Live loads on floors of libraries and newspaper archive buildings
 229 Downloads
Abstract
A detailed live load survey was carried out on floors of the library and newspaper archive at a public library in Mexico City. The study included furniture, racks and shelves, as well as books, journals, papers and other items used in libraries. Considering temporal concentration, an additional survey of people was estimated separately. Those loads were used to estimate distribution functions of the maximum total live loads for different areas. The results were compared with the values specified by the Mexico City Building Code and ASCE 716. The paper provides some detailed background behind the normative methodology of the current specialized codes to define the basic value of design live load intensity by considering the maximum load effect as a function of the building uses and the definition of influence area by structural element. The results of the survey corresponding to typical public libraries have shown that the probabilities of occurrence of the design loads recommended in the local code might be a proper representation of the mean values. Based on the results, basic values of design load intensity were proposed.
Keywords
Live load Libraries Newspaper archives Probability distribution Design loadsIntroduction
The live loads on floors in buildings are caused by the weights of people, furniture, supplies, stores, equipment, stored objects and persons, among others weights borne by the structure during its use and occupancy. Live loads are movable and variable and sometimes cause dynamic effects.
In codes, live loads are specified as the weight per unit area corresponding to the use of the floor. The design load shall be calculated by considering the maximum load effect for the particular use caused by the specific disposition of people and supplies. Live loads are composed of two stochastic processes corresponding to sustained loads (weight of users and furniture) and extraordinary loads as parties, meetings, etc. (Ruíz and SampayoTrujillo 1997).
 (a)
It is impossible to survey all possible uses of a floor, because future human activity cannot be predicted. So, design live loads for unspecified uses should be estimated from normative loads by similar uses.
 (b)
Spatial scatter may be comprehended with enough data, but temporal scatter, especially that resulting from the concentration of people and furniture occurring only once in several years or even once in more than a period of time, cannot be determined with few data. It is considered that the current sustained live loads in practice could be referred without serious danger or loss of serviceability and, therefore, the basic value of live load is estimated on the basis of the sustained load data surveyed.
The general features of a type of loads are fairly similar within a group of structures. In fact, several researches have focused attention in the study of the design live loads for structures with different specified uses (e.g., CIB 1989; Choi 1991; Ruiz and SampayoTrujillo 1997; Wen and Yeo 2001; TapiaHernández et al. 2017; Saberi et al. 2017). However, since there are not enough data for the current condition of live loads on floors of libraries, their normative demands are estimated from other building uses. For example, according to the MCBC17 (Fig. 1a), the design live load at libraries has been classified as a gathering place (with or without fixed seats), which includes temples, churches, theaters, auditoria, gymnasia, dance floors, restaurants, games rooms, arcades and similar, despite the fact that different conditions and load demands might be expected between them.
The normative live loads on floor of libraries according to some international codes are compared in Fig. 1b. Four international regulations were considered: NorthAmerica ASCE/SEI 710 (2010), Japan AIJ06 (2006), Canada CNBC15 (2015) and Mexico MCBC17 (2017). A single magnitude of live load is established in the MCBC17, which applies equally to reading rooms and stack rooms. It is worth noting that the design live load for stack rooms, according to the MCBC17, is the lower limit, and in fact, it is equivalent to the load specified by the CNBC15 for reading rooms. No information is included between the compared codes to define the design load for newspaper archive buildings; thus, the load should be estimated from normative loads of libraries.
Additionally, current codes provide somewhat deliberate guidance in regard to treatment of live loads in the seismic analysis. For example, ASCE 716 requires consideration of 25% of the live load as inertia. These normative percentages are typically not questioned because live loads may not be so significant in relation to the dead load and because of the perception that only a minor portion of the live load is likely to be present at the time of occurrence of an intense earthquake. However, for storage structure such as libraries, live loads are nearly permanent (SmithPardo et al. 2015).
With this panorama, this research aims to evaluate the design live loads on floors of libraries and newspaper archives buildings, according to the typical conditions in buildings of Mexico. Pursuant to this goal, a detailed live load survey was carried out, which included furniture, people and other items typical used in libraries. The study pretends to improve the acquired knowledge and explores a more realistic assessment of the live load demands on the actual conditions of these particular floors uses.
Basic value of design live load
Conversion factor for equivalent uniformly distributed load k _{e}
The conversion factor for equivalent uniformly distributed load k_{e} is used for converting the nominal live load intensity of a survey to the equivalent uniformly distributed load of a specific area. The conversion factor k_{e} is estimated differently for structural elements such as slabs, beams, columns and foundations, because the influence of their disposition state on load effect is quite different.
The structural elements are analyzed elastically to investigate the influence on structure based on the furniture disposition obtained from a survey. k_{e} is the ratio of the 99percentile value of the equivalent uniformly distributed load to that of the averaging weight over the influence area. According to AIJ06, the conversion factor for uniformly distributed load of slab in stack rooms is equal to k_{e} = 1.6 and is equal to k_{e} = 1.2 for beams, columns and foundations.
Area reduction factor k _{a}
In particular, the live loads in stack rooms might be regarded as less random. The location of book shelves is systematic to some extent as a result of the use, without changes or remodeling over the years. Thus, the load caused by stored objects may consist of a number of loads sustained and distributed over areas with few and smooth fluctuations over a long period of time. In any case, they might tend to increase over the time, because of the acquisition of new editions or new copies.
Multistory reduction factor k _{n}
Finally, the axial compression stress in building columns caused by live loads is the cumulative stress of the live loads on every floor. Therefore, the variation of axial compression in a multistory column becomes smaller as the number of floors supported increases, because the variation on every floor is averaged. Thus, in calculating the axial compression caused by live loads, the design live load can be reduced according to the number of stories supported by the column, throughout the multistory reduction factor k_{n}.
Statistical data
Organization of the library building
Level  Facilities  Extension (m^{2}) 

