Skip to main content
Log in

Development of portable image-guidance system (PIGS) for preclinical small animal experiments with the cone-beam irradiation of X-RAD

  • Original Paper - Cross-Disciplinary Physics and Related Areas of Science and Technology
  • Published:
Journal of the Korean Physical Society Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to develop a portable image-guidance system (PIGS) for preclinical experiments to identify anatomical structures of small animals and deliver beams accurately to their target locations more precisely. The PIGS consists of a gadolinium oxide (Gd2O3) scintillator, a transparent acrylic, a thin mirror, opaque polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA), and a charge-coupled device (CCD) camera. In addition, the PIGS can reduce dose-measurement effects using tissue-equivalent as the principal. Using 320 X-RAD devices, the X-ray beam was irradiated with 130~35 kVp /12.5~45.0 mA of tube parameters. With 3D-printed grids and homemade mouse phantom, we evaluated the accuracy between the actual position and the location in the imaging coordinate. The image quality of the actual mouse's anatomical images was also examined by setting a 5.0-mm region of interest (ROI) on images, such as the actual mouse Lt. brain, Lt. lung and Lt. femur for each energy. Furthermore, the EBT3 film was used to compare the solid water phantom and PIGS with the dose measurements at a depth of 5.0 mm to confirm any differences. Overall, PIGS showed excellent results in evaluating the accuracy and image quality of image coordinates of small animals. The accuracy of the image coordinates showed error values below the moving average ± 0.2 mm. Furthermore, the mouse imaging results showed the best anatomical image results with high CNR values and low SNR values at 35 kVp/45 mA conditions. COV was the best at 0.0028 in non-filtered 35 kVp/40 mA conditions. Overall, NPS showed similar patterns without significant differences in all energy conditions but had less area noise with lower spatial frequency under lower energy conditions. In addition, the dose evaluation of PIGS and solid water phantom using EBT3 showed a Dmax error value of within 0.2% at a depth of 5 mm measured. This study showed that PIGS could accurately identify the main anatomical structures of mice to deliver radiation beams to the targets. In addition, we proved that the application of PIGS in 320 X-RAD causes no dosimetric influence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data sets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. R. Baskar, K.A. Lee, R. Yeo, K.-W. Yeoh, cancer and radiation therapy: current advances and future directions. Int. J. Med. Sci. 9, 193–199 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. A.D. Augustine et al., Animal models for radiation injury, protection and therapy. Radiat. Res. 164, 100–109 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. J. Denekamp, Tumour regression as a guide to prognosis: a study with experimental animals. Br. J. Radiol. 50, 271–279 (1977)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. F. Verhaegen, P. Granton, E. Tryggestad, Small animal radiotherapy research platforms. Phys. Med. Biol. 56, R55-83 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. M. Matinfar, E. Ford, I. Iordachita, J. Wong, P. Kazanzides, Image-guided small animal radiation research platform: calibration of treatment beam alignment. Phys. Med. Biol. 54, 891–905 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. R.E. Jacobs, S.R. Cherry, Complementary emerging techniques: high-resolution PET and MRI. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 11, 621–629 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. E. Izaguirre et al., MO-E-AUD C-07: modeling small animal micro irradiator orthovoltage sources. Med. Phys. 35, 2877–2877 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. D.W. Holdsworth, M.M. Thornton, Micro-CT in small animal and specimen imaging. Trends Biotechnol. 20, S34–S39 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. S. Sharma et al., Advanced small animal conformal radiation therapy device. Technol. Cancer Res. Treat. 16, 45–56 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. C. DesRosiers et al., Use of the Leksell Gamma knife for localized small field lens irradiation in rodents. Technol. Cancer Res. Treat. 2, 449–454 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. S. Stojadinovic et al., MicroRT—Small animal conformal irradiator. Med. Phys. 34, 4706–4716 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. E.C. Halperin, M.R. Sontag, Techniques of experimental animal radiotherapy. Lab. Anim. Sci. 44, 417–423 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  13. G. Soultanidis et al., development of an anatomically correct mouse phantom for dosimetry measurement in small animal radiotherapy research. Phys. Med. Biol. 64, 12nt02 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. H. Zhou et al., development of a micro-computed tomography-based image-guided conformal radiotherapy system for small animals. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 78, 297–305 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. R.A. Weersink et al., Integration of optical imaging with a small animal irradiator. Med. Phys. 41, 102701 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. E.E. Graves et al., design and evaluation of a variable aperture collimator for conformal radiotherapy of small animals using a microCT scanner. Med. Phys. 34, 4359–4367 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. R. Clarkson et al., Characterization of image quality and image-guidance performance of a preclinical microirradiator. Med. Phys. 38, 845–856 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. P. Lindsay et al., SU-GG-J-70: development of an image-guided conformal small animal irradiation platform. Med. Phys. 35, 2695–2695 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. M. Woo, R. Nordal, Commissioning and evaluation of a new commercial small rodent x-ray irradiator. Biomed. Imaging Interv. J. 2, e10 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. H. Deng et al., The small-animal radiation research platform (SARRP): dosimetry of a focused lens system. Phys. Med. Biol. 52, 2729–2740 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. M. Ghita et al., Small field dosimetry for the small animal radiotherapy research platform (SARRP). Radiat. Oncol. 12, 204 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. S. Gutierrez, B. Descamps, C. Vanhove, MRI-only based radiotherapy treatment planning for the rat brain on a small animal radiation research platform (SARRP). PLoS ONE 10, e0143821 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. H. Wang, K. Nie, Y. Kuang, An on-board spectral-CT/CBCT/SPECT imaging configuration for small-animal radiation therapy platform: a Monte Carlo study. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 39, 588–600 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. S. Yoo et al., Clinical implementation of AAPM TG61 protocol for kilovoltage x-ray beam dosimetry. Med. Phys. 29, 2269–2273 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. C.-M. Ma et al., AAPM protocol for 40–300 kV x-ray beam dosimetry in radiotherapy and radiobiology. Med. Phys. 28, 868–893 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. E. Samei, M. Flynn, H. Chotas, J. Dobbins, DQE of direct and indirect digital radiography systems. Medical Imaging 2001 (SPIE, 2001), vol. 4320.

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea(NRF) grant funded by Korea government(MSIT) (2020R1F1A107580212).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jungwon Kwak.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

There are no conflicts of interest to declare.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shin, JB., Koh, M., Jung, N.H. et al. Development of portable image-guidance system (PIGS) for preclinical small animal experiments with the cone-beam irradiation of X-RAD. J. Korean Phys. Soc. 81, 1070–1080 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40042-022-00564-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40042-022-00564-1

Keywords

Navigation