EURO Journal on Decision Processes

, Volume 4, Issue 1–2, pp 119–155 | Cite as

Renewables in the EU after 2020: a multi-criteria decision analysis in the context of the policy formation process

  • Simone Steinhilber
  • Jutta Geldermann
  • Martin Wietschel
Original Article

Abstract

The policy problem of a post-2020 renewables policy framework for the EU is analysed using the multi-criteria decision aid method PROMETHEE, and put into a wider context of the policy formation process using the Multiple Streams Approach. The political debate includes two policy items: Firstly, the EU climate and energy target structure for 2030; and secondly, if the decision is taken for a new renewables target in 2030, whether and to which degree a future renewables support scheme should be harmonised on European level. Analysing 16 future policy pathways in detail, assuming three different decision maker prototypes, we conclude that if a 2030 renewables target exists, policy pathways with lower degrees of harmonisation are more likely to be implemented. The combined application of Kingdon’s Multiple Streams Approach with PROMETHEE to this policy formation process illustrates how the two methods complement each other. While Kingdon’s approach takes a broader view and is able to explain seemingly irrational behaviour of policy entrepreneurs, PROMETHEE is suitable for analysing one section of the policy formation process in more detail, namely the identification, discussion, and selection of policy alternatives.

Keywords

Multi-criteria decision analysis PROMETHEE Renewable energy Policy harmonisation Multiple streams approach Policy formation process 

Mathematics subject classification

90B50 90B99 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The PROMETHEE analysis was conducted in work package 6 of the European research project beyond2020, co-funded by the Intelligent Energy Europe Programme of the European Union. Full reports can be downloaded at www.res-policy-beyond2020.eu. We thank the anonymous reviewers for their constructive feedback and advice.

