Skip to main content

The feasibility of maximum likelihood estimation of activity and attenuation (MLAA) algorithm for reduction of truncation artifact in the breast PET/MRI

Abstract

In integrated positron emission tomography (PET)/magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) systems, the field of view (FOV) in MRI is smaller than in PET, the difference of FOV between PET and MRI can cause geometric distortion and truncation artifacts at off-center positions. Especially, breast PET/MRI can easily lead to off-center positions around the back of the body by prone patient on the breast radiofrequency (RF) coil, it leads to truncation artifact in MRI, the PET imaging requires the attenuation correction within PET FOV using an attenuation map by acquiring MRI data. However, MRI-based attenuation maps containing truncation artifacts result in errors in visibility and quantification for PET imaging due to the limitations of MRI FOV. The maximum likelihood estimation of activity and attenuation (MLAA)-based algorithm can estimate the truncated part of an attenuation map from PET emission data. This study aimed to reduce truncation artifacts using MLAA-based attenuation correction (AC) in breast PET/MRI. A uniform phantom and national electrical manufacturers’ association international electro-technical commission body PET phantom, simulated using a Siemens Biograph PET/MRI scanner with a breast RF coil, was evaluated. PET images were evaluated between the conventional Dixon volume interpolated breath-hold examination (VIBE) of the MRI-based attenuation map and MLAA-based attenuation map by predicting the missing body contour. In this study, the MLAA algorithm was joint estimation based attenuation map composed of Dixon VIBE with a PET emission data. PET images with Dixon VIBE AC showed truncation artifacts along the horizontal axis of patient at the off-center of the FOV. The contours of the phantoms were recovered using the MLAA algorithm. The PET activity concentration with Dixon VIBE in truncated regions was 15–17% of the non-truncated regions; however, this increased to 91–97% when using the MLAA algorithm. The MLAA algorithm in breast PET/MRI reduces truncation artifacts and improves the visibility and quantification.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

References

  1. H. Herzog, U. Pietrzyk, N.J. Shah, K. Ziemons, The current state, challenges and perspectives of MR-PET. Neuroimage 49, 3 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.10.036

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. H. Zaidi et al., Design and performance evaluation of a whole-body ingenuity TF PET–MRI system. Phys. Med. Biol. (2011). https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/56/10/013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. H. Barthel, M.L. Schroeter, K.T. Hoffmann, O. Sabri, PET/MR in dementia and other neurodegenerative diseases. Semin. Nucl. Med. (2015). https://doi.org/10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2014.12.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. J. Teuho et al., Magnetic resonance based attenuation correction and scatter correction in neurological positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging-current status with emerging applications. Front. Phys. (2020). https://doi.org/10.3389/fphy.2019.00243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. H. Zaidi, B. Hasegawa, Determination of the attenuation map in emission tomography. J. Nucl Med. 44, 2 (2003). https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.108.054726

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. H. Zaidi, M.L. Montandon, Scatter compensation techniques in PET. PET Clin. 2, 2 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpet.2007.10.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. A. Martinez-Möller, S.G. Nekolla, Attenuation correction for PET/MR: problems, novel approaches and practical solutions. Z Med. Phys. 22, 4 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.zemedi.2012.08.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. M. Hofmann, B. Pichler, B. Scholkopf, T. Beyer, Towards quantitative PET/MRI: a review of MR-based attenuation correction techniques. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-008-1007-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. G.J. Stanisz et al., T1, T2 relaxation and magnetization transfer in tissue at 3T. Magn. Reson. Med. 54, 3 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.20605

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. A. Martinez-Möller et al., Tissue classification as a potential approach for attenuation correction in whole-body PET/MRI: evaluation with PET/CT data. J. Nucl. Med. 50, 4 (2009). https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.108.054726

