The dry weight of earthworms differed significantly among treatments (F2,15 = 36.5; p < 0.001), and was highest with the gneiss vermicompost (4.25 g; se = 0.21), lower with the steatite-enriched compost (2.78 g; se = 0.16) and still lower with the non-enriched compost (2.11 g; se = 0.16). The differences among all composts were significant (contrasts with SNK test, p < 0.05). Despite the presence of heavy metals in the silicate rocks (Table 1), the earthworm weights indicate that the inclusion of rock powders in vermicomposting was not harmful, but rather favorable for the growth and reproduction of these animals, which confirms earlier findings (Souza et al. 2013).
Overall, there was a significant effect of vermicompost type on the concentrations of heavy metals in the body of the earthworms (MANOVA, Pillai–Bartlett statistic = 1.99, p < 0.0001). The concentrations of Cu (F2,15 = 49.2; p < 0.001), Ni (F2,15 = 21.3; p < 0.001), Cr (F2,15 = 820.7, p < 0.001) and Cd (F2,15 = 30.2; p < 0.001) differed significantly among treatments (Table 3). They were higher with steatite and did not differ between gneiss and unenriched vermicompost. The concentrations of Zn (F2,15 = 6807.5; p < 0.001) and Pb (F2,15 = 128.3; p < 0.001) in earthworms also differed significantly among treatments. They were higher with gneiss-enriched vermicompost (Table 3). Some of these metals, such as Cu and Zn, are constituents of the animal body in minute concentrations. Associated with some proteins, these elements move within the animal body, participating in several reactions in the organism (Andriguetto et al. 1998).
Table 3 Mean metal concentrations (n = 6; standard error) in the vermicomposts at the end of vermicomposting with cattle manure with steatite powder (VcS), or gneiss powder (VcG), or without rock powder (Vc) Overall, there was a significant effect of compost type on the heavy metal concentrations in the vermicomposts (MANOVA, Pillai–Bartlett statistic = 1.95, p < 0.0001). The concentrations of Ni (F2,15 = 1614.7; p < 0.001) and Cr (F2,15 = 4809; p < 0.001) differed significantly among composts (Table 3). They were considerably higher in the steatite-enriched vermicompost than in the other composts. Although the concentrations of these metals were rather high, reflecting the high concentration of these elements present in the steatite (Table 1), only the Ni concentration (182.8 mg kg−1) was higher than allowed under Brazilian legislation (Table 2). The Zn concentrations differed significantly among treatments (F2,15 = 2455.4; p < 0.001) and was higher in gneiss-enriched vermicompost. The Cu concentrations varied significantly with treatments (F2,15 = 9.5; p = 0.002); it did not differ between the steatite-enriched vermicompost and the unenriched vermicompost, but was lower in the vermicompost with gneiss (Table 3). Pb concentrations also differed significantly among treatments (F2,15 = 15.8; p < 0.001). It did not differ between the gneiss and steatite-enriched vermicompost, but was lower in the unenriched vermicompost (Table 3). No Cd was detected in any of the vermicompost treatments.
High heavy metal concentrations of Ni and Cr in the vermicomposts should not be ascribed to the rock powders only, as these elements were also present in manure. For instance, the concentrations of Ni, Cr and Pb in the manure were higher than in gneiss powder (as shown above). The presence of heavy metals in the manure can be attributed to feed supplements for cattle (Marçal et al. 2005), chemical fertilizers and pesticides applied to the cattle’s pasture. Although the heavy metal concentrations in the manure were higher than in gneiss powder, the concentrations are below the limit allowed under Brazilian regulation for organic and inorganic fertilizers in both materials (MAPA 2006, Table 2).
Overall, there was a significant effect (MANOVA, Pillai–Bartlett statistic = 1.99, p < 0.0001) of vermicompost type on the concentrations of heavy metals in the roots (Table 4). The Cu concentration (F2,15 = 50.6; p < 0.001) did not differ between the steatite-enriched compost and the unenriched compost, but was lower in the compost with gneiss. Zinc concentration was higher in gneiss vermicompost than in the steatite-enriched compost and both of these treatments were higher than in the control (F2,15 = 335.6, p < 0.001), being slightly above the reported range (18.2–21.5 mg kg−1) for maize 45 days after germination (Ferreira et al., 2001). The Ni concentrations differed among all treatments (F2,15 = 304.0; p < 0.001), being higher in the steatite-enriched compost than in the other treatments. Chromium concentrations differed significantly among treatments (F2,15 = 105.3; p < 0.001), was highest with the steatite-enriched vermicompost, and was lowest in the vermicompost without rock powder (Table 4). Lead concentrations varied significantly with treatment (F2,15 = 63.3; p < 0.001), did not differ significantly between gneiss-enriched vermicompost and unenriched compost, and were higher in the vermicompost with steatite (Table 4).
Table 4 Mean heavy metal concentrations (n = 6; standard error) in the roots and shoots of maize in soils fertilized with vermicompost enriched with steatite (VcS), gneiss (VcG) or with no rock powder (Vc) Overall, there was a significant effect (MANOVA, Pillai–Bartlett statistic = 1.98, p < 0.0001) of vermicompost type on the concentrations of heavy metals in shoots (Table 4). Cu concentrations did not differ significantly with treatments (F2,15 = 1.1; p = 0.324). Zinc concentrations differed significantly among treatments (F2,15 = 335.6, p < 0.001), was higher in compost with gneiss than in the other treatments and was lowest in the vermicompost without rock powder. Nickel concentrations differed among treatments (F2,15 = 304.0; p < 0.001), was higher in the treatment with steatite than in the other treatments and was lowest in the vermicompost without rock powder. Cadmium was not detected in any of the treatments. Chromium concentrations differed among treatments (F2,15 = 7070.3; p < 0.001), and were higher in plant shoots in the steatite treatment than in the other treatments. Lead concentrations differed among treatments (F2,15 = 8.73; p = 0.003), and were lower in the treatments enriched with gneiss powder than in the other treatments.
The concentrations of Cu, Zn and Cd in the roots (Table 4) were below the maximum tolerance limits for plants. Copper concentrations in roots were close to the range reported suitable for maize plants (6–20 mg kg−1, Malavolta 2006). The optimal Zn levels in the leaves of maize plants are between 15 and 50 mg kg−1 (Malavolta 2006). The addition of rock powders, mainly of gneiss powder, contributed to increases of Zn levels in the plants.
Overall, there was a significant effect of vermicompost type on the concentrations of heavy metals in the dry weight of plants (shoots plus roots) (MANOVA, Pillai–Bartlett statistic = 1.01, p < 0.0001). The dry weight of plants differed among treatments (F2.15 = 75.6; p < 0.001) and was higher with steatite (7.99 g; se = 0.12) than with gneiss (6.90 g; se = 0.15) and, in turn, higher than in the control (5.92 g; se = 0.11, SNK test, p < 0.05). The higher gain in dry matter of plants grown with vermicompost enriched with rock powders shows the potential for the enrichment of manure with these powders for soil fertilization. The increased dry matter was probably due to an increase of the availability of nutrients and an increase of the soil nutrient pools when adding rock powders to vermicomposting (Souza et al. 2013).
The use of gneiss powder can be an alternative for Zn fertilization, one of the most limiting micronutrients for the productivity of many crops in Brazil, including coffee, in which Zn deficiency is common. The region of Zona da Mata in Minas Gerais, where gneiss is the predominant rock, is considered one of the major coffee growing regions in Brazil and farmers successfully use rock powders (particularly granite and gneiss) to improve coffee yield and quality (Cupertino et al. 2015).
The concentrations in the roots and shoots (Table 4) of Ni in the compost with steatite in all treatments exceeded the upper limits for plants defined by the Brazilian regulation (ANVISA 1965, 1998), and the maximum suggested by Kabata-Pendias (2010) and for the United States of America (Table 2). Ni, present in high concentrations in the steatite powder (Table 1), was recently acknowledged as an essential element for plants, and its toxicity to plants was also recently studied. Nickel tends to accumulate in maize leaves and grains. However, the Ni levels expected in plants vary largely. According to Mengel and Kirkby (2001), Ni contents in plant dry matter ranged from 0.1 to 5 mg kg−1, whereas the Ni levels in food plants grown in United States of America ranged from 1 to 10 mg kg−1 (Kabata-Pendias 2010). The values reported in our experiment exceeded the maximum threshold defined by Brazilian regulation for maize grains (Table 2), but no limit was defined for the shoots, as analyzed here. However, our data are within the acceptance range defined for the United States of America (Table 4, Kabata-Pendias 2010).
The results show that adding rock powder, especially steatite, resulted in increased availability of chromium to the plants. There is no evidence that Cr is essential for the metabolism of plants (Kabata-Pendias and Mukherjee 2007). In general, available Cr accumulates in the roots, forming barriers that decrease its translocation to the shoots (Losi et al. 1994). The plants showed no visual symptoms of toxicity, but Cr concentrations, especially in plants grown on steatite-enriched compost, exceeded the maximum threshold for human food, according to under Brazilian regulation (ANVISA 1965, 1998), the maximum suggested by World Health Organization for the European Union and for the United States of America (Kabata-Pendias 2010) (Table 2). Therefore, Cr concentrations in the maize plants (shoot + root) are somewhat worrying. However, since the content of Cr in the shoots was lower than in the roots, we also expect lower content in the grain, the edible part of the plant.
The Pb concentrations in all the treatments exceeded the upper limits for plants defined by Brazilian regulation for maize grains (Table 2). The Pb found in roots and shoots is below the threshold toxicity to maize (56.0 mg kg−1, Kabata-Pendias 2010). The roots can take up significant amounts of heavy metals such as Pb, of which, in general, little is translocated to plant shoots (Malavolta 2006; Shtangeeva et al. 2011).
Overall, there was not a significant effect (MANOVA, Pillai–Bartlett statistic = 0.32, p = 0.253) of vermicompost type on the concentrations of heavy metals in the soil after cultivation (Table 4). Pb was not detected in the gneiss-enriched soil, and Cd and Cr were not detected in any of the treatments. In all the treatments, the metal concentrations were below the reference values for soil quality, defined by the state of Minas Gerais, Brazil, regulations (COPAM 2011), and maximum limits suggested by Alloway (2013) for the European Union and United States of America (Table 2). Probably, the soil immobilized the metals present in the vermicomposts. Soil organic matter can complex metals present in the soil solution, and thereby decrease the toxicity of pollutants (Dumat et al. 2006). Organic matter has a great affinity for heavy metals in the soil because of its adsorption properties, acting via ionic bonds and its action as a chelating agent in the soil solution (Jeong et al. 2007).
The balance of Ni, Cr and Pb, based on the main inputs and outputs of the metals in the treatments with rock powders, namely manure, earthworms, vermicompost, substrate (soil, cattle manure, limestone and vermicompost) and plants, is found in Table 5. The heavy metal contents found in limestone are not separately listed in the balance chart, since all the treatments received the same dose, i.e., 3 g of limestone. The contribution of the steatite powder to the substrate is 17 times more for Ni and 4.7 times more for Cr than that of manure (Table 5). In turn, the manure contributed approximately 6.7 times more Pb to the substrate than steatite powder. Gneiss powder contributed less Ni, Cr and Pb to the substrate than did the manure (21.5, 15, and 10.4 times less, respectively). Therefore, in the case of gneiss powder, the plant possibly extracted most of these elements from the manure, because the concentrations in gneiss powder were lower than in the manure. This suggests that greater care has to be taken when considering the quality of the supplements for animal feed (Marçal et al. 2005). Maize plants extracted low quantities of Ni, Cr and Pb from the substrate (Table 5), which can be attributed to the immobilization of these metals by the soil and to the ability of selective uptake of elements by the plants (Kabata-Pendias 2010).
Table 5 Balance of Ni, Cr and Pb in maize considering the main inputs and outputs of the metals in the treatments with rock powder (Steatite, S or Gneiss, G)