Skip to main content
Log in

Angular dependence of an EDGE detector in small fields in clinical settings

  • Original Paper - Cross-Disciplinary Physics and Related Areas of Science and Technology
  • Published:
Journal of the Korean Physical Society Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Relative output dose was evaluated while changing the gantry angle and couch angle using an EDGE diode detector in a clinical setting. An ELEKTA cone collimator used in stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) was used for measurements. We place the edge detector at a depth of 10 cm of solid phantom (30 × 30 × 20 cm3) with a source to axis distance (SAD) of 100 cm. The relative output dose obtained by the EDGE detector was measured while the cone was mounted and the gantry angle was changed under the conditions of 0°, 45°, 90°, 315°, and 270°. As the distance of the passing beam increases as the gantry angle increases at table angle 0°, the intensity of the beam decreases and has a minimum value at the angle of 56.3°, 123.7°, 236.3°, and 303.7°. The sensitivity of output was highest in the anterior direction, and it showed a tendency to decrease in the posterior direction. It can be seen that the relative dose decreases around 60 and 120 degrees according to the change of the table angle, which is thought to be due to the change in beam transmittance according to the beam passing distance and the structure of the EDGE detector, and the sensitivity of the detector. It is also meaningful to report the dependence of the output dose on the angle when measuring using the phantom used in actual clinical practice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. M.R. Arnfield, K. Otto, V.R. Aroumougame, R.D. Alkins, The use of film dosimetry of the penumbra region to improve the accuracy of intensity modulated radiotherapy. Med. Phys. 32(1), 12–18 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. F. García-Vicente, J.M. Delgado, C. Peraza, Experimental determination of the convolution kernel for the study of the spatial response of a detector. Med. Phys. 25(2), 202–207 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. P. Andreo, H. Benmakhlouf, Improved Reference and Relative Dosimetry of Small Radiation Therapy Photon Beams. (Stockholm: 2014)

  4. I.J. Das, G.X. Ding, A. Ahnesjö, Small fields: nonequilibrium radiation dosimetry. Med. Phys. 35(1), 206–215 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. F.M. Khan, J.P. Gibbons, Gibbons, Khan’s the physics of radiation therapy (Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, 2014)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Y. Prezado, I. Martinez-Rovira, S. Thengumpallil, P. Deman, Dosimetry protocol for the preclinical trials in white-beam minibeam radiation therapy. Med. Phys. 38(9), 5012–5020 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. L. Kurjewicz, A. Berndt, Measurement of Gamma Knife helmet factors using MOSFETs. Med. Phys. 34(3), 1007–1012 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. E. Pappas, T.G. Maris, F. Zacharopoulou et al., Small SRS photon field profile dosimetry performed using a PinPoint air ion chamber, a diamond detector, a novel silicon-diode array (DOSI), and polymer gel dosimetry Analysis and intercomparison. Med. Phys. 35(10), 4640–4648 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. C. Mckerracher, D.I. Thwaites, Assessment of new small-field detectors against standard-field detectors for practical stereotactic beam data acquisition. Phys. Med. Biol. 44(9), 2143–2160 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. B. Zhang, J. Zhu, Y. Li, S. Chen, L. Chen, X. Liu, Feasibility of lateral dose profile measurements in a small field using TLDs. Phys. Med. Biol. 60(3), N47-57 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. R. Ramani, A.W. Lightstone, D.L. Mason, P.F. O’Brien, The use of radiochromic film in treatment verification of dynamic stereotactic radiosurgery. Med. Phys. 21(3), 389–392 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. D. Khezerloo, H.A. Nedaie, B. Farhood et al., Optical computed tomography in PRESAGE(®) three-dimensional dosimetry: challenges and prospective. J. Can. Res. Ther. 13(3), 419–424 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  13. G. Reggiori, P. Mancosu, N. Suchowerska et al., Characterization of a new unshielded diode for small field dosimetry under flattening filter free beams. Phys. Med. 32(2), 408–413 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. M. Westermark, J. Arndt, B. Nilsson, A. Brahme, Comparative dosimetry in narrow high-energy photon beams. Phys. Med. Biol. 45(3), 685–702 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. L.D. Wolfsberger, M. Wagar, P. Nitsch et al., Angular dose dependency of MatriXX TM and its calibration. J. Appl. Clin. Med. Phys. 11(1), 241–251 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. P.A. Jursinic, Angular dependence of dose sensitivity of surface diodes. Med. Phys. 36(6), 2165–2171 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korea government (MSIT) (No. 2021R1F1A1050932).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Soah Park.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kim, M.Y., Yoon, JW., Cheong, KH. et al. Angular dependence of an EDGE detector in small fields in clinical settings. J. Korean Phys. Soc. 81, 1064–1069 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40042-022-00611-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40042-022-00611-x

Keywords

Navigation