References

  1. Alfares HK, Duffuaa SO (2008) Assigning cardinal weights in multi-criteria decision making based on ordinal ranking. J Multi Criteria Decis Anal 15:125–133. doi: 10.1002/mcda.420 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aune FR, Dalen HM, Hagem C (2012) Implementing the EU renewable target through green certificate markets. Energy Econ 34:992–1000. doi: 10.1016/j.eneco.2011.07.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Belton V, Stewart TJ (2002) Multiple criteria decision analysis an integrated approach. Springer, BostonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bergmann B, Bitsch C, Behlau V, Jensen S, Held A, Pfluger B, Ragwitz M, Resch G (2008) Harmonisation of support schemes. A European harmonised policy to promote RES-electricity—sharing costs & benefits. A report compiled within the European research project futures-e (Deriving a Future European Policy for Renewable Electricity), co-financed under the European Commission’s “Intelligent Energy for Europe” Programme. Fraunhofer ISI, Karlsruhe, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  5. Blechinger PFH, Shah KU (2011) A multi-criteria evaluation of policy instruments for climate change mitigation in the power generation sector of Trinidad and Tobago. Sustain Biofuels 39:6331–6343. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2011.07.034 Google Scholar
  6. Brans J-P, Mareschal B (2005) Promethee methods. Multiple criteria decision analysis: state of the art surveys. Springer, New York, pp 163–186Google Scholar
  7. Brans JP, Vincke P, Mareschal B (1986) How to select and how to rank projects: the Promethee method. Math Program Mult Criteria Decis Mak 24:228–238. doi: 10.1016/0377-2217(86)90044-5 Google Scholar
  8. Browne D, O’Regan B, Moles R (2010) Use of multi-criteria decision analysis to explore alternative domestic energy and electricity policy scenarios in an Irish city-region. ECOS 2008 21st international conference on efficiency, cost, optimization, simulation and environmental impact of energy systems. 35, 518–528. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2009.10.020
  9. Del Río P, Cerdá E (2014) The policy implications of the different interpretations of the cost-effectiveness of renewable electricity support. Energy Policy 64:364–372. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2013.08.096 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Del Río P, Ragwitz M, Steinhilber S, Resch G, Busch S, Klessmann C, de Lovinfosse I, Van Nysten J, Fouquet D, Johnston A (2012a) Key policy approaches for a harmonisation of RES(-E) support in Europe—main options and design elements. CSIC, Madrid Google Scholar
  11. Del Río P, Ragwitz M, Steinhilber S, Resch G, Busch S, Klessmann C, de Lovinfosse I, Van Nysten J, Fouquet D, Johnston A (2012b) Assessment criteria for identifying the main alternatives—advantages and drawbacks, synergies and conflicts. CSIC, Madrid (Spain)Google Scholar
  12. European Commission (2001) Directive 2001/77/EC of the European parliament and of the council of 27 September 2001 on the promotion of electricity produced from renewable energy sources in the internal electricity marketGoogle Scholar
  13. European Commission (2005) COM (2005) 627 The support of electricity from renewable energy sourcesGoogle Scholar
  14. European Commission (2008a) SEC(2008) 57 commission staff working document The support of electricity from renewable energy sources Accompanying document to the Proposal for a directive of the european parliament and of the council on the promotion of the use of energy from renewable sourcesGoogle Scholar
  15. European Commission (2008b) COM (2008)19 Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the promotion of the use of energy from renewable sourcesGoogle Scholar
  16. European Commission (2013a) COM (2013)169 Green Paper: A 2030 framework for climate and energy policies. BrusselsGoogle Scholar
  17. European Commission (2013b) Commission services non-paper—Green Paper 2030: Main outcomes of the public consultation. BrusselsGoogle Scholar
  18. European Commission, 2014. The 2020 climate and energy package [WWW Document]. URL http://ec.europa.eu/clima/policies/package/. Accessed 13 Mar 2014
  19. European Council (2014) EUCO 169/14 Council Conclusions. BrusselsGoogle Scholar
  20. Figueira J, Greco S, Ehrgott M (2005) Multiple criteria decision analysis state of the art surveys. Springer, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Fouquet D, Johansson TB (2008) European renewable energy policy at crossroads—Focus on electricity support mechanisms. Transit Sustain Energy Syst 36:4079–4092. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2008.06.023 Google Scholar
  22. Fouquet D, Van Nysten J, Johnston A (2012) Potential areas of conflict of a harmonised RES support scheme with European Union Law. A report compiled within the project beyond 2020 (work package 3), supported by the EACI of the European Commission within the “Intelligent Energy Europe” programme. BBH, BrusselsGoogle Scholar
  23. Frondel M, Schmidt C (2012) Marktwirtschaftliche Energiewende: Ein Wettbewerbsrahmen für die Stromversorgung mit alternativen Technologien. Rheinisch-Westfälisches Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung, EssenGoogle Scholar
  24. Futterlieb M, Mohns T (2009) Erneuerbare Energien-Politik in der EU—Der Politikprozess zur Richtlinie 2009/28/EG: Harmonisierung. Akteure, EinflussnahmeGoogle Scholar
  25. Geden O, Fischer S (2014) Moving Targets—Die Verhandlungen über die Energie- und Klimapolitik-Ziele der EU nach 2020. Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik, Berlin (Germany)Google Scholar
  26. Gephart M, Klessmann C, Kimmel M, Page S, Winkel T (2012) Contextualising the debate on harmonising RES-E support in Europe—A brief pre-assessment of potential harmonisation pathways. A report compiled within the project beyond 2020 (work package 6), supported by the EACI of the European Commission within the “Intelligent Energy Europe” programme. Ecofys, Berlin (Germany)Google Scholar
