A study of the hydrodynamics of steam-assisted coal particles removal


The presence of coal particles, as well as the acidic aerosol in the exhaust gases from the coal-fired power plants, present a major threat to the global atmosphere. Here, the hydrodynamics of the orthogonal injection of the steam into the square duct flow channel through which the air containing coal particulates has been investigated. The steam was injected into the flow channel to wet the coal particles to enable their separation from the air based on the particles becoming heavier. The experimental setup used in the present study consisted of the 2 cm × 2 cm square flow duct made of the transparent Perspex and was 50 cm long. The mixture of air and coal particles was introduced at one end of the duct, and a centrifugal rotator was located at the other end of the duct, which was used to separate the coal particles from the wet coal particles from the air. And swirling steam was injected into the duct by two nozzles located at lower and upper surfaces of the duct. PIV images of the flow field at varying steam and air pressure and making use of the measurements of the turbulent fluctuating velocities, relative velocity and transient analysis, spike in removal efficiency of the coal particles from the air was found as 4–7%, corresponding to the range of particle sizes, 0.30–0.45 μm, inlet steam pressure of 1.5 bars and air pressure varying from 0.4 to 3.0 bars. However, the overall separation efficiency was obtained as 51%.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7


  1. 1.

    Fernández Alonso, D., Gonçalves, J.A.S., Azzopardi, B.J., Coury, J.R.: Drop size measurements in Venturi scrubbers. Chem Eng Sci 56, 4901–4911 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0009-2509(01)00140-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    A. Alkislar, M.B. Lourenco, L.M. Krothapalli, Stereoscopic PIV measurements of a screeching supersonic jet - IOS Press, (n.d.). https://content.iospress.com/articles/journal-of-visualization/jov3-2-06 (Accessed July 20, 2020).

  3. 3.

    Carr, Z.R., Ahmed, K.A., Forliti, D.J.: Spatially correlated precision error in digital particle image velocimetry measurements of turbulent flows. Exp Fluids 47, 95–106 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-009-0638-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Warda, H.A., Kassab, S.Z., Elshorbagy, K.A., Elsaadawy, E.A.: An experimental investigation of the near-field region of free turbulent round central and annular jets. Flow Meas Instrum 10, 1–14 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0955-5986(98)00042-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Chigier, N.A., Beér, J.M.: The flow region near the nozzle in double concentric jets. J Fluids Eng Trans ASME 86, 797–804 (1964a). https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3655957

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Chigier, N.A., Beér, J.M.: Velocity and static-pressure distributions in swirling air jets issuing from annular and divergent nozzles. J Fluids Eng Trans ASME 86, 788–796 (1964b). https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3655954

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Vanierschot, M., Persoons, T., Van den Bulck, E.: A new method for annular jet control based on cross-flow injection. Phys Fluids 21, 025103 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3037343

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Vanierschot, M., Van den Bulck, E.: Hysteresis in flow patterns in annular swirling jets. Exp Therm Fluid Sci 31, 513–524 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.expthermflusci.2006.06.001

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    M. Vanierschot, Fluid mechanics and control of annular jets with and without swirl, 2007. https://lirias.kuleuven.be/1674777 (Accessed August 1, 2020).

  10. 10.

    Semrau, K.T.: Dust scrubber design-a critique on the state of the art. J Air Pollut Control Assoc 13, 587–594 (1963). https://doi.org/10.1080/00022470.1963.10468224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Accortt, J.I., Plumley, A.L., Martin, J.R.: Fine paniculate removal and S02 absorption with a two stage wet scrubber. J Air Pollut Control Assoc 24, 966–969 (1974). https://doi.org/10.1080/00022470.1974.10469999

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Davies, C.N.: The separation of airborne dust and particles. Proc Inst Mech Eng 167(1b), 185–213 (1953). https://doi.org/10.1177/002034835316701b13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Zheng, X., Kaili, X., Wang, Q., Shen, R., Wang, Y.: Hydrogen inhibition in wet dust removal systems by using calcium lignosulfonate (CLS). Int J Hydrogen Energy 44(45), 25091–25100 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.07.157

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


The authors are thankful to the Russian Government and Institute of Engineering and Technology, Department of Hydraulics and Hydraulic and Pneumatic Systems, South Ural State University, Lenin prospect 76, Chelyabinsk, 454080, Russian Federation for their support to this work through Act 211 Government of the Russian Federation, contract No. 02. A03.21.0011.

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to Afrasyab Khan.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Khan, A., Sanaullah, K., Konstantinovich, S.E. et al. A study of the hydrodynamics of steam-assisted coal particles removal. Int J Energy Environ Eng (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40095-020-00368-8

Download citation


  • Steam-water flow
  • Coal particles
  • Hydrodynamics
  • Steady flow
  • Transient flow
  • Efficiency