Skip to main content
Log in

Dynamics of the plasma sheet in the near-Earth magnetotail by the impact of an interplanetary shock

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of the Korean Physical Society Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The impact of an interplanetary shock significantly disturbs the Earth’s magnetosphere. Although the disturbances in the magnetotail induced by such an impact have extensively been investigated in previous studies, they are not still fully understood. In this study, we examined the disturbances produced in the central plasma sheet observed by the Cluster spacecraft. After the sudden impulse (SI) on the ground, significant compression of the magnetotail was observed. Initially, the dominant direction of the compression was the dawn-dusk direction, but later it changed to the north–south direction. Ions and electrons in the plasma sheet were significantly energized in the energy range from ~ 5 to ~ 100 keV. The energization was more effective on electrons than ions, and the energy dependence of the energization suggests that this process is non-adiabatic. We suggest that these particles can serve as the seed population of relativistic particles in the radiation belts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. C.T. Russell, M. Ginskey, S.M. Petrinec, Sudden impulses at low-latitude stations: steady state response for northward interplanetary magnetic field. J. Geophys. Res. 99, 253 (1994)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. X. Li, I. Roth, M. Temerin, J.R. Wygant et al., Simulation of the prompt energization and transport of radiation belt particles during the March 24, 1991 SSC. Geophys. Res. Lett. 20, 2423 (1993)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. J. Wygant, F. Mozer, M. Temerin, J. Blake et al., Large amplitude electric and magnetic field signatures in the inner magnetosphere during injection of 115 MeV electron drift echoes. Geophys. Res. Lett. 21, 1739 (1994)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. X. Li, D.N. Baker, S. Elkington, M. Temerin et al., Energetic particle injections in the inner magnetosphere as a response to an interplanetary shock. J. Atmos. Sol. Terr. Phys. 65, 233 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6826(02)00286-9

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. D.-Y. Lee, L.R. Lyons, Geosynchronous magnetic field response to solar wind dynamic pressure pulse. J. Geophys. Res. 109, A04201 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1029/2003JA010076

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. Q.-G. Zong, X.-Z. Zhou, Y.F. Wang, X. Li et al., Energetic electron response to ULF waves induced by interplanetary shocks in the outer radiation belt. J. Geophys. Res. 114, A10204 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JA014393

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. K.-H. Kim, D.-H. Lee, K. Shiokawa, E. Lee et al., Magnetospheric responses to the passage of the interplanetary shock on 24 November 2008. J. Geophys. Res. 117, A10209 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1029/2012JA017871

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. K.E.J. Huttunen, J. Slavin, M. Collier, H.E.J. Koskinen et al., Cluster observations of sudden impulses in the magnetotail caused by interplanetary shocks and pressure increases. Ann. Geophys. 23, 609 (2005)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. K. Keika, R. Nakamura, W. Baumjohann, A. Runov et al., Response of the inner magnetosphere and the plasma sheet to a sudden impulse. J. Geophys. Res. 113, A07S35 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JA012763

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Y. Miyashita, K. Keika, K. Liou, S. Machida et al., Plasma sheet changes caused by sudden enhancements of the solar wind pressure. J. Geophys. Res. 115, A05214 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JA014617

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. Q.Q. Shi, M. Hartinger, V. Angelopoulos, Q.-G. Zong et al., THEMIS observations of ULF wave excitation in the nightside plasma sheet during sudden impulse events. J. Geophys. Res. 118, 284 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1029/2012JA017984

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. X. Zhou, X.-Z. Zhou, V. Angelopoulos, Q. Shi et al., Interplanetary shock–induced current sheet disturbances leading to auroral activations: THEMIS observations. J. Geophys. Res. 118, 3173 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1002/jgra.50175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. C. Yue, Y. Nishimura, L.R. Lyons, V. Angelopoulos et al., Coordinated THEMIS spacecraft and all-sky imager observations of interplanetary shock effects on plasma sheet flow bursts, poleward boundary intensifications, and streamers. J. Geophys. Res. 118, 3346 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1002/jgra.50372

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. C.P. Escoubet, M. Fehringer, M. Goldstein, Introduction The Cluster mission. Ann. Geophys. 19, 1197 (2001). https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-19-1197-2001

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. H. Rème, C. Aoustin, J.M. Bosqued, I. Dandouras et al., First multispacecraft ion measurements in and near the Earth’s magnetosphere with the identical Cluster ion spectrometry (CIS) experiment. Ann. Geophys. 19, 1303 (2001). https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-19-1303-2001

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. A.D. Johnstone, C. Alsop, S. Burge, P.J. Carter et al., PEACE: a plasma electron and current experiment. Space Sci. Rev. 79, 351 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-5666-0_13

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. B. Wilken, P.W. Daly, U. Mall, K. Aarsnes et al., First results from the RAPID imaging energetic particle spectrometer on board Cluster. Ann. Geophys. 19, 1355 (2001). https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-19-1355-2001

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  18. A. Balogh, C.M. Carr, M.H. Acuña, M.W. Dunlop et al., The Cluster magnetic field investigation: overview of in-flight performance and initial results. Ann. Geophys. 19, 1207 (2001). https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-19-1207-2001

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  19. G. Gustafsson, M. André, T. Carozzi, A.I. Eriksson et al., First results of electric field and density observations by Cluster EFW based on initial months of operation. Ann. Geophys. 19, 1219 (2001). https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-19-1219-2001

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  20. E.C. Stone, A.M. Frandsen, R.A. Mewaldt, E.R. Christian et al., The Advanced Composition Explorer. Space Sci. Rev. 86, 1 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005082526237

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  21. P. Lindqvist, et al., User guide to the EFW measurements in the Cluster Active Archive (CAA), Cluster Science Archive. https://caa.esac.esa.int/documents/UG/CAA_EST_UG_EFW_v39.pdf, Accessed 8 Apr 2021.

  22. G. Paschmann, P.W. Daly, Analysis Methods for Multi-Spacecraft Data, ISSI Scientific Report SR-001 (ISSI/ESA, Noordwijk, 2000), pp. 395–418

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the Cluster CIS, PEACE, RAPID, FGM, and EFW teams and the Cluster Science Archive for providing the data. The ACE data were provided by CDAWeb, NASA. The Sym-H index was provided by WDC for Geomagnetism, Kyoto. This work was partly supported by the National Research Foundation (NRF) of Korea funded by Ministry of Science and ICT (2020R1F1A1076496).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ensang Lee.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kim, HE., Lee, E. Dynamics of the plasma sheet in the near-Earth magnetotail by the impact of an interplanetary shock. J. Korean Phys. Soc. 78, 1153–1161 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40042-021-00187-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40042-021-00187-y

Keywords

Navigation