Ground floor  Newspaper archive  362.0 
Electronic resources  
Specialized collection  
First floor  General collection Q–Z  725.0 
Audiovisual collection  
Mezzanine  Rare books  168.0 
Collection of reference works  
Second floor  General collection A–P  710.0 
The library section is organized following the classification system of the Library of Congress Classification (LCC), which was developed in the late nineteenth and early twentieth century to organize and arrange the book collections of the Library of Congress of United States of America, whereas the newspaper archive collection is made up by publications (journals and newspapers): (1) 1200 printed journals, which represent 180,000 fascicles and (2) eight national newspapers and two international newspapers, which represent 900 copies. Further information might be found in DomínguezPalacios (2016).
In this study, it is assumed that the live load on a library can be treated as stationary homogeneous random field in space and time. This means that the statistical distribution does not change with time, which is an assumption that is desirable to make it possible to use the results of this survey to other similar buildings.
Sampling results
Influence of the area
The design live loads are the maximum loads expected by the intended use or occupancy and shall not be less than the minimum uniformly distributed unit loads established in codes (e.g., ASCE 716; MCBC17). The scatter of the averaged load (live loads divided by the area on which they act) becomes smaller as the area becomes larger. This is because live loads are averaged over the area. Therefore, the basic live load intensity should be determined considering the influence of area.
The results in Fig. 6 are called the analysis of averaged live load intensities for square unit areas. Load models are area dependent (Choi 1991). In general, it is expected that load values are small for large areas and grow for small areas. However, the variation of live loads on floors of libraries and newspaper archives is such less sensitive to the area of influence in comparison with the factor for residential flats or office buildings. In fact, the live loads are practically constant from 25 m^{2}, equal to 2.6 kN/m^{2} (54.3 psf) for the library and 3.0 kN/m^{2} (62.7 psf) for the newspaper archive. This means that the magnitude might be established in regardless of the influence area in practice, because the load caused by book shelves consists of loads sustained and distributed over areas with few and smooth fluctuations. This tendency supports the recommendation of ASCE 716 and MCBC17, where a reduction in uniform live loads in stack areas as a function of the area supported by the element or by the tributary area under any condition is not permitted.
Sampling of people
The uniformly distributed live loads established in codes also include the weight of users normally present. The ratio of the magnitudes of the load caused by persons in ordinary load situations and the load caused by furniture may vary considerably depending on the type of structure and the occupancy along the day.
According to the results, the maximum number of users at reading room happened around noon with a maximum of 35 people (Fig. 9a). In contrast, six was the maximum number of users at aisles of stack rooms (Fig. 9b). Assuming 0.70 kN (0.16 kips) per person, based on similar studies (Ruiz and Soriano 1997; Ruiz and SampayoTrujillo 1997), the weight per unit area linked to the users would be 0.042 kN/m^{2} in the worstcase scenario (6 × 0.7 kN/100 m^{2}). This implies that most of the live load in stack rooms is closely related to the weight of shelves and publications. And in fact, in newspaper archives, the live load depends only on the furniture, since the amount of users tends to zero.
This result is relevant in regard to the treatment of live loads in the seismic analysis, being that the weight would not be reduced or removed during an earthquake in libraries or newspaper archives. In other building uses, the normative percentages might typically not be questioned since live loads may not be so significant. In storage structures, dynamic amplifications of live loads have been previously identified and investigated in cars parking garages (Wen and Yeo 2001) or containers stacks (SmithPardo et al. 2015). According to the obtained results for stack rooms, live loads (1) could exceed the dead load (Fig. 6) and (2) are nearly permanent for practical purposes (Fig. 9). For this reason, some codes require consideration of 25 percent of the live load as inertia in storage floors (e.g., ASCE/SEI 710), but might not be enough conservative and need to be studied further in order to develop a normative proposal.
In spite of this negative panorama, during an earthquake, storage slabs may slide or rock and this action affects the way in which the building responds to the excitation. Because such movement is accompanied by energy dissipation associated with friction or impact, only a portion of live load effectively contributes to the inertial forces action on the structure (SmithPardo et al. 2015). In anyway, further analyses to evaluate the energy dissipation under lateral seismic demands are desirable in order to calibrate the live load reduction in codes.
In contrast, the situation may be quite different for reading rooms where the weight of users is a large part of the total live load. So, a reduction in the gravitational load during an intense earthquake is expected as established in current codes (Fig. 1b).
Finally, considering temporal concentration, people and furniture should be estimated separately because of their different dispositions. For this reason and accounting that the weight of users is small, the following discussion that pretends a better understanding of live loads in libraries focuses the attention on the book shelves loads mainly.
Statistical study
According to the results, for practical purposes, the normative magnitude (3.43 kN/m^{2}; 71.6 psf) is an adequate representation of the mean value of the actual load on the floor of the library; however, for the newspaper archive, it is 11% less than the mean value. In contrast, the magnitude of the live load for stack rooms according to the ASCE/716 (7.18 kN/m^{2}; 150.0 psf) is not an adequate representation of the local conditions.
Based on the results (Fig. 12), the normative value (3.43 kN/m^{2}; 71.6 psf) is related to a probability of occurrence of 0.47 for the library and 0.24 for the newspaper archive. This indicates that the local design load for stack rooms might not enough conservative and it would be desirable to define a live load for each case (libraries and newspaper archives), since the data and probabilities are not equivalent between them. Thus, it is necessary to increase the basic live load for purposes of design of newspaper archive buildings in relationship to the one defined for libraries.
For design purposes, the probability of occurrence of 0.84 might be appropriate. This is related to a live load equal to 4.1 kN/m^{2} (85.6 psf) for the library (Fig. 12a) and 4.8 kN/m^{2} (100.3 psf) for newspaper archive. These results apply to stack room floors that support nonmobile, doublefaced library book stacks, where the shelf depth is around 27.5 cm (10.8 in) for each face and parallel rows of doubleface book stack is separated by aisles around 80.0 cm (31.5 in) wide as depicted in Fig. 6. Finally, it is worth noting that the basic live load magnitude must be defined according to each code’s philosophy, since the appropriate magnitude of the probability of occurrence and the magnitude of basic live load are linked to the load factors applied in the load combinations.
Conclusions
This paper discusses the results of a detailed survey of live loads on typical floor of libraries and newspaper archives. In spite of the fact that the type of live load considered was limited to loads resulting from the intended use of the library and newspaper archive building in a public University in Mexico City, the results may be cautiously extrapolated for similar settings around the world. The study included furniture, racks and shelves, as well as books, journals, papers and other items used in libraries. Considering temporal concentration, an additional survey of people was estimated separately, in reading rooms during 2 months and more than 3 months at the corridors of the stack rooms.
Based on the results, density distribution and fragility curves were performed in order to evaluate the suitability of the live load for gathering rooms, according to the Mexico’s City Building Code (MCBC17) in relation to the actual condition. The paper provides some detailed background behind the basic value of design live load of the current specialized codes and its relationships with the results of this study.

According to the results, the actual live loads in stack room floors of libraries and newspaper archives are not equivalent, when the weight of shelves and publications is accounted for. The general features of this type of loads might not be fairly similar between different gathering rooms (temples, churches, theaters, auditoriums, gyms, dance floors, restaurants, game rooms, galleries and similar) as it is currently proposed at the Mexico City Building Code (MCBC17). In fact, when the normative load is compared with other international regulations, it is noted that a more detailed definition is required by the Mexican Code.

The measured loads of doublefaced book stacks (shelves and publications) noted that floors of stack rooms in libraries shall be designed to support a concentrated load around 4.45 kN (9.81 kips) at the most unfavorable position such as recommended by ASCE 716. But it is necessary to increase in 20% that value of the concentrated load, in order to achieve an appropriate representation of the actual effects on the floor of the newspaper archive.

The analysis of averaged live load intensities for square unit areas concludes that the variation of live loads on floors of libraries and newspaper archives is less sensitive to the area of influence compared to the reduction factor for residential flats and office buildings. In fact, the live loads are practically constant from 25 m^{2}; therefore, live loads in stack rooms might be regarded as less random in practice. The location of racks is systematic to some extent as a result of the uses, without changes over the years. The load caused by stored objects may consist of a number of loads sustained and distributed over areas with few and smooth fluctuations a long period of time. In any case, they have a tendency to increase uniformly over the time of occupancy, because of the acquisition of new editions or new copies.