  27. Greening LA, Bernow S (2004) Design of coordinated energy and environmental policies: use of multi-criteria decision-making. Energy Policy 32:721–735. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2003.08.017 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hirschman AO (1964) The paternity of an index. Am Econ Rev 54(5):761–762Google Scholar
  29. Hirzel S (2013) Analyse und Bewertung industrieller Energieeffizienzmaßnahmen: Ein multikriterieller Ansatz für Gruppenentscheidungen unter Unsicherheit dargestellt am Beispiel von Druckluftsystemen. Dissertation at RWTH Aachen (in preparation)Google Scholar
  30. Hix S, Høyland BK (2011) The political system of the European Union. Palgrave Macmillan, BasingstokeGoogle Scholar
  31. Ide A-M (2013) RES in the new environmental and energy state aid frameworkGoogle Scholar
  32. Jacobsson S, Bergek A, Finon D, Lauber V, Mitchell C, Toke D, Verbruggen A (2009) EU renewable energy support policy: faith or facts? China Energy Effic 37:2143–2146. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2009.02.043 Google Scholar
  33. Kingdon JW (1995) Agendas, alternatives, and public policies, 2nd, ed edn. Longman Classics in Political Science, LongmanGoogle Scholar
  34. Kowalski K, Stagl S, Madlener R, Omann I (2009) Sustainable energy futures: methodological challenges in combining scenarios and participatory multi-criteria analysis. Eur J Oper Res 197:1063–1074. doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2007.12.049 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lootsma FA (1999) Multi-criteria decision analysis via ratio and difference judgement, Applied optimization. Kluwer, DordrechtCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Mundaca L, Neij L (2009) A multi-criteria evaluation framework for tradable white certificate schemes. Energy Policy 37:4557–4573. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2009.06.011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Pohekar SD, Ramachandran M (2004) Application of multi-criteria decision making to sustainable energy planning—A review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 8:365–381. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2003.12.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Queiruga D, Walther G, González-Benito J, Spengler T (2008) Evaluation of sites for the location of WEEE recycling plants in Spain. Waste Manag 28:181–190. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2006.11.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Ragwitz M, Steinhilber S (2014) Effectiveness and efficiency of support schemes for electricity from renewable energy sources: support schemes for renewable electricity. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Energy Environ 3:213–229. doi: 10.1002/wene.85 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Resch G, Liebmann L, Ortner A, Busch S, Panzer C, del Rio P, Ragwitz M, Steinhilber S (2014) Cost-benefit analysis of policy pathways for a harmonisation of RES(-E) support in Europe. EEG, ViennaGoogle Scholar
  41. Roy B (1980) Selektieren, Sortieren und Ordnen mit Hilfe von Prävalenzrelationen: neue Ansätze auf dem Gebiet der Entscheidungshilfe für Multikriteria-ProblemeGoogle Scholar
  42. Roy B, Bouyssou D (1993) Aide multicritère à la décision: méthodes et cas. Economica, ParisGoogle Scholar
  43. Solomon DS, Hughey KFD (2007) A proposed Multi Criteria Analysis decision support tool for international environmental policy issues: a pilot application to emissions control in the international aviation sector. Environ Sci Policy 10:645–653. doi: 10.1016/j.envsci.2007.06.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Solymosi T, Dombi J (1986) A method for determining the weights of criteria: the centralized weights. Second EURO Summer Inst 26:35–41. doi: 10.1016/0377-2217(86)90157-8 Google Scholar
  45. Steinhilber S, del Río P, Toro F, Ragwitz M, Boie I (2014) Multi-criteria decision analysis—assessing policy pathways for renewables support in the EU after 2020. Fraunhofer ISI, Karlsruhe (Germany)Google Scholar
  46. Stillwell WG, Seaver DA, Edwards W (1981) A comparison of weight approximation techniques in multiattribute utility decision making. Organ Behav Hum Perform 28:62–77. doi: 10.1016/0030-5073(81)90015-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Turcksin L, Bernardini A, Macharis C (2011) A combined AHP-PROMETHEE approach for selecting the most appropriate policy scenario to stimulate a clean vehicle fleet. State Art Eur. Quant. Oriented Transp. Logist. Res.—14th Euro Work. Group Transp. 26th Mini Euro Conf. 1st Eur. Sci. Conf. Air Transp. 20:954–965. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.08.104 Google Scholar
  48. Van Nysten J, Johnston A (2014) Legal requirements and policy recommendations for the adoption and implementation of a potential harmonised RES support scheme. BBH, Brussels (Belgium)Google Scholar
  49. Von Stechow C, Watson J, Praetorius B (2011) Policy incentives for carbon capture and storage technologies in Europe: a qualitative multi-criteria analysis. Special Issue Political Policy Carbon Capture Storage 21:346–357. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.01.011 Google Scholar
  50. Wang J-J, Jing Y-Y, Zhang C-F, Zhao J-H (2009) Review on multi-criteria decision analysis aid in sustainable energy decision-making. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 13:2263–2278. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2009.06.021 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Weitzman M (1974) Prices vs. quantities. Rev Econ Stud 41:477–491CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Zhou P, Ang BW, Poh KL (2006) Decision analysis in energy and environmental modeling: an update. Energy 31:2604–2622. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2005.10.023 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg and EURO - The Association of European Operational Research Societies 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Simone Steinhilber
    • 1
  • Jutta Geldermann
    • 2
  • Martin Wietschel
    • 1
  1. 1.Fraunhofer Institute for Systems and Innovation ResearchKarlsruheGermany
  2. 2.Georg-August-Universität GöttingenGöttingenGermany

Personalised recommendations