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. G. Delso, A. Martinez-M€oller, R. A. Bundschuh, S. G. Nekolla and S. I. Ziegler, The effect of limited MR field of view in MR/PET attenuation correction, Med. Phys. (2010). https://doi.org/10.1118/1.3431576

  12. J.O. Blumhagen et al., Field of view extension and truncation correction for MR-based human attenuation correction in simultaneous MR/PET imaging. Med. Phys. 41, 2 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1118/1.4861097

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. T. Beyer, A. Bockisch, H. Kuhl, M.J. Martinez, Whole-body 18F-FDG PET/CT in the presence of truncation artifacts. J. Nucl. Med. 47, 1 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  14. J. Nuyts et al., Simultaneous maximum a posteriori reconstruction of attenuation and activity distributions from emission sinograms. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging. (1999). https://doi.org/10.1109/42.774167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. J. Nuyts, C. Michel, M. Fenchel, G. Bal, C. Watson, Completion of a truncated attenuation image from the attenuated PET emission data. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging. (2013). https://doi.org/10.1109/TMI.2012.2220376

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. A. Lougovski, G. Schramm, J. Maus, F. Hofheinz, J.V.D. Ho, Preliminary evaluation of the MLAA algorithm with the Philips ingenuity PET/MR. EJNMMI. Phys. (2014). https://doi.org/10.1186/2197-7364-1-S1-A33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. S. Vandenberghe, P.K. Marsden, PET-MRI: a review of challenges and solutions in the development of integrated multimodality imaging. Phys. Med. Biol. 60, 4 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/60/4/R115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. G. Delso et al., Performance measurements of the Siemens mMR integrated whole-body PET/MR scanner. J. Nucl. Med. 52, 12 (2011). https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.111.092726

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. R. Boellaard et al., Quality control for quantitative multicenter whole-body PET/MR studies: a NEMA image quality phantom study with three current PET/MR systems. Med. Phys. 42, 10 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1118/1.4930962

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. O. Rousset, A. Rahmim, A. Alavi, H. Zaidi, Partial volume correction strategies in PET. PET. Clin. 2, 2 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpet.2007.10.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. T. Meechai, S. Tepmongkol, C. Pluempitiwiriyawej, Partial-volume effect correction in positron emission tomography brain scan image using super-resolution image reconstruction. Br. J. Radiol. 88, 1046 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20140119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. M.E. Lindemann, M. Oehmigen, J.O. Blumhagen, M. Gratz, H.H. Quick, MR-based truncation and attenuation correction in integrated PET/MR hybrid imaging using HUGE with continuous table motion. Med. Phys. 44, 9 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1002/mp.12449

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. A. Rezaei et al., Simultaneous reconstruction of activity and attenuation in time-of-flight PET. IEEE. Trans. Med. Imaging. 31, 12 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1109/TMI.2012.2212719

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. R. Boellaard, M.B.M. Hofman, O.S. Hoekstra, A.A. Lammertsma, Accurate PET/MR quantification using time of flight MLAA image reconstruction. Mol. Imaging Biol. 16, 4 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11307-013-0716-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. E.T. Voert et al., Clinical evaluation of TOF versus non-TOF on PET artifacts in simultaneous PET/MR: a dual centre experience. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging. 44, 7 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-017-3619-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Dr. Jae Sung Lee in Department of Nuclear Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital for assistance of this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chanrok Park.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yoon, S., Jang, J.S. & Park, C. The feasibility of maximum likelihood estimation of activity and attenuation (MLAA) algorithm for reduction of truncation artifact in the breast PET/MRI. J. Korean Phys. Soc. 81, 173–178 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40042-022-00522-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40042-022-00522-x

Keywords

  • Positron emission tomography (PET)/magnetic resonance (MR)
  • Truncation artifact
  • Dixon volume interpolated breath-hold examination (VIBE) sequence
  • Maximum likelihood estimation of activity and attenuation (MLAA)
  • National electrical manufacturers association (NEMA) international electro technical commission (IEC) body phantom