The sampling of the users noted that the number of users at aisles of stack rooms is negligible even in the maximum sampled value. Thus, the live load is closely related to the weight of shelves and publications. This result is relevant in regard to the treatment of live loads in the seismic analysis for purposes of design and practical implementation, being that the weight would not be reduced or removed during a strong earthquake.

Through a statistical study, density distributions and fragility curves were obtained accounting the actual conditions in a typical public library. It was concluded that the current proposal in the local code (MCBC17) is adequate to estimate just mean values of the live loads, which corresponds to an associated probability of exceedance of 0.53 and 0.76 for the library and newspaper archives, respectively. Based on a probability of occurrence of 0.84, proposals of the basic value of design load intensity were developed, equal to 4.1 kN/m^{2} for the library and 4.8 kN/m^{2} for newspaper archive. This discussion is relevant to define an appropriate magnitude of the live load, since in current codes, the issue of whether nominal design loads are intended to be means or upper bound values is linked to the load factors applied in the load combinations. Because of this, the proper basic value of design load shall be defined according to each code’s philosophy.

According to the results, the live load proposed at ASCE 716 of 7.18 kN/m^{2} is conservative for the local actual conditions.
Additional samples of libraries and newspaper archives could complement and potentially help for the calibration in the design codes. Caution should be exercised by designers, before the generalized application of the above statements as they correspond to finding for the specific cases analyzed here.
Notes
Acknowledgements
The authors wish to thank the authorities of the Library of the Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana – Azcapotzalco for their ample and kind collaboration during the survey woks. Additionally, they would like to thank the help of the students that were involved in different stages of this research: Cinthia González, Diego Pérez, Sebastián Morales, Ricardo Aguirre, Martha C. Rodríguez and Freddy Pineda.
References
 AIJ06 (2006) Recommendations for loads on building. Architectural Institute of Japan AIJ, Tokyo, pp 1–56 (English translation) Google Scholar
 AIJC06 (2006) Commentary. Recommendations for loads on building. Architectural Institute of Japan AIJ, Tokyo, pp 1–56 (English translation) Google Scholar
 Ang AHS, Tang WH (2007) Probability concepts in engineering planning and design, 2a edn. Vol I—emphasis on civil and environmental engineering. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
 ASCE/SEI 710 (2010) Minimum design loads for buildings and other structures, ASCE Standard ASCE/SEI 705. American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston. ISBN 9780784470534Google Scholar
 Choi ECC (1991) Extraordinary live load in office buildings. J Struct Eng ASCE 117(11):3216–3227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
 CIB (1989) Action on structures live loads in buildings, CIB report, Publication 116, Commission W81, JuneGoogle Scholar
 CNBC15 (2015) Canadian National Building Code, Canadian Committee of building codes and fire prevention. National Council Research, Ottawa, ONGoogle Scholar
 DomínguezPalacios AC (2016) Cargas vivas en la hemeroteca de la Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana – Azcapotzalco. Dissertation, Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana – Azcapotzalco, Mexico (in Spanish)Google Scholar
 MartínezRuíz M (2017) Evaluación de la carga viva en la biblioteca de la Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana – Azcapotzalco. Dissertation, Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana – Azcapotzalco, Mexico (in Spanish)Google Scholar
 MCBC17 (2017) Mexico City Building Code. Gaceta Oficial de la Ciudad de México, México (in Spanish) Google Scholar
 Ruiz SE, SampayoTrujillo A (1997) Design live loads for classrooms in United States and Mexico. J Struct Eng ASCE 123(12):1652–1657CrossRefGoogle Scholar
 Ruiz SE, Soriano A (1997) Design live loads for office buildings in México and the United States. J Struct Eng 133(6):816–822CrossRefGoogle Scholar
 Saberi MR, Rahai AR, Sanayei M, Vogel RM (2017) Steel bridge service life prediction using bootstrap method. Int J Civ Eng 15(1):51–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
 SmithPardo JP, Reyes JC, ArdilaBothia L, VillamizarGonzález JN, ArdilaGiraldo OA (2015) Effect of live load on the seismic design of singlestory storage structures under unidirectional horizontal ground motions. Eng Struct 93:50–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
 TapiaHernández E, Perea T, IslasMendoza MA (2017) Design assessment of short span steel bridges. Int J Civ Eng 15(2):319–332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
 Wen YK, Yeo GL (2001) Design live loads for passenger cars parking garages. J Struct Eng ASCE 127(3):280–289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Copyright information
Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.