, A., Moran, C.: Detection of hydrocarbon fuel spills using a distributed fibre optic sensor. Sens. Actuators A Phys. 109, 60–67 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Colombo, A., Karney, B.W.: Pipe breaks and the role of leaks from an economic perspective. Water Sci. Technol. Water Supply 3(1–2), 163–169 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Zou, L., Sezerman, O.: Pipeline Corrosion Monitoring by Fiber Optic Distributed Strain and Temperature Sensors, pp. 1–8. NACE International, Houston (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Barry, A., Broaddus, D., Ivasauskas, J.: A novel solution for performing real-time fiber optic temperature measurements. SPE Int. 175047, 1–18 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Bolognini, G., Soto, M.A., Di Pasquale, F.: Simultaneous distributed strain and temperature sensing based on combined Raman–Brillouin scattering using Fabry–Perot lasers. Meas. Sci. Technol. 21(9), 094025 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Bado, M.F., Casas, J.R.: A review of recent distributed optical fiber sensors applications for civil engineering structural health monitoring. Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) 21(5), 1818 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Cataldo, A., Cannazza, G.: A new method for detecting leaks in underground water pipelines. IEEE Sens. 12, 1660–1667 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Adegboye, M.A., Fung, W., Karnik, A.: Recent advances in pipeline monitoring and oil leakage detection technologies: principles and approaches. Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) 19(11), 2548 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ahadi, M., Bakhtiar, M.S.: Leak detection in water-filled plastic pipes through the application of tuned wavelet transforms to acoustic emission signals. Appl. Acoust. 71(7), 634–639 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Inaudi, D., Glisic, B.: Long-range pipeline monitoring by distributed fibre optic sensing. J. Press. Vessel Technol. 132(1), 011701 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Brown, G.: Downhole temperatures from optical fiber. Oilfield Rev. 4(20), 34–39 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Cusano, A., Breglio, G., Giordano, M.: Fiber Optic Sensing System for Smart Materials and Structures, pp. 1401–409. IEEE, Piscataway (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Besagni, G., Inzoli, F.: Two-Phase Bubble Columns: A Comprehensive Review. MDPI, Chemengineering, London (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Fang, L., Yang, Y., Fu, L., Wei, Z., Zhao, N., Li, X. (eds.): The Noise Characteristics of Gas-Liquid Two Phase Slug Flow in Vertical Pipe. IEEE, Piscataway (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Pan, Y., Chen, Z., Xiao, L.: Application of Fiber Bragg GRating Sensor Networks in Oil Wells. SPE International, Issue 136978, pp. 1–6 (2010)

  26. Wang, W., Song, H., Xue, J.: Overview of Intelligent Composites with Embedded FBG Sensors, pp. 47–51. Piscataway, IEEE (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Hsu, N.N., Breckenridge, F.R.: Characterization and calibration of acoustic emission sensors. Mater. Eval. 39, 60–68 (1981)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Klein, L.A.: Multiple-sensor system applications, benefits, and design considerations. In: Edition, S. (ed.) Sensor and Data Fusion: A Tool for Information Assessment and Decision Making, pp. 9–52. SPIE Press, Anon (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Ho, J.S., Li, Z.: Microwave Metamaterials for Biomedical Sensing. Elsevier Inc, Amsterdam (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Liptak, B.: Do Multiple Sensors Improve Accuracy? [online] (2021). https://www.controlglobal.com/articles/2018/do-multiple-sensors-improve-accuracy/. 04/11/2021

  31. El-Alej, M.E.: Monitoring Sand Particle Concentration in Multiphase Flow using Acoustic Emission Technology [online] thesis or dissertation (2014)

  32. Shuib, H., Mba, D.: Acoustic emission of a single bubble activities. In: Proceedings of the World Congress on Engineering 2078-0958 (2010)

  33. Narcy, M., Colin, C.: Two-phase pipe flow in microgravity with and without phase change: recent progress and future prospects. Interfacial Phenom. Heat Transf. 3(1), 1–17 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Alssayh, M., Addali, A.: Identification of two-phase flow regime using acoustic emission technology. Int. J. Mech. Production.. 16, 2320–2092 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Griffin, J.: Traceability of acoustic emission measurements for a proposed calibration method—classification of characteristics and Identification using signal analysis. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 50–51, 757–783 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Husin, S., Addali, A.: Acoustic Emission for Monitoring Two-Phase Flow. EWGAE, Vienna (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Alhashan, T., Addali, A.: Experimental investigation of the influences of different liquid types on acoustic emission energy levels during the bubble formation process. Int. J. Energy Environ. Eng. 9, 13–20 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Essid, M.: Monitoring sand Particle Concentration in Multiphase Flow Using Acoustic Emission Technology. PhD, Cranfield University, Cranfield (2014)

  39. Bernasconi, Giancarlo & Del Giudice, Silvio & Giunta, Giuseppe: Pipeline Acoustic Monitoring. 1-7, 7th Pipeline Technology Conference, Germany (2012)

  40. Droubi, M.G., Reuben, R.L., Steel, J.I.: Flow noise identification using acoustic emission (AE) energy decomposition for sand monitoring in flow pipeline. Appl. Acoust. 131, 5–15 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Droubi, M.G., Reuben, R.L., White, G.: Statistical distribution models for monitoring acoustic emission (AE) energy of abrasive particle impacts on carbon steel. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 30, 356–372 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Ennaceur, C., Beaugrand, V., EWGAE.: 28th European Conference on Acoustic Emission Testing. Acoustic Emission Monitoring of Crack Growth in Dissimilar Joints for Corrosion Resistant Applications. Krakow, Poland (2008)

  43. Sause, M.G.R. Investigation of Pencil-Lead Breaks as Acoustic Emission Sources. J. Acoust. Emis 29, 184 (2011)

  44. Gath, I., Geva, A.B.: Unsupervised optimal fuzzy clustering. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 11(7), 773–780 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Gosain, A., Dahiya, S.: Performance analysis of various fuzzy clustering algorithms: a review. Procedia Comput. Sci. 79, 100–111 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Klawonn, F.: Fuzzy clustering: Insights and a new approach. Mathw. Soft Comput. 11(2–3), 125–142 (2004)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Mechanical, Aerospace and Automotive Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Environment and Computing, Coventry University, Gulson Road, Coventry, CV1 2JH, UK

    D. Zainal Abidin, S. Theminimulla, D. G. Waugh & J. M. Griffin

Authors
  1. D. Zainal Abidin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. S. Theminimulla
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. D. G. Waugh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. J. M. Griffin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to D. Zainal Abidin.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zainal Abidin, D., Theminimulla, S., Waugh, D.G. et al. Applying a non-invasive multi-spectral sensing technique to two-phase flow measurements for pipeline monitoring. Int J Energy Environ Eng 13, 587–605 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40095-021-00471-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40095-021-00